| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2006;37:1771.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the University of Western Ontario (B.D.M., T.-Y.L.), London, ON; Robarts Research Institute (B.D.M., T.-Y.L.) London, ON; Lawson Health Research Institute (B.D.M., T.-Y.L.), London, ON; London Health Sciences Centre (D.H.L., I.B.G., V.B., D.P., V.H., R.C.), London, ON; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (A.J.F., D.J.S., S.E.B., R.I.A., S.S.), Toronto, ON; Foothills Medical Centre (S.B.C., A.M.D.), Calgary, AB; and Ottawa Health Research Institute (M.J.H., M.G.), Ottawa, ON.
Correspondence to Dr Ting-Yim Lee, Robarts Research Institute, Imaging Research Laboratories, 100 Perth Dr, London, ON, Canada, N6A 5K9. E-mail tlee{at}imaging.robarts.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Thirty patients underwent a noncontrast CT (NCCT), CT angiography (CTA), and CT perfusion (CTP) scan within 7 hours of stroke onset, NCCT and CTA at 24 hours, and NCCT at 5 to 7 days. Twenty-five patients met the criteria for inclusion and were subsequently divided into 2 groups: those with recanalization at 24 hours (n=16) and those without (n=9). Penumbra was operationally defined as tissue with an admission CBF <25 mL · 100 g1 · min1 that was not infarcted on the 5- to 7-day NCCT. Logistic regression was applied to differentiate between infarct and penumbra data points.
Results For recanalized patients, CBF was significantly lower (P<0.05) for infarct (13.3±3.75 mL · 100 g1 · min1) than penumbra (25.0±3.82 mL · 100 g1 · min1). CBV in the penumbra (2.15±0.43 mL · 100 g1) was significantly higher than contralateral (1.78±0.30 mL · 100 g1) and infarcted tissue (1.12±0.37 mL · 100 g1). Logistic regression using an interaction term (CBFxCBV) resulted in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 97.0%, 97.2%, and 97.1%, respectively. The interaction term resulted in a significantly better (P<0.05) fit than CBF or CBV alone, suggesting that the CBV threshold for infarction varies with CBF. For patients without recanalization, CBF and CBV for infarcted regions were 15.1±5.67 mL · 100 g1 · min1 and 1.17±0.41 mL · 100 g1, respectively.
Conclusions We have shown in a limited sample of patients that CBF and CBV obtained from CTP can be sensitive and specific for infarction and should be investigated further in a prospective trial to assess their utility for differentiating between infarct and penumbra.
Key Words: blood volume cerebral blood flow cerebral infarction computed tomography penumbra
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10% of stroke patients in most academic stroke centers and
2.4% of patients in the general population.5 Imaging techniques may help select patients beyond the current 3-hour time window for intravenous thrombolysis because it has been shown in a meta-analysis that the odds of a favorable outcome with tPA does not decrease to 1.0 until
360 minutes after onset.6 Positron emission tomography (PET) is able to differentiate between normal, penumbral, and infarcted tissue in the acute stage of stroke.7,8 However, because of logistic and practical limitations of PET, its clinical use in acute stroke is limited. MRI has also contributed significantly to stroke imaging. Although early studies suggested that various techniques such as perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging could differentiate between penumbra and infarct,9 more recent studies have shown that this interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging and perfusion-weighted imaging may be an oversimplification.10,11 MRI sequences and analysis tools are constantly being developed and improved, and MRI will remain an important part of stroke imaging. These techniques are mainly limited by time in hyperacute stages when magnetic safety checklists and safety of monitoring equipment/personnel is a limiting factor.
Despite advances in various imaging modalities, computed tomography (CT) remains the most used imaging modality in acute stroke. CT scanners are readily accessed around the clock in urban and community hospitals, are relatively inexpensive compared with other imaging techniques, and studies can be performed rapidly. Recent studies have shown that contrast-enhanced CT can add to sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of routinely performed noncontrast CT scan (NCCT)1214 for stroke diagnosis and may be able to delineate infarcted and penumbral tissue in acute stroke.13,15,16
In this study, we attempted to determine whether cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps obtained by dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (CT Perfusion 3; General Electric Healthcare) at admission could be used to accurately differentiate between penumbra and infarcted brain tissue. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who experienced recanalization at 24 hours, and those without recanalization at 24 hours. In patients without recanalization, the CBF threshold for infarction was established to define tissue that would progress to infarction without reperfusion. Logistic regression was applied to data points from patients in the recanalized group to define the thresholds for separating infarcted from penumbra. Only patients with recanalization were used in the regression analysis to minimize the effects of tissue progression from penumbra to infarction.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Imaging
All patients underwent NCCT, CTA, and CTP on admission, again
24 hours after admission, and follow-up NCCT at 5 to 7 days after stroke. NCCT helical scans were performed from the skull base to the vertex with the following imaging parameters: 120 kVp, 340 mA, 4x5-mm collimation, 1 second/rotation, and table speed of 15 mm/rotation. Each CTP consisted of injection of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 50 mL) iodinated contrast agent (Iohexol; 300 mg/mL) at a rate of 2 to 4 mL/second followed by a 45-second cine scan at 80 kVp, 190 mA. Scanning was delayed by 3 to 5 seconds after the start of the injection. CTP studies covered a 20-mm slab of the brain from basal ganglia to lateral ventricles with either 4 5-mm or 210 mm sections. CTA was performed as follows: 0.7 mL/kg contrast (maximum 90 mL), 5- to 10-second delay, 120 kVp, 270 mA, 1 second/rotation, 1.25-mm thick slices, and table speed 3.75 mm/rotation. CTA covered from the carotid bifurcation through to vertex. Recanalization at 24 hours was classified as complete, partial, or absent by an experienced neuroradiologist (D.H.L.).
From each CTP, a time density curve (TDC), which displays the change in Hounsfield Units for a specified region over the duration of the scan, was obtained from a contralateral artery and from the superior sagittal or transverse sinus. CT Perfusion 3 software, an approved and commercially available product (General Electric HealthCare), was used to calculate quantitative parametric maps of CBF and CBV by deconvolution of tissue enhancement curves and arterial TDC in 2x2 pixel blocks. CBF and CBV derived from deconvolution-based CT imaging has been shown to be quantitative and accurate when compared with PET or Xenon CT imaging.17,18 Partial volume averaging of the arterial input curve was corrected using the venous TDC.19 In addition to CBF and CBV maps, CT Perfusion software was used to create a perfusion-weighted map by averaging cine images over the duration of the first contrast passage through the brain.
Image Analysis
All NCCT, CBF, CBV, and perfusion-weighted images were imported into custom software (IDL v5.6; RSI Inc.) for analysis. Delayed NCCT images were registered to baseline images to adjust for movement between scans. The perfusion-weighted map was used to segment gray and white matter based on thresholds of Hounsfield Units. The resulting gray matter mask was applied to the admission CBF and CBV maps to obtain average gray matter values for each of 3 tissue types: contralateral, penumbra, and infarct. CBF and CBV thresholds were applied to all tissue types to minimize the contribution of vascular pixels because it has been shown that CTP values correlate well with Xenon CT and PET when large vessels are excluded.17,18 Pixels with CBF >100 mL · 100 g1 · min1 or CBV >8 mL · 100 g1 were excluded and not used in calculating average CBF and CBV values for regions of interest (ROIs).
For patients in the occluded group, ischemia was defined as CBF <25 mL · 100 g1 · min1, which is consistent with previously published thresholds for infarction in patients without recanalization.20 The area of ischemic gray matter on admission CBF map and final infarct size on the corresponding 5- to 7-day NCCT images were calculated and compared to determine whether this CBF threshold was appropriate for defining tissue that would progress to infarction. Because of the loss of differentiation between gray and white matter in the final infarct, a "mirrored" template of the contralateral gray matter was applied to estimate the area of infarcted gray matter.
For patients in the recanalized group, analysis was performed in the following sequence by observers blinded to the clinical data of the patients: (1) outline infarct ROI on registered 5- to 7-day NCCT (performed by an experienced neuroradiologist; D.H.L.); (2) superimpose infarct ROI on admission CTP images; (3) outline ischemic tissue (<25 mL · 100 g1 · min1), if present, on admission CBF map; and (4) outline contralateral hemisphere. The gray matter mask obtained from the perfusion-weighted images was applied, and regions were labeled as infarct, ischemic, and contralateral. The penumbra region was operationally defined in this study as the difference between the infarct and ischemic regions. In this study, infarct regions were defined 5 to 7 days after stroke on an NCCT image, which could lead to an underestimation of the final infarct size because ischemic/penumbral tissue may still be evolving to infarction at this time point.
Statistical Analysis
Mean and SD of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, onset to imaging time, and age were calculated for all patients and are given in the Table. For patients in the occluded group, a paired t test was performed to determine whether ischemic (CBF <25 mL · 100 g1 · min1) area on admission was significantly different from final infarct size for the corresponding 5- to 7-day NCCT. For patients in the recanalized group, 1-way ANOVA was performed with Tukey post hoc test for significant differences in CBF and CBV values between penumbra, infarct, and contralateral regions. Significant differences were defined as P<0.05 for all comparisons. Logistic regression analysis was performed using all data points obtained from the recanalized group. CBF, CBV, and an interaction term (including CBF and CBV) were included as potential predictors in the regression model. Sensitivity and specificity for infarction were calculated from the resulting regression model. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 13 for Windows (SPSS Inc).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recanalized Group
Sixteen patients in the recanalized group (average onset to imaging time 133 minutes) contributed a total of 36 penumbra and 33 infarct regions (Figure 1). Penumbral tissue had a significantly lower CBF (25.0±3.82 mL · 100 g1 · min1) than contralateral brain tissue (37.3±5.01 mL · 100 g1 · min1), and infarcted tissue had a significantly lower blood flow (13.3±3.75 mL · 100 g1 · min1) than penumbral tissue (Figure 2A). CBV values in the penumbra (2.15±0.43 mL · 100 g1) were significantly higher than contralateral brain tissue (1.78±0.30 mL · 100 g1) and were significantly lower in the infarct (1.12±0.37 mL · 100 g1) compared with contralateral and penumbral tissue (Figure 2B).
|
|
Logistic regression analysis identified the interaction term between CBF and CBV as best predictor for differentiating between penumbra and infarct data points, significantly better than CBF or CBV thresholds alone (P<0.05). A nonlinear line (Figure 1) can be derived from the logistic regression model that provides the maximum separation between penumbra and infarct data points in the CBV versus CBF plot, defined by the equation CBFxCBV=31.3, where the units of CBF are mL · min1 · (100 g)1 and that of CBV are mL · (100 g)1. The model classified any pair of CBV and CBF values above this line as penumbra and points below the line as infarct. Sensitivity for infarction (97.0%), specificity for infarction (97.2%), and overall accuracy (97.1%) are obtained by comparing the predicted group membership (from the regression model) to the actual group membership (defined on the 5- to 7-day NCCT).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Increased CBV in the penumbra is a result of direct autoregulatory responses by the brain to maintain CBF by dilating the precapillary vessels in response to decreased perfusion pressure.21 Reduced CBV in infarcted tissue has been reported previously, but the mechanism for it is not completely understood.1315,22 One possible explanation for matched decrease in CBF and CBV is a result of failure of autoregulation in response to severe hypoperfusion.21 Other theories that have been proposed for this matched decrease are metabolic mechanisms such as neuronal death, resulting in significantly elevated extracellular potassium concentrations causing vasoconstriction.23 CBV thresholds for infarction identified in this study were lower than those defined by Wintermark et al13 but could be a result of vascular pixel elimination or algorithm differences for calculation of CBV and CBF, possibly because of partial volume corrections. Additionally, the CBV threshold we identified varies with CBF and is not constant across various CBF values. Using logistic regression (Figure 1), sensitivity and specificity for infarction were 97.0% and 97.2%, respectively, comparable to, or higher than, previous studies using MRI or contrast-enhanced CT.11,12,14 Therefore, this model could possibly be applied to ischemic regions in the acute stage of stroke to determine whether they are viable (penumbra) or infarcted.
This study is not without limitations. First, CBF and CBV thresholds were derived from an ROI analysis, and the exact time of recanalization could not be assessed within the first 24 hours, possibly allowing some conversion of penumbra to infarct between the admission CTP and recanalization. A second factor that may have caused an overestimation of the thresholds for infarction is the variability in onset to imaging time, as it is known that the CBF threshold for infarction increases with time.20 Applying our thresholds would therefore result in an overestimation of infarct size for some patients, particularly those at earlier time points. In thrombolysis treatment of acute stroke, with the possibility of hemorrhagic complication, this overestimation would make our method more conservative than optimistic with respect to treatment decision. Additionally, defining infarcted tissue at 5 to 7 days after stroke on an NCCT image could result in errors because the tissue may still be evolving to complete infarction beyond the first week. Limitations of this CT imaging technique are limited anatomical coverage, use of iodinated contrast agent, and exposure to x-ray films. Advances in CT hardware and imaging techniques will lead to increased anatomical coverage or a reduction in radiation dose.24,25 Studies have shown very good tolerance to iodinated contrast by patients,26 and the x-ray dose from a CTP study is about double that of a whole-head NCCT (T.-Y.L., unpublished data, 2005).
Defining the penumbra and infarct using CBF and CBV values from CTP could help in selecting patients for thrombolytic therapy within and possibly outside the current 3- to 6-hour treatment window, where it has been shown that penumbra may persist for >12 hours.27,28 CT imaging is available around the clock in most hospitals, is more rapidly accessible to stroke patients than MRI, and can be used to exclude intracranial hemorrhage, identify occlusion site, and possibly differentiate infarct from penumbra. Our study provides preliminary evidence that CBF and CBV derived from an admission CTP can identify infarct from penumbral tissue with sensitivity and specificity. This technique needs to be tested in a larger, randomized, prospective trial to examine its efficacy and whether it could be used to guide treatment decisions and possibly improve clinical outcome.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
We thank the Canadian Stroke Network for supporting this study and General Electric HealthCare for partial support.
Disclosures
T.-Y.L. is a consultant to General Electric HealthCare on the CT Perfusion software. Portions of the software are copyrighted by Lawson Health Research Institute and Robarts Research Institute.
Received November 25, 2005; revision received March 22, 2006; accepted April 28, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Provenzale and M. Wintermark Optimization of Perfusion Imaging for Acute Cerebral Ischemia: Review of Recent Clinical Trials and Recommendations for Future Studies Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1263 - 1270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.M. Provenzale, K. Shah, U. Patel, and D.C. McCrory Systematic Review of CT and MR Perfusion Imaging for Assessment of Acute Cerebrovascular Disease AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1476 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Lansberg, V. N. Thijs, R. Bammer, J.-M. Olivot, M. P. Marks, L. R. Wechsler, S. Kemp, and G. W. Albers The MRA-DWI Mismatch Identifies Patients With Stroke Who Are Likely to Benefit From Reperfusion Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2491 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Murphy, A. J. Fox, D. H. Lee, D. J. Sahlas, S. E. Black, M. J. Hogan, S. B. Coutts, A. M. Demchuk, M. Goyal, R. I. Aviv, et al. White Matter Thresholds for Ischemic Penumbra and Infarct Core in Patients with Acute Stroke: CT Perfusion Study Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 818 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bruno, T. A. Kent, B. M. Coull, R. R. Shankar, C. Saha, K. J. Becker, B. M. Kissela, and L. S. Williams Treatment of Hyperglycemia In Ischemic Stroke (THIS): A Randomized Pilot Trial Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 384 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.I. Aviv, J. Mandelcorn, S. Chakraborty, D. Gladstone, S. Malham, G. Tomlinson, A.J. Fox, and S. Symons Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scoring of CT Perfusion in Early Stroke Visualization and Assessment AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2007; 28(10): 1975 - 1980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Lev CT/NIHSS Mismatch for Detection of Salvageable Brain in Acute Stroke Triage Beyond the 3-Hour Time Window: Overrated or Undervalued? Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2028 - 2029. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-Y. Lee, B. D. Murphy, R. I. Aviv, A. J. Fox, S. E. Black, D. J. Sahlas, S. Symons, D. H. Lee, D. Pelz, I. B. Gulka, et al. Cerebral Blood Flow Threshold of Ischemic Penumbra and Infarct Core in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2201 - 2201. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |