Published online before print September 27, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.487264
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:2873.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Carotid Atherosclerosis Is a Stronger Predictor of Myocardial Infarction in Women Than in Men
A 6-Year Follow-Up Study of 6226 Persons: The Tromsø Study
From the Departments of Neurology (S.H.J., E.B.M., O.J., E.S.) and Cardiology (M.-L.L.), University Hospital North-Norway, Tromsø, Norway; and the Institute of Clinical Medicine (E.B.M., O.J., E.S.) and the Institute of Community Medicine (T.W., M.-L.L., I.N., E.A.), University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Correspondence to Stein Harald Johnsen, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, University Hospital North-Norway, N-9038 Tromsø, Norway. E-mail Stein.Johnsen{at}ism.uit.no
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background and Purpose— Ultrasound of carotid arteries provides measures of intima media thickness (IMT) and plaque, both widely used as surrogate measures of cardiovascular disease. Although IMT and plaques are highly intercorrelated, the relationship between carotid plaque and IMT and cardiovascular disease has been conflicting. In this prospective, population-based study, we measured carotid IMT, total plaque area, and plaque echogenicity as predictors for first-ever myocardial infarction (MI).
Methods— IMT, total plaque area, and plaque echogenicity were measured in 6226 men and women aged 25 to 84 years with no previous MI. The subjects were followed for 6 years and incident MI was registered.
Results— During follow-up, MI occurred in 6.6% of men and 3.0% of women. The adjusted relative risk (RR; 95% CI) between the highest plaque area tertile versus no plaque was 1.56 (1.04 to 2.36) in men and 3.95 (2.16 to 7.19) in women. In women, there was a significant trend toward a higher MI risk with more echolucent plaque. The adjusted RR (95% CI) in the highest versus lowest IMT quartile was 1.73 (0.98 to 3.06) in men and 2.86 (1.07 to 7.65) in women. When we excluded bulb IMT from analyses, IMT did not predict MI in either sex.
Conclusions— In a general population, carotid plaque area was a stronger predictor of first-ever MI than was IMT. Carotid atherosclerosis was a stronger risk factor for MI in women than in men. In women, the risk of MI increased with plaque echolucency.
Key Words: carotid arteries • echogenicity • epidemiology • myocardial infarction • plaque • sex • ultrasonics
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Autopsy and ultrasound studies have shown a close relationship between atherosclerosis in the carotid and coronary arteries.1,2 B-mode ultrasound of carotid arteries provides measures of intima media thickness (IMT) and the presence of plaques, both widely used as surrogate measures of cardiovascular disease. Although IMT and plaques are highly intercorrelated,3,4 the role of IMT in the atherosclerotic process has been questioned, especially when measurements include the common carotid artery (CCA) only.5,6 IMT has usually been measured in the CCA because high measurement precision is easily obtained from this artery. However, plaques are rare in this arterial segment. Plaques usually occur at sites of nonlaminar turbulent flow such as in the carotid bulb and the proximal internal carotid segment.7 The pathological processes leading to intima media thickening in the distal CCA and to plaque formation may therefore not be similar, and plaque and intima media thickening may reflect different aspects of atherogenesis with distinctive relations to clinical disease.6,8–10 Diffuse intima media thickening is associated with end-organ disease and probably reflects an adaptive hypertrophic response of mainly medial cells associated with age and hypertension, whereas plaque formation is largely a result of a pathological process in the intima.10 Studies on the relationship between IMT and coronary heart disease have been conflicting.11 IMT has been found to be a better predictor of stroke than of ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarction (MI).6,9 Moreover, IMT has been found to correlate closer with left ventricular mass12,13 than with coronary artery disease.5,14 Arterial plaques represent a later stage of atherogenesis related to endothelial dysfunction, oxidation, inflammation, and cell proliferation.15 Carotid plaque morphology assessed by either ultrasound or angiography is related to coronary plaque morphology and coronary morbidity.16,17 In this large, prospective population-based ultrasound study, we studied carotid IMT and plaque (area and echogenicity) in relation to first-ever MI.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Subjects
The Tromsø Study is a population-based prospective study with repeated health surveys in the municipality of Tromsø, Norway. In 1994 to 1995, all men and women aged 55 to 74 years, and 5% to 10% samples of the remaining 5-year birth cohorts aged 25 and above, were eligible for ultrasound examination. This was done in 6727 subjects, 77% of the eligible population. The Regional Committee for Research Ethics approved the study, and informed consent for research was obtained from 6645 of the participants who were scanned with ultrasound. At the baseline examination, 412 persons had a verified MI and were excluded from the study as were 7 persons who attended the survey but were not inhabitants of Tromsø. The remaining 6226 persons were followed from the date of ultrasound examination until December 31, 2000. Mean follow-up was 5.4 years (median, 5.8 years).
Baseline Data
Information about smoking habits, prevalent diabetes mellitus, angina pectoris, previous MI, stroke, and use of antihypertensive- and lipid-lowering drugs was collected from self-administered questionnaires. Standardized measurements of height and weight were done. Specially trained personnel recorded blood pressure with an automatic device (Dinamap Vital Signs Monitor, Tampa, Fla). Nonfasting serum total cholesterol and triglycerides were analyzed by enzymatic colorimetric methods with commercial kits (CHOD-PAP for cholesterol and GPO-PAP for triglycerides; Boehringer-Mannheim). Serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was measured after the precipitation of lower-density lipoprotein with heparin and manganese chloride. We measured fibrinogen with the PT-Fibrinogen reagent (Instrumentation Laboratory). Monocytes and white blood cells were counted with automated cell counters by standard techniques. Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure were measured twice with an interval of 4 to 12 weeks and the average of these values was used in analyses. The Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital North-Norway, Tromsø, did the blood analyses.
Definition and Ascertainment of End Points
The outcome was first nonfatal or fatal MI. Acute coronary events were categorized according to symptoms, electrocardiographic changes, and levels of cardiac biomarkers. A detailed description of the end point definitions of MI is available in the supplemental Appendix, available online at http://stroke.ahajournals.org. All participants were linked to the Population Registry of Norway to identify subjects who had died and emigrants. Causes of deaths were retrieved from the official Causes of Death Registry. To classify possible out-of-hospital fatal MIs, including sudden death, medical records, death certificates, and autopsy records were reviewed. Nonfatal events were primarily based on review of hospital records. Follow-up time was assigned from the date of screening until December 31, 2000, with date of first MI, death, or migration as censoring dates.
Ultrasonography
Details about the ultrasound methods and reproducibility have been published.18,19 Briefly, high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography was performed with a duplex scanner (Acuson Xp10 128, ART-upgraded) equipped with a 7.5-MHz linear array transducer. The far and near walls of the right CCA, bulb, and internal carotid artery (6 locations) were scanned for the presence of plaques. For each plaque, a still image was recorded. Still plaque images were digitized using the Matrox Meteor II frame grabber card and Matrox Intellicam v2.07 software at a resolution of 768x576 pixels.19 After image digitizing, the following steps were performed with the software Adobe Photoshop v7.0: plaque echogenicity was assessed by the gray scale median (GSM) using the histogram function. GSMs of the lumen and adventitia were used as reference structures. Each plaque was then outlined with the Lasso tool, and the cropped image was then standardized against lumen and adventitia using the "levels" function. The plaque areas were calculated as pixel values. For the resolution used in the present study, a plaque area of 167 pixels corresponded to 1 mm2. In subjects with more than one plaque, the sum of plaque areas was taken as the total plaque area and GSM of the total plaque area was estimated as a weighted mean of the GSM value of each single plaque. Plaque echogenicity was also graded visually from low (1) to high (4) echogenicity.18 Automated measurement of IMT was performed in the near and far walls of the CCA and the far wall of the bulb.20 Measurements of IMT were performed in 10-mm segments, and mean IMT from the 3 preselected images was calculated for each location. Plaques were included in measurements of IMT. We used the average of mean IMT of the 3 locations as well as the mean IMT values of the CCA only.
Statistical Analyses
Between-group differences were estimated by analysis of variance. Significance of trends was tested using linear regression. The risk of fatal or nonfatal MI in different plaque groups was compared by life-table analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to model the outcome MI as a function of ultrasound measurements and baseline cardiovascular risk factors. The interaction between sex and plaque area, plaque echogenicity and IMT were included in the models in separate analyses. The SAS software package was used (SAS, V9). A 2-sided P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
IMT was measured in 2971 men and 3208 women. Plaque(s) was found in 1529 men (53%) and 1439 women (44%; Table 1). The distribution of plaques in different arterial segments was: CCA, 6% in men and 3% in women; bulb, 45% in men and 37% in women; and internal carotid artery, 18% in men and 15% in women. Men had larger total plaque area, lower plaque echogenicity, and a thicker intima media layer than women. Other baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.
|
During follow-up, incident MI was registered in 198 (6.6%) men and 97 (3.0%) women. In both sexes, the MI incidence increased by increasing total plaque area (Table 2; Figure 1). The male-to-female ratio for MI was highest in persons without plaques and decreased gradually by increasing plaque area. The sex ratio was somewhat attenuated when adjusting for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with no further attenuation when adjusting for plaque echogenicity. In men, the unadjusted RR for MI was nearly 3 times higher in the top tertile compared with those without plaques, whereas in women, this risk increased more than 7-fold (Table 2). The age-adjusted RR (95% CI) was 2.06 (1.41 to 3.00) in men and 4.75 (2.71 to 8.33) in women. In multivariable models, total plaque area was still a significant predictor in both men and women (RR for highest tertile versus no plaque 1.56 [1.04 to 2.36] and 3.95 [2.16 to 7.19], respectively).
|
|
GSM of the total plaque mass was associated with plaque area in women, because larger plaques tended to be more echolucent (lower GSM). In women, but not men, there was a slightly higher risk for MI with lower GSM (more echolucent plaques; Table 3). The unadjusted RR for MI was more than 5 times higher in women in the lowest GSM tertile than in women without plaque. The risk estimates remained significant after multivariable adjustment.
|
In men and women, the risk of MI increased with increasing IMT (Table 4; Figure 2). The unadjusted RR for MI in men was >4 times higher in the upper IMT quartile compared with the lowest, whereas in women, this risk increased more than 9-fold. Adjustment for age weakened the RR to 2.56 (1.51 to 4.36) in men and 3.80 (1.44 to 9.99) in women. In multivariable models, IMT was still a significant predictor in women (RR for highest versus lowest quartile 2.86 [1.07 to 7.65]) and borderline significant in men (RR for highest versus lowest quartile 1.73 [0.98 to 3.06]). In age-adjusted analyses restricted to the CCA–IMT only, CCA–IMT was a significant predictor of MI in men (RR for highest versus lowest quartile 2.88 [1.64 to 5.06]) but not in women (RR 2.05 [0.91 to 4.59]). In fully adjusted models, CCA–IMT did not predict MI either in men or women (P for trend 0.1 and 0.2, respectively).
|
|
To study whether sex was an effect modifier in the association between carotid atherosclerosis and MI, the possible interactions between sex and our markers of carotid atherosclerosis (plaque area, plaque echogenicity, and IMT) were tested in full Cox models. Both for plaque area and plaque echogenicity, the interaction term was significant in the sex- and age-adjusted model (P=0.002) as well as in the fully adjusted model (P=0.01). The interaction term for IMT was not statistically significant (P=0.1, P=0.4).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The extent of atherosclerosis in the carotid artery, measured either as thickening of the intima media layer or as total plaque area, predicted independently first-ever MI in our study. This confirms previous findings.10,21,22 However, the association between IMT and MI was weaker, especially in women, than between total plaque area and MI. When the analyses were confined to CCA–IMT, no independent relationship between IMT and MI could be demonstrated in either sex. It has been suggested that measurement of IMT at the CCA alone is a reasonable alternative to more detailed and technically difficult measurements at other arterial sites. Reported findings have demonstrated inconsistent association among IMT, risk factors, and clinical disease depending on which arterial segments are measured.5,8,11 In cross-sectional studies, CCA–IMT was reported to be strongly associated with risk factors for stroke and with prevalent stroke, whereas IMT measured in the carotid bulb and plaque presence was associated with cardiovascular risk factors and prevalent ischemic heart disease.6 In our study, the adjusted risk estimates for plaque area and IMT were very similar in men. In contrast, plaque area was a stronger predictor than IMT in women. When analyses were restricted to the CCA–IMT only, the trend was weakened and no longer reached significance either in men or women. This is in line with previous findings6 and probably reflects the differences in the pathological processes leading to intima media thickening of the distal part of CCA and plaque formation in the coronary arteries, whereas plaque formation in the carotid and coronary arteries are more closely related.23
Coronary and carotid plaques are thought to have similar atherogenesis.24 In a study of asymptomatic hypercholesterolemic patients, carotid plaque demonstrated by B-mode ultrasound significantly improved the diagnostic specificity of exercise electrocardiography in predicting atherosclerotic lesions by coronary angiography.25 May plaque morphology assessed in one arterial territory reflect the individual’s plaque morphology in other arterial territories due to a common underlying systemic factor? This possibility has been suggested earlier.16,17,26,27 A common inflammatory link for plaque activation in carotid and coronary plaques has been proposed based on high C-reactive protein levels in patients with coronary artery disease and echolucent carotid plaques.17,28 In women, we observed a trend toward a higher risk of MI with more echolucent plaque, even after adjusting for plaque area. No clear relationship between plaque echogenicity and risk of MI was seen in men. This is in contrast to clinical studies demonstrating that echolucent or unstable carotid plaques predicted coronary plaque complexity and the development of future coronary complications in patients with stable coronary artery disease.17,27 The natural history of an atherosclerotic plaque seems to be that it becomes more fibrous (echogenic) over time.29 Plaque occurrence in carotid and coronary arteries is highly correlated; however, plaques apparently develop later in life in the carotids than in the aorta and coronary arteries.30 Therefore, at one point in time, the stage of plaque development in the 2 arterial territories may differ. In our cohort, men and women were of the same age. Men develop atherosclerosis earlier than women and we can therefore assume that the men in this study have more longlasting and fibrous atherosclerosis than women. This might have influenced the plaque stability and the risk for plaque rupture and clinical events in men. Moreover, studies that reported a relationship between carotid and coronary plaque echogenicity were often based on selected patient groups with clinical coronary artery disease, reflecting more advanced atherosclerosis than would be expected in a general population.
Sex-related differences are becoming increasingly recognized as potentially important factors in atherosclerosis.31 Whereas the prevalence of angina pectoris is similar among men and women, men have a higher incidence of MI and myocardial death than women at any age.32 This divergence in sex ratios between angina pectoris and MI remains unexplained. For both IMT and plaque area, the RR estimates in our study were stronger in women than in men, although men had more atherosclerosis and MI. When carotid atherosclerosis was present, women seemed to carry a higher risk of future MI than men. This is probably due to the fact that women with little atherosclerosis have a very low risk for MI as compared with men. A previous study found a stronger association between carotid plaque area and the combined outcome of stroke, MI, and vascular death in women than in men.33 A similar finding was also reported in the ARIC study.21 As demonstrated in Table 2, the male-to-female ratio for MI was highest in the no-plaque group and lowest tertile and thereafter decreased. In these subjects, other factors than the burden of atherosclerosis may explain the sex difference in MI such as sex differences in plaque properties and interaction among plaque content, platelet activation, and the coagulation system. Previous studies reported higher relative risk ratios for daily smoking and low high-density lipoprotein levels in women than in men.21,34 In this study, the RR estimate for current versus never smoking were 2.7 (1.8 to 4.0) for women and 1.8 (1.4 to 2.4) for men (P<0.0001). For high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <0.9 mmol/L, the corresponding risk estimates were 0.7 (0.1 to 4.8) and 2.2 (1.4 to 3.4).
Strengths of this study are the prospective design, the long follow-up time, few dropouts, and a high quality of the end point registration. A strict definition of MI was used and the end points were verified by meticulous study of hospital records and death certificates by physicians. Both plaque size (area) and echogenicity were measured as continuous variables, and measurement of plaque area provides an accurate and comprehensive measure of atherosclerosis.10,35 Plaque area may be a more representative measure of the atherosclerotic burden than plaque thickness or IMT because much of the plaque growth occurs longitudinally along the vessel wall.36 A potential shortcoming of this study is that only one carotid artery was studied. Inclusion of the left carotid and the femoral arteries might have given a better description of the individual plaque burden. The numbers of events are relatively low, especially in women (altogether 97 events in women, plaque features measured in only 44% of them), and the results should therefore be interpreted with some caution.
We conclude that in a general population, carotid plaque area and IMT independently predict the risk of first ever MI. IMT analyses of the CCA only did not predict MI. In women with the most advanced carotid atherosclerosis, the risk of MI compared with those without plaque was more than twice the corresponding risk in men. In women, there was a significant trend toward a higher risk of MI with increasing plaque echolucency. Demonstration of carotid plaques provides important additional information about future risk of coronary events, at least in women.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This study was supported by grants from the Norwegian Research Council and was conducted in collaboration with the Norwegian Health Screening Services, Oslo, Norway. The Regional Committee for Research Ethics approved the study and informed consent was obtained from all the participants.
Disclosures
None.
Received March 15, 2007; revision received May 1, 2007; accepted May 2, 2007.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Young W, Gofman JW, Tandy R, Malamud N, Waters ESG. The quantitation of atherosclerosis. III. The extent of correlation of degrees of atherosclerosis within and between the coronary and cerebral vascular beds. Am J Cardiol. 1960; 6: 300–308.[CrossRef]
2. Wofford JL, Kahl FR, Howard GR, McKinney WM, Toole JF, Crouse JR III. Relation of extent of extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis as measured by B-mode ultrasound to the extent of coronary atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991; 11: 1786–1794.
3. Bonithon-Kopp C, Touboul PJ, Berr C, Leroux C, Mainard F, Courbon D, Ducimetiere P. Relation of intima-media thickness to atherosclerotic plaques in carotid arteries. The Vascular Aging (EVA) Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996; 16: 310–316.
4. Bots ML, Hofman A, De Jong PT, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness as an indicator of atherosclerosis at other sites of the carotid artery. The Rotterdam Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1996; 6: 147–153.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Adams MR, Nakagomi A, Keech A, Robinson J, McCredie R, Bailey BP, Freedman SB, Celermajer DS. Carotid intima-media thickness is only weakly correlated with the extent and severity of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1995; 92: 2127–2134.
6. Ebrahim S, Papacosta O, Whincup P, Wannamethee G, Walker M, Nicolaides AN, Dhanjil S, Griffin M, Belcaro G, Rumley A, Lowe GD. Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: the British Regional Heart Study. Stroke. 1999; 30: 841–850.
7. Glagov S, Zarins C, Giddens DP, Ku DN. Hemodynamics and atherosclerosis. Insights and perspectives gained from studies of human arteries. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988; 112: 1018–1031.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Savage PJ, Borhani NO, Kittner SJ, Tracy R, Gardin JM, Price TR, Furberg CD. Thickening of the carotid wall. A marker for atherosclerosis in the elderly? Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Stroke. 1996; 27: 224–231.
9. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 1997; 96: 1432–1437.
10. Spence JD. Measurement of intima-media thickness vs. carotid plaque: uses in patient care, genetic research and evaluation of new therapies. International Journal of Stroke. 2006; 1: 216–221.[CrossRef]
11. del Sol AI, Moons KG, Hollander M, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Grobbee DE, Breteler MM, Witteman JC, Bots ML. Is carotid intima-media thickness useful in cardiovascular disease risk assessment? The Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 2001; 32: 1532–1538.
12. Cuspidi C, Lonati L, Sampieri L, Pelizzoli S, Pontiggia G, Leonetti G, Zanchetti A. Left ventricular concentric remodelling and carotid structural changes in essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1996; 14: 1441–1446.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Linhart A, Gariepy J, Giral P, Levenson J, Simon A. Carotid artery and left ventricular structural relationship in asymptomatic men at risk for cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 1996; 127: 103–112.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Megnien JL, Simon A, Gariepy J, Denarie N, Cocaul M, Linhart A, Levenson J. Preclinical changes of extracoronary arterial structures as indicators of coronary atherosclerosis in men. J Hypertens. 1998; 16: 157–163.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Hegele RA. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Clin Chim Acta. 1996; 246: 21–38.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Rothwell PM, Villagra R, Gibson R, Donders RC, Warlow CP. Evidence of a chronic systemic cause of instability of atherosclerotic plaques. Lancet. 2000; 355: 19–24.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Honda O, Sugiyama S, Kugiyama K, Fukushima H, Nakamura S, Koide S, Kojima S, Hirai N, Kawano H, Soejima H, Sakamoto T, Yoshimura M, Ogawa H. Echolucent carotid plaques predict future coronary events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 1177–1184.
18. Joakimsen O, Bønaa KH, Stensland-Bugge E. Reproducibility of ultrasound assessment of carotid plaque occurrence, thickness, and morphology. The Tromsø Study. Stroke. 1997; 28: 2201–2207.
19. Fosse E, Johnsen SH, Stensland-Bugge E, Joakimsen O, Mathiesen EB, Arnesen E, Njølstad I. Repeated visual and computer-assisted carotid plaque characterization in a longitudinal population-based ultrasound study: the Tromsø study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006; 32: 3–11.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Stensland-Bugge E, Bønaa KH, Joakimsen O. Reproducibility of ultrasonographically determined intima-media thickness is dependent on arterial wall thickness. The Tromsø Study. Stroke. 1997; 28: 1972–1980.
21. Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, Rosamond W, Szklo M, Sharrett AR, Clegg LX. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987–1993. Am J Epidemiol. 1997; 146: 483–494.
22. Geroulakos G, O’Gorman DJ, Kalodiki E, Sheridan DJ, Nicolaides AN. The carotid intima-media thickness as a marker of the presence of severe symptomatic coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 1994; 15: 781–785.
23. Spence JD, Hegele RA. Noninvasive phenotypes of atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: e188.
24. Craven TE, Ryu JE, Espeland MA, Kahl FR, McKinney WM, Toole JF, McMahan MR, Thompson CJ, Heiss G, Crouse JR III. Evaluation of the associations between carotid artery atherosclerosis and coronary artery stenosis. A case–control study. Circulation. 1990; 82: 1230–1242.
25. Giral P, Bruckert E, Dairou F, Boubrit K, Drobinski G, Chapman JM, Beucler I, Turpin G. Usefulness in predicting coronary artery disease by ultrasonic evaluation of the carotid arteries in asymptomatic hypercholesterolemic patients with positive exercise stress tests. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84: 14–17.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Cohen A, Tzourio C, Bertrand B, Chauvel C, Bousser MG, Amarenco P. Aortic plaque morphology and vascular events: a follow-up study in patients with ischemic stroke. FAPS Investigators. French Study of Aortic Plaques in Stroke. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3838–3841.
27. Saito D, Shiraki T, Oka T, Kajiyama A, Doi M, Masaka T. Morphologic correlation between atherosclerotic lesions of the carotid and coronary arteries in patients with angina pectoris. Jpn Circ J. 1999; 63: 522–526.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Lombardo A, Biasucci LM, Lanza GA, Coli S, Silvestri P, Cianflone D, Liuzzo G, Burzotta F, Crea F, Maseri A. Inflammation as a possible link between coronary and carotid plaque instability. Circulation. 2004; 109: 3158–3163.
29. Stary HC. Natural history and histological classification of atherosclerotic lesions: an update. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 1177–1178.
30. Solberg LA, McGarry PA, Moossy J, Tejada C, Løken AC, Robertson WB, Donoso S. Distribution of cerebral atherosclerosis by geographic location, race, and sex. Lab Invest. 1968; 18: 604–612.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Shaw LJ, Lewis JF, Hlatky MA, Hsueh WA, Kelsey SF, Klein R, Manolio TA, Sharrett AR, Tracy RP. Women’s Ischemic Syndrome Evaluation: current status and future research directions: report of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute workshop: October 2–4, 2002: section 5: gender-related risk factors for ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 2004; 109: e56–e58.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J. 1986; 111: 383–390.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Iemolo F, Martiniuk A, Steinman DA, Spence JD. Sex differences in carotid plaque and stenosis. Stroke. 2004; 35: 477–481.
34. Njølstad I, Arnesen E, Lund-Larsen PG. Smoking, serum lipids, blood pressure, and sex differences in myocardial infarction: a 12-year follow-up of the Finnmark Study. Circulation. 1996; 93: 450–456.
35. Spence JD, Eliasziw M, DiCicco M, Hackam DG, Galil R, Lohmann T. Carotid plaque area: a tool for targeting and evaluating vascular preventive therapy. Stroke. 2002; 33: 2916–2922.
36. Spence JD. Technology Insight: ultrasound measurement of carotid plaque—patient management, genetic research, and therapy evaluation. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006; 2: 611–619.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. Helfand, D. I. Buckley, M. Freeman, R. Fu, K. Rogers, C. Fleming, and L. L. Humphrey Emerging Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease: A Summary of Systematic Reviews Conducted for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med, October 6, 2009; 151(7): 496 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Zanchetti, M. Hennig, R. Hollweck, G. Bond, R. Tang, C. Cuspidi, G. Parati, R. Facchetti, and G. Mancia Baseline Values but Not Treatment-Induced Changes in Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Predict Incident Cardiovascular Events in Treated Hypertensive Patients: Findings in the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA) Circulation, September 22, 2009; 120(12): 1084 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. D. Spence Is Carotid Intima-Media Thickness a Reliable Clinical Predictor? Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2008; 83(11): 1299 - 1300. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 How Good Are Surrogate Measures of Coronary Artery Disease? Journal Watch Cardiology, November 14, 2007; 2007(1114): 3 - 3. [Full Text]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||