| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2006;37:332.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Letters to the Editor |
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Experimental Cardiology Laboratory, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
To the Editor:
With great interest we read the recent article by Dick et al reporting that gender is an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients conservatively treated for high-grade carotid stenosis.1 The authors discussed possible mechanisms that would explain the observed differences in outcome: eg, cardiovascular risk profile and carotid plaque burden are higher in men, and hormones could be protective for women. As appreciated by the authors, their study design did not allow inferences regarding a causal relationship between gender and outcome. Recently, we hypothesized that gender could be associated with the pathological substrate of acute cardiovascular events: a thin cap fibroatheroma. To gain insight in atherosclerotic plaque characteristics among patient groups experiencing carotid artery stenosis, we constructed a biobank containing atherosclerotic plaques.2 All plaques obtained during endarterectomy are characterized. In addition, patients fill in questionnaires and undergo follow-up. Characterization of the atherosclerotic plaques pointed out that significant differences are observed between men and women. A study in 214 carotid endarterectomy plaques showed that male gender was associated with significantly higher fat content and significantly lower smooth muscle cell content.3 These factors are generally considered to be associated with plaque destabilization and subsequent cardiovascular events.4 More recently, a thrombectomy study in 211 patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction revealed that male sex was associated with more fresh thrombi while more organized plaque material was obtained in female patients.5 The value of plaque markers to predict cardiovascular events from plaque phenotype is subject of an ongoing study. Consistent with our hypothesis is that plaque area, which the authors refer to as a predictor of vascular events, is found to be related with plaque phenotype.6
Eventually, increasing insight in pathophysiology of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque and upcoming imaging technology may shift focus to plaque markers in the search for the patient at risk. The observation that risk factors for cardiovascular events, like gender, are associated with atherosclerotic plaque characteristics support this idea.
References
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |