| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2006;37:2562.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurology (R.G., N.A.V., K.U., M.D.H., L.R.W., T.G.J.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa; the Department of Neurology (R.G.), Michigan State University, East Lansing; Neurosurgery of Kalamazoo, LLC (F.A.-A., T.B.), Kalamazoo, Mich; and the Department of Neurosurgery (A.J.T., M.B.H., T.G.J.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Correspondence to Tudor G. Jovin, MD, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Stroke Institute, 200 Lothrop St, Suite C-400, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail jovintg{at}upmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods This study was a retrospective review of the period between April 1, 2004, and April 15, 2006, of 59 patients with 62 symptomatic intracranial or extracranial atherosclerotic lesions at 2 medical centers (University of Pittsburgh and Borgess Medical Center).
Results The mean age of our cohort was 61±12 years. The location of the 62 lesions was as follows: extracranial vertebral artery 31 (50%), intracranial vertebral artery or basilar artery 18 (29%), extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) near the petrous bone 5 (8%), and intracranial ICA 8 (13%). There were 2 (3%) periprocedural complications: 1 nonflow-limiting dissection and 1 disabling stroke. Fifty vessels were available for follow-up angiography or computed tomography angiography at a median time of 4.0±2 months. A total of 2 of 36 extracranial stents (7%) and 1 of 26 intracranial stents (5%) were found to have restenosis
50% at follow-up.
Conclusions This report demonstrates that DES delivery in the intracranial and extracranial circulation is technically feasible. A small percentage of patients developed short-term in-stent restenosis. Longer-term follow-up is required in the setting of a prospective study to determine the late restenosis rates for DESs in comparison with bare metal stents.
Key Words: angioplasty intracranial stenosis stenting stents
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
70%.3 Failure of medical therapy to reduce the rate of stroke has led to advances in endovascular options for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Coronary stents4 or primary angioplasty5 have been used to improve the luminal diameter of the vessel. More recently, a self-expanding stent with improved navigability has been approved under the US Food and Drug Administration Humanitarian Device Exemption.6 A major concern for using bare metal stents for symptomatic intracranial and extracranial stenting has been the rate of restenosis, reported to be as high as 32%.4 The recent advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs) in the coronary circulation has significantly reduced rates of restenosis, from roughly 30% to 4% to 8% at 9-month follow-up.7,8
We sought to determine the safety, technical feasibility, and short-term restenosis rates for DESs in the extracranial and intracranial cerebral circulation in patients with a symptomatic atherosclerotic lesion.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients were given aspirin and a loading dose of clopidogrel of 300 mg the night before the procedure if they were not already taking these medications. All patients were prescribed aspirin 81 mg/d or 325 mg/d and clopidogrel 75 mg/d after the procedure for at least 3 months at the University of Pittsburgh and at least 6 months at Borgess Medical Center. Aspirin was continued indefinitely after cessation of clopidogrel. Conscious sedation was used for all extracranial stenting procedures. General anesthesia was used in 21 patients undergoing intracranial stenting procedures, whereas conscious sedation was used in 5 patients undergoing intracranial stenting in the anterior circulation. All patients in this cohort were considered for stenting with a DES as first-line therapy. In instances where a DES could not be delivered, a bare metal stent was attempted.
A 5F diagnostic catheter was placed proximal to the stenotic segment and exchanged for a 6F or 7F guiding catheter. At this point, patients were given intravenous heparin to maintain an activated clotting time between 200 and 300. The lesion was traversed with a 0.014-inch microwire. Taxus (Boston Scientific, Inc) or Cypher (Cordis Corp) balloon-mounted stents were delivered over the 0.014-inch microwire and positioned across the lesion. The diameter of the stent deployed was determined by undersizing it by 10% of the lumen diameter. The shortest length for the stent was used to completely cover the atheromatous segment. The stent diameters ranged from 2.5 to 3.5 mm, whereas the length ranged from 8 to 18 mm. All treated lesions were <16 mm long. Each stent was deployed with slow inflation of the balloon over 30 to 45 seconds under fluoroscopic guidance to ensure that the stent did not displace forward across the lesion. Poststent deployment control runs were performed to measure the diameter of the vessel after stenting. Heparin was not reversed after the procedure, and all patients were admitted to a neurological step-down unit when an extracranial stent was placed or to an intensive care unit when an intracranial stent was placed.
Follow-up conventional angiograms (n=41) or computed tomography (CT) angiograms (n=7) were available for 48 patients with 50 stents at 3 months or later. Eleven patients with 12 stents did not have follow-up studies owing to recent stent placement with follow-up not scheduled until a later time, patient refusal, or loss to follow-up. These follow-up studies were investigated for restenosis that was defined as a luminal narrowing of
50% in the target vessel. Clinical follow-up was available for these same 48 patients. Any new neurological event that patients might have experienced after the procedure was extracted from their clinical follow-up in the medical records.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
70%.
|
The success rate for delivery of a DES was 62 of 65 vessels (95%). The location of the 3 vessels with failed delivery of a DES was 2 intracranial ICAs and 1 intracranial vertebral artery; thus, the failure rate for delivery of an intracranial stent was 10% (3 of 29; Table 2). A bare metal stent was eventually successfully delivered to the intracranial vertebral artery lesion, but no stents were successfully navigated to the 2 intracranial ICA lesions. The mean stenosis before treatment was 83±12%, with a reduction of stenosis to 12±11% after the procedure in patients with successful stent delivery. Successful reduction of the stenosis to <50% occurred in 61of 62 vessels (98%). The 1 patient with unsuccessful reduction of the stenosis to <50% had a heavily calcified intracranial carotid lesion (the Figure). During inflation of the balloon to deploy the stent, it was noted that the balloon did not fully expand, likely because of the underlying calcified plaque. The patient returned 4 months later with an acute stroke secondary to an occluded stent and was subsequently severely disabled as a result of the stroke. There were 2 periprocedural complications: 1 nonflow-limiting dissection (a petrous carotid stent) and 1 disabling stroke 12 hours after the procedure (a basilar artery stent).
|
|
A total of 48 patients with 50 stents were available for follow-up at a median time of 4±2 months. Three (6%) of these stents were found to have restenosis
50%. Two of these lesions were at the origin of the vertebral artery, and 1 was in the intracranial ICA (the same patient in whom the original stent procedure did not reduce the stenosis to <50%). Only 1 of these patients (as described in the Figure) presented with symptoms of a stroke or TIA at follow-up.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is limited experience as to the likelihood of developing DES toxicity to the cerebral arteries in humans because of short-term follow-up.9,10 A study on the placement of sirolimus-eluting stents in canine cerebral arteries did not reveal histological evidence of toxicity.11 This represents the largest experience to date with the use of DESs for these arteries. The compounds used on these stents, sirolimus and paclitaxel, have been shown to reduce the response of neointimal hyperplasia by blocking mitogen-induced smooth muscle proliferation.12,13 The literature on coronary stent placement has shown that these stents significantly reduce restenosis rates, thus reducing the need for revascularization.7,8 Longer-term follow-up at 2 years shows that the biological effects of the drug polymer persist toward suppressing neointimal hyperplasia.14 This effect may be dependant on whether the stent is a slow-release or a fast-release type.15
Patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease had a 1-year risk of stroke in the ipsilateral territory of 11%.2 This risk nearly doubles to 19% in the first year if the target vessel has a stenosis
70%.3 In our series, 90% of patients had a stenosis
70% and were judged to be at high risk of a subsequent stroke if maintained on medical therapy. Prior studies had suggested that posterior circulation atherosclerosis was associated with a higher risk of stroke,16 but a recently published prospective study did not note differences in stroke rates by location.3 The natural history of symptomatic cervical and ostial vertebral artery stenosis is unknown. Patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery disease at the common carotid artery bifurcation have a 13% risk of a recurrent stroke at 1 year with medical therapy,17 which is similar to what was recently reported in symptomatic intracranial disease.2 Patients who underwent stenting procedures for extracranial vertebral artery disease in this series were considered only if they had bilateral vertebral artery disease or if 1 vertebral artery was occluded with poor contribution from the posterior communicating arteries. Although the natural history of symptomatic extracranial vertebral artery disease is unknown, we thought that these patients were at high risk of recurrent stroke even in placed on maximal medical therapy.
Other authors have used coronary stents to treat patients with symptoms as a result of extracranial vertebral artery stenosis4,18,19 and intracranial lesions.20,21 The main concern related to treating extracranial vertebral artery stenosis with stents has been the rate of restenosis, ranging from 10% to 40% in the literature,4,18,19 whereas periprocedural complication rates22,23 and vascular tortuosity have limited the wide use of intracranial stenting. Our report demonstrates that the restenosis rate was 6% at a median follow-up of 4 months in this cohort and 7% in patients treated for extracranial vertebral artery disease. Additionally, the periprocedural complication rates were relatively low at 3%, with 1 patient developing a disabling stroke after the procedure and 1 asymptomatic dissection. The WingSpan stent system (Boston Scientific) was studied as a treatment option for patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. This study found that the stent could be delivered successfully in 44 of 45 patients (98%). The 6-month restenosis rate was found to be 7.5% with a 30-day ipsilateral stroke or death rate of 4.5%.24 The SSYLVIA trial considered stent placement in the intracranial or extracranial cerebrovasculature, and the 6-month restenosis rate was 32% overall and the periprocedural complication rate was 6.6%.4 Our results cannot be directly compared with either of these studies because of the shorter follow-up and the retrospective nature of the study, but it does provide short-term data.
Although there is justified enthusiasm for the use of DESs because of their lower restenosis rates, caution must be used, as delayed endothelialization may occur.25 It is unclear whether delaying the healing process results in reductions in longer-term rates of restenosis. In addition, although reports of arterial toxicity have not been noted in the intracranial and extracranial circulation, there have been reports of delayed hypersensitivity to the stents, causing thrombosis in the coronary circulation.26 As experience grows with the use of DESs in the intracranial and extracranial circulation, longer-term follow-up data will become available to answer these questions.
Another caution is the placement of a stent across a calcified lesion. In coronary vessels, rates of restenosis are significantly linked to plaque burden.27 Calcified lesions do not allow a stent to fully expand, and thus, it leaves a small lumen with a higher chance of causing restenosis.28 The patient whom we describe in the Figure unfortunately developed a subacute thrombosis at 4 months, and this event may be linked to poor stent expansion in the setting of high plaque burden from a calcified lesion. We have changed our practice since encountering this patient by attempting to predilate calcified lesions first. If the lesion does not reduce to <50%, then stent placement is not attempted.
There are limitations to this study because of its retrospective nature. The first is that longer-term follow-up is necessary to determine the restenosis rates for DESs. The second is that the rate of restenosis for bare metal stents in the cerebral circulation is not well established, and as such, a randomized, controlled study would be necessary to distinguish the differences in restenosis rates between bare metal stents and DESs. The third is that we did not attempt to place these stents in locations where it was deemed that excessive tortuosity would preclude successful delivery of the stent. This caveat introduced selection bias in our cohort, but nonetheless, the results shows that these stents can be delivered and successfully deployed in select patients with a high degree of success. The fourth limitation is that 7 patients were followed up with CT angiography, which has not been validated against catheter angiography. Others have noted that CT angiography generally overestimates restenosis, and thus, it is unlikely that we underestimated the rates of restenosis in this study.29 Despite these limitations, this report shows that delivery of a DES to the extracranial and intracranial vessels is feasible with a high technical success rate and low complication rate. The rates of restenosis at short-term follow-up in this report are encouraging but require further investigation with longer-term follow-up.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
Received June 1, 2006; revision received June 28, 2006; accepted July 12, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, Levine SR, Chaturvedi S, Kasner SE, Benesch CG, Sila CA, Jovin TG, Romano JG. Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 13051316.
3. Kasner SE, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, Levine SR, Chaturvedi S, Benesch CG, Sila CA, Jovin TG, Romano JG, Cloft HJ. Warfarin Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial. Circulation. 2006; 113: 555563.
4. SSYLVIA Study Investigators. Stenting of symptomatic atherosclerotic lesions in the vertebral or intracranial arteries (SSYLVIA): study results. Stroke. 2004; 35: 13881392.
5. Marks MP, Wojak JC, Al-Ali F, Jayaraman M, Marcellus ML, Connors JJ, Do HM. Angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: clinical outcome. Stroke. 2006; 37: 10161020.
6. Henkes H, Miloslavski E, Lowens S, Reinartz J, Liebig T, Kuhne D. Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with balloon dilatation and self-expanding stent deployment (WingSpan). Neuroradiology. 2005; 47: 222228.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Holmes DR, OShaughnessy C, Caputo RP, Kereiakes DJ, Williams DO, Teirstein PS, Jaeger JL, Kuntz RE, for the SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 13151323.
8. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, Hermiller J, OShaughnessy C, Tift Mann J, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Popma JJ, Russell ME, for the TAXUS-IV Investigators. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 221231.
9. Abou-Chebl A, Bashir Q, Yadav JS. Drug-eluting stents for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis: initial experience and midterm angiographic follow-up. Stroke. 2005; 36: e165e168.
10. Boulos AS, Agner C, Deshaies EM. Preliminary evidence supporting the safety of drug-eluting stents in neurovascular disease. Neurol Res. 2005; 27: S95S102.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Levy EI, Hanel RA, Howington JU, Nemes B, Boulos AS, Tio FO, Paciorek AM, Amlani S, Kagan-Hallett KS, Fronckowiak MD, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Sirolimus-eluting stents in the canine cerebral vasculature: a prospective, randomized, blinded assessment of safety and vessel response. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100: 688694.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Marx SO, Jayaraman T, Go LO, Marks AR. Rapamycin-FKBP inhibits cell cycle regulators of proliferation in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1995; 76: 412417.
13. Axel DI, Kunert W, Goggelmann C, Oberhoff M, Herdeg C, Kuttner A, Wild DH, Brehm BR, Riessen R, Koveker G, Karsch KR. Paclitaxel inhibits arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo using local drug delivery. Circulation. 1997; 96: 436445.
14. Aoki J, Colombo A, Dudek D, Banning AP, Drzewiecki J, Zmudka K, Schiele F, Russell ME, Koglin J, Serryus PW, Taxus II Study Group. Persistent remodeling and neointimal suppression 2 years after polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: insights from serial intravascular ultrasound analysis in the TAXUS II study. Circulation. 2005; 112: 38763883.
15. Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, Feres F, Seixas AC, Tanajura LF, Mattos LA, Falotico R, Jaeger J, Popma JJ, Serruys PW, Sousa AGMR. Four-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up of patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents. Circulation. 2005; 111: 23262329.
16. Qureshi AI, Suri MFK, Ziai WC, Yahia AM, Mohammad Y, Sen S, Agarwal P, Zaidat OO, Suarez JI, Wityk RJ. Stroke-free survival and its determinants in patients with symptomatic vertebrobasilar stenosis: a multicenter study. Neurosurgery. 2003; 52: 10331040.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325: 445453.[Abstract]
18. Chastain HD II, Campbell MS, Iyer S, Roubin GS, Vitek J, Mathur A, Al-Mubarak NA, Terry JB, Yates V, Kretzer K, Alred D, Gomez CR. Extracranial vertebral artery stent placement: in-hospital and follow-up results. J Neursourg. 1999; 91: 547552.
19. Albuquerque FC, Fiorella D, Han P, Spetzler RF, McDougall CG. A reappraisal of angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of vertebral origin stenosis. Neurosurgery. 2003; 53: 607614.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Lylyk P, Cohen JE, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Miranda C. Angioplasty and stent placement in intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses and dissections. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23: 430436.
21. Al-Mubarak N, Gomez CR, Vitek JJ, Roubin GS. Stenting of symptomatic stenosis of the intracranial internal carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998; 19: 19491951.[Abstract]
22. Mazighi M, Tanasescu R, Ducrocq X, Vicaut E, Bracard S, Houdart E, Woimant F. Prospective study of symptomatic atherothrombotic intracranial stenoses: the GESICA Study. Neurology. 2006; 66: 11871191.
23. Gupta R, Schumacher HC, Mangla S, Meyers PM, Duong H, Khandji AG, Marshall RS, Mohr JP, Pile-Spellman J. Urgent endovascular revascularization for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Neurology. 2003; 61: 17291735.
24. Food and Drug Administration. Wingspan stent system and gateway PTA balloon catheter: summary of safety and probable benefit, August 3, 2005. Last accessed June 28th, 2006 at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf5/h050001b.pdf.
25. Guagliumi G, Farb A, Musumeci G, Valsecchi O, Tespili M, Motta T, Virmani R. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Sirolimus-eluting stent implanted in human coronary artery for 16 months: pathological findings. Circulation. 2003; 107: 13401341.
26. Virmani R, Guagliumi G, Farb A, Musumeci G, Grieco N, Motta T, Mihalcsik L, Tespili M, Valsecchi O, Kolodgie FD. Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: should we be cautious? Circulation. 2004; 109: 701705.
27. Hoffman R, Mintz GS, Mehran R, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Hongsheng W, Leon MB. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 4349.
28. von Birgelen C, Mintz GS, Bose D, Baumgart D, Haude M, Wieneke H, Neumann H, Brinkhoff J, Jasper M, Erbel R. Impact of moderate lesion calcium on mechanisms of coronary stenting as assessed with three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound in vivo. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 92: 510.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Trossbach M, Hartmann M, Braun C, Sartor K, Hahnel S. Small vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro evaluation of in-stent stenoses using CT angiography. Neuroradiology. 2004; 46: 459463.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Vajda, E. Miloslavski, T. Guthe, S. Fischer, G. Albes, A. Heuschmid, and H. Henkes Treatment of Stenoses of Vertebral Artery Origin Using Short Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents: Improved Follow-Up Results AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2009; 30(9): 1653 - 1656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Fiorella, T N Turan, C P Derdeyn, and M I Chimowitz Current status of the management of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: the rationale for a randomized trial of medical therapy and intracranial stenting JNIS, July 3, 2009; (2009) jnis.2009.000125v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Groschel, S. Schnaudigel, S. M. Pilgram, K. Wasser, and A. Kastrup A Systematic Review on Outcome After Stenting for Intracranial Atherosclerosis Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e340 - e347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Schumacher, P. M. Meyers, R. T. Higashida, C. P. Derdeyn, S. D. Lavine, G. M. Nesbit, D. Sacks, P. Rasmussen, and L. R. Wechsler Reporting Standards for Angioplasty and Stent-Assisted Angioplasty for Intracranial Atherosclerosis Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e348 - e365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Meyers, H. C. Schumacher, R. T. Higashida, S. L. Barnwell, M. A. Creager, R. Gupta, C. G. McDougall, D. K. Pandey, D. Sacks, and L. R. Wechsler Indications for the Performance of Intracranial Endovascular Neurointerventional Procedures: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Circulation, April 28, 2009; 119(16): 2235 - 2249. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. H. Yu, T. W. H. Leung, J. S. Y. Lam, W. W. M. Lam, and L. K. S. Wong Symptomatic Ostial Vertebral Artery Stenosis: Treatment with Drug-eluting Stents--Clinical and Angiographic Results at 1-year Follow-up Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 224 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mazighi, J. S. Yadav, and A. Abou-Chebl Durability of Endovascular Therapy for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1766 - 1769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. O. Zaidat, R. Klucznik, M. J. Alexander, J. Chaloupka, H. Lutsep, S. Barnwell, M. Mawad, B. Lane, M. J. Lynn, M. Chimowitz, et al. The NIH registry on use of the Wingspan stent for symptomatic70-99% intracranial arterial stenosis Neurology, April 22, 2008; 70(17): 1518 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.S. Turk, E.I. Levy, F.C. Albuquerque, G.L. Pride Jr, H. Woo, B.G. Welch, D.B. Niemann, P.D. Purdy, B. Aagaard-Kienitz, P.A. Rasmussen, et al. Influence of Patient Age and Stenosis Location on Wingspan In-Stent Restenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 23 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Fiorella and H. H. Woo Emerging Endovascular Therapies for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease Stroke, August 1, 2007; 38(8): 2391 - 2396. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Vicenzini, F. Puccinelli, M. C. Ricciardi, G. Guidetti, R. Delfini, and G. L. Lenzi Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Sonography Versus Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography in the Follow-up of Basilar Stenting J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2007; 26(4): 543 - 546. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Pelz, E. I. Levy, and L. N. Hopkins Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology 2006 Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 232 - 234. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |