Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:2869-2870
Published online before print August 30, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490227
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/10/2869    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.490227v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - treatment
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke

(Stroke. 2007;38:2869.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cochrane Corner

Rehabilitation for Spatial Neglect Improves Test Performance but Not Disability

Audrey Bowen, BA, MSc, PhD Nadina B. Lincoln, BSc, MSc, PhD

From the University of Manchester (A.B.), UK; and the University of Nottingham (N.B.L.), UK.

Correspondence to Dr Audrey Bowen, Human Communication and Deafness, Humanities Devas Street, University of Manchester, School of Psychological Sciences, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. E-mail audrey.bowen{at}manchester.ac.uk

Graeme J. Hankey MD, FRCP Section Editor


Key Words: attention • neglect • rehabilitation • systematic review


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
*Introduction
down arrowObjective
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowMain Results
down arrowConclusions
 
Unilateral spatial neglect causes difficulty attending to one side of space and adversely affects activities of daily living.


*    Objective
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
*Objective
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowMain Results
down arrowConclusions
 
This updated systematic review examined the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation aimed at spatial neglect after stroke. The primary outcome was at the level of disability (restricted activity), specifically whether any benefits were maintained beyond the end of the intervention. Immediate effects, impairment measures and discharge destination were also investigated.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowObjective
*Materials and Methods
down arrowMain Results
down arrowConclusions
 
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched July 4, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2005), EMBASE (1980 to July 2005), CINAHL (1983 to July 2005), PsycINFO (1974 to July 2005), UK National Research Register (July 2005). We hand-searched relevant journals, screened reference lists, and tracked citations using SCISEARCH. Two reviewers independently selected trials, extracted data, and assessed trial quality. To reduce bias we included only randomized controlled trials (RCT) of neglect rehabilitation. We excluded studies of general stroke rehabilitation and those with mixed patient groups, unless >75% of their sample were stroke patients, or separate stroke data were available.


*    Main Results
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowObjective
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Main Results
down arrowConclusions
 
There were 12 eligible RCTs with 306 participants. Only 4 had adequate allocation concealment, ie, low risk of selection bias. A large number of outcome measures were reported. Only 6 studies measured disability and 2 investigated whether the effects persisted (the primary outcome). The overall effect was not statistically significant (SMD 0.61, 95% CI, –0.42, 1.63).

In contrast, there was improved performance on some, but not all of the secondary outcomes (impairment measures). As shown in the Figure, there was a reduction in the number of errors made on cancellation tests (immediate, 4 studies: SMD, –0.65; 95% CI, –1.28, –0.01; follow up, 3 studies: SMD, –0.76; 95% CI, –1.39, –0.13) and on line bisection (immediate, 4 studies, SMD, –0.84; 95% CI, –1.36, –0.33; follow up, 1 study: SMD, –1.09; 95% CI, –2.0, –0.18). Discharge destination (1 study) was not significant (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.45, 4.35).


Figure 1490227
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure. Neglect rehabilitation reduces the errors made on cancellation tests, measured immediately postintervention and at follow-up.


*    Conclusions
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowObjective
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowMain Results
*Conclusions
 
Several types of neglect specific approaches are now described in the literature. They can alter performance on impairment measures and warrant further investigation in high quality randomized controlled trials. Training in visual scanning was the approach most often related to improving performance detecting and cancelling visual targets or bisecting lines. Prism use (simply wearing prisms rather than prism adaptation training) was also successfully used in 1 study but outcome was not measured after the intervention ended, so we do not know whether prism effects persist. However, there is insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of any of these approaches at reducing disability, the main aim of rehabilitation. It is essential that future trials are adequately powered and choose outcome measures that determine effects on disability that persist beyond the end of the intervention. Because we did not review whether patients with neglect benefited from rehabilitation input in general, patients with neglect should continue to receive general stroke rehabilitation services. This Cochrane review is ongoing and the authors would be grateful to receive information about on-going trials.

Note: The full text of this review should be cited as: Bowen A, Lincoln NB. Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007; Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003586. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003586.pub2.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

None.

Received April 4, 2007; accepted April 11, 2007.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/10/2869    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.490227v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - treatment
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke