Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:1179-1184
Published online before print March 1, 2007, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000260184.85257.2b
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/4/1179    most recent
01.STR.0000260184.85257.2bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Labrum, R.
Right arrow Articles by Markus, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Labrum, R.
Right arrow Articles by Markus, H. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Imaging
Right arrow Genetics of Stroke
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

(Stroke. 2007;38:1179.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Toll Receptor Polymorphisms and Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness

Robyn Labrum, PhD; Steve Bevan, PhD; Matthias Sitzer, MD; Matthias Lorenz, MD Hugh S. Markus, FRCP

From the Centre for Clinical Neuroscience (R.L., S.B., H.S.M.), St. George’s University of London, UK; and the Department of Neurology (M.S., M.L.), Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Correspondence to Professor Hugh S. Markus, Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, St. George’s University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK. E-mail hmarkus{at}sgul.ac.uk


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Inflammation is a key mechanism in atherosclerosis. Variation in genes encoding inflammatory responses may therefore influence atherosclerosis risk possibly through interaction with chronic infections and proinflammatory environmental risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, and obesity. The Toll-like receptor family (TLRs) genes TLR2 and TLR4, both involved in the inflammatory process, are potential candidates and TLR-4 has been previously associated with cardiovascular disease, although other studies have failed to confirm this.

Methods— A total of 3000 individuals from the prospective community-based Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS) were genotyped for single nucleotide polymorphisms: TLR2 (Arg753Gln, –16934 A/T) and TLR4 (D299G, T399I). Associations were determined with common carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) at baseline and also progression of IMT over the 3-year follow-up period. Gene–environment interactions with high sensitive C-reactive protein, smoking, body mass index, and diabetes were determined.

Results— There was no association between single nucleotide polymorphisms or haplotypes in either TLR4 or TLR2 and either baseline IMT or progression of IMT over the 3-year follow up. There were no interactions among the three proinflammatory risk factors. No genotype or haplotype was associated with high sensitive C-reactive protein.

Conclusions— In this large community population, we found no evidence for genetic variation in these two TLRs being risk factors for increased IMT either directly or through interaction with proinflammatory risk factors. We were unable to confirm associations with the TLR4 polymorphisms reported in previous smaller studies.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • carotid artery • genetics • inflammation • ultrasound


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Inflammation is a key process in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Increasing evidence suggests a number of conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking obesity and alcohol may act by promoting inflammation. Recently, proinflammatory variants in genes encoding inflammatory responses have been implicated as risk factors for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, acting synergistically with chronic infections and proinflammatory conventional risk factors.1,2

Several receptors on the surface of inflammatory cells present in atherosclerotic plaques are involved in the innate immune response. Of these, the Toll-like receptor family (TLRs) plays an essential role in recognizing evolutionary highly conserved molecular motifs in pathogens or "pathogen-associated molecular patterns." The TLR family is characterized by the presence of an extracellular domain containing leucine rich repeats and a cytoplasmic Toll/IL1 receptor domain similar to that found in the IL1 receptor family.3 To date, at least 10 TLRs have been identified. Expression of TLRs is upregulated in atherosclerotic lesions, particularly on the surface of endothelial cells and macrophages.4

Two members of the TLR family of receptors are of particular interest with reference to atherosclerosis. TLR4 is an essential signaling receptor for lipopolysaccharide, a component of the outer wall of Gram-negative bacteria. Enhanced TLR4 expression in atheroma has also been associated with activation of the transcription factor NF-{kappa}ß that plays an important role in inducing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines2,5–7 suggesting that TLR4 is important in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis.4,8–10 TLR2 recognizes, among others, Gram-positive bacteria, lipoproteins, and lipopeptides from several different bacteria as well as elements in the yeast cell wall and is also involved in mycobacterial signaling.

Variation in the genes encoding these two receptors has been described. Two cosegregating variants (D299G and T399I) in TLR4 attenuate lipopolysaccharide receptor signaling, diminish the response of the receptor to Gram-negative bacteria by affecting the extracellular domain of the protein, which is involved in the recognition of receptor ligands,11 and are associated with endotoxin hyporesponsiveness.11 They have been associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, including carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT)12 and acute coronary event risk.13 However, other studies failed to replicate these findings in coronary artery disease,14 IMT,15 and stroke.16 The conflicting findings with TLR4 may reflect the small sample sizes in most studies as well as the differing populations studied. Another important factor is that few have examined gene–environment interactions with potential proinflammatory conventional risk factors. If inflammation is a mechanism by which some of these risk factors mediate atherosclerosis, the need to assess gene–environment interactions becomes important.17

Variation in the TLR2 gene has been shown to confer susceptibility to severe infection, particularly with mycobacteria.18 An Arg753Gln polymorphism was overrepresented in patients with tuberculosis19 as well as in a subgroup of patients with severe atopic dermatitis,20 whereas the "T" allele of a –16934 A/T promoter polymorphism was associated with reduced susceptibility to asthma and allergies in children.21 No studies have determined whether these TLR2 variants are risk factors for cardiovascular disease, although the Arg753Gln polymorphism was associated with restenosis after coronary angioplasty.22

A widely used intermediate phenotype for atherosclerosis is carotid artery IMT. IMT measured on high-resolution B-mode ultrasound correlates with histologic measures of IMT, is increased in patients with conventional risk factors, and is an independent predictor of future cardiovascular events. Being noninvasive, it is ideal for community populations and can be repeated at a later date to determine associations with disease progression. In this study in a large community population, we determined whether polymorphisms in TLR2 and TLR4, either alone or by interaction with the proinflammatory conventional risk factors smoking obesity and diabetes, were associated with both carotid IMT at baseline and IMT progression over a 3-year follow up.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
We studied subjects from the prospective "Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study" (CAPS).23 All members of a German primary health care service population (n=32 708) who lived within a radius of 50 km from five study sites in Western Germany were invited to participate. Within a predefined time limit, 6962 (21.3%) agreed to participate. Of these, 5056 (from four of the five study sites) were invited to follow-up examination after 3 years and 3383 (67%) participated. Demographic and risk factor profiles of those invited and not invited were very similar. Forty-eight subjects died during the follow-up period. Mean (SD) duration of follow up between the two carotid duplex examinations was 38.53 (4.32) months. The first 3000 individuals in whom repeat carotid IMT measurements were performed were included in the current study.

Vascular risk factors were assessed using a standardized computer-assisted interview performed by a physician experienced in vascular medicine. Risk factors determined included pack-years of cigarette smoking and smoking category (never/ex/current smoker), history of arterial hypertension, history of diabetes mellitus, and body mass index (BMI).23 Socioeconomic status was measured using a four-point scale previously applied to German populations for coronary risk factor studies.24 The mean value of three supine blood pressure measurements was taken as the actual arterial blood pressure.25 Fasting blood samples were taken for estimation of serum cholesterol and glycosylated hemoglobin A1. Total serum cholesterol was determined enzymatically using a commercial kit (Boehringer). Baseline high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) circulating levels were measured using an IMMAGE automatic immunoassay system (Beckmann-Coulter). Informed written consent was obtained from all participants, and the study protocol was approved by the ethical review committee of the Hospital of J.W. Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main.

Ultrasound Imaging
For ultrasonic examinations, a 7.5- to 10.0-MHz linear array transducer was used (P700SE; Phillips Medical System). Preprocessing configurations (log gain compensation [60 dB] and image persistence) were held constant during all examinations. The gain was adjusted so that the least dense arterial wall interface was just visible. Using antero-oblique insonation, far-wall carotid IMT was visualized within the common carotid artery 20 to 60 mm proximally from the flow divider on both sides. The images were digitally captured during the systole of a single heartbeat on a personal computer using S-VHS PC-EYE 2-frame grabber (ELTEC Elektronik GmbH) in 16-bit R-G-B packing mode (748x576 pixel) for offline measurements. Vertical and horizontal calibration measurements were performed every 100th measurement using an ultrasound assurance phantom. The method used for IMT measurements, which used a semiautomated image analysis approach, and inter/intraobserver reproducibility, has been described in detail previously.26 The presence of carotid plaque was also determined defined as a focal region of IMT thickening of >1.7 mm as previously described.23 This 1.7-mm cutoff was predefined for the CAPS study27 based on a previous described definition.28 Plaques were identified in cross-sectional imaging allowing near-wall plaques to be detected and were imaged also using the color mode so nonechogenic plaques were detected.

Methods
Blood was taken in EDTA tubes and stored at –80°C. DNA was extracted from leukocytes in 2981 using Nucleon Kits (Tepnel Life Sciences). All genotyping assays were performed blind to patient details. Genotyping methods are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Details of Genotyping Methods for Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in TLR2 and TLR4

Polymerase chain reaction was performed in a total reaction volume of 15 µL with the following conditions: denaturation 95°C for 5 minutes followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 30 seconds with a final cycle of 95°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 10 minutes apart from TLR2-16934 A/T, the polymerase chain reaction for which was performed with denaturation 95°C for 5 minutes followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 68 to 50°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 30 seconds with a final cycle of 95°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 10 minutes. Restriction enzyme digestion was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical Analysis
Analyses were performed with both baseline and progression IMT values. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 10.0). Mean IMT values between the right and left common carotid artery were used in all analyses. Baseline IMT values were skewed and the reciprocal was used to normalize the distributions before parametric analysis. The progression IMT values represent the absolute change in IMT over the 3-year period. These values were normally distributed and therefore the original values were used for analysis. For analysis of hs-CRP logarithmically transformed values were used. For analysis of association between genotype and hs-CRP when there were less than five subjects in a homozygous genotype, the subjects were considered with the heterozygote.

Associations with both individual single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotypes was performed. Haplotypes were constructed and frequencies were calculated using PHASE 2.0 software (www.stat.washington.edu/stephens/software.html). Additive, dominant, and recessive allele models were tested to determine the effects of heterozygosity. Age- and sex-adjusted and subsequently multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, and vascular risk factors (smoking, BMI, history of diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, and history of arterial hypertension) was performed. Multiple linear regression was used to determine any relationships between genotypes/haplotypes and mean IMT levels with specific gene–hs-CRP, gene–smoking, gene–diabetes, and gene–BMI interaction terms included, respectively.

Gene–environment interactions were examined using binary logistic regression with the interaction term as a covariate in the analysis. Both recessive and dominant models were examined in this manner as is usual practice for such studies. Correction for multiple testing was applied for the number of individual risk factors per genotype to achieve a probability value for significance to be assumed before analysis was undertaken.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Demographic characteristics of the study population are given in Table 2. Genotyping was successful in 2955 of the 3000 cases. All genotypes for the polymorphisms studied were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Allele and haplotype frequencies are shown in Table 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Demographic and Risk Profile of the Study Population


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. TLR2 and TLR4 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism and Haplotype Frequencies

Associations With Baseline Intima-Media Thickness
There were no associations between TLR 2 and 4 individual SNPs or haplotypes on univariate analysis or multivariate analysis controlling for age and sex and cardiovascular risk factors. Mean IMT values, 95% confidence intervals, and probability values for change in IMT are given for SNPs (additive model) in Table 4 and haplotypes (dominant model) in Table 5. Similar results were obtained when analyzing data using dominant and recessive models (data not shown). There were no significant interactions between any of the SNPs or haplotypes and smoking, BMI, or diabetes mellitus when analyzed individually using additive, dominant, and recessive models (data not shown). There was no association between hs-CRP and any genotype or haplotype (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. Results of Multivariate Analysis for Individuals Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 5. Results of Multivariate Analysis for TLR2 and TLR4 Haplotypes

We also examined whether each gene may be making a small contribution to IMT variability acting through gene–environment interactions as has recently been described for cytokine genes2 by calculating a combined gene score. Based on evidence from the literature, the TLR2 "AC" haplotype and the TLR4 "GC" haplotype were designated proinflammatory (because variants have been shown to have an "antiinflammatory" action, it follows that the wild types would be "proinflammatory"). A gene-variant score in which 2 represented individuals homozygous for 2 inflammatory haplotypes and 0 was homozygous for none was also calculated. No significant increase in IMT was noted with increasing gene variant score (P=0.775) (Table 6). A proinflammatory environmental risk factor score was also calculated2 as 0 for no proinflammatory stimuli, 1 for a single proinflammatory stimulus, and ≥2 for two or more proinflammatory stimuli with the proinflammatory stimuli being current/ex-smoker, BMI >30 kg/m2, and a positive history of diabetes. A significant increase in IMT was noted with increasing proinflammatory risk score (Table 6), but no interaction was found between the gene variant and proinflammatory risk factor scores (P=0.385).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 6. Mean Baseline IMT With Increase in Gene Variant and Proinflammatory Risk Factor Scores

Association With Intima-Media Thickness Progression
There was no association between TLR2 or 4 SNPs (Table 4) or haplotypes (Table 5) and common carotid artery IMT progression over the 3-year follow-up period. Results were similar, with no significant associations, when baseline IMT was controlled for. There were no significant interactions between any of the SNPs or haplotypes and smoking, BMI, or diabetes mellitus when analyzed individually using additive, dominant, and recessive models (data not shown).

Additive gene scores were also calculated for IMT progression values (as described for the cross-sectional analysis of baseline IMT). Again, no significant difference in change in IMT was noted for increasing gene variant score (P=0.922). In addition, no interaction was noted between the gene variant score and proinflammatory risk factor score (P=0.896).

Association With Carotid Plaque
There were 162 with carotid plaque at baseline. There was no association between any polymorphism and carotid plaque (TLR 2 16934 P=0.414, TLR 2 753 P=0.315, TLR4 299 P=0.145, TLR 399 P=0.789; all analyses based on an additive model but similar form other models).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this large community population, we found no association between polymorphisms or haplotypes in either the TLR2 or TLR4 genes. There was no association with either IMT values at baseline or progression of IMT over a 3-year period. Furthermore, we found no evidence of any interaction with potential proinflammatory cardiovascular risk factors.

The genes for TLR2 and TLR4 present attractive candidates for atherosclerosis because they are important in recognizing evolutionary highly conserved molecular motifs in pathogens. Expression of TLRs is upregulated in atherosclerotic lesions,4 and in addition, variation in both the coding and regulatory regions of both genes has been associated with altered susceptibility to inflammatory conditions.11–13,19–22 Furthermore, associations between the variants we studied in TLR4 have been associated with both cardiac disease13 and carotid IMT,12 although other studies have found negative results.14–16 No previous studies have looked at associations of TLR2 polymorphisms with cardiovascular risk apart from restenosis after coronary angioplasty.22

The differences between our study and previous positive results may be accounted for by a number of reasons. Probably most importantly, our study was nearly three times as large as the previous largest positive study.15 Population differences could also account for the conflicting results. However, the previous IMT study looked at a European (Northern Italian) population,15 which might not be expected to differ markedly from our German population.

Recent genetic studies of cardiovascular disease, and early atherosclerosis estimated by IMT, have emphasized the importance of gene–environment interactions.1,2 It has been suggested that a number of conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, and obesity may act, at least in part, by inducing a chronic inflammatory response. Consistent with this, interactions between these risk factors and a number of cytokine and other proinflammatory genes have been reported.1,2,12 In these studies, associations between the genetic variants and IMT itself were weak or not significant but became highly significant once interactions with proinflammatory environmental risk factors were accounted for. In view of the role of TLRs in the inflammatory process, one might hypothesize that similar interactions between the TLR genes and chronic infections on the one hand and conventional proinflammatory risk factors on the other hand would be important. However, we found no evidence of any interactions between the polymorphisms studied and hs-CRP, smoking, diabetes, or obesity with either baseline or progression IMT.

Inflammatory processes may play a role at a number of stages during the atherosclerotic process. They have been implicated not only in early atherosclerosis, but also in plaque instability leading to conversion of asymptomatic to symptomatic disease. Measurement of IMT only allows investigation of risk factors for the former. Therefore, further studies are required to determine whether these genetic variants are important in later stages of the disease process and in conversion to plaque instability. We also looked at the associations with carotid plaque and found no associations, but the number of subjects with plaque was small and therefore the power to detect an association was low. A variety of definitions have been used for carotid plaque; we used >1.7 mm,28 which was predefined at the start of the CAPS study,27 but cutoffs ranging from 1.1 to 1.7 mm have been used.29,30 The higher cutoff we used may partly explain the low plaque prevalence.

This study has a number of strengths. Associations were determined in a well-characterized large population. The use of a continuous variable such as IMT provides considerable statistical power. IMT values were available not only at baseline, but also at 3 years allowing associations with progression to be determined. Importantly, IMT values in the CAPS population have been associated with emergent cardiovascular end points during follow up.31 A potential limitation of our study is the possibility that variants in TLR2 or TLR4 other than those we studied may play a role in atherosclerosis. However, we chose variants that have been implicated functionally in previous studies and associated with altered inflammatory responses and in the case of TLR4, which have been previously associated with cardiovascular disease. A further limitation of the progression part of our study is that there was only a small increase in IMT over the 3-year follow-up period, and measurement error may further reduce the ability to detect associations. However, we have previously found associations between IMT progression over the same period and conventional risk factors,32 and the results were consistent with those with baseline IMT, which represents lifelong exposure to risk factors.

In conclusion, in this large community population, we found no evidence that genetic variants in either TLR2 or TLR4 are risk factors for increased IMT either directly or through interaction with proinflammatory cardiovascular risk factors.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

This work was supported by a British Heart Foundation project grant (PG/03/070).

Disclosures

None.

Received September 3, 2006; revision received November 3, 2006; accepted November 21, 2006.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Jerrard-Dunne P, Sitzer M, Risley P, Buehler A, von Kegler S, Markus HS. Inflammatory gene load is associated with enhanced inflammation and early carotid atherosclerosis in smokers. Stroke. 2004; 35: 2438–2443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Markus HS, Labrum R, Bevan S, Reindl M, Egger G, Wiedermann CJ, Schwartz D, Lorenz E, Xu Q, Kiechl S, Willeit J. Genetic and acquired inflammatory conditions are synergistically associated with early atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2006; 3: 2253–2259
  3. Akira S, Takeda K, Kaisho T. Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nat Immunol. 2001; 2: 675–680.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Edfeldt K, Swedenborg J, Hansson GK, Yan ZQ. Expression of Toll-like receptors in human atherosclerotic lesions: a possible pathway for plaque activation. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1158–1161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kopp EB, Medzhitov R. The Toll-receptor family and control of innate immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 1999; 11: 13–18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Medzhitov R, Preston-Hurlburt P, Janeway CA. A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature. 1997; 388: 394–397.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Chow JC, Young DW, Golenbock DT, Christ WJ, Gusovsky F. Toll-like receptor-4 mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 10689–10692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bjorkbacka H, Kunjathoor VV, Moore KJ, Koehn S, Ordija CM, Lee MA, Means T, Halmen K, Luster AD, Golenbock DT, Freeman MW. Reduced atherosclerosis in MyD88-null mice links elevated serum cholesterol levels to activation of innate immunity signaling pathways. Nat Med. 2004; 10: 416.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Michelsen KS, Wong MH, Shah PK, Zhang W, Yano J, Doherty TM, Akira S, Rajavashisth TB, Arditi M. Lack of Toll-like receptor 4 or myeloid differentiation factor 88 reduces atherosclerosis and alters plaque phenotype in mice deficient in apolipoprotein E. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 204;101:10679.
  10. Xu XH, Shah PK, Faure E, Equils O, Thomas L, Fishbein MC, Luthringer D, Xu XP, Rajavashisth TB, Yano J, Kaul S, Arditi M. Toll-like receptor-4 is expressed by macrophages in murine and human lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaques and upregulated by oxidized LDL. Circulation. 2001; 104: 3103–3108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Arbour NC, Lorenz E, Schutte BC, Zabner J, Kline JN, Jones M, Frees K, Watt JL, Schwartz DA. TLR4 mutations are associated with endotoxin hyporesponsiveness in humans. Nat Genet. 2000; 25: 187–191.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Kiechl S, Lorenz E, Reindl M, Wiedermann CJ, Oberhollenzer F, Bonora E, Willeit J, Schwartz DA. Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms and atherogenesis. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 185–192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Boekholdt SM, Agema WR, Peters RJ, Zwinderman AH, van der Wall EE, Reitsma PH, Kastelein JJ, Jukema JW; REgression GRowth Evaluation Statin Study Group. Variants of Toll-like receptor 4 modify the efficacy of statin therapy and the risk of cardiovascular events. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2416–2421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Morange PE, Tiret L, Saut N, Luc G, Arveiler D, Ferrieres J, Amouyel P, Evans A, Ducimetiere P, Cambien F, Juhan-Vague I; PRIME Study Group. TLR4/Asp299Gly, CD14/C-260T, plasma levels of the soluble receptor CD14 and the risk of coronary heart disease: The PRIME Study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004; 12: 1041–1049.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Norata GD, Garlaschelli K, Ongari M, Raselli S, Grigore L, Benvenuto F, Maggi FM, Catapano AL. Effect of the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) variants on intima-media thickness and monocyte-derived macrophage response to LPS. J Intern Med. 2005; 258: 21–27.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Reismann P, Lichy C, Rudofsky G, Humpert PM, Genius J, Si TD, Dorfer C, Grau AJ, Hamann A, Hacke W, Nawroth PP, Bierhaus A. Lack of association between polymorphisms of the Toll-like receptor 4 gene and cerebral ischemia. J Neurol. 2004; 251: 853–858.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Hunter DJ. Gene–environment interactions in human diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2005; 6: 287–298.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Lorenz E, Mira JP, Cornish KL, Arbour NC, Schwartz DA. A novel polymorphism in the Toll-like receptor 2 gene and its potential association with staphylococcal infection. Infect Immun. 2002; 68: 6398–6401.
  19. Ogus AC, Yoldas B, Ozdemir T, Uguz A, Olcen S, Keser I, Coskun M, Cilli A, Yegin O. The Arg753GLn polymorphism of the human Toll-like receptor 2 gene in tuberculosis disease. Eur Respir J. 2004; 23: 219–223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ahmad-Nejad P, Mrabet-Dahbi S, Breuer K, Klotz M, Werfel T, Herz U, Heeg K, Neumaier M, Renz H. The Toll-like receptor 2 R753Q polymorphism defines a subgroup of patients with atopic dermatitis having severe phenotype. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 113: 565–567.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Eder W, Klimecki W, Yu L, von Mutius E, Riedler J, Braun-Fahrlander C, Nowak D, Martinez FD; ALEX Study Team. Toll-like receptor 2 as a major gene for asthma in children of European farmers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 113: 482–488.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Hamann L, Gomma A, Schroder NW, Stamme C, Glaeser C, Schulz S, Gross M, Anker SD, Fox K, Schumann RR. A frequent Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 polymorphism is a risk factor for coronary restenosis. J Mol Med. 2005; 83: 478–485.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Sitzer M, Puac D, Buehler A, Steckel DA, von Kegler S, Markus HS, Steinmetz H. Internal carotid artery angle of origin. A novel risk factor for early carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2003; 34: 950–955.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Helmert U, Shea S, Herman B, Greiser E. Relationship of social class characteristics and risk factors for coronary heart disease in West Germany. Public Health. 1990; 104: 399–416.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Pickering TG. Blood pressure measurement and detection of hypertension. Lancet. 1994; 344: 31–35.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Sitzer M, Markus HS, Mendall MA, Liehr R, Knorr U, Steinmetz H. C-reactive protein and carotid intimal medial thickness in a community population. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2002; 9: 97–103.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Sitzer M, Skutta M, Siebler M, Sitzer G, Siegrist J, Steinmetz H. Modifiable stroke risk factors in volunteers willing to participate in a prevention program. Neuroepidemiology. 1998; 17: 179–187.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Bonithon-Kopp C, Scarabin PY, Taquet A, Touboul PJ, Malmejac A, Guize L. Risk factors for early carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged French women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1991; 11: 966–972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Mannami T, Baba B, Ogata J. Potential of carotid enlargement as a useful indicator affected by high blood pressure in a large general population of a Japanese city. The Suita Study. Stroke. 2000; 31: 2958–2965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hunt KJ, Duggirala R, Goring HH, Williams JT, Almasy L, Blangero J, O’Leary DH, Stern MP. Genetic basis of variation in carotid artery plaque in the San Antonio Family Heart Study. Stroke. 2002; 33: 2775–2780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lorenz MW, von Kegler S, Steinmetz H, Markus HS, Sitzer M. Carotid intima-media thickening indicates a higher vascular risk across a wide age range: prospective data from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS). Stroke. 2006; 37: 87–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Mackinnon AD, Jerrard-Dunne P, Sitzer M, Buehler A, von Kegler S, Markus HS. Rates and determinants of site-specific progression of carotid artery intima media thickness: the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS). Stroke. 2004; 35: 2150–2154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. M. Lepper, M. von Eynatten, P. M. Humpert, M. Triantafilou, and K. Triantafilou
Toll-like Receptor Polymorphisms and Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness
Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): e50 - e50.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/4/1179    most recent
01.STR.0000260184.85257.2bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Labrum, R.
Right arrow Articles by Markus, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Labrum, R.
Right arrow Articles by Markus, H. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Imaging
Right arrow Genetics of Stroke
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.