| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2006;37:388.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Correspondence to Takashi Inoue, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate 020-8505, Japan. E-mail tainoue{at}iwate-med.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Twelve normal subjects and 17 patients with major cerebral artery occlusive disease underwent PW MRI and PET. The images were coregistered with 3-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition images. Quantitative PW MRI-CBV maps were generated using the indicator dilution method with arterial input function. One large cortical region of interest for each unilateral middle cerebral artery territory was determined on each image. PET-CVR was calculated by measuring cerebral blood flow before and after acetazolamide challenge.
Results A significant negative correlation was observed between PW MRI-CBV and PET-CVR (r=0.713; P<0.0001). PW MRI-CBV higher than the mean +2 SD obtained in normal subjects (15.2 mL/100 g) was defined as elevated and PET-CVR lower than the mean 2 SD obtained in normal subjects (15.1%) was defined as reduced. Assuming the PET-CVR as the true determinant of hemodynamic impairment, PW MRI-CBV provided 80.0% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity, with 80.0% positive predictive value for detecting patients with reduced CVR.
Conclusions The PW MRI-CBV method can simply and accurately identify patients with hemodynamic impairment without exposure to ionizing radiation.
Key Words: cerebral blood volume magnetic resonance imaging perfusion-weighted imaging
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MRI can detect the changes in susceptibility during the passage of a compact bolus injection of contrast agent and so provide information about the pattern of brain perfusion.7 This method of perfusion-weighted MRI (PW MRI) initially yielded only relative hemodynamic values because of the complexity of susceptibility changes.8,9 Recently, additional postprocessing steps have been developed for deriving quantitative values from PW MRI.1014
The present study tried to validate the accuracy of PW MRI for detecting hemodynamic impairment by correlating CBV measured by PW MRI with CVR measured by PET in patients with unilateral major cerebral artery occlusive disease.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients
This study also included 17 patients (4 women and 13 men) aged 24 to 76 years (mean 63 years) with unilateral major cerebral artery occlusive disease (Table 1). All patients had experienced the last cerebral ischemic event more than 2 months before entry into the study. Conventional MRI was performed in all patients. No cortical infarction was observed in any of the patients. Five patients had transient ischemic attacks with (1 patient) or without (4 patients) definite cerebral infarction on MRI. The remaining 12 patients had minor complete strokes with definite cerebral infarction on MRI. Cerebral angiography with arterial catheterization or MR angiography demonstrated internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis in 2 patients, ICA occlusion in 8 patients, middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis in 4 patients, and MCA occlusion in 3 patients. No patient had occlusion or stenosis of more than 50% in the contralateral ICA or MCA.
|
The study protocol was approved by the local ethical committee. All patients and subjects gave written informed consent before the study.
MRI Protocol
MRI was performed using a GE Signa 3.0 Tesla imager (GE Medical Systems) with a standard head coil. After a sagittal scout image was taken, 3-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition (3D SPGR) was acquired for coregistration between PET and PW MRI. A spin echo type echo planar-imaging sequence was used for PW MRI with repetition time 1500 ms, echo time 30 ms, field of view 240 mm, matrix 128x128, 5 slices with 7 mm thickness, and 60 images in each of the 5 slices. In all experiments, a bolus injection of 12 mL gadodiamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA; OMNISCAN, Nycomed Imaging) was given at 3 mL/s followed by a 20 mL saline flush using an MR-compatible power injector. The total imaging time was 90 seconds after initiation of the bolus injection. Immediately after MRI, arterial blood sampling was performed to measure PaCO2, PaO2, and the blood pH. The PW MRI was performed before the PET study, both on the same day, in all patients.
PET Protocol
All subjects underwent PET scans with a Headtome IV PET scanner (Shimadzu) with a spatial resolution of 4.5 mm full width at half maximum. The PET scanner provides 14 tomographic images with 6.5 mm thickness because of the continuous axial motion of the gantry. The PET study was performed as described previously.15 Before emission scanning, a transmission scan using a 68Ga-68Ge line source was obtained to correct tissue attenuation. After transmission scanning, a fast intravenous bolus injection of 1110 MBq H152O was given to measure CBF at rest. Acetazolamide (1000 mg; range, 13 to 19 mg/kg body weight) was then given intravenously. Fifteen minutes later, CBF was measured by the same procedure as for at rest. Continuous arterial blood sampling was conducted throughout PET scanning using a catheter implanted in the radial artery to measure arterial isotope activities. PaCO2, PaO2, and the blood pH were also measured with the same blood samples.
Blood pressure was measured by auscultation twice for each PW MRI-CBV or PET-CBF measurement and used to assess the change in mean blood pressure.
Data Analysis
PW MRI and PET data were transferred to a postprocessing workstation and analyzed using the image analysis software system Dr.View (Asahikasei). The oblique planes of these 2 methods were different, so the images were coregistered with the 3D SPGR images. First, the oblique planes were determined on the 3D SPGR images in accordance with the PW MR images. Then, the PET images consisting of 14 slices with 6.5 mm thickness were resliced automatically to 5 slices with 7 mm thickness. These resliced images were generated in the identical oblique planes to the PW MR images.
Quantitative PW MRI-CBV maps were generated using the method previously reported.8,9,11,12 The arterial input function was obtained manually from the contralateral MCA for deconvolution analysis in the patient group and from the right MCA in the normal subject group. One slice that passed through the basal ganglia was selected on both PW MR and PET images, and a large cortical region of interest (ROI) for each unilateral MCA territory was set manually (Figure 1). The PET-CBF at rest and with acetazolamide challenge, and PW MRI-CBV were determined in each ROI. PET-CVR was calculated as CVR (%)=([acetazolamide challenge CBFresting CBF]/resting CBF)x100.
|
Statistical Analysis
Data were expressed as the mean±SD, and differences between physiological variables were examined by repeated-measures analysis of variance. Correlations between various parameters were determined by linear regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at the P<0.05 level. The accuracy of PW MRI-CBV to detect abnormal reduction of PET-CVR was determined by receiver operating characteristic curves.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
A total of 24 ROIs in 12 normal subjects and 34 ROIs in 17 patients were analyzed in each image. Normal values obtained from the 24 ROIs in normal subjects were 9.91±2.7 mL/100 g for PW MRI-CBV and 34.7±9.9% for PET-CVR.
Figure 2 shows the PW MRI-CBV and PET-CVR values in each subject and patient. The fit to the regression line of the values obtained in the subjects was significant (P<0.0001), with a correlation coefficient of 0.713. An elevated PW MRI-CBV value was defined as higher than the mean +2 SD obtained in normal subjects (15.3 mL/100 g). A reduced PET-CVR was defined as lower than the mean 2 SD obtained in normal subjects (14.9%).
|
The PW MRI-CBV and PET-CVR methods obtained identical results in 88.2% of the ROIs: 23.5% (8/34 ROIs) were true positives and 64.7% (22/34) were true negatives (Figure 2). PW MRI-CBV identified false-positives and false-negatives in 5.9% (2/34 ROIs) each. Assuming the PET-CVR as the true determinant of hemodynamic impairment, PW MRI-CBV provided 80.0% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity, with 80.0% positive predictive value and 91.7% negative predictive value for detecting patients with reduced CVR.
Sensitivity and specificity at the cutoff point (15.3 mL/100 g, consistent with the mean +2 SD of the CBV in normal subjects) lying closest to the left upper corner of the receiver operating characteristic curve were 80.0% and 91.7% for PW MRI-CBV (Figure 3). Representative PET and PW MR images in Case 13 are shown in Figure 4.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent prospective studies have demonstrated that reduced CVR after acetazolamide administration, defined as lower than the mean 2 SD of the CVR or 95% confidence limits obtained in healthy volunteers, can predict the risk of stroke recurrence in patients with symptomatic major cerebral artery occlusive disease.1618 Furthermore, patients with CVR lower than the mean 2 SD of the CVR obtained in healthy volunteers are at risk for cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy.19 We used the same value to indicate hemodynamic impairment.
The correlation between CVR and CBV measured by MRI in humans has received little attention.20 There is a significant correlation between CVR measured by single-photon emission- computed tomography and CBV measured by PW MRI in patients with major cerebral artery occlusive disease.20 The present study demonstrated a similar significant correlation between CVR measured by PET and CBV measured by PW MRI. Furthermore, we revealed the threshold of PW MRI-CBV to detect the patients with reduced CVR. Assuming the PET-CVR as the true determinant of hemodynamic impairment, PW MRI-CBV provided 80.0% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity for detecting patients with reduced CVR. Thus, the PW MRI-CBV method could be used to identify patients with hemodynamic impairment.
The contrast agents used in PW MRI are nondiffusible tracers, so they do not pass through the blood-brain barrier, unlike diffusible tracers. Therefore, PW MRI is sensitive to the blood component in the arteries and veins.21 Moreover, the appropriate parameters in the PW MRI sequence mainly reflect the signal from capillary-sized vessels and suppress the signal from larger vessels.22 Therefore, PW MRI is likely to reflect the CBV in the brain tissue.
Quantification of hemodynamic states in PW MRI is enabled by the indicator dilution method with arterial input function.1013,20,23 Thus, the quantitative values of PW MRI are influenced by the arterial input function. The present study included only patients with unilateral ICA or MCA occlusive disease, and the arterial input function was obtained from the contralateral MCA. However, the cerebral hemodynamics are impaired more severely in patients with bilateral major cerebral artery occlusive disease than in those with unilateral major cerebral artery occlusive disease.24 Whether CBV can be accurately measured by PW MRI in patients with bilateral major cerebral artery occlusive disease remains unclear. Furthermore, it was reported that CBV was higher with MRI than with PET, which may reflect an underestimation of the arterial input function.25 An individual scale factor should be applied to PW MRI measurements to improve the agreement with PET.25
Conclusion
The present relatively small study demonstrated that CBV measured by PW MRI can accurately detect hemodynamic impairment in patients with unilateral major cerebral artery occlusive disease. PW MRI involves no exposure to ionizing radiation and requires less than a few minutes of scanning time, so can easily be added to any clinical MRI examination. However, several investigators have recently demonstrated that CBV is not always increased with reductions in cerebral perfusion pressure under clinical circumstance.26 Thus, further investigation regarding the relationship between the PW MRI-CBV value and the risk of stroke recurrence in patients with symptomatic major cerebral artery occlusive disease or the risk for cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy is necessary.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 8, 2005; accepted November 16, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Powers WJ, Raichle ME. Positron emission tomography and its application to the study of cerebrovascular disease in man. Stroke. 1985; 16: 361376.
3. Ringelstein EB, Grosse W, Matentzoglu S, Glockner WM. Non-invasive assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity by means of transcranial doppler sonography during hyper- and hypocapnea. Klin Wochenschr. 1986; 64: 194195.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Ringelstein EB, Van Eyck S, Mertens I. Evaluation of cerebral vasomotor reactivity by various vasodilating stimuli: comparison of CO2 to acetazolamide. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992; 12: 162168.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Nemoto EM, Yonas H, Kuwabara H, Pindzola RR, Sashin D, Meltzer CC, Price JC, Chang Y, Johnson DW. Identification of hemodynamic compromise by cerebrovascular reserve and oxygen extraction fraction in occlusive vascular disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004; 24: 10811089.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Yamauchi H, Okazawa H, Kishibe Y, Sugimoto K, Takahashi M. Oxygen extraction fraction and acetazolamide reactivity in symptomatic carotid artery disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004; 75: 3337.
7. Apruzzese A, Silvestrini M, Floris R, Vernieri F, Bozzao A, Hagberg G, Caltagirone C, Masala S, Simonetti G. Cerebral hemodynamics in asymptomatic patients with internal carotid artery occlusion: a dynamic susceptibility contrast MR and transcranial doppler study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001; 22: 10621067.
8. Ostergaard L, Sorensen AG, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: Experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn Reson Med. 1996; 36: 726736.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med. 1996; 36: 715725.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Lin W, Celik A, Derdeyn C, An H, Lee Y, Videen T, Ostergaard L, Powers WJ. Quantitative measurements of cerebral blood flow in patients with unilateral carotid artery occlusion: a PET and MR study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 14: 659667.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Ostergaard L, Johannsen P, Host-Poulsen P, Vestergaard-Poulsen P, Asboe H, Gee AD, Hansen SB, Cold GE, Gjedde A, Gyldensted C. Cerebral blood flow measurements by magnetic resonance imaging bolus tracking: comparison with [(15)o]h2o positron emission tomography in humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998; 18: 935940.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Ostergaard L, Smith DF, Vestergaard-Poulsen P, Hansen SB, Gee AD, Gjedde A, Gyldensted C. Absolute cerebral blood flow and blood volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging bolus tracking: comparison with positron emission tomography values. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998; 18: 425432.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Guckel F, Lorenz WJ. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1994; 193: 637641.
14. Smith AM, Grandin CB, Duprez T, Mataigne F, Cosnard G. Whole brain quantitative CBF, CBV, and MTT measurements using MRI bolus tracking: implementation and application to data acquired from hyperacute stroke patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 12: 400410.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Ogasawara K, Ito H, Sasoh M, Okuguchi T, Kobayashi M, Yukawa H, Terasaki K, Ogawa A. Quantitative measurement of regional cerebrovascular reactivity to acetazolamide using 123i-n-isopropyl-p-iodoamphetamine autoradiography with spect: validation study using h2 15o with PET. J Nucl Med. 2003; 44: 520525.
16. Kuroda S, Houkin K, Kamiyama H, Mitsumori K, Iwasaki Y, Abe H. Long-term prognosis of medically treated patients with internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: can acetazolamide test predict it? Stroke. 2001; 32: 21102116.
17. Ogasawara K, Ogawa A, Yoshimoto T. Cerebrovascular reactivity to acetazolamide and outcome in patients with symptomatic internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: a xenon-133 single-photon emission computed tomography study. Stroke. 2002; 33: 18571862.
18. Yonas H, Smith HA, Durham SR, Pentheny SL, Johnson DW. Increased stroke risk predicted by compromised cerebral blood flow reactivity. J Neurosurg. 1993; 79: 483489.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Ogasawara K, Yukawa H, Kobayashi M, Mikami C, Konno H, Terasaki K, Inoue T, Ogawa A. Prediction and monitoring of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy by using single-photon emission computerized tomography scanning. J Neurosurg. 2003; 99: 504510.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Kikuchi K, Murase K, Miki H, Kikuchi T, Sugawara Y, Mochizuki T, Ikezoe J, Ohue S. Measurement of cerebral hemodynamics with perfusion-weighted MR imaging: Comparison with pre- and post-acetazolamide 133xe-spect in occlusive carotid disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001; 22: 248254.
21. Boxerman JL, Hamberg LM, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn Reson Med. 1995; 34: 555566.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Weisskoff RM, Zuo CS, Boxerman JL, Rosen BR. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment. Magn Reson Med. 1994; 31: 601610.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Lythgoe DJ, Ostergaard L, William SC, Cluckie A, Buxton-Thomas M, Simmons A, Markus HS. Quantitative perfusion imaging in carotid artery stenosis using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 18: 111.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Reinhard M, Muller T, Roth M, Guschlbauer B, Timmer J, Hetzel A. Bilateral severe carotid artery stenosis or occlusion - cerebral autoregulation dynamics and collateral flow patterns. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003; 145: 10531059;discussion 10591060.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Grandin CB, Bol A, Smith AM, Michel C, Cosnard G. Absolute CBF and CBV measurements by MRI bolus tracking before and after acetazolamide challenge: repeatabilily and comparison with PET in humans. Neuroimage. 2005; 26: 525535.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Derdeyn CP, Videen TO, Yundt KD, Fritsch SM, Carpenter DA, Grubb RL, Powers WJ. Variability of cerebral blood volume and oxygen extraction: stages of cerebral haemodynamic impairment revisited. Brain. 2002; 125: 595607.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Hirooka, K. Ogasawara, T. Inoue, S. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, K. Chida, D. Ishigaki, M. Kobayashi, H. Nishimoto, Y. Otawara, et al. Simple Assessment of Cerebral Hemodynamics Using Single-Slab 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography in Patients with Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Steno-Occlusive Diseases: Comparison with Quantitative Perfusion Single-Photon Emission CT AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2009; 30(3): 559 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.-J. Rim, H.S. Kim, Y.S. Shin, and S.Y. Kim Which CT Perfusion Parameter Best Reflects Cerebrovascular Reserve?: Correlation of Acetazolamide-Challenged CT Perfusion with Single-Photon Emission CT in Moyamoya Patients AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1658 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fukuda, K. Ogasawara, M. Kobayashi, N. Komoribayashi, H. Endo, T. Inoue, Y. Kuzu, H. Nishimoto, K. Terasaki, and A. Ogawa Prediction of Cerebral Hyperperfusion after Carotid Endarterectomy Using Cerebral Blood Volume Measured by Perfusion-Weighted MR Imaging Compared with Single-Photon Emission CT AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2007; 28(4): 737 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |