| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2006;37:991.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurology (A.I., I.C., M.-G.B., H.C.) and Department of Neuroradiology (M.B.), Hopital Lariboisière, Paris, France; the Department of Biostatistics (R.P.), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
Correspondence to Hugues Chabriat, Department of Neurology, Hopital Lariboisière, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010 Paris, France. E-mail hugues.chabriat{at}lrb.ap-hop-paris.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 114 MRI examinations from 39 patients with CVT using a structured assessment. The time course of sensitivity in the detection of clot (n=166 clots) was analyzed for different MR sequences using a multilevel logistic model. The sensitivity of different MR sequences for diagnosis of cortical venous thrombosis was tested separately (n=38 clots).
Results The sensitivity of T2*SW and T1-weighted spin echo image (T1SE) sequences to detect clot in the sinuses or veins was estimated at 90% and 71% between day 1 and day 3, which was much higher than that of T2SE, FLAIR or DWI during the first week of clinical onset. The sensitivity of T2*SW was stable in the first week. After this period, the sensitivity of T2*SW decreased less than that of T1SE. Thrombosed cortical veins, even in the absence of visible occlusion on magnetic resonance venography, were detected more frequently with T2*SW (97%) and T1SE (78%) than with FLAIR or DWI (<40%).
Conclusions T2*SW imaging appears to be of additional diagnostic value in CVT. The T2*SW sequence may be particularly useful during the acute phase of CVT when the sensitivity of the other sequences is incomplete and for the diagnosis of isolated cortical venous thrombosis.
Key Words: cerebral thrombosis echo planar imaging magnetic resonance imaging sensitivity
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MRI Data
All MRI examinations were performed on a 1.5-Tesla Signal Imager (GE Medical System) using the following parameters: T1SE (TR, 500 ms; TE, 14 ms; 20 slices, sagittal with or without axial slices; 5 mm thickness; matrix size, 256x192; field of view, 24x24 cm; acquisition time, 1.44 minutes; 1 excitation), T2SE (TR, 5200 ms; TE, 102 ms; 20 slices; axial slices; slices thickness, 5 mm; matrix size, 256x320, field of view, 24x24 cm; acquisition time, 1.20 minutes; 2 excitations), FLAIR (TR, 8400 ms; TE, 145 ms; 20 slices; axial slices; 5 mm thickness; matrix size, 256x192; field of view, 24x24 cm; acquisition time, 3.48 minutes; 1 excitation; TI, 2100), DWI (TR, 10 000 ms; TE, 100 ms; 20 slices; axial slices; slice thickness 7 mm; matrix size, 128x128; field of view, 24x24 cm; acquisition time 32 seconds, b value, 1000 s/mm2; diffusion gradient, G=22 mT/m; duration, 32 ms; separation time, 39 ms), T2*SW (TR, 560 ms; TE, 15 ms; 20 slices; slice thickness 5 mm; matrix size, 256x192; field of view, 24x24 cm; acquisition time 1.09 minutes;), 2-dimensional time-of-flight sequence (TR, 24 ms; TE, 4.9 ms; interleaved section, 121x1.5 mm slices; matrix size, 256x128; field of view, 24x18 cm; flip angle, 20°; bandwith; 16 kHz; acquisition time, 4.54 minutes; 1 excitation).
All sequences obtained at each MRI examination were reviewed retrospectively by a neuroradiologist (M.B.) blinded to the subjects clinical condition. First, the sites of venous occlusion were systematically assessed by the reader on each MRI examination (based on all available data) at the following locations: superior sagittal sinus (SSS), left lateral sinus (LLS), right lateral sinus (RLS), deep venous system (DVS; vein of Galen, internal cerebral veins or straight sinus), right cortical veins (RCV) or left cortical veins (LCV). At each site of thrombosis, the presence of a normal flow-void, isointense signal or hyperintense signal on T1SE, T2SE, DWI, and FLAIR images were recorded. In addition, the presence or absence of a typical magnetic susceptibility effect on T2*SW was noted (MSE; only a strong and obvious hypointense signal encompassing the vessel lumen was considered in this category). A second observer performed the same task in a subset of patients (n=46 sites). The intra- and interobserver agreement was good or excellent (for each parameter, weighted
coefficients were between 0.851 and 1 for the intra-observer agreement and between 0.768 and 0.939 for the inter-observer agreement).
Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics were first used for the main clinical and MRI data. The results were presented as counts (percents) for categorical variables and as means (SD) or medians (range) for continuous variables.
Because the main objective of the present study was to investigate the signal changes occurring with time in venous clots, only MRI results at the sites of venous occlusion were considered for statistical analysis. Given the variable delays between the repeated MRI examinations and clinical onset and the different venous sites of thrombosis included in the analysis, the course of the sensitivity for the different MRI sequences was analyzed using a multilevel logistic model. This model accounted for correlations between the repeated observations during the follow-up for each venous occlusion through random effects.11,12 Additionally, a second level of correlation was considered using random patient effects. From the observed data, a piecewise linear model for time was first assumed, with an additional quadratic effect of time after 30 days. In a second step, the detailed structure of both fixed and random effects best fitting the data were selected using Schwartzs Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) model selection criterion.13 Once the final model was fitted, specific hypotheses regarding fixed effects were tested.14 When performing 2x2 group comparisons, Hochbergs correction for multiple testing was used.15
The comparisons across groups outside this model were performed using the
2 test or the Student t test. All tests were 2-sided, and a probability value under 0.05 was considered significant. Analyses were performed using R.2.0.1 software (The R Development Core Team).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The number of examinations performed in each patient ranged from 2 to 4 (average: 3). One hundred and fourteen examinations corresponding to 650 MR sequences (T1SE, n=113; T2SE, n=102; FLAIR, n=113; T2*SW, n=103; DWI, n=108; MRV, n=111) were analyzed. MRV was not obtained at follow-up in 3 MRI examinations.
Main MRI Features at Time of Diagnosis
The presence of a thrombosed sinus or vein was detected on MRV combined with MRI at the site of SSS in 20, LLS in 21, RLS in 18, DVS in 10, LCV in 2, and RCV in 3 patients. A single venous site, as defined previously, was involved in 19 patients, 2 venous sites in 13 patients, 3 in 2 patients, 4 in 5 patients, and 1 patient had an extensive CVT involving 5 different sites. At the time of diagnosis (first MRI examination), 75 different clots were identified at these different sites.
At the 75 sites of thrombosis (Figure 1), the clot appears on the first MRI examination as hyperintense on T1SE in 83% of sites, on T2SE in 27%, on FLAIR in 28% and on DWI in 21%. A typical MSE was detected on T2*SW at 93% of the sites of thrombosis (illustrative case shown in Figure 2).
|
|
MRI was performed within 3 days of the onset of symptoms in 7 patients. Eleven sites of thrombosis were identified in these subjects with the clot appearing on T1SE as hyperintense in 5/7 clots and isointense in 2/7; on T2SE as hyperintense in 1/7 clots, and isointense in 4/7 (T1SE and T2SE data were not available in 1 patient who had 4 sites of venous occlusion). With FLAIR and DWI, hyperintensity was detected at 1/11 sites, and on T2*SW a typical MSE was detected at 10/11 sites.
Time-Related Sensitivity of Hyperintense Signal on T1SE, T2SE, FLAIR and DWI and of the Presence of a MSE on T2*SW
All MRI data were included for this analysis corresponding to 166 sites of thrombosis located in the SSS (n=37), LLS (n=53), RLS (n=46), DVS (n=16), LCV (n=5) and RCV (n=9).
The model estimates of sensitivity for the hyperintense signal of the clot as observed on T1SE, T2SE, FLAIR and DWI and for the presence of a MSE on T2*SW are presented in Figure 3. The model showed that the sensitivity of the different MRI sequences significantly differed at the first day of clinical onset (P<0.0001). The sensitivity of both T1SE and T2*SW were found higher than the sensitivity of the other sequences (P=0.00012 after adjustement for multiple testing). However, the difference in sensitivity between the hyperintense signal of the thrombus on T1SE (87.0%) and the presence of the MSE on T2*SW (94.3%) did not reach statistical significance (P=0.51). Between day 1 and 7, the sensitivity of the corresponding signal modifications varied significantly between the different sequences (P<0.0001). An increase in sensitivity was observed for all sequences (significant positive slopes), except for the MSE on T2*SW whose sensitivity remained stable (slope in the model=0.0055; standard error (SE)=0.246; P=0.83) and differed from the other slopes (P=0.05). Between day 7 and day 30, no global difference was detected in the variations of sensitivity between the different sequences (P=0.11). However, the decrease in sensitivity was less rapid for the MSE on T2*SW than for the hyperintense aspect on T1SE; slopes: 0.053 (SE=0.025) versus 0.080 (SE=0.024); P=0.0076). After day 30, the variations in sensitivity also differed according to the different MRI sequences (P=0.021 on the quadratic term). A significant difference was also found between the slopes of the different sensitivity curves after day 30, particularly between those of T1SE and T2*SW (P=0.0075). The frequent persistence of MSE on T2*SW at the very late stage of CVT is illustrated in Figure 4.
|
|
Sensitivity of Different MRI Sequences to Detect Cortical Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
MR signal changes related to thrombosis in cortical veins were analyzed separately in the 89 examinations with a complete MRI data set. Thirty-eight cortical venous sites were diagnosed as thrombosed in 12 patients (cases 6, 16, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27, 30, 34, 35, 36 and 39) among whom 10 presented with thrombosis in other venous sites and 2 as isolated cortical venous thrombosis. A typical MSE on T2*SW was found at 37 cortical venous sites, whereas hyperintensity on T1SE was detected at 30 sites (98 versus 79%; P=0.01; illustrative case shown in Figure 5). Hyperintensity corresponding to the clot was detected at only 5 sites on FLAIR images (14%), 1 site on DWI (3%) and was not detected on T2SE. Noteworthily, MRV disclosed an occluded cortical vein in only 14 sites with cortical venous thrombosis (37%).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this series, conventional MRI sequences combined with MRV were used for diagnosis.4,9 MRV showed the presence of an occluded vein or sinus in 37/39 patients at the first MRI examination. T1SE showed a hyperintense signal at the site of thrombosis, highly suggestive of a recent thrombosis in 84% of cases. The most important finding of this study is that a MSE was detected at 90% sites of venous thrombosis at the first MRI investigation. Interestingly, a MSE was detected at 6 sites of thrombosis when the clot was only isointense on T1SE-weighted images. Moreover, within the first 3 days of symptom onset, the frequency of MSE on T2*SW images was over 90%, whereas the frequency of a hyperintense signal on T1SE was &70%. These data suggest that T2*SW may be helpful for the diagnosis of CVT, particularly during its early phase when the signal of thrombosis on T1SE is not yet hyperintense.
In the present study, the sensitivity of different MRI sequences in the detection of clots in CVT was estimated. The results confirm signal changes reported in T1 and T2SE in the early phase of CVT.9 Particularly, we observed that the frequency of hyperintensity at the site of venous occlusion progressively increases during the first week and decreases after this period for T1SE, FLAIR and DWI. Furthermore, we found that after 4 months, a hyperintense signal is no longer present on T1SE or DWI, in contrast to what is seen on T2SE and FLAIR images (20% and 54% respectively). Conversely, the frequency of MSE on T2*SW is high early in the course of clot formation and decreases very slowly with time. The estimated frequency of MSE on gradient echo images remained higher than 30% 4 months after clinical onset. These findings suggest that T2*SW cannot be used in isolation to date the appearance of venous occlusion. However, the combination of different MRI sequences, particularly T1SE and T2*SW, may be helpful to determine the time elapsed since the occurrence of thrombosis.
Thirty-eight sites of venous occlusion involving the cortical veins were identified in 12 patients with CVT in the present series. The sensitivity of T2*SW to detect these cortical venous clots was particularly high. The 98% frequency of MSE at the sites of cortical CVT was higher than the frequency of hyperintensity on T1SE and largely exceeded the diagnostic potential of MRV in these locations. T2*SW thus appears as the most sensitive MRI sequence for the diagnosis of cortical CVT, as already suggested in isolated cases.8 Therefore, this sequence should be added to conventional MRI sequences particularly when isolated cortical CVT is suspected.20
There are several limitations in the present study. First, because the analysis was performed retrospectively, data were not always complete for all MRI examinations, which could lead to imprecise estimations of sensitivity. However, only 4.9% of the sequences were unavailable for analysis. Second, the external validity of the present study may be altered by (1) the specific MRI parameters used in our center that may influence the results, albeit slightly, (2) the expertise of the center in CVT, and (3) the review of films in a research setting in cases with an already established diagnosis of CVT. Despite these limitations, the present data are consistent with previous analyses of signal changes caused by clots both in vitro and in vivo.21 Finally, the time-dependent changes in sensitivity observed in the present study resembles the MR signal changes reported in tissue hemorrhages.21 As reported in cerebral hemorrhages, early MSE on T2*SW within the venous thrombus is presumably related to the appearance of deoxyhemoglobin. The persisting decrease in MR signal is attributable to secondary accumulation of methemoglobin after a few days that is replaced by hemosiderin after several weeks. By contrast, the delayed increase of MR signal on T1SE is caused by the transient accumulation of methemoglobin in the clots.
In conclusion, this study shows that T2*SW is of additional diagnostic value for clot detection in CVT in conjunction with conventional MRI and MRV, particularly in the acute phase of thrombosis and in cortical CVT. The results of this study should be helpful for both diagnosis and therapy in CVT.
Received September 18, 2005; revision received November 1, 2005; accepted November 30, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Ameri A, Bousser MG. Cerebral venous thrombosis. Neurol Clin. 1992; 10: 87111.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Bousser MG, Russell R. Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Major Problem in Neurology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders, 1997.
4. Connor SE, Jarosz JM. Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Clin Radiol. 2002; 57: 449461.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Hinman JM, Provenzale JM. Hypointense thrombus on T2-weighted MR imaging: a potential pitfall in the diagnosis of dural sinus thrombosis. Eur J Radiol. 2002; 41: 147152.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Favrole P, Guichard JP, Crassard I, Bousser MG, Chabriat H. Diffusion-weighted imaging of intravascular clots in cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke. 2004; 35: 99103.
7. Selim M, Fink J, Linfante I, Kumar S, Schlaug G, Caplan LR. Diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis with echo-planar T2*SW-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol. 2002; 59: 10211026.
8. Cakmak S, Hermier M, Montavont A, Derex L, Mauguiere F, Trouillas P, Nighoghossian N. T2*SW-weighted MRI in cortical venous thrombosis. Neurology. 2004; 63: 1698.
9. Dormont D, Anxionnat R, Evrard S, Louaille C, Chiras J, Marsault C. MRI in cerebral venous thrombosis. J Neuroradiol. 1994; 21: 8199.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Ho CL, Chen CY, Chen YC, Chao TY. Cerebral dural sinus thrombosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia with early diagnosis by fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR image: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Hematol. 2000; 79: 9094.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Davidian M, Giltinan DM. Nonlinear Models for Repeated Measurement Data. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, 62, Chapman&Hall/CRC: Boca-Raton, 1995.
12. Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models. Halstead Press: New York, 1995.
13. Schwartz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics. 1978; 6: 461464.[CrossRef]
14. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS, 2nd ed, Springer-Verlag: New-York, 1997.
15. Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika. 1988; 75: 800803.
16. Einhäupl KM, Villringer A, Haberl RL, Pfister W, Deckert M, Steinhoff H, Schmeidek P. Clinical spectrum of sinus venous thrombosis. In: Einhauple KM, Kempski O, Baethmann A, eds. Cerebral Sinus Thrombosis/Experimental and Clinical Aspects. New York, 1990.
17. Cantu C, Barinagarrementeria F. Cerebral venous thrombosis associated with pregnancy and puerperium. Review of 67 cases. Stroke. 1993; 24: 18801884.
18. Tsai FY, Wang AM, Matovich VB, Lavin M, Berberian B, Simonson TM, Yuh WT. MR staging of acute dural sinus thrombosis: correlation with venous pressure measurements and implications for treatment and prognosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995; 16: 10211029.[Abstract]
19. Daif A, Awada A, al-Rajeh S, Abduljabbar M, al Tahan AR, Obeid T, Malibary T. Cerebral venous thrombosis in adults. A study of 40 cases from Saudi Arabia. Stroke. 1995; 26: 11931195.
20. Duncan IC, Fourie PA. Imaging of cerebral isolated cortical vein thrombosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184: 13171319.
21. Alemany Ripoll M, Stenborg A, Sonninen P, Terent A, Raininko R. Detection and appearance of intraparenchymal haematomas of the brain at 1.5 T with spin-echo, FLAIR and GE sequences: poor relationship to the age of the haematoma. Neuroradiology. 2004; 46: 435443.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Katayama, I. Kitajima, H. Niimi, H. Kitahara, and H. Kawai Diagnosis of cerebral cortical vein thrombosis with T2* weighted magnetic resonance imaging BMJ Case Reports, September 6, 2009; 2009(sep06_1): bcr0320091651 - bcr0320091651. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Linn, T. Pfefferkorn, K. Ivanicova, S. Muller-Schunk, S. Hartz, M. Wiesmann, M. Dichgans, and H. Bruckmann Noncontrast CT in Deep Cerebral Venous Thrombosis and Sinus Thrombosis: Comparison of its Diagnostic Value for Both Entities AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2009; 30(4): 728 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Boukobza, I. Crassard, M.G. Bousser, and H. Chabriat MR Imaging Features of Isolated Cortical Vein Thrombosis: Diagnosis and Follow-Up AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2009; 30(2): 344 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Deistung, A. Rauscher, J. Sedlacik, S. Witoszynskyj, and J. R. Reichenbach Informatics in Radiology: GUIBOLD: A Graphical User Interface for Image Reconstruction and Data Analysis in Susceptibility-weighted MR Imaging RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 639 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |