Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2006;37:2204
Published online before print August 3, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000237182.54763.59
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/9/2204    most recent
01.STR.0000237182.54763.59v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khatri, P.
Right arrow Articles by Broderick, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khatri, P.
Right arrow Articles by Broderick, J.

(Stroke. 2006;37:2204.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Measuring Treatment Effect in Acute Stroke Trials

Pooja Khatri, MD Joseph Broderick, MD

Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

To the Editor:

We read with interest Bruno et al’s analysis of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in the trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment (TOAST). They found the dichotomous variable, NIHSS score ≤2 at 3 months, to be associated with "very favorable outcome" at 3 months, defined as both Glasgow Outcome Scale of 1 and modified Barthel Index 19 to 20.1

Prior work analyzing the NINDS recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) trial (the only conclusively positive clinical acute stroke trial) found NIHSS score ≤2 to be one of the most useful predictors of rt-PA treatment effect as well. Specifically, using the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm, the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group identified all possible dichotomous end points that may discriminate between rt-PA treatment and placebo groups at 3 months (ie, long-term efficacy) and at 24 hours (ie, early rt-PA effect). Significant variables were identified in Part I of the NINDS trial, and then tested for validity in Part II of the trial. NIHSS score ≤2 at 3 months was a more powerful and sensitive measure of rt-PA long-term efficacy than the primary outcome measure of the trial (ie, the composite global statistic combining modified Rankin, Glasgow Outcome, NIHSS, and Barthel Index scores). Furthermore, NIHSS score ≤2 at 24 hours was the single most powerful discriminator of an early rt-PA effect.2

NIHSS score ≤2 at 24 hours was also one of the best indicators of rt-PA long-term efficacy among the subset of patients with moderate-to-severe strokes (ie, baseline NIHSS ≥10), a cohort that has been the focus of the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) trials.2 In fact, this outcome was chosen as a secondary end point for the IMS trials based on this CART analysis. Again, in IMS I, NIHSS score ≤2 at 24 hours is the most sensitive measure of treatment effect at 3 months, compared with historical controls from the NINDS rt-PA trial (odds ratio 5.39; 95% CI, 1.80 to 16.19).3

Among dichotomous variables, NIHSS score ≤2 at 24 hours may be the best Phase I and II marker of early treatment effect in revascularization studies, and correlates well with long-term outcome. NIHSS score ≤2 at 3 months is also a useful outcome measure, as shown by NINDS and TOAST analyses. Recently, changes in distributions of relevant outcome measures, such as the NIHSS score and modified Rankin Scale score, have been proposed as potentially more powerful predictors of treatment effect than dichotomous variables.4 Determining the best end points for acute stroke trials is currently a topic of great interest.

Acknowledgments

Disclosures

The authors would like to report the following conflicts of interest: consulting for Genentech, Inc; Genentech supplies medication, and EKOS Corp and Concentric Corp supplies devices for an ongoing trial in which P.K. is involved. EKOS Corp has also provided grant support in the past for a completed trial.

References

1. Bruno A, Saha C, Williams LS. Using change in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale to measure treatment effect in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 2006; 37: 920–921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Broderick JP, Lu M, Kothari R, Levine SR, Lyden PD, Haley EC, Brott TG, Grotta J, Tilley BC, Marler JR, Frankel M. Finding the most powerful measures of the effectiveness of tissue plasminogen activator in the NINDS tPA stroke trial. Stroke. 2000; 31: 2335–2341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Combined intravenous and intra-arterial recanalization for acute ischemic stroke: the Interventional Management of Stroke Study. Stroke. 2004; 35: 904–911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Lees KR, Zivin JA, Ashwood T, Davalos A, Davis SM, Diener HC, Grotta J, Lyden P, Shuaib A, Hardemark HG, Wasiewski WW, Stroke-Acute Ischemic NXY Treatment (SAINT I) Trial Investigators. NXY-059 for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 588–600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/9/2204    most recent
01.STR.0000237182.54763.59v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khatri, P.
Right arrow Articles by Broderick, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khatri, P.
Right arrow Articles by Broderick, J.