Published online before print August 30, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.484386
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:2759.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
The Increase of Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells After Acute Ischemic Stroke Is Associated With Good Outcome
From the Clinical Neuroscience Research Laboratory (T.S., O.H., M.R.-Y., D.B., O.M., M.B., R.L., J.C.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Department of Pharmacology (M.A.M., I.L.), School of Medicine, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Department of Neurology (M.C.), Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain; Department of Neurosciences (J.F.A., A.D.), Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Correspondence to Prof José Castillo, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. E-mail mecasti{at}usc.es
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background and Purpose— Increased circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) have been associated with a low cardiovascular risk and may be involved in endothelial cell regeneration. The present study was designed to evaluate the prognostic value of EPC in acute ischemic stroke.
Methods— Forty-eight patients with a first-ever nonlacunar ischemic stroke were prospectively included in the study within 12 hours of symptoms onset. Stroke severity was evaluated by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and functional outcome was assessed at 3 months by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Infarct volume growth between admission and days 4 to 7 was measured on multiparametric MRI. EPC colonies were defined as early outgrowth colony-forming unit-endothelial cell (CFU-EC). The increment of CFU-EC was quantified during the first week and defined as the absolute difference between the number of CFU-EC at day 7 and admission. The influence of CFU-EC increase on good functional outcome (mRS 
2) and infarct growth was analyzed by logistic regression and linear models.
Results— Patients with good outcome (n=25) showed a higher CFU-EC increment during the first week (median [quartiles], 23 [11, 36] versus –3 [–7, 1], P<0.0001) compared with patients with poor outcome. CFU-EC increment 
4 during the first week was associated with good functional outcome at 3 months (odds ratio, 30.7; 95% CI, 2.4 to 375.7; P=0.004) after adjustment for baseline stroke severity, ischemic volume and thrombolytic treatment. For each unit increase in the CFU-EC the mean reduction in the growth of infarct volume was 0.39 (0.03 to 0.76) mL (P=0.033).
Conclusions— The increase of circulating EPC after acute ischemic stroke is associated with good functional outcome and reduced infarct growth. These findings suggest that EPC might participate in neurorepair after ischemic stroke.
Key Words: endothelial progenitor cells • ischemic stroke • neovascularization • neurorepair
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), which derive from bone marrow and move to the peripheral blood, have been suggested to be a marker of cardiovascular risk and endothelial function.1,2 The number of circulating EPC has been reported to be decreased in patients with cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking habit, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes and hypertension,3–5 many of which have been identified as prognostic markers of poor outcome after ischemic stroke. Moreover, low EPC number has also been found in patients with unstable angina6 and cerebrovascular disease.7 EPC have been related to endothelial cell regeneration and neovascularization after tissue ischemia.8,9
The mobilization of circulating EPC has been shown to enhance the repair of damaged arteries.10 The transfusion of EPC reduces neointima formation after vascular injury,11 and the transplantation of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction improves ventricular function.12,13 Because EPC have been involved in all these aforementioned repair processes, we tested the hypothesis that EPC might be associated with improved functional outcome and reduced brain injury in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Study Population and Patients Characteristics
Between September 2005 and June 2006, one hundred patients with a first–ever nonlacunar hemispheric cerebral infarction in the territory of the middle cerebral artery of <12 hours duration and previously independent for their daily living activities were prospectively evaluated to be included in the study. Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases (n=6), severe hepatic (n=2) or renal (n=1) diseases, hematological diseases (n=4), cancer (n=3) or infectious disease in the 15 days before inclusion (n=22) were excluded. Eight patients did not accept their participation in the study and 6 patients were lost during follow-up, so a total of 48 patients (male, 50%; mean age, 70.7 (10) years) were finally included in the study.
The protocol was approved by the ethics committee and informed consent was given by patients or their relatives.
Clinical Variables
All patients were admitted in the acute stroke unit and treated by the same stroke team according to the Guidelines of the Cerebrovascular Diseases Study Group of the Spanish Society of Neurology.14 Medical history recording potential vascular risk factors, blood and coagulation tests, 12-lead ECG, chest radiography, and carotid ultrasonography were performed at admission. Stroke subtype was classified according to the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria15 as atherothrombotic (n=8), cardioembolic (n=21), and undetermined (n=19). Fifteen patients received thrombolytic treatment with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) following the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) criteria.
Stroke severity was assessed by certified neurologists (M.B., M.R.-Y.) using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission, at 72 (±24) hours, and at 7 (±1) and 90 (±7) days.16 Functional outcome was evaluated at 3 months using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).
Neuroimaging Studies
All patients had a multiparametric MRI study at admission (median time from stroke onset, 5.6 [2.4, 8.5] hours) and on days 4 to 7. The increase in infarct volume was calculated as the absolute difference between the diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume at baseline and the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) lesion volume on days 4 to 7. Lesion volumes were calculated by using a manual segmentation method: the perimeter of the area of abnormal signal intensity was traced on each diffusion-weighted imaging or FLAIR map, and subsequently the volumetric software estimated the total volume using the thickness and the traced area on each slice; the window level and width were chosen to obtain the best contrast between the lesion and the normal surrounding tissue; each volume calculation was done 3 times, and the mean value was taken as definitive. All neuroimaging evaluations were made by the same neuroradiologist who had no knowledge of the patients’ clinical and laboratory results.
Isolation, Cultivation and Characterization of EPC
A 14-mL sample of venous blood obtained at 5.4 (3.6, 7.4) hours from stroke onset, was used for the isolation of the EPC colonies. The samples were processed within 1 hour after collection by a unique investigator who had no knowledge of the patients’ clinical and radiological results. Mononuclear cells were first isolated from peripheral blood by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation. Five million peripheral-blood mononuclear cells per well were then plated on fibronectin-coated 6-well dishes (BD, BioSciences Discovery Labware) in Endocult Liquid Medium (StemCell Technologies) containing penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 µg/mL) for 2 days, in order to remove the adherent cell population including mature endothelial cells and monocytes. After 2 days, one million of nonadherent cells (which contain the EPC) were harvested and plated on fibronectin-coated 24-well plates (BD BioSciences Discovery Labware) in EndoCult Liquid Medium. Colonies that form 3 days later were counted and classified as early outgrowth colony forming unit—endothelial cell or colony-forming unit-endothelial cell (CFU-EC). A CFU-EC consisted of a central cluster of rounded cells with elongated sprouting cells at the periphery (Figure 1). CFU-EC quantification, in a minimum of 3 wells per sample, was performed at admission, and at days 7 (1) and 90 (7) of evolution. We calculated the increment of EPC colonies during the first week as the absolute difference between the number of CFU-EC at day 7 and admission. Confirmation of the endothelial-cell lineage was performed as previously described.1,7,17 The intraobserver correlation, which was assessed by the unique investigator who analyzed 2 blood samples obtained from a single subject, was 0.96.
|
Outcome Variables
The primary end point was good functional outcome (mRS 2) at 3 months. The absolute improvement in the NIHSS scores between baseline and days 7 and 90, and the increase in infarct volume were evaluated as secondary outcome variables.
Statistical Analysis
The results are expressed as percentages for categorical variables and as mean (SD) or median (quartiles) for the continuous variables depending on their normal distribution or not. Proportions were compared using the 
2 test, and the Student t test or the Mann–Whitney test were used to compare continuous variables between groups. Spearman analysis was used for bivariate correlations.
The influence of the CFU-EC increase on functional outcome was assessed by logistic regression analysis after adjusting for the main baseline variables related to outcome in the univariate analyses (enter approach and probability of entry P<0.05). Because of a lack of linearity, CFU-EC increase was categorized by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results were expressed as adjusted odds ratios with the corresponding 95%CI. The influence of the increment of CFU-EC on the growth of infarct volume, and on the change of NIHSS score, was evaluated by general linear models after adjusting for variables associated in the bivariate comparisons. Tables with bivariate analyses are not shown.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Primary Outcome
Table 1 shows the main characteristics of patients by outcome groups. There was no difference in the number of CFU-EC at baseline between groups, but the number increased significantly at day 7 and 3 months in the good outcome group whereas remained stable during the 3 months follow-up in the poor outcome group (P<0.0001; Figure 2). The median CFU-EC increase during the first week was significantly lower in patients with history of high blood pressure (–1 [–5, 9] versus 21 [3,37]; P<0.0001), whereas it was significantly higher in patients treated with tPA (36 [21,48] versus 0 [–4, 11]; P<0.0001). CFU-EC increase negatively correlated with stroke severity (r=–0.465, P=0.001), body temperature (r=–0.469, P=0.001), serum glucose (r=–0.410, P=0.004) and fibrinogen levels (r=–0.418, P=0.003), and with the diffusion-weighted imaging ischemic lesion (r=–0.364; P=0.011) at baseline. No relationship was found regarding age, sex, history of diabetes, smoking habit, cardiac diseases, time from symptoms onset to sampling, and blood pressure on admission.
|
|
CFU-EC increment of 4 during the first week was associated with good functional outcome at 3 months (odds ratios, 30.7; 95% CI, 2.4 to 375.7; P=0.004) after adjustment for stroke severity and diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume at baseline, and for t-PA treatment (Table 2).
|
Secondary Outcomes
CFU-EC increase correlated with the improvement in the NIHSS score at day 7 (r=–0.535; P<0.0001) and day 90 (r=–0.394; P=0.006). Lineal regression models showed that by each unit increase in the CFU-EC during the first week, the NIHSS showed a mean improvement of –0.12 (95% CI, –0.22 to –0.03; P<0.0001) points at day 7 and of –0.09 (95% CI, –0.20 to –0.01; P=0.012) points at 3 months (Table 3).
|
Figure 3 shows the negative correlation between CFU-EC increase and infarct volume growth during the first week (r=–0.656, P<0.0001). For each unit increase in the CFU-EC the mean reduction in the growth of infarct volume was 0.39 (0.03 to 0.76) mL (P=0.033; Table 4).
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first prospective study which has evaluated the relationship between circulating EPC and brain injury in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Remarkably, the EPC increase during the first week was independently associated with good outcome at 3 months. This favorable effect on the primary variable was supported by positive effects on the reduction of infarct growth and neurological improvement at day 7 and 90.
We have demonstrated that circulating EPC increase in response to cerebral ischemia in patients after acute ischemic stroke, and that the magnitude of this increase is directly related to a better functional outcome. These findings are in line with experimental and human studies which indicate that EPC might mediate endothelial cell regeneration and neovascularization,8,10,11,17 and that EPC participate in the cerebral neovascularization processes present in adult brain after ischemia.9,18,19 The fact that patients with good outcome showed higher CFU-EC number on day 7 and at 3 months, but not at admission, support the hypothesis that EPC can mediate processes of chronic vessel repair and neurorepair. Furthermore, the increment in the EPC during the first week was associated with an improvement in the NIHSS score at the same time. Likewise, a negative correlation exists between CFU-EC increase and infarct volume growth during the first week. However, the mechanisms by which EPC are associated with better neurological and functional outcome and with smaller growth of infarct volume deserve further studies.
Reduced circulating EPC have been associated with several cardiovascular risk factors such as hypercholesterolemia,20 smoking habit,4 diabetes21 and Framingham score,1 and with prognostic factors of acute stroke such as age, heart diseases, stroke severity, elevated blood pressure, serum glucose, fibrinogen and C-reactive protein.4,5,22–24 Some of these factors were associated with a lower increase of EPC during the first week in this study, so we cannot completely rule out a confounding effect of these related variables. However, we did not find a prognostic effect of EPC at baseline, whereas the effect of EPC increment on outcome and infarct volume remained after adjustment for the main prognostic variables. Consequently, our results support the hypothesis that EPC may have an independent beneficial role in acute ischemic stroke.
The higher EPC increase in the small number of patients treated with rt-PA deserves further studies. rt-PA treatment is associated with overexpression of matrix metalloproteinase-9,25 which is a potent stimulator of the increment of circulating EPC.26 Because we did not perform systematic transcranial ultrasound, the potential effect of early recanalization on EPC increase is unknown.
In conclusion, a higher increase in circulating EPC during the first week is independently associated with a better clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients. However, whether circulating EPC are able to incorporate into brain ischemic areas and to promote regenerative vasculogenesis in humans remains to be clarified. Finally, the role of EPC as a new therapeutic tool able to promote chronic neurorepair of brain tissue damaged by ischemia needs to be further explored.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This project has been partially supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science SAF2005-00359, SAF2005-05960, SAF2006-01753, Fundación de Investigación Médica Mútua Madrileña, Xunta de Galicia PGIDIT06BTF91801PR, and Spanish Ministry of Health (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) RETICS-RD06/0026.
Disclosures
None.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Partial results of this investigation were presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in Washington DC, USA (November 2005) and the 15th European Stroke Conference in Brussels, Belgium (May 2006).
Received February 2, 2007; revision received March 28, 2007; accepted April 12, 2007.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JP, Schenke WH, Waclawiw MA, Quyyumi AA, Finkel T. Circulating endotelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 593–600.
2. Werner N, Kosiol S, Schiegl T, Ahlers P, Walenta K, Link A, Böhm M, Nickenig G. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and cardiovascular outcomes. N Eng J Med. 2005; 353: 999–1007.
3. Verma S, Anderson TJ. Fundamentals of endothelial function for the clinical cardiologist. Circulation. 2002; 105: 546–549.
4. Vasa M, Fichtlscherer S, Aicher A, Adler K, Urbich C, Martin H, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Number and migratory activity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells inversely correlate with risk factors for coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2001; 89: e1–e7.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Tepper OM, Galiano RD, Capla JM, Kalka C, Gagne PJ, Jacobowitz GR, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Human endothelial progenitor cells form type II diabetics exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion incorporation into vascular structures. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2781–2786.
6. George J, Goldstein E, Abashidze S, Deutsch V, Schmilovich H, Finkelstein A, Herz I, Miller H, Keren G. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with unstable angina: association with systemic inflammation. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25: 1003–1008.
7. Ghani U, Shuaib A, Salam A, Nasir A, Shuaib U, Jeerakathil T, Sher F, O’Rourke F, Nasser AM, Schwindt B, Todd K. Endothelial progenitor cells during cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. 2005; 36: 151–153.
8. Werner N, Nickenig G. Influence of cardiovascular risk factors on endothelial progenitor cells: limitations for therapy? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 257–266.
9. Zhang ZG, Zhang L, Jiang Q, Chopp M. Bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells participate in cerebral neovascularization after focal cerebral ischemia in the adult mouse. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 284–288.
10. Kong D, Melo LG, Gnecchi M, Zhang L, Mostoslavsky G, Liew CC, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Cytokine-induced mobilization of circulating endothelial progenitor cells enhances repair of injured arteries. Circulation. 2004; 110: 2039–2046.
11. Werner N, Junk S, Laufs U, Link A, Walenta K, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Intravenous transfusion of endothelial progenitor cells reduces neointima formation after vascular injury. Circ Res. 2003; 93: e17–e24.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Assmus B, Schachinger V, Teupe C, Britten M, Lehmann R, Dobert N, Grunwald F, Aicher A, Urbich C, Martin H, Hoelzer D, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Transplantion of Progenitor cells and Regeneration Enhancement in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI). Circulation. 2002; 106: 3009–3017.
13. Assmus B, Honold J, Schachinger V, Britten MB, Fischer-Rasokat U, Lehmann R, Teupe C, Pistorius K, Martin H, Abolmaali ND, Tonn T, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Transcoronary transplantation of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1222–1232.
14. Comité ad hoc del Grupo de Estudio de Enfermedades Cerebrovasculares de la SEN. Guía para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del ictus. Prous Science. Barcelona 2004.
15. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE 3rd. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993; 24: 35–41.
16. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989; 20: 864–870.
17. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275: 964–967.
18. Krupinski J, Kaluza J, Kumar P, Kumar S, Wang JM. Role of angiogenesis in patients with cerebral ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994; 25: 1794–1798.[Abstract]
19. Zhang ZG, Zhang L, Jiang Q, Zhang R, Davies K, Powers C, Bruggen N, Chopp M. VEGF enhances angiogenesis and promotes blood-brain barrier leakage in the ischemic brain. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 829–838.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Chen JZ, Zhang FR, Tao QM, Wang XX, Zhu JH, Zhu JH. Number and activity of endothelial progenitor cells from peripheral blood in patients with hypercholesterolaemia. Clin Sci (Lond). 2004; 107: 273–280.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Loomans CJ, de Koning EJ, Staal FJ, Rookmaaker MB, Verseyden C, de Boer HC, Verhaar MC, Braam B, Rabelink TJ, van Zonneveld AJ. Endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction: a novel concept in the pathogenesis of vascular complications of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004; 53: 195–199.
22. Thijssen DH, Vos JB, Verseyden C, van Zonneveld AJ, Smits P, Sweep FC, Hopman MT, de Boer HC. Haematopoietic stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells in healthy men: effect of aging and training. Aging Cell. 2006; 5: 495–503.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Tyner SD, Venkatachalam S, Choi J, Jones S, Ghebranious N, Igelmann H, Lu X, Soron G, Cooper B, Brayton C, Hee Park S, Thompson T, Karsenty G, Bradley A, Donehower LA. p53 mutant mice that display early ageing-associated phenotypes. Nature. 2002; 415: 45–53.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Krankel N, Adams V, Linke A, Gielen S, Erbs S, Lenk K, Schuler G, Hambrecht R. Hyperglycemia reduces survival and impairs function of circulating blood-derived progenitor cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 698–703.
25. Ning M, Furie KL, Koroshetz WJ, Lee H, Barron M, Lederer M, Wang X, Zhu M, Sorensen AG, Lo EH, Kelly PJ. Association between tPA therapy and raised early matrix metalloproteinase-9 in acute stroke. Neurology. 2006; 66: 1550–1555.
26. Heissig B, Hattori K, Dias S, Friedrich M, Ferris B, Hackett NR, Crystal RG, Besmer P, Lyden D, Moore MA, Werb Z, Rafii S. Recruitment of stem and progenitor cells from the bone marrow niche requires MMP-9 mediated release of kit-ligand. Cell. 2002; 109: 625–637.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. Jickling, A. Salam, A. Mohammad, M. S. Hussain, J. Scozzafava, A. M. Nasser, T. Jeerakathil, A. Shuaib, and R. Camicioli Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Age-Related White Matter Changes Stroke, October 1, 2009; 40(10): 3191 - 3196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Zavada, L. Kideryova, R. Pytlik, Z. Hruskova, and V. Tesar Reduced number of endothelial progenitor cells is predictive of early relapse in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis Rheumatology, October 1, 2009; 48(10): 1197 - 1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. C. Santana Circulating endothelial progenitor cells in ANCA-associated vasculitis: the light at the end of the tunnel? Rheumatology, October 1, 2009; 48(10): 1183 - 1184. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. P.W. Rouhl, R. J. van Oostenbrugge, J. Damoiseaux, J.-W. C. Tervaert, and J. Lodder Endothelial Progenitor Cell Research in Stroke: A Potential Shift in Pathophysiological and Therapeutical Concepts Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 2158 - 2165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S.V. Elkind Endothelial repair capacity and migraine: The fix is in Neurology, April 22, 2008; 70(17): 1506 - 1507. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||