Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2006;37:294-296
Published online before print January 12, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000201856.90105.ab
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/2/294    most recent
01.STR.0000201856.90105.abv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amarenco, P.
Right arrow Articles by Moskowitz, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amarenco, P.
Right arrow Articles by Moskowitz, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Primary prevention

(Stroke. 2006;37:294.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Advances in Stroke 2005

The Dynamics of Statins

From Event Prevention to Neuroprotection

Pierre Amarenco, MD Michael A. Moskowitz, MD

From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre (P.A.), Denis Diderot University and Medical School, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France; and the Stroke and Neurovascular Regulation Laboratory (M.A.M.), Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Mass.

Correspondence to Pierre Amarenco, Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre, Bichat Hospital, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France. E-mail pierre.amarenco{at}bch.aphp.fr


Key Words: prevention & control • statins, HMG-CoA

Working on new antibiotic candidates, Akira Endo found in 1976 that statins could strongly inhibit HMG-CoA reductase.1 It turned out that his discovery was the most important advance in cardiovascular prevention since aspirin and blood pressure–lowering. Contradicting most epidemiological studies which failed to find a link between cholesterol levels and stroke,2 statins strongly reduce stroke incidence. This prompted an investigation of the non–cholesterol-dependent effects of statins, so called pleiotropic effects, on biologic actions related to plaque instability, inflammation, endothelial function, fibrinolytic activity, platelet function,3 as well as cerebral blood flow and NO-enhancing pathways leading to neuroprotection.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Reduction as an Essential Biological Marker of Stroke Risk

Since the publication of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S),4 the majority of statin trials found a significant reduction in stroke events in patients with coronary heart disease, or with a history of vascular disease, high blood pressure or diabetes. The meta-analysis of over 90 000 patients showed a significant 21% stroke reduction with no statistical heterogeneity between trials and no increase in hemorrhagic stroke.5 Indeed, from the meta-analysis, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction could be related to 35% to 80% of the statin benefit.5 New results from randomized trials confirmed that LDL-lowering was associated with a decreased risk of stroke by 48% in diabetics with "normal" LDL cholesterol at baseline,6 and 25% in patients with coronary artery disease.7 In the Treat to New Target trial, the benefit was observed in patients with a mean LDL cholesterol of 70 mg/dL as compared with the group of patients with a mean LDL level of 1.02 mg/dL.7 These results suggest that LDL cholesterol provides a useful biological marker to target the efficacy of statin therapy and reduce the risk of stroke. An important next step is to test the hypothesis that aggressive LDL-lowering is associated with a decreased risk of recurrent stroke in patients after a recent stroke or transient ischemic attack.8

Contradicting previous epidemiologic observations, the incidence of strokes has now been associated with increasing LDL cholesterol in 787 442 people, the largest cohort study ever studied. Presented at the 2005 European Stroke Conference,9 the subjects from Korea were aged 30 to 64 years and followed for 11 years. There were 6328 incident ischemic strokes, 3947 incident hemorrhagic strokes, and 4417 myocardial infarctions. Both ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction were strongly associated with serum cholesterol levels.9

The most recent Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA) showed that treatment of hypertensive and normocholesterolemic patients with calcium-channel blockers plus statins reduced the risk of stroke by almost half compared with a similar group of patients treated with beta-blocker–based treatment alone (4.6% versus 8.2%, respectively).10

Low C-Reactve Protein Together With Low LDL Levels Predict Better Cardiovascular Outcomes

Decreased progression of carotid intima-media thickness was also strongly associated with LDL reduction in the meta-analysis.5 Reduced progression of atherosclerosis was also observed in coronary arteries in a randomized trial testing aggressive cholesterol-lowering versus usual LDL cholesterol treatment (40 mg pravastatin).11 In this trial, the volume of coronary atherosclerosis increased in the usual care arm and was stable in the aggressive arm. This effect was even greater in patients who had both low LDL and low C-reactive protein levels.12 The benefits of lowering LDL and C-reactive protein was also noted in the PROVE-IT-TIMI-22 trial in which fewer cardiovascular events were reported in the aggressive LDL-lowering group compared with the usual care arm.13

Neuroprotective Effects of Statins

Several laboratories have now shown that chronic statin administration reduces infarct size in rats and mice after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion and also improve behavioral deficits.14 The protection is dose-dependent and obtained using 5 different statins, indicative of a class effect. Acute administration also protects against stroke damage when tested after permanent occlusion.15

The explanations for stroke protection in normocholesterolemic animal models are multiple and probably attributable to cholesterol-independent pleiotropic actions dependent on HMGCoA reductase inhibition. Large doses given chronically for 2 weeks raise cerebral blood flow in both the ischemic core and penumbra but do not lower cholesterol at this treatment duration.16 As one mechanism, these drugs increase endothelium-derived nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and do so by increasing the amount and activity of the generating enzyme nitric oxide synthase within the vascular endothelium. eNOS converts the guanidino nitrogen of the semiessential amino acid L-arginine to NO. Vascular NO regulates cerebral perfusion in part by relaxing vascular smooth muscle, and statins improve relaxation in peripheral vessels within 2 weeks of initiating therapy.17 In genetically engineered mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene expression, blood flow is more significantly reduced within the ischemic territory as compared with the wild-type strain, and these mice are susceptible to developing larger infarcts after middle cerebral artery occlusion.14 Administering an eNOS enzyme inhibitor as an alternative approach significantly increases infarct volume in experimental models, presumably because of blood flow–dependent mechanisms.18

Consistent with these observations, manipulations that increase rather than decrease NO availability dilate cerebral vessels and increase cerebral blood flow. The effects are greatly amplified after eNOS upregulation by statin treatment.19 Enhancing NO generation by L-arginine significantly increases flow in the ischemic penumbra. Infusion is followed shortly thereafter by increased electrophysiological activity within the perinfarct zone, indicative of tissue recovery, and stroke damage is reduced.20 Although the statin and L-arginine data emphasize the importance of nitric oxide–induced flow effects, nitric oxide also exhibits antithrombic, anti-inflammatory actions on endothelial progenitor cells and neovascularization, and these are relevant to reducing stroke risk and recovery.17 However, the extent to which the NO- or cholesterol-dependent mechanisms explain statin actions in humans remains to be determined by future studies.

In addition to effects on cholesterol, chronic statin administration impacts the synthesis of isoprenoids, intermediates in the cholesterol pathway. Decreasing the availability of isoprenoids inhibits the function of a small GTP-binding protein, whose membrane localization and function are dependent on isoprenylation. Statins down-regulate Rho and Rho-kinase, its downstream effector. Rho-kinase is a serine-threonine kinase that regulates stress fiber formation, smooth muscle contraction and cell migration. Rho-kinase is important in a number of pathological conditions including vascular inflammation and remodeling, hypertension and vasospasm, as well as atherosclerosis. Rho-kinase inhibition both in vivo and in vitro up-regulate eNOS and increase cerebral blood flow, as well as protect in models of stroke in a dose-dependent manner.21 Protective effects by Rho-kinase inhibitors are absent in eNOS-deficient mice implicating NO and eNOS up-regulation once again. In the clinical arena, Rho-kinase inhibitors reportedly improve patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, and recent preliminary data show that statins improve clinical outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage as well.22 Acute statin effects, by contrast, depend on eNOS phosphorylation by phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and PKB/Akt(3,4)-dependent pathways.

The mechanisms of statin stroke protection are complex and difficult to dissect in part because of multiple stroke-related pathways downstream from HMGCoA reductase inhibition in liver as well as within the endothelium. However, with complexity comes opportunity based on diversity of actions and vectors targeting the inflammatory process and the dynamic mechanisms that place the blood vessel at center stage in the evolution of ischemic stroke. Attempts to clarify and build on the mechanisms most relevant to stroke protection in man are a major challenge for the future.

Received December 1, 2005; accepted December 19, 2005.

References

1. Endo A, Kuroda M, Tsujita Y. ML-236A, ML-236B, and ML-236C, new inhibitors of cholesterogenesis produced by Penicillium citrinium. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1976; 29: 1346–1348.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure, and stroke: 13 000 strokes in 450 000 people in 45 prospective cohorts. Lancet. 1995; 346: 1647–1653.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Takemoto M, Liao JK. Pleiotropic effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 1712–1719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994; 344: 1383–1389.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Amarenco P, Labreuche J, Lavallée P, Touboul P-J. Statin in stroke prevention and carotid atherosclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004; 35: 2902–2909.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, Hitman GA, Neil HA, Livingstone SJ, Thomason MJ, Mackness MI, Charlton-Menys V, Fuller JH; CARDS investigators. CARDS investigators. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 364: 685–696.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, Shear C, Barter P, Fruchart JC, Gotto AM, Greten H, Kastelein JJ, Shepherd J, Wenger NK; Treating to New Targets (TNT) Investigators. For the Treating to New Target (TNT) Investigators. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1425–1435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. The SPARCL Investigators. Design and baseline characteristics of the stroke prevention by aggressive reduction in cholesterol levels (SPARCL). Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003; 16: 389–395.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Ebrahim S, Sung J, Song Y-M, Ferrer R, Lawlor D, Smith GD. Serum cholesterol, haemorrhagic and ischaemic stroke: the Korean National Health Service prospective cohort study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005; 19 (Suppl 2): 15.

10. Dahlof B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT, Mehlsen J, Nieminen M, O’Brien E, Ostergren J; ASCOT Investigators. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo- Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 366: 895–906.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Brown BG, Ganz P, Vogel RA, Crowe T, Howard G, Cooper CJ, Brodie B, Grines CL, DeMaria AN; REVERSAL Investigators. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 3; 291: 1071–1080.

12. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Crowe T, Sasiela WJ, Tsai J, Orazem J, Magorien RD, O’Shaughnessy C, Ganz P; Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) Investigators. Statin therapy, LDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 29–38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Ridker PM, Cannon CP, Morrow D, Rifai N, Rose LM, McCabe CH, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E; Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) Investigators. C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 20–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Endres M, Laufs U, Liao JK, Moskowitz MA. Targeting eNOS for stroke protection. Trends Neurosci. 2004; 27: 283–289.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Sironi L, Cimino M, Guerrini U, Calvio AM, Lodetti B, Asdente M, Balduini W, Paoletti R, Tremoli E. Treatment with statins after induction of focal ischemia in rats reduces the extent of brain damage. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 322–327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Endres M, Laufs U, Huang Z, Nakamura T, Huang P, Moskowitz MA, Liao JK. Stroke protection by 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase inhibitors mediated by endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 8880–8885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Calabro P, Yeh ET. The pleiotropic effects of statins. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2005; 20: 541–546.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Huang Z, Huang PL, Ma J, Meng W, Ayata C, Fishman MC, Moskowitz MA. Enlarged infarcts in endothelial nitric oxide sythase knockout mice are attenuated by nitro-L-arginine. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996; 16: 981–987.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Yamada M, Huang Z, Dalkara T, Endres M, Laufs U, Waeber C, Huang PL, Liao JK, Moskowitz MA. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase-dependent cerebral blood flow augmentation by L-arginine after chronic statin treatment. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000; 20: 709–717.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Dalkara T, Morikawa E, Panahian N, Moskowitz MA. Blood flow-dependent functional recovery in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1994; 267: H678–H683.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Rikitake Y, Kim H-H, Huang Z, Seto M, Yano K, Asano T, Moskowitz MA, Liao JK. Inhibition of Rho Kinase (ROCK) leads to increased cerebral blood flow and stroke protection. Stroke. 2005; 36: 2251–2257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Parra A, Kreiter KT, Williams S, Sciacca RE, Mack WJ, Naidech AM, Commichau C, Fitzsimmons B-F, Janjua N, Mayer ST, Connolly ES Jr. Effect of prior statin use on functional outcome and delayed vasospasm after acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a matched controlled cohort study. Neurosurgery. 2005; 56: 476–484.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
V. Prinz and M. Endres
The Acute (Cerebro)Vascular Effects of Statins
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2009; 109(2): 572 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
P. V. Rao, Y. K. Peterson, T. Inoue, and P. J. Casey
Effects of Pharmacologic Inhibition of Protein Geranylgeranyltransferase Type I on Aqueous Humor Outflow through the Trabecular Meshwork
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2464 - 2471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
B. Sharma, N. Singh, and M. Singh
Modulation of celecoxib- and streptozotocin-induced experimental dementia of Alzheimer's disease by pitavastatin and donepezil
J Psychopharmacol, March 1, 2008; 22(2): 162 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Nassief and J. D. Marsh
Statin Therapy for Stroke Prevention
Stroke, March 1, 2008; 39(3): 1042 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Amarenco, L. B. Goldstein, M. Szarek, H. Sillesen, A. E. Rudolph, A. Callahan III, M. Hennerici, L. Simunovic, J. A. Zivin, K. M. A. Welch, et al.
Effects of Intense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Trial
Stroke, December 1, 2007; 38(12): 3198 - 3204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. A. Moskowitz
The 2006 Thomas Willis Lecture: The Adventures of a Translational Researcher in Stroke and Migraine
Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1645 - 1651.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/2/294    most recent
01.STR.0000201856.90105.abv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amarenco, P.
Right arrow Articles by Moskowitz, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amarenco, P.
Right arrow Articles by Moskowitz, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Primary prevention