| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2006;37:2012.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, the Donald W. Reynolds Center for Cardiovascular Research, the Leducq Center for Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Roche Molecular Systems, Alameda, Calif.
Correspondence to Robert Y. L. Zee, PhD, Laboratory of Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology, Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Avenue East, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail rzee{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods We evaluated nine PDE4D single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among 259 incident ischemic stroke cases and 259 controls were matched on age and smoking status and length of follow up since randomization, all drawn from initially healthy white males within the Physicians Health Study cohort who were prospectively followed for first-ever stroke events.
Results Genotype and allele distributions were similar between cases and controls. Results from single-marker conditional logistic regression analysis adjusting for traditional stroke risk factors showed significant association of SNP56 with risk of ischemic stroke (recessive odds ratio [OR], 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 4.61; P=0.03). Among the participants without baseline hypertension, SNP42 (additive OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.99 to 2.86, P=0.06), SNP45 (dominant odds ratio, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.00 to 5.00, P=0.05), and SNP56 (additive odds ratio, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.02 to 3.10, P=0.04) showed modest association with increased risk of ischemic stroke.
Conclusions We found modest associations between several PDE4D gene polymorphisms and risk of incident ischemic stroke in men without baseline hypertension in this prospective, non-Icelandic study. Although of borderline statistical significance, the direction and magnitude of the effect for SNP42 parallels that observed in a recent study evaluating women from an independent, nested casecontrol study.
Key Words: embolic stroke PDE4D
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stroke was defined by the presence of a new focal neurologic deficit with symptoms and signs persisting for >24 hours and was ascertained from blinded review of medical records, autopsy results, and the judgment of a board-certified neurologist on the basis of clinical reports, computed tomographic (CT), or magnetic resonance image (MRI) scanning. For each ischemic stroke case, a control matched by age, smoking history, and length of follow up was chosen among those subjects who remained free of vascular diseases at the time the index event occurred in the case participant. The control participants were selected from those who remained event-free up to the date that the dataset was closed for selection of study participants. The present association study consisted of white men only; 259 incident ischemic stroke casecontrol pairs were identified for the present investigation.
The study was approved by the Brigham and Womens Hospital Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research.
Genotype Determination
Genotyping was performed using an immobilized probe approach, as previously described (Roche Molecular Systems).9 In brief, each DNA sample was amplified in a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using biotinylated primers. Each PCR product pool was then hybridized to a panel of sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes immobilized in a linear array. The colorimetric detection method was based on the use of streptavidinhorseradish peroxidase conjugate with hydrogen peroxide and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine as substrates.
To confirm genotype assignment, scoring was carried out by two independent observers. Discordant results (<1% of all scoring) were resolved by a joint reading and, when necessary, a repeat genotyping. Results were scored blinded as to casecontrol status.
Statistical Analysis
Allele and genotype frequencies among cases and controls were compared with values predicted by Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using the
2 test. Relative risks of ischemic stroke associated with each genotype were calculated separately by conditional logistic regression analysis conditioning on the matching by age, smoking status (never, past, current), and length of follow up since randomization and further controlling for randomized treatment assignment (aspirin or beta-carotene) and traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as history of hypertension (
140/90 mm Hg), presence or absence of diabetes, and body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), assuming an additive, dominant, or recessive mode of inheritance. Because smoking is a known risk factor for stroke, matching by smoking status improves the efficiency of the analysis to examine the possible association of the gene variants tested and the clinical outcome. Pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) was examined as described by Devlin and Risch.10 For comparison with earlier reports,2,8a we also examined haplotypes of five SNPs in region A (SNPs 9, 26, 32, 34, and 42). Haplotype estimation and inference was determined using PHASE v2.1.11,12 Haplotype distributions between cases and controls were examined by likelihood ratio test. The relationship between haplotypes and incident ischemic stroke was examined using a haplotype-based logistic regression analysis with baseline parameterization13 adjusting for the same risk factors. All analyses were carried out using SAS/Genetics 9.1 package (SAS Institute Inc). Based on the notion that potential genetic effects could be more readily discerned in individuals without hypertension,14 the main cardiovascular risk factor for ischemic stroke, and in light of the findings of Brophy et al,8a a stratified analysis by baseline hypertension status (defined as
140/90 mm Hg in PHS) was performed to examine potential effect modification on 302 participants without baseline hypertension. We did not compute risk estimates for participants with baseline hypertension status resulting from small sample size. For each odds ratio (OR), we calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A two-tailed probability value of 0.05 was considered a statistically significant result. Because the present investigation aimed to test positive associations observed in the Icelandic population and in the SOF cohort,8a our data were not corrected for multiple testing.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Using a single-marker
2 analysis, genotype and allele distributions were similar between cases and controls (Table 2
). Results from the fully adjusted conditional logistic regression analysis, assuming an additive, dominant, or recessive mode of inheritance, showed significant association of SNP56 with increased risk of ischemic stroke (recessive OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.61, P=0.03; Table 3). Among those without baseline hypertension, we found an association of SNP45 (dominant OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.00 to 5.00, P=0.05) and SNP56 (additive OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.02 to 3.10, P=0.04) with increased risk of ischemic stroke (Table 4). Interestingly, the suggestive association for SNP56 under the recessive model shows a higher OR in subjects without baseline hypertension (recessive OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 0.93 to 10.50, P=0.07) than in the unstratified population (recessive odds ratio, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.61, P=0.03). A suggestive association of SNP42 with increased risk was also noted (additive OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.99 to 2.86, P=0.06; Table 4). The effect of SNP42 on ischemic stroke risk was in the same direction as that observed in SOF.8a Measures of LD are listed in Table 5.
|
|
|
|
|
The overall haplotype distributions were similar between cases and controls. The most frequent haplotypes were A-G-C-C-A and C-A for regions A and D, respectively (Table 6) and hence were used as the referent. The fully adjusted haplotype-based conditional logistic regression analysis showed a suggestive association of haplotype A-A-T-A-G with risk of ischemic stroke (P=0.06), relative to the referent haplotype, in participants without baseline hypertension (data not shown). This haplotype differs from the Icelandic risk haplotype at the last SNP allele2 and from the protective SOF haplotype at two alleles.8a
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this prospective investigation, we examined specific PDE4D SNPs and haplotypes that were associated with either increased or decreased risk of stroke in an Icelandic population or in the SOF (U.S. population). In our data, we observed modest associations between SNPs 42, 45, and 56 and increased risk of incident ischemic stroke. The direction of these effects is opposite to those observed in the Icelandic population,2 which did not stratify by hypertension status. For example, the Icelandic study found that the A-allele of SNP45 was associated with decreased risk, whereas the present investigation found the A-allele was associated with marginally increased risk among those without baseline hypertension. However, the modest effect observed in our data for SNP42 among nonhypertensive participants was in the same direction of effect as that observed in the SOF population.8a By contrast, the SOF data did not find significant associations for SNPs 45 or 56. Thus, stratified analysis of earlier studies according to hypertension status is warranted.
All of the observed associations in the present study are of borderline statistical significance, and thus it is possible that these findings represent the play of chance. However, an alternative explanation for the apparent inconsistency between the present findings and those observed in the Icelandic population and the partial consistency between the PHS and SOF results is that different populations may exhibit heterogeneity of linkage disequilibrium between the putative risk allele and the surrogate markers being tested.1921 Recently, several independent non-Icelandic association studies examined the associations of specific PDE4D gene variants with risk of ischemic stroke6,22 and/or stroke subtypes (carotid/cardiogenic),3,57,23 although these studies did not stratify by hypertension status nor examine a similar set of SNPs. Although the LD pattern among these noncausal SNPs in PHS was more similar to that in SOF than in the Icelandic population (data not shown), we observed only partial congruence between the findings of SOF and findings in the current PHS data. Thus, as shown in Table 7, although we believe it of interest that multiple studies to date have found apparent allelic imbalances, in particular SNP45, within the PDE4D gene between stroke patients and controls, these findings have not been consistent between studies or in direction of effect.
|
The prospective nature of the PHS study and the use of a closed population sampling scheme in which subsequent case status was determined solely by the development of disease strongly reduce the possibility that our findings are the result of bias or unrecognized confounding. Our study cohort consists of entirely white males with distinct socioeconomic status (physicians), so our data cannot be generalized to other ethnic groups or women. Furthermore, because none of the gene variants tested has been found to be functional, we cannot exclude the possibility that the polymorphisms examined are in linkage disequilibrium with an unidentified susceptibility gene(s)/polymorphism(s) that are responsible for the observed significant associations. We have limited information on ischemic stroke-subtype classification; the potential association of these PDE4D polymorphisms/haplotypes with subtypes of ischemic stroke could not be examined in the present investigation. Thus, additional prospective studies are needed to further examine the association of PDE4D gene variation in ischemic stroke.
In conclusion, our prospective investigation found modest evidence for associations of specific PDE4D gene polymorphisms with risk of incident ischemic stroke among men. Like in the analysis of the female SOF cohort,8a the significance of the observed associations for individual SNPs was increased among those without hypertension at baseline, a finding that contrasts in direction of effect reported in the original study from an Icelandic population but that continues to raise hypotheses regarding a potential role for the PDE4D gene in stroke.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Supported by grants from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (HL-58755 and HL-63293), the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, the American Heart Association, and the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Disclosures
None.
Received February 6, 2006; revision received April 13, 2006; accepted May 2, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Bevan, M. Dichgans, A. Gschwendtner, G. Kuhlenbaumer, E.B. Ringelstein, and H. S. Markus Variation in the PDE4D Gene and Ischemic Stroke Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on 5200 Cases and 6600 Controls Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 1966 - 1971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Worrall and J. C. Mychaleckyj PDE4D and Stroke: A Real Advance or a Case of the Emperor's New Clothes? Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 1955 - 1957. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |