| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:642.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Inflammation and Stroke: Introduction |
From the Departments of Neurology (S.J., M.S.) and Diagnostic Radiology (A.S.), Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Correspondence to Sebastian Jander, Department of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mail jander{at}uni-duesseldorf.de
Abstract
Brain inflammation holds promise as a therapeutic target in subacute stages of ischemic stroke. At the cellular level, postischemic inflammation is dominated by cells of the innate immune system with resident microglia/brain macrophages and blood-derived monocytes/macrophages being the most important cell types involved. Iron oxide nanoparticles such as ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) are novel cell-specific contrast agents for MRI. After intravenous injection USPIO is taken up by circulating phagocytic cells. USPIO-laden macrophages cause typical signal changes in MRI of infarcted brain parenchyma, which has been demonstrated in studies of both experimental ischemia and human stroke. USPIO-enhanced MRI may therefore represent an important tool to address the role of macrophages for ischemic lesion development both in basic science and clinical studies.
Key Words: acute stroke animal models basic science inflammation magnetic resonance
Ischemic stroke is the most frequent cause of persistent neurologic disability in modern Western societies. Therapeutic intervention through systemic or local thrombolysis is currently only possible in a narrow time window of 3 to 6 hours after stroke.1,2 However, a large body of evidence suggests that stroke-induced brain damage progresses during subacute stages up to several days after the insult,3 causing delayed expansion of the infarctions4,5 along with clinical worsening or impaired recovery. In addition, a considerable proportion of stroke patients reaches hospital treatment well beyond the early time window for thrombolysis therapy. Thus, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies that could be applied in later stages of ischemic lesion development.
Local brain inflammation is a pathologic hallmark of ischemic stroke lesions6,7 and is spatiotemporally related to the occurrence of delayed apoptotic cell death.8 At the cellular level, postischemic inflammation is dominated by cells of the innate, nonspecific immune system with resident microglia/brain macrophages and blood-derived monocytes/macrophages being the most important cell types involved (Figure 1). Microglia is activated within minutes of ischemia onset and produces a plethora of inflammatory mediators, which exacerbate tissue damage,911 but may also protect the brain against ischemic and excitotoxic injury.1214 In contrast to the rapid microglia response, blood-derived macrophages are recruited with a delay of at least 24 to 48 hours.1517 At these later stages, the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines is already downregulated,18 whereas various antiinflammatory and protective factors are progressively expressed.19,20 Thus, inflammatory responses to brain ischemia are heterogeneous with respect to temporal pattern, the cell types involved, and the pathophysiological implications.
|
Several approaches for antiinflammatory or immunomodulatory treatment have proven effective in animal stroke models.2123 However, attempts to translate this into successful clinical application have failed so far.24 Possible reasons are the heterogeneity of underlying pathomechanisms and the uncertain time window at which inflammation could be targeted in the human disease situation. In other inflammatory central nervous system diseases such as multiple sclerosis, monitoring of inflammatory lesion activity through gadolinium-enhanced MRI has greatly contributed to the development of immunomodulatory therapy.25 However, work in experimental stroke models showed that multimodal MRI comprising diffusion- and perfusion-weighted as well as gadolinium-enhanced imaging is not able to discriminate inflamed from noninflamed infarct subareas.26 Thus, there is considerable interest in the development of novel techniques for the noninvasive detection of brain inflammation in stroke and other central nervous system pathologies.
Iron Oxide Nanoparticle-Enhanced MRI: Experimental Findings
Already several years ago, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles have been introduced as cell-specific contrast agents that can be injected intravenously and are taken up by cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system.27 Based on particle size, one can distinguish superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO;
60 to 150 nm diameter) from ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO;
20 to 50 nm). SPIO particles are rapidly phagocytosed by cells of the reticuloendothelial system in liver and spleen leading to rapid clearance from the blood pool after intravenous injection. In contrast, circulation times of USPIO are considerably longer which, at least in theory, favors the interaction with phagocyte populations in the blood and lymph nodes. Accordingly, USPIO agents such as Ferumoxtran-10 (Combidex, Sinerem) are in advanced clinical development for lymph node imaging.28 whereas SPIO particles such as ferumoxide (Endorem, Resovist) have been approved for liver imaging. Despite these differences, both types of contrast agents have been successfully used in the study of inflammatory processes in brain ischemia,2934 central nervous system autoimmune disease,3538 and traumatic nerve lesions.39 Additional applications include the tracking of in vitro prelabeled stem cells on transplantation into the lesioned central nervous system.40
In experimental brain ischemia, Rausch and coworkers were the first to use USPIO for macrophage imaging in a model of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO).29 In this study, ferumoxtran-10 was injected intravenously into rats at 5 hours after pMCAO followed by repeated MRI on days 1, 2, 4, and 7. On T2-weighted images, patchy areas of signal loss in the infarctions were found until day 4 and decreased thereafter. Essentially similar findings were obtained in a transient ischemia model.30 Photochemically induced ischemia is another model of ischemic stroke characterized by the permanent occlusion of cortical microvessels, which has the advantage of circumscribed, highly reproducible lesions.41,42 Using this model, several studies showed accumulation of iron oxide particles in the infarct border zone during subacute stages of lesion development.31,33,34 Importantly, iron-related signal changes on MRI were paralleled by macrophage-associated iron deposition detected histochemically on postmortem brain sections. In the study by Kleinschnitz et al,31 SPIO injection between days 5 and 6 after ischemia, but not at earlier time points, caused typical signal loss on T2*-weighted images obtained 24 hours after injection. Thus, based on the assumption that SPIO was primarily taken up by circulating phagocytes, this study suggests that infiltration of SPIO-laden macrophages occurred to a significant extent only at the end of the first week after ischemia. This is in line with earlier results suggesting that the recruitment of hematogenous macrophages likewise occurs in a narrow time interval between days 3 and 6 after ischemia.1517 Collectively, these findings demonstrate that appropriate timing of contrast agent injection and subsequent MRI is of critical importance for iron oxide particle-based macrophage imaging in brain ischemia.
Microglia and macrophage responses are segregated not only with respect to time, but to some extent also spatially. After focal cortical ischemia, there is secondary involvement of the ipsilateral thalamus attributable to retrograde degeneration of thalamocortical projection fibers.4345 In these areas of delayed degeneration, strong and longlasting microglia activation develops, whereas hematogenous macrophages are largely excluded. In the studies reported so far, iron oxide particle-related signal changes were restricted to the primary lesion site and not observed in the thalamus. These observations further support the concept that particle uptake occurs peripherally with subsequent infiltration of iron-laden cells into the lesioned central nervous system parenchyma. Thereby, iron oxide particle-enhanced MRI potentially differs from positron-emission tomography with [11C]PK11195 as a radioactive ligand to peripheral-type benzodiazepine-binding sites on mononuclear phagocytes. Previous studies showed increased binding of [11C]PK11195 in the thalamus ipsilateral to a cortical MCA infarction indicating that [11C]PK11195positron-emission tomography detects microglia responses in the degenerating areas.43,44 USPIO uptake and [11C]PK11195 binding may therefore reflect distinct aspects of the cellular inflammatory response to brain ischemia.
Clinical Trial of Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced MRI in Human Stroke
Based on the experimental findings, we conducted an open-label clinical phase II pilot trial of USPIO-enhanced MRI in 10 consecutive patients with early ischemic stroke.32 In our study, USPIO contrast agent was infused 5 to 6 days after stroke onset, which corresponds to the presumed period of hematogenous macrophage recruitment15,31 and infarct expansion shown in quantitative MRI analysis.4,5 In line with preclinical safety studies,46 USPIO infusions were well tolerated by all patients. To delineate lesion extension, all patients underwent initial stroke MRI, including diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging, within 24 hours after stroke. To define the pattern of gadolinium-based contrast medium enhancement, a first follow-up gadolinium-enhanced MRI was performed 4 to 5 days after symptom onset (ie, 24 hours before USPIO infusion). Two additional scans were obtained at 24 and 48 hours after USPIO infusion. As the main finding, we observed consistent USPIO-related signal changes in all 10 patients, whereas gadolinium enhancement only occurred in three patients. Thus, USPIO enhancement was not a mere epiphenomenon of bloodbrain barrier breakdown. Interestingly, our study revealed two distinct components of USPIO-related signal changes, one associated with blood vessels and one representing parenchymal enhancement (Figure 2). Vessel-associated changes appeared as signal loss on T2/T2*-weighted images and decreased from the first to second scan after USPIO infusion, most likely reflecting a transient blood pool effect of the contrast agent. Conversely, parenchymal enhancement was mainly evident on T1-weighted images, increased over time, and matched with the expected distribution of macrophages. We therefore suggest that the increasing USPIO enhancement on T1-weighted images indicates brain infiltration by USPIO-laden macrophages. Similar to our findings, Dousset and colleagues47 recently reported prominent signal changes on T1- rather than on T2*-weighted images in patients with multiple sclerosis. The reasons for the distinct USPIO-related signal patterns on T1- versus T2*-weighted images are currently unknown.
|
Open Questions and Perspectives
The studies summarized here raise the perspective that USPIO-enhanced MRI may provide a novel in vivo surrogate marker of cellular inflammation in stroke and other central nervous system pathologies. There are a number of open questions that require further study. First of all, the assumption that circulating monocyte-derived phagocytes act as the principal cell type responsible for iron particle uptake after IV injection is so far only based on indirect evidence. Furthermore, even circulating mononuclear phagocytes can be subdivided into subpopulations with distinct phenotypic and functional profiles.48 Thus, USPIO enhancement may reflect the infiltration of a specific macrophage subpopulation, which remains to be identified. Finally, inflammation may not only have deleterious consequences for ischemic lesion progression, but may also mediate beneficial effects such as lesion demarcation, wound healing, and tissue regeneration. So far, the specific functional contribution of macrophages for the development of brain infarction is essentially unknown. USPIO-enhanced MRI may represent an important tool to address this issue both in basic science and clinical studies.
Acknowledgments
Sources of Funding
Work in the authors laboratory is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ja 690/5-1, Ja 690/5-2).
Disclosures
None.
Footnotes
Presented at the 25th Princeton Conference on Cerebrovascular Disease; Portland Hilton, Portland, Oregon; May 1820, 2006.
Received May 16, 2006; revision received September 5, 2006; accepted October 3, 2006.
References
1. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 15811587.
2. Thomalla G, Schwark C, Sobesky J, Bluhmki E, Fiebach JB, Fiehler J, Zaro WO, Kucinski T, Juettler E, Ringleb PA, Zeumer H, Weiller C, Hacke W, Schellinger PD, Rother J. Outcome and symptomatic bleeding complications of intravenous thrombolysis within 6 hours in MRI-selected stroke patients: comparison of a German multicenter study with the pooled data of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS tPA trials. Stroke. 2006; 37: 852858.
3. Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, Moskowitz MA. Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends Neurosci. 1999; 22: 391397.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Beaulieu C, de CA, Tong DC, Moseley ME, Albers GW, Marks MP. Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of perfusion and diffusion in stroke: evolution of lesion volume and correlation with clinical outcome. Ann Neurol. 1999; 46: 568578.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Ritzl A, Meisel S, Wittsack HJ, Fink GR, Siebler M, Modder U, Seitz RJ. Development of brain infarct volume as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): follow-up of diffusion-weighted MRI lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20: 201207.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Stoll G, Jander S, Schroeter M. Inflammation and glial responses in ischemic brain lesions. Prog Neurobiol. 1998; 56: 149171.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. del Zoppo G, Ginis I, Hallenbeck JM, Iadecola C, Wang X, Feuerstein GZ. Inflammation and stroke: putative role for cytokines, adhesion molecules and iNOS in brain response to ischemia. Brain Pathol. 2000; 10: 95112.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Braun JS, Jander S, Schroeter M, Witte OW, Stoll G. Spatiotemporal relationship of apoptotic cell death to lymphomonocytic infiltration in photochemically induced focal ischemia of the rat cerebral cortex. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1996; 92: 255263.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Banati RB, Gehrmann J, Schubert P, Kreutzberg GW. Cytotoxicity of microglia. Glia. 1993; 7: 111118.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Barone FC, Arvin B, White RF, Miller A, Webb CL, Willette RN, Lysko PG, Feuerstein GZ. Tumor necrosis factor-
: a mediator of focal ischemic brain injury. Stroke. 1997; 28: 12331244.
11. Rothwell N, Allan S, Toulmond S. The role of interleukin 1 in acute neurodegeneration and stroke: pathophysiological and therapeutic implications. J Clin Invest. 1997; 100: 26482652.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Mattson MP, Barger SW, Furukawa K, Bruce AJ, Wyss-Coray T, Mark RJ, Mucke L. Cellular signaling roles of TGFß, TNF
and ßAPP in brain injury responses and Alzheimers disease. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1997; 23: 4761.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Raivich G, Bohatschek M, Kloss CU, Werner A, Jones LL, Kreutzberg GW. Neuroglial activation repertoire in the injured brain: graded response, molecular mechanisms and cues to physiological function. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999; 30: 77105.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Hallenbeck JM. The many faces of tumor necrosis factor in stroke. Nat Med. 2002; 8: 13631368.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Schroeter M, Jander S, Huitinga I, Witte OW, Stoll G. Phagocytic response in photochemically induced infarction of the rat cerebral cortex: the role of resident microglia. Stroke. 1997; 28: 382386.
16. Schilling M, Besselmann M, Leonhard C, Mueller M, Ringelstein EB, Kiefer R. Microglial activation precedes and predominates over macrophage infiltration in transient focal cerebral ischemia: a study in green fluorescent protein transgenic bone marrow chimeric mice. Exp Neurol. 2003; 183: 2533.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Tanaka R, Komine-Kobayashi M, Mochizuki H, Yamada M, Furuya T, Migita M, Shimada T, Mizuno Y, Urabe T. Migration of enhanced green fluorescent protein expressing bone marrow-derived microglia/macrophage into the mouse brain following permanent focal ischemia. Neuroscience. 2003; 117: 531539.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Jander S, Schroeter M, Stoll G. Role of NMDA receptor signaling in the regulation of inflammatory gene expression after focal brain ischemia. J Neuroimmunol. 2000; 109: 181187.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Wang X, Yue TL, White RF, Barone FC, Feuerstein GZ. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 exhibits delayed gene expression following focal cerebral ischemia. Brain Res Bull. 1995; 36: 607609.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Wang X, Louden C, Yue TL, Ellison JA, Barone FC, Solleveld HA, Feuerstein GZ. Delayed expression of osteopontin after focal stroke in the rat. J Neurosci. 1998; 18: 20752083.
21. Zhang RL, Chopp M, Jiang N, Tang WX, Prostak J, Manning AM, Anderson DC. Anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 reduces ischemic cell damage after transient but not permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the Wistar rat. Stroke. 1995; 26: 14381443.
22. Yrjanheikki J, Tikka T, Keinanen R, Goldsteins G, Chan PH, Koistinaho J. A tetracycline derivative, minocycline, reduces inflammation and protects against focal cerebral ischemia with a wide therapeutic window. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 1349613500.
23. Frenkel D, Huang Z, Maron R, Koldzic DN, Hancock WW, Moskowitz MA, Weiner HL. Nasal vaccination with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein reduces stroke size by inducing IL-10-producing CD4+ T cells. J Immunol. 2003; 171: 65496555.
24. Enlimomab Acute Stroke Trial Investigators. Use of anti-ICAM-1 therapy in ischemic stroke: results of the Enlimomab Acute Stroke Trial. Neurology. 2001; 57: 14281434.
25. Barkhof F, Rocca M, Francis G, Van Waesberghe JH, Uitdehaag BM, Hommes OR, Hartung HP, Durelli L, Edan G, Fernandez O, Seeldrayers P, Sorensen P, Margrie S, Rovaris M, Comi G, Filippi M. Validation of diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis and response to interferon beta1a. Ann Neurol. 2003; 53: 718724.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Schroeter M, Franke C, Stoll G, Hoehn M. Dynamic changes of magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in relation to inflammation and glial responses after photothrombotic cerebral infarction in the rat brain. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2001; 101: 114122.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Weissleder R, Elizondo G, Wittenberg J, Rabito CA, Bengele HH, Josephson L. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: characterization of a new class of contrast agents for MR imaging. Radiology. 1990; 175: 489493.
28. Will O, Purkayastha S, Chan C, Athanasiou T, Darzi AW, Gedroyc W, Tekkis PP. Diagnostic precision of nanoparticle-enhanced MRI for lymph-node metastases: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7.
29. Rausch M, Sauter A, Frohlich J, Neubacher U, Radu EW, Rudin M. Dynamic patterns of USPIO enhancement can be observed in macrophages after ischemic brain damage. Magn Reson Med. 2001; 46: 10181022.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Rausch M, Baumann D, Neubacher U, Rudin M. In-vivo visualization of phagocytotic cells in rat brains after transient ischemia by USPIO. NMR Biomed. 2002; 15: 278283.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Kleinschnitz C, Bendszus M, Frank M, Solymosi L, Toyka KV, Stoll G. In vivo monitoring of macrophage infiltration in experimental ischemic brain lesions by magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003; 23: 13561361.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Saleh A, Schroeter M, Jonkmanns C, Hartung HP, Mödder U, Jander S. In vivo MRI of brain inflammation in human ischaemic stroke. Brain. 2004; 127: 16701677.
33. Saleh A, Wiedermann D, Schroeter M, Jonkmanns C, Jander S, Hoehn M. Central nervous system inflammatory response after cerebral infarction as detected by magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed. 2004; 17: 163169.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Schroeter M, Saleh A, Wiedermann D, Hoehn M, Jander S. Histochemical detection of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) contrast medium uptake in experimental brain ischemia. Magn Reson Med. 2004; 52: 403406.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Dousset V, Ballarino L, Delalande C, Coussemacq M, Canioni P, Petry KG, Caille JM. Comparison of ultrasmall particles of iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced T2-weighted, conventional T2-weighted, and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR images in rats with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999; 20: 223227.
36. Dousset V, Gomez C, Petry KG, Delalande C, Caille JM. Dose and scanning delay using USPIO for central nervous system macrophage imaging. MAGMA. 1999; 8: 185189.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Rausch M, Hiestand P, Baumann D, Cannet C, Rudin M. MRI-based monitoring of inflammation and tissue damage in acute and chronic relapsing EAE. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 50: 309314.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Floris S, Blezer EL, Schreibelt G, Dopp E, van der Pol SM, Schadee-Eestermans IL, Nicolay K, Dijkstra CD, de Vries HE. Bloodbrain barrier permeability and monocyte infiltration in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: a quantitative MRI study. Brain. 2004; 127: 616627.
39. Bendszus M, Stoll G. Caught in the act: in vivo mapping of macrophage infiltration in nerve injury by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci. 2003; 23: 1089210896.
40. Hoehn M, Kustermann E, Blunk J, Wiedermann D, Trapp T, Wecker S, Focking M, Arnold H, Hescheler J, Fleischmann BK, Schwindt W, Buhrle C. Monitoring of implanted stem cell migration in vivo: a highly resolved in vivo magnetic resonance imaging investigation of experimental stroke in rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 1626716272.
41. Watson BD, Dietrich WD, Busto R, Wachtel MS, Ginsberg MD. Induction of reproducible brain infarction by photochemically initiated thrombosis. Ann Neurol. 1985; 17: 497504.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Jander S, Kraemer M, Schroeter M, Witte OW, Stoll G. Lymphocytic infiltration and expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in photochemically induced ischemia of the rat cortex. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1995; 15: 4251.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Myers R, Manjil LG, Frackowiak RS, Cremer JE. [3H]PK 11195 and the localisation of secondary thalamic lesions following focal ischaemia in rat motor cortex. Neurosci Lett. 1991; 133: 2024.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Pappata S, Levasseur M, Gunn RN, Myers R, Crouzel C, Syrota A, Jones T, Kreutzberg GW, Banati RB. Thalamic microglial activation in ischemic stroke detected in vivo by PET and [11C]PK11195. Neurology. 2000; 55: 10521054.
45. Schroeter M, Zickler P, Denhardt DT, Hartung HP, Jander S. Increased thalamic neurodegeneration following ischaemic cortical stroke in osteopontin-deficient mice. Brain. 2006; 129: 14261437.
46. Doerfler A, Engelhorn T, Heiland S, Knauth M, Wanke I, Forsting M. MR contrast agents in acute experimental cerebral ischemia: potential adverse impacts on neurologic outcome and infarction size. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 11: 418424.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Dousset V, Brochet B, Deloire MS, Lagoarde L, Barroso B, Caille JM, Petry KG. MR imaging of relapsing multiple sclerosis patients using ultra-small-particle iron oxide and compared with gadolinium. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006; 27: 10001005.
48. Geissmann F, Jung S, Littman DR. Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties. Immunity. 2003; 19: 7182.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. R. Benoit, D. Mayer, Y. Barak, I. Y. Chen, W. Hu, Z. Cheng, S. X. Wang, D. M. Spielman, S. S. Gambhir, and A. Matin Visualizing Implanted Tumors in Mice with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Magnetotactic Bacteria Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2009; 15(16): 5170 - 5177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gelderblom, F. Leypoldt, K. Steinbach, D. Behrens, C.-U. Choe, D. A. Siler, T. V. Arumugam, E. Orthey, C. Gerloff, E. Tolosa, et al. Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Cerebral Immune Cell Accumulation in Stroke Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1849 - 1857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Desestret, J.-C. Brisset, S. Moucharrafie, E. Devillard, S. Nataf, J. Honnorat, N. Nighoghossian, Y. Berthezene, and M. Wiart Early-Stage Investigations of Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Induced Signal Change After Permanent Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Mice Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1834 - 1841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. O. Breckwoldt, J. W. Chen, L. Stangenberg, E. Aikawa, E. Rodriguez, S. Qiu, M. A. Moskowitz, and R. Weissleder Tracking the inflammatory response in stroke in vivo by sensing the enzyme myeloperoxidase PNAS, November 25, 2008; 105(47): 18584 - 18589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Flogel, Z. Ding, H. Hardung, S. Jander, G. Reichmann, C. Jacoby, R. Schubert, and J. Schrader In Vivo Monitoring of Inflammation After Cardiac and Cerebral Ischemia by Fluorine Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, July 8, 2008; 118(2): 140 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Vellinga, R. D. Oude Engberink, A. Seewann, P. J.W. Pouwels, M. P. Wattjes, S. M.A. van der Pol, C. Pering, C. H. Polman, H. E. de Vries, J. J.G. Geurts, et al. Pluriformity of inflammation in multiple sclerosis shown by ultra-small iron oxide particle enhancement Brain, March 1, 2008; 131(3): 800 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |