| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:198.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Comments, Opinions, and Reviews |
From the Department of Neurology, University Medical Center St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Correspondence to Frank-Erik de Leeuw, MD, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center St. Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, (HP 935), The Netherlands. E-mail h.deleeuw{at}neuro.umcn.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods— We performed systematic literature search of PubMed with the following medical subject heading terms: memory and stroke. The search strategy yielded 798 articles of which 65 fulfilled our inclusion criteria and went on to the data extraction stage.
Results— Five studies reported the prevalence of poststroke memory dysfunction at different poststroke intervals. The prevalence of poststroke memory dysfunction varied from 23% to 55% 3 months poststroke, which declined from 11% to 31% 1 year poststroke. Larger stroke volume, prestroke medial temporal lobe atrophy, and white matter lesions were related with decreased poststroke memory function.
Conclusions— Not all patients with poststroke memory dysfunction 3 months after a stroke had memory dysfunction 1 year poststroke. Consequently, not all criteria for the dementia diagnosis were fulfilled any more. This may indicate that poststroke dementia may be reversible in a substantial proportion of patients with stroke. Preferably, standardized reassessment of cognitive function should be performed in each patient diagnosed with poststroke dementia.
Key Words: cognitive prevalence stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surprisingly, formal studies investigating the time course of poststroke memory function (PMF) are scarce. This may allow for potential misclassification of poststroke dementia or VaD when memory function changes over time (the presence of memory dysfunction is a symptom needed to fulfill this clinical diagnosis).
Another reason for investigating the true occurrence of PMD is that a stroke only seldom occurs in the brain structure that is predominantly involved in memory encoding and retrieval (the medial temporal lobe).6–8 Despite this, the frequency of PSD or VaD is estimated to be over 30%,9 which may suggest that other (pre-)stroke characteristics are related to PMF such as white matter lesions (WML), medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), previous (silent) infarcts, and prestroke cognitive function. Many studies have investigated the epidemiology of PMF. However, some methodological limitations must be considered, including small sample size, inability to adjust for confounding factors, and unclear operationalization and description of the timing of assessment of memory function. Only a few addressed the role of stroke characteristics and that of the previously mentioned presumed prestroke characteristics in patients with PMD. It is important to know the course of PMF, because albeit the preeminent factor in the PSD and VaD diagnosis, it may not even be present (to the same extent) over 3 months after the stroke as it was during the diagnosis of PSD and VaD (within 3 months after stroke).
We systematically reviewed the available data on frequency, time course, and risk factors of poststroke memory function in nondemented stroke survivors. Second, we evaluated the effect of location and severity of stroke on PMF. In addition, we wanted to investigate the role of prestroke structural brain changes, including WML, MTA, previous (silent) infarcts, and prestroke cognitive decline, on the frequency of PMF.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Time Course of Poststroke Memory Function
The most common tests that were used to assess verbal memory function were the Wechsler Memory Scale,10 the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test,11 the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test,12 the Cambridge Assessment Of Mental Disorders,13 the California Verbal Learning Test,14 and the Verbal Learning Task.15
Five studies5,16–19 investigated the formal time course of poststroke memory dysfunction that had all included patients with first-ever stroke at different poststroke intervals (Table 1). There was a general tendency20–34 of a reduced (verbal) memory function (Table 2) among stroke survivors as compared with controls (healthy controls or normative data).
|
|
There were 10 studies that attempted to operationalize PMD, each with their own defined cutoffs (see details in Table 1).4,5,16–19,35–38
The prevalence of PMD ranged from 50% weeks after the stroke to 11% more than 1 year after the stroke (for details, see Table 1).
Relation Between Poststroke Memory Function and Stroke Characteristics
Table 2 presents an overview of poststroke memory function (assessed at different stroke–memory assessment intervals) in relation to possible (pre-)stroke confounding factors.
Several studies provided a clear description of the size (volume)26,39–43 and the location4,16,25,33,34,38,42–51 of the infarction; however, the relation with PMF was only seldom investigated. In one study,42 a linear relation between the size of the infarction and the degree of PMF was found. More circumstantial evidence for a role of stroke severity with respect to PMF comes from a study41 that found a larger total volume of infarction among those patients who developed poststroke dementia.
Cerebral infarcts in the left middle temporal gyrus and the and/or left dorsal lateral frontal cortex were significantly correlated with PMF.46 Four studies33,38,44,48 found a lower PMF in left-sided stroke compared with right hemispheric stroke. Most studies found left hemispheric stroke to be related to more severe PMD as compared with the right hemisphere, presumably because most memory tasks rely on intact language function, although these studies also included nonverbal memory tasks.
Relation Between Prestroke Characteristics and Poststroke Memory Function
There are a number of factors that presumably were already present before the stroke (including WML,52–54 MTA55,56 previous [silent] infarcts, and prestroke cognitive decline) that could be related to PMF. As a result of the fact that stroke patients usually did not have neuroimaging and/or neuropsychology before the actual stroke, the effects of these factors on PMD are difficult to disentangle from the direct stroke effects. Some studies tried to overcome this problem by making adjustments for WML and MTA.
White Matter Lesions
WML was scored in only five of 12 studies.17,18,22,43,47 Their presence, as assessed by means of semiquantitative rating scales, varied from 15% to 45%. In general, there was a lower PMF among patients with WML compared with those without with otherwise identical demographic and stroke characteristics. WML were associated with global cognitive impairment in patients with stroke.22,57,58 Independent of this finding, there was a significant association between left frontal WMH volume and poststroke working memory and between both left and right temporal WMH volumes and memory function (not otherwise specified).22
Medial Temporal Lobe Atrophy
The degree of MTA was assessed in only two studies. Their presence (as assessed on a semiquantitative scale)59 was strongly related to immediate and delayed poststroke memory function (not otherwise specified) among 260 stroke survivors.26 This is in line with findings among 22 stroke survivors in which there was a relation between poststroke verbal memory as assessed with the Verbal Learning Task and prestroke MTA.47
Previous (silent) Infarcts
Information on previous (silent) infarction was lacking in most studies. Twenty-one articles included first-ever stroke survivors and 44 articles included also patients with multiple strokes or did not specify this. One article related silent stroke to memory.34 They found that silent infarctions located in the thalamus were associated with a greater decline in memory performance (z-score=–0.50; 95% CI, –0.87 to –0.13).
Prestroke Cognition
None of the 65 included articles investigated prestroke cognition in relation to poststroke memory function.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, some methodological aspects must be considered. The measurement of PMD at several poststroke intervals was assessed in five studies.5,16–19 Therefore, the ascertainment of a time course of PMD prevalence relies on different studies that investigated PMD at different poststroke intervals. However, these studies differed tremendously in terms of patient inclusion, assessment of memory function, and in the collection of stroke and prestroke (imaging) characteristics.
In addition, and not always explicitly mentioned, most studies included patients who were able to complete neuropsychologic examination. As a consequence, patients who could not complete testing (with a presumably larger stroke than those who could be examined) and those with aphasia were not examined. This could have led to an underestimation of PMD. On the other hand, people with only a minor stroke may not have been included because they, for example, were not willing to participate months after a stroke from which they had completely recovered already.
Some studies5,18,23,25,26,34,50,58,61 investigated patients derived from a larger cohort (also includes one population-based study)34 that apparently had manifestations of cerebral ischemia, either on a scan (in that case, it was unclear whether the infarct had been symptomatic or not) or based on history-taking. These results are most likely not to be compared with patients with "recent" stroke because it seems likely that both stroke characteristics and memory function differ between early stroke survivors and "ever stroke" patients.
Another source of bias that may lead to underestimation of PMD is the fact that all studies only included patients that were actually admitted to the hospital. Many patients with stroke, especially the most severely affected with presumably prestroke cognitive impairment or even dementia, are not admitted to the hospital. It seems likely that they are the ones with the highest prevalence of PMD and the highest risk of PSD. Some studies excluded patients who appeared demented immediately after stroke. Consequently, the remaining sample (that then does not encompass any demented patient) has a lower risk of developing PSD.
We found a considerable age difference between the studies making comparisons difficult, because age is an important determinant of memory.24,38,62 In addition, age is an important determinant of both MTA and WML, the latter being one of the most important confounders or effect modifiers in the relation between stroke and PMD. The possibility that differences in MTA or WML underlie (at least in part) the observed differences of PMD between studies can therefore not be ruled out.
There was a wide variability in assessment of verbal memory function and the definition of memory dysfunction. From most studies, the memory dysfunction (for example, expressed as the number SDs below the mean) could not be calculated as a result of lack of raw data. Therefore, the prevalence of PMD across different poststroke intervals is rather limited and difficult to compare. Other studies used normative data or controls to define memory function. However, the problem with normative data could be that there is not much known about the persons investigated and they certainly did not undergo neuroimaging. Therefore, normative data could also include people with a silent stroke or WMLs.
The mentioned methodological considerations may lead to questioning the validity of the concept of PMD and consequently of the diagnosis of VaD and PSD. These diagnoses are based (analogous to the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease1) on the assumption of a stable or gradual decline of poststroke memory function among patients without prestroke characteristics that could be related to PMD.1,9 Our review indicates that this is not true. Patients with PMD 3 months after a stroke (who could then have been diagnosed with VaD or PSD when also all other dementia criteria were fulfilled) could very well have recovery of memory dysfunction 6 months after the stroke and consequently not fulfill dementia diagnosis any more. We also found that patients with PMD appear to constitute a population with many other (pre-)stroke factors that could, independent from the stroke, be related to PMD, both structural as well cognitive.
The development of PMD also seems counterintuitive, because the stroke does usually not affect structures known to be involved in memory.6–8 However, the emergence of poststroke memory dysfunction fits in current thinking of memory as a function of an intact cerebral network, connecting several parts of the brain, including medial temporal lobes, anterior thalamic nucleus, mammillary body, fornix, and the prefrontal cortex with each other (the so-called circuit of Papez).4,33,34,43,46,47,63 Any stroke in either of these structures or in the connections in between could result in PMF. Presumably, patients with already preexisting damage in either compartments of the network (MTA) or in the connections (WML) are at increased risk for PMD. Perhaps these are also the patients who are therefore at the highest risk for PSD, although formal studies are lacking. Therefore, future studies should include well-characterized patients with stroke (both in terms of stroke and prestroke characteristics) that assess memory function at several predefined poststroke intervals. They should particularly include information on whether ever or first-ever stroke survivors are included because a previous stroke may influence cognitive function assessed immediately after another, novel stroke. Care should be given to proper registration of those patients who cannot complete memory testing. Novel imaging techniques such as task-related, but also resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging, may be of use in the detection of what part of the brain (or what network) shows altered function in patients with PMD. These techniques could then, when established, perhaps also be of use in the early prediction of those with PMD or even poststroke dementia and as such possibly guide early (cognitive) rehabilitation medicine.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
Received July 12, 2006; revision received August 31, 2006; accepted September 11, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bowler JV. Vascular cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005; 76: v35–v44.
3. De Leeuw FE, van Gijn J. Vasculaire dementie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004; 148: 1181–1186.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Kumral E, Evyapan D, Balkir K, Kutluhan S. Bilateral thalamic infarction. Clinical, etiological and MRI correlates. Acta Neurol Scand. 2001; 103: 35–42.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Rasquin SM, Verhey FR, Lousberg R, Winkens I, Lodder J. Vascular cognitive disorders: memory, mental speed and cognitive flexibility after stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2002; 203–204: 115–119.[CrossRef]
6. Buckner RL, Kelley WM, Petersen SE. Frontal cortex contributes to human memory formation. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2: 311–314.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Kelley WM, Miezin FM, McDermott KB, Buckner RL, Raichle ME, Cohen NJ, Ollinger JM, Akbudak E, Conturo TE, Snyder AZ, Petersen SE. Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding. Neuron. 1998; 20: 927–936.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Wagner AD, Schacter DL, Rotte M, Koutstaal W, Maril A, Dale AM, Rosen BR, Buckner RL. Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science. 1998; 281: 1188–1191.
9. Leys D, Henon H, Mackowiak-Cordoliani MA, Pasquier F. Poststroke dementia. Lancet Neurol. 2005; 4: 752–759.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Wechsler D. A standardized memory scale for clinical use. J Psychol. 1945; 19: 87–95.
11. Rey A. Lexamen clinique en psychologie 183. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1964.
12. Wilson C. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Tichfield: Thames Vally Test Co, 1985.
13. Roth M. CAMDEX: a standardized instrument for the diagnosis of mental disorder in the elderly with special reference to the early detection of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1986; 149: 698–709.
14. Delis. California Verbal Learning Test. Research edition. New York: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc, 1987.
15. Brand NJJ. Learning and retrieval rate of words presented auditorily and visually. J Gen Psychol. 1985; 112: 201–210.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Kotila M, Waltimo O, Niemi ML, Laaksonen R, Lempinen M. The profile of recovery from stroke and factors influencing outcome. Stroke. 1984; 15: 1039–1044.
17. Nys GM, van Zandvoort MJ, de Kort PL, Jansen BP, van der Worp HB, Kappelle LJ, de Haan EH. Domain-specific cognitive recovery after first-ever stroke: a follow-up study of 111 cases. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005; 11: 795–806.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Rasquin SM, Lodder J, Ponds RW, Winkens I, Jolles J, Verhey FR. Cognitive functioning after stroke: a one-year follow-up study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004; 18: 138–144.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. van Zandvoort MJ, Kessels RP, Nys GM, de Haan EH, Kappelle LJ. Early neuropsychological evaluation in patients with ischaemic stroke provides valid information. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005; 107: 385–392.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Babikian VL, Wolfe N, Linn R, Knoefel JE, Albert ML. Cognitive changes in patients with multiple cerebral infarcts. Stroke. 1990; 21: 1013–1018.
21. Berrin-Wasserman S, Winnick WA, Borod JC. Effects of stimulus emotionality and sentence generation on memory for words in adults with unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychology. 2003; 17: 429–438.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Burton EJ, Kenny RA, OBrien J, Stephens S, Bradbury M, Rowan E, Kalaria R, Firbank M, Wesnes K, Ballard C. White matter hyperintensities are associated with impairment of memory, attention, and global cognitive performance in older stroke patients. Stroke. 2004; 35: 1270–1275.
23. Dik MG, Deeg DJ, Bouter LM, Corder EH, Kok A, Jonker C. Stroke and apolipoprotein E epsilon4 are independent risk factors for cognitive decline: a population-based study. Stroke. 2000; 31: 2431–2436.
24. Engstad T, Almkvist O, Viitanen M, Arnesen E. Impaired motor speed, visuospatial episodic memory and verbal fluency characterize cognition in long-term stroke survivors: the Tromso Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2003; 22: 326–331.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Hochstenbach JB, den OR, Mulder TW. Cognitive recovery after stroke: a 2-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1499–1504.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Jokinen H, Kalska H, Ylikoski R, Hietanen M, Mantyla R, Pohjasvaara T, Kaste M, Erkinjuntti T. Medial temporal lobe atrophy and memory deficits in elderly stroke patients. Eur J Neurol. 2004; 11: 825–832.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Jokinen H, Kalska H, Mantyla R, Pohjasvaara T, Ylikoski R, Hietanen M, Salonen O, Kaste M, Erkinjuntti T. Cognitive profile of subcortical ischaemic vascular disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006; 77: 28–33.
28. Nyenhuis DL, Gorelick PB, Geenen EJ, Smith CA, Gencheva E, Freels S, Toledo-Morrell L. The pattern of neuropsychological deficits in vascular cognitive impairment–no dementia (vascular CIND). Clin Neuropsychol. 2004; 18: 41–49.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Valenzuela MJ, Lorentz LM, Koschera A. Progression of cognitive impairment in stroke patients. Neurology. 2004; 63: 1618–1623.
30. Srikanth VK, Thrift AG, Saling MM, Anderson JF, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, Donnan GA. Increased risk of cognitive impairment 3 months after mild to moderate first-ever stroke: a community-based prospective study of nonaphasic English-speaking survivors. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1136–1143.
31. Stephens S, Kenny RA, Rowan E, Allan L, Kalaria RN, Bradbury M, Ballard CG. Neuropsychological characteristics of mild vascular cognitive impairment and dementia after stroke. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004; 19: 1053–1057.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Prohovnik I, Cross DT, Gropen TI, Mohr JP, Stern Y. Confusion and memory loss from capsular genu infarction: a thalamocortical disconnection syndrome? Neurology. 1992; 42: 1966–1979.
33. Vakil E, Blachstein H, Soroker N. Differential effect of right and left basal ganglionic infarctions on procedural learning. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2004; 17: 62–73.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Vermeer SE, Prins ND, den HT, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1215–1222.
35. Cartoni A, Lincoln NB. The sensitivity and specificity of the Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State (MEAMS) for detecting cognitive impairment after stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005; 15: 55–67.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Hochstenbach J, Mulder T, van LJ, Donders R, Schoonderwaldt H. Cognitive decline following stroke: a comprehensive study of cognitive decline following stroke. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998; 20: 503–517.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Lincoln NB, Tinson DJ. The relation between subjective and objective memory impairment after stroke. Br J Clin Psychol. 1989; 28: 61–65.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Madureira S, Guerreiro M, Ferro JM. Dementia and cognitive impairment three months after stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2001; 8: 621–627.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Bowler JV, Hadar U, Wade JP. Cognition in stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 1994; 90: 424–429.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Corbett A, Bennett H, Kos S. Cognitive dysfunction following subcortical infarction. Arch Neurol. 1994; 51: 999–1007.
41. Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Bagiella E, Sano M, Stern Y. Dementia as a predictor of adverse outcomes following stroke: an evaluation of diagnostic methods. Stroke. 1998; 29: 69–74.
42. Elwan O, Hashem S, Helmy AA, el TM, Abdel NM, Elwan F, Madkour O, Abdel KA, el TS. Cognitive deficits in ischemic strokes: psychometric, electrophysiological and cranial tomographic assessment. J Neurol Sci. 1994; 125: 168–174.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Exner C, Weniger G, Irle E. Implicit and explicit memory after focal thalamic lesions. Neurology. 2001; 57: 2054–2063.
44. Hom J, Reitan RM. Generalized cognitive function after stroke. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1990; 12: 644–654.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Malhotra P, Jager HR, Parton A, Greenwood R, Playford ED, Brown MM, Driver J, Husain M. Spatial working memory capacity in unilateral neglect. Brain. 2005; 128: 424–435.
46. Reed BR, Eberling JL, Mungas D, Weiner MW, Jagust WJ. Memory failure has different mechanisms in subcortical stroke and Alzheimers disease. Ann Neurol. 2000; 48: 275–284.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Van der Werf YD, Scheltens P, Lindeboom J, Witter MP, Uylings HB, Jolles J. Deficits of memory, executive functioning and attention following infarction in the thalamus; a study of 22 cases with localised lesions. Neuropsychologia. 2003; 41: 1330–1344.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. von Cramon DY, Hebel N, Schuri U. Verbal memory and learning in unilateral posterior cerebral infarction. A report on 30 cases. Brain. 1988; 111: 1061–1077.
49. Welte PO. Indices of verbal learning and memory deficits after right hemisphere stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74: 631–636.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Yaretzky A, Raviv S, Netz Y, Jacob T. Primary visual memory of stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 1995; 17: 293–297.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Zwinkels A, Geusgens C, van de SP, Van HC. Assessment of apraxia: inter-rater reliability of a new apraxia test, association between apraxia and other cognitive deficits and prevalence of apraxia in a rehabilitation setting. Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18: 819–827.
52. Burns JM, Church JA, Johnson DK, Xiong C, Marcus D, Fotenos AF, Snyder AZ, Morris JC, Buckner RL. White matter lesions are prevalent but differentially related with cognition in aging and early Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2005; 62: 1870–1876.
53. Mungas D, Jagust WJ, Reed BR, Kramer JH, Weiner MW, Schuff N, Norman D, Mack WJ, Willis L, Chui HC. MRI predictors of cognition in subcortical ischemic vascular disease and Alzheimers disease. Neurology. 2000; 57: 2229–2235.
54. Vataja R, Pohjasvaara T, Mantyla R, Ylikoski R, Leppavuori A, Leskela M, Kalska H, Hietanen M, Aronen HJ, Salonen O, Kaste M, Erkinjuntti T. MRI correlates of executive dysfunction in patients with ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2003; 10: 625–631.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Korf ES, Wahlund LO, Visser PJ, Scheltens P. Medial temporal lobe atrophy on MRI predicts dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2004; 63: 94–100.
56. Scheltens P, Leys D, Barkhof F, Huglo D, Weinstein HC, Vermersch P, Kuiper M, Steinling M, Wolters EC, Valk J. Atrophy of medial temporal lobes on MRI in probable Alzheimers disease and normal ageing: diagnostic value and neuropsychological correlates. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992; 55: 967–972.
57. Ballard C, Stephens S, Kenny R, Kalaria R, Tovee M, OBrien J. Profile of neuropsychological deficits in older stroke survivors without dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2003; 16: 52–56.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Burton E, Ballard C, Stephens S, Kenny RA, Kalaria R, Barber R, OBrien J. Hyperintensities and fronto-subcortical atrophy on MRI are substrates of mild cognitive deficits after stroke. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2003; 16: 113–118.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Barber R, Scheltens P, Gholkar A, Ballard C, McKeith I, Ince P, Perry R, OBrien J. White matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimers disease, vascular dementia, and normal aging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999; 67: 66–72.
60. Lewis G. DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Psychol Med. 1996; 26: 651–652.
61. Larson E, Kirschner K, Bode R, Heinemann A, Goodman R. Construct and predictive validity of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status in the evaluation of stroke patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005; 27: 16–32.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Paik MC, Sano M, Mohr JP, Aboumatar S, Tseng CL, Chan S, Williams JB, Remien RH, Hauser WA, Stern Y. Frequency and clinical determinants of dementia after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2000; 54: 1124–1131.
63. Budson AE, Price BH. Memory dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 692–699.
Related Article:
Stroke 2007 38: 7-8.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Snaphaan, M. Rijpkema, I. v. Uden, G. Fernandez, and F.-E. de Leeuw Reduced medial temporal lobe functionality in stroke patients: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study Brain, July 1, 2009; 132(7): 1882 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Gorelick and J. V. Bowler Advances in Vascular Cognitive Impairment 2007 Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 279 - 282. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lodder Poststroke Cognition and the Fight Against the Hard Problem: Vascular Neurologists, Enter the Arena! Stroke, January 1, 2007; 38(1): 7 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |