Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:1263-1268
Published online before print February 22, 2007, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000259890.18354.d2
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/4/1263    most recent
01.STR.0000259890.18354.d2v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlager, O.
Right arrow Articles by Schillinger, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlager, O.
Right arrow Articles by Schillinger, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.
Right arrow Other Stroke

(Stroke. 2007;38:1263.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

C-Reactive Protein Predicts Future Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Carotid Stenosis

Oliver Schlager, MD; Markus Exner, MD; Wolfgang Mlekusch, MD; Schila Sabeti, MD; Jasmin Amighi, MD; Petra Dick, MD; Oswald Wagner, MD; Renate Koppensteiner, MD; Erich Minar, MD Martin Schillinger, MD

From Departments of Angiology (O.S., W.M., S.S., J.A., P.D., R.K., E.M., M.S.), Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics (M.E., O.W.), Medical University Vienna, Austria.

Correspondence to Martin Schillinger, MD, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Angiology, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail martin.schillinger{at}meduniwien.ac.at


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Atherosclerosis is a systemic inflammatory disease. We demonstrated previously that high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is associated with short-term progression of carotid atherosclerosis. We now investigated whether baseline levels of hs-CRP predict midterm clinical outcome in these patients.

Methods— We prospectively studied 1065 of 1268 consecutive patients who were initially asymptomatic with respect to carotid artery disease and were investigated with serial carotid ultrasound examinations at baseline and after a 6- to 9-month interval. Patients were followed-up clinically for the occurrence of cardiovascular events, a composite of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, stroke, and death.

Results— We recorded progression of carotid stenosis in 93 patients (9%) after 6 to 9 months, and 381 cardiovascular events in 337 patients (27%) during a median of 3 years of clinical follow-up (interquartile range, 2.5 to 3.5 years). The hs-CRP levels were significantly elevated in patients with progressive carotid stenosis (P<0.001), and hs-CRP was significantly associated with the occurrence of a first future cardiovascular event (P<0.001). Adjusted hazard ratios for a first cardiovascular event for increasing quintiles of hs-CRP were 1.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 2.17), 1.76 (95% confidence interval, 1.17 to 2.66), 2.22 (95% confidence interval, 1.48 to 3.32), and 2.41 (95% confidence interval, 1.61 to 3.60) as compared with the lowest quintile, respectively. This association was independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and the baseline degree of carotid stenosis.

Conclusion— Inflammation was associated with morphological and clinical progression of atherosclerotic disease. Patients with elevated levels of hs-CRP exhibit an increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcome attributable to clinical adverse events of progressive atherosclerotic disease.


Key Words: asymptomatic carotid stenosis • carotid artery • outcome • prognosis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Atherosclerosis is a systemic inflammatory disease.1–4 Inflammation is a key feature of plaque instability and triggers progression of atherosclerosis.5–7 Patients with progressive or unstable plaques are at high risk for future clinical complications.5,7 With the rapidly evolving scope of preventive therapies, there is a growing interest in cardiovascular risk stratification. Several prognostic biomarkers have been evaluated to noninvasively identify patients with unstable plaques who are at high risk for incident clinical events. Among the panel of potentially useful parameters, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) has been unequivocally demonstrated to predict disease progression and clinical adverse events in the coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral circulation in apparently healthy subjects as well as in patients with prevalent atherosclerosis.8–18 Nevertheless, an association of hs-CRP with morphological and clinical progression of atherosclerosis has not been demonstrated in a large clinical study as yet.

We have demonstrated previously in the prospective ICARAS protocol that inflammation measured by hs-CRP is associated with short-term morphological progression of atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries.19 We now investigated whether baseline levels of hs-CRP predict midterm clinical outcome in these patients.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Design
We prospectively enrolled all consecutive patients who underwent duplex ultrasound investigations of the extracranial carotid arteries from March 2002 until March 2003 at our institution who were neurologically asymptomatic in the Inflammation in Carotid Arteries Risk for Atherosclerosis Study (ICARAS).19–21

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion and exclusion criteria have been reported previously.19 Briefly, we included patients who were initially asymptomatic with respect to carotid artery disease, defined as the absence of transient ischemic attacks, amaurosis fugax, or stroke in patients’ recent history. Patients with a history of transient ischemic attacks or stroke were only eligible if the event occurred at least 12 months before inclusion and no residual or recurrent symptoms were identified by a neurologist.

Study End Point
The primary clinical study end point was the occurrence of a first cardiovascular event, a composite of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary interventions, coronary artery bypass graft, stroke, and death during the follow-up period. As a secondary objective we investigated the association between hs-CRP and the occurrence of the triple-end point myocardial infarction, stroke, and death.

Clinical Data
After patient identification at the ultrasound laboratory, medical history, and data from physical examination were recorded. We screened for current infectious or inflammatory diseases by evaluating patients’ clinical history and current symptoms. Clinical suspicion for infectious or inflammatory diseases prompted further specific investigations according to clinical judgment. Completeness and accuracy of all data were ascertained by 2 independent observers.

Color-Coded Duplex Sonography and Grading of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
Duplex examinations at baseline and during follow-up were performed on an Acuson 128 XP10 with a 7.5-MHZ linear array probe (Acuson) by experienced technical assistants who were supervised by 2 of the authors. Two independent investigators determined progression of carotid atherosclerosis based on the baseline and follow-up duplex investigations. All duplex operators were blinded with respect to patients’ clinical data and laboratory findings. Duplex grading of the carotid stenosis was performed as described previously.22–24 The accuracy of our classification of the degree of stenosis with respect to angiography was assessed previously in our duplex laboratory in an independent cohort including 1006 carotid arteries.24 Using angiography as the gold standard, positive predictive values and negative predictive values ranged from 70% to 98%, and interobserver agreement was excellent with respect to the absolute degree of stenosis (kappa, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 0.88), as well as with respect to progression of the disease (kappa, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.89). We used the following 6 categories to quantify the degree of carotid stenosis at baseline and follow-up: 0% to 29% (carotid plaques), 30% to 49% (advanced plaques), 50% to 69% (moderate stenosis), 70% to 89% (high-grade stenosis), 90% to 99% (subocclusive stenosis), and occlusion (100%). Progression of atherosclerotic disease was defined as an increase of the degree stenosis by at least 1 category. Progression of stenosis in either one or both carotid arteries was considered as indicative of progressive disease.

Laboratory Data
For determination of hs-CRP values, a high-sensitivity assay (N Latex CRP Mono; DADE Behring) with a detection level of 0.03 mg/dL and a coefficient of variation of 4.6% was used. Serum amyloid A (SAA) was measured by N Latex SAA (DADE Behring) with a detection level of 3.8 mg/L and a coefficient of variation of 6.4%.

Surveillance Protocol
Patients were scheduled for a follow-up visit 6 to 9 months after the initial presentation for clinical re-examination, neurological history with standard questionnaires, duplex examination, and blood sampling. Patients with clinical suspicion of neurological events during the follow-up time were further evaluated by a neurologist and mandatory cranial computed tomography.

Thereafter, patients were clinically reinvestigated every 6 months at the outpatient ward of our department until December 2005. A follow-up questionnaire was then sent to each patient during January 2006, re-evaluating the occurrence of cardiovascular events. Information from the follow-up questionnaire was validated by reviewing the original hospital discharge reports of corresponding re-admissions because of cardiovascular events. If the follow-up questionnaire was not returned, personal telephone contact to the patients, their relatives, or to the treating physicians was established. Further information was obtained by reviewing the hospital discharge reports of any other re-admission during the follow-up period. The performance of percutaneous coronary interventions or coronary bypass graft was validated by review of the original procedure protocols. Outcome was assessed by 2 independent observers who were blinded with respect to patients’ baseline clinical and laboratory data.

Statistical Methods
Continuous data are presented as the median and the interquartile range (range from the 25th to the 75th percentile), or the total range. Discrete data are given as counts and percentages. We used {chi}2 tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, exact tests, and Spearman correlation coefficients for univariate analyses, as appropriate. Time-dependent variables were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were applied to assess the association between hs-CRP levels and the occurrence of a first cardiovascular event. Baseline variables that were imbalanced between patients with and without progressive carotid stenosis were entered into the models to adjust for potentially confounding effects. Results of the Cox models are presented as the hazards ratio and the 95% CIs. Additionally, we analyzed the association between hs-CRP and cardiovascular events in predefined strata according to patients’ cardiovascular risk profile at baseline. A 2-sided P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Calculations were performed with Stata (release 8.0; Stata) and SPSS for Windows (version 10.0; SPSS Inc).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Characteristics and Progressive Disease
We enrolled 1363 eligible patients in the study. Of these, 95 patients (7%) had to be excluded because of missing duplex ultrasound follow-up data after the initial 6- to 9-month period (28 deaths; 67 refused the repeated duplex ultrasound investigation) and another 203 patients (15%) who were lost to clinical follow-up, leaving 1065 patients for the final analysis. Clinical baseline characteristics (age, sex, frequency of atherothrombotic risk factors, cardiovascular comorbidities, and baseline degree of stenosis) of the 298 patients with missing follow-up data were not significantly different compared with the study sample (data not shown).

Median age of the study population was 69 years (interquartile range, 61 to 76) and 668 patients (63%) were male. In 17% of the patients a history of stroke was found without residual or recurrent symptoms; in these patients, the time interval between previous stroke and inclusion in the study was a median of 5.2 years (range, 2.1 to 12.4). During the initial follow-up period of a median of 7.5 months (range, 6 to 9), progression of carotid lesions was found with duplex ultrasound in 93 of 1065 patients (8.7%). Patients with progressive disease were older, exhibited more frequently traditional cardiovascular risk factors, had higher levels of hs-CRP at baseline, and had a more extensive degree of atherosclerosis at baseline reflected by the history of stroke and symptomatic peripheral artery disease (Table). Baseline degree of stenosis was strongly associated with progressive disease; patients with a degree of stenosis >50% had 14% risk for disease progression as compared with 5% in patients with a degree of stenosis <50% (P<0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Demographic Data and Clinical Characteristics of 1065 Patients With Either Stable or Progressive Carotid Stenosis After a Follow-Up Period of a Median of 7.5 Months (range, 6 to 9 months)

Follow-Up for Cardiovascular Events
We recorded 381 cardiovascular events in 337 patients (27%) during a clinical follow-up period of a median of 3 years until occurrence of a first event (interquartile range, 2.5 to 3.5 years), including 42 myocardial infarctions (3.9%), 79 percutaneous coronary interventions (7.4%), 47 coronary bypass grafts (4.4%), 56 strokes (5.3%), and 157 deaths (14.7%). Cumulative event-free survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 89% (95% CI, 0.87 to 0.91), 82% (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.84), and 73% (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.76).

Inflammation and Cardiovascular Events
Patients with higher baseline levels of hs-CRP had a significantly increased risk for cardiovascular events (P<0.001). Being aware of several potential confounding factors, we calculated the adjusted risk for adverse cardiovascular outcome by multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, adjusting for age (years), sex (male/female), smoking (in categories), hypertension (yes/no), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (mg/dL), HbA1c (%), stage of peripheral artery disease (none/asymptomatic/claudication), history of stroke (yes/no), baseline degree of carotid stenosis (in categories), and statin treatment (yes/no). By multivariable analysis, hs-CRP was significantly associated with cardiovascular events (P<0.001; Figure 1); adjusted hazard ratios for increasing quintiles of hs-CRP as compared with the lowest quintile were 1.41 (95% CI, 0.92 to 2.17), 1.76 (95% CI, 1.17 to 2.66), 2.22 (95% CI, 1.48 to 3.32), and 2.41 (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.60), respectively. Consistent with the overall effect, we observed significant associations between increasing quintiles of hs-CRP and cardiovascular events within the predefined strata according to patients’ baseline cardiovascular risk profile (Figure 2).


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Ultrasound follow-up. Box-plots show hs-CRP levels at baseline and follow-up in patients with stable versus progressive carotid stenosis. Clinical follow-up. Adjusted risk for cardiovascular events (composite of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary interventions, coronary bypass graft, stroke, and death) according to quintiles of hs-CRP was calculated by multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses.


Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Association between increasing quintiles of hs-CRP and cardiovascular events in various strata according to patients’ baseline cardiovascular risk profile.

With respect to the occurrence of the secondary clinical end point, the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death, adjusted hazard ratios for increasing quintiles of hs-CRP were 1.60 (95% CI, 0.94 to 2.69), 1.85 (95% CI, 1.11 to 3.08), 2.38 (95% CI, 1.44 to 3.95), and 2.98 (95% CI, 1.83 to 4.87), respectively, as compared with the lowest quintile.

Consistent with hs-CRP, SAA also showed a significant association with adverse clinical outcome (P<0.001). Adjusted hazard ratios for cardiovascular events for increasing quintiles of SAA as compared with the lowest quintile were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.62 to 1.48), 1.52 (95% CI, 1.06 to 2.17), 1.60 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.37), and 1.70 (95% CI, 1.19 to 2.40), respectively.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We found that inflammation measured by acute phase parameters was associated with morphological and clinical progression of atherosclerosis. Elevated baseline levels of hs-CRP seem to reflect activity of atherosclerotic disease and indicate an increased risk for systemic progression of atherosclerosis. Determination of hs-CRP levels in patients with high cardiovascular risk, as included in the present study, may add to conventional risk stratification strategies as the observed effect was independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

Accumulating epidemiological data have evolved confirming that elevation of acute phase parameters like hs-CRP and SAA herald clinically relevant atherothrombotic events.8–18,25 The hs-CRP exerts pro-atherogenic effects and promotes endothelial cell activation, adhesion molecule expression, and resultant endothelial dysfunction.26–29 However, large population-based cohort studies failed to demonstrate an independent association between hs-CRP and early stages of atherosclerosis measured by carotid intima-media thickness.10 In contrast, particularly in patients with advanced stages of the disease, hs-CRP proved to be a robust predictor of adverse clinical outcome.18 Putting these findings together it seems reasonable to speculate that hs-CRP merely acts as a marker of advanced and progressive disease rather than as a relevant underlying pathophysiological substrate in early stages of atherosclerosis development.

In the present study, hs-CRP predicted morphological progression of carotid disease and clinical progression of atherosclerosis in the coronary and cerebrovascular vessel area. Elevated levels of inflammatory biomarkers likely uncover the presence of a multiple vulnerable lesions, thus identifying a "vulnerable patient" with several coexisting high-risk lesions in different arterial segments.5,7 Rothwell et al30 demonstrated a systemic predisposition to irregularity and rupture of atherosclerotic plaque independently of traditional vascular risk factors in a large series of patients with carotid stenosis. Elevation of hs-CRP and SAA indicates enhanced inflammation and may help to identify these patients who generally are at a high-risk for morphological and clinical progression of atherosclerotic disease. The concept of identifying vulnerable patients who are susceptible to cardiovascular adverse events early seems appealing, and measurement of inflammatory biomarkers may be a potent adjunctive tool for this purpose. In this context it seems particularly interesting that hs-CRP was predictive for cardiovascular events in all investigated subgroups, independently of traditional risk factors and baseline extent of the disease, suggesting clinical utility of this biomarker adjunctive to conventional clinical risk factors.

Limitations
Several limitations of the study have to be acknowledged. Several medications may influence levels of acute phase parameters, progression of atherosclerosis, and occurrence of clinical adverse events. In particular, statins and platelet inhibitors certainly play a relevant role in this context. Although we adjusted statistically for the use of statins at baseline, we are unable to exclude residual confounding by changes of the medication during the course of the study.

Conclusion
Inflammation was associated with morphological and clinical progression of atherosclerotic disease. Patients with elevated levels of hs-CRP exhibit an increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcome due to clinical adverse events of progressive atherosclerotic disease.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

None.

Received October 18, 2006; revision received November 15, 2006; accepted November 20, 2006.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis Nature. 2000; 407: 233–241.
  2. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115–126.[Free Full Text]
  3. Libby P, Ridker P, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1135–1143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Glass CK, Witztum JL. Atherosclerosis: the road ahead. Cell. 2001; 104: 503–516.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, Fayad Z, Stone PH, Waxman S, Raggi P, Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Burke A, Yuan C, Fitzgerald PJ, Siscovick DS, de Korte CL, Aikawa M, Juhani Airaksinen KE, Assmann G, Becker CR, Chesebro JH, Farb A, Galis ZS, Jackson C, Jang IK, Koenig W, Lodder RA, March K, Demirovic J, Navab M, Priori SG, Rekhter MD, Bahr R, Grundy SM, Mehran R, Colombo A, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne C, Insull W Jr, Schwartz RS, Vogel R, Serruys PW, Hansson GK, Faxon DP, Kaul S, Drexler H, Greenland P, Muller JE, Virmani R, Ridker PM, Zipes DP, Shah PK, Willerson JT. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1664–1672.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Burke AP, Fowler DR, Kruth HS, Weber DK, Farb A, Guerrero LJ, Hayase M, Kutys R, Narula J, Finn AV, Virmani R. Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 2285–2287.[Free Full Text]
  7. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, Fayad Z, Stone PH, Waxman S, Raggi P, Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Burke A, Yuan C, Fitzgerald PJ, Siscovick DS, de Korte CL, Aikawa M, Airaksinen KE, Assmann G, Becker CR, Chesebro JH, Farb A, Galis ZS, Jackson C, Jang IK, Koenig W, Lodder RA, March K, Demirovic J, Navab M, Priori SG, Rekhter MD, Bahr R, Grundy SM, Mehran R, Colombo A, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne C, Insull W Jr, Schwartz RS, Vogel R, Serruys PW, Hansson GK, Faxon DP, Kaul S, Drexler H, Greenland P, Muller JE, Virmani R, Ridker PM, Zipes DP, Shah PK, Willerson JT. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1172–1178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, Buring JE, Cook NR. Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1557–1565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 973–979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Tracy RP, Lemaitre RN, Psaty BM, Ives DG, Evans RW, Cushman M, Meilahn EN, Kuller LH. Relationship of C-reactive protein to risk of cardiovascular disease in the elderly: results from the Cardiovascular Health Study and the Rural Health Promotion Project. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 1121–1127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N. C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 836–843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Koenig W, Sund M, Frolich M, Fischer HG, Lowel H, Dohring A, Hutchinson WL, Pepys MB. C-reactive protein, a sensitive marker of inflammation, predicts future risk of coronary heart disease in initially healthy middle-aged men: results from the MONICA (Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984 to 1992. Circulation. 1999; 99: 237–242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Danesh J, Whincup P, Walker M, Lennon L, Thompson A, Appleby P, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB. Low grade inflammation and coronary heart disease: prospective study and updated meta-analyses. BMJ. 2000; 321: 199–204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rost NS, Wolf PA, Kase CS, Kelly-Hayes M, Silbershatz H, Massaro JM, D’Agostino RB, Franzblau C, Wilson PW. Plasma concentration of C-reactive protein and risk of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 2001; 32: 2575–2579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ford ES, Giles WH. Serum C-reactive protein and self-reported stroke: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination survey. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 1052–1056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Albert CM, Ma J, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Ridker PM. Prospective study of C-reactive protein, homocysteine, and plasma lipid levels as predictors of sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 2002; 105: 2595–2599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ridker PM, Stampfer MJ, Rifai N. Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis: a comparison of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein (a), and standard cholesterol screening as predictors of peripheral arterial disease. JAMA. 2001; 285: 2481–2485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Schillinger M, Exner M, Amighi J, Mlekusch W, Sabeti S, Rumpold H, Wagner O, Minar E. Joint effects of C-reactive protein and glycated hemoglobin in predicting future cardiovascular events in patients with advanced atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2323–2328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W, Sabeti S, Amighi J, Rumpold H, Maurer G, Wagner O, Minar E. Inflammation and carotid artery risk for atherosclerosis study (ICARAS). Circulation. 2005; 111: 2203–2209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Sabeti S, Exner M, Sabeti S, Mlekusch W, Amighi J, Rumpold H, Maurer G, Minar E, Wagner O, Schillinger M. Prognostic impact of fibrinogen in carotid atherosclerosis: unspecific indicator of inflammation or independent predictor of disease progression. Stroke. 2005; 36: 1400–1404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Exner M, Minar E, Mlekusch W, Sabeti S, Amighi J, Lalouschek W, Maurer G, Bieglmayer C, Kieweg H, Wagner O, Schillinger M. Myeloperoxidase predicts progression of carotid stenosis in states of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 2212–2218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. De Bray JM, Glatt B, for the International Consensus Conference, December 1994. Quantification of atheromatous stenosis in the extracranial internal carotid artery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1995; 5: 414–426.[CrossRef]
  23. Nicolaides AN, Shifrin EG, Bradbury A, Dhanjil S, Griffin M, Belcaro G, Williams M. Angiographic and duplex grading of internal carotid stenosis: can we overcome the confusion? J Endovasc Surg. 1996; 3: 158–165.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Sabeti S, Schillinger M, Mlekusch W, Willfort A, Haumer M, Nachtmann T, Mullner M, Lang W, Ahmadi R, Minar E. Duplex sonography for quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis: a comparative analysis of different flow velocity thresholds. Radiology. 2004; 232: 431–439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Ridker PM, Buring JE, Cook NR, Rifai N. C-reactive protein, the metabolic syndrome, and risk of incident cardiovascular events: an 8-year follow-up of 14719 initially healthy American women. Circulation. 2003; 107: 391–397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Pasceri V, Willerson JT, Yeh ET. Direct proinflammatory effect of C-reactive protein on human endothelial cells. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2165–2168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Devaraj S, Xu DY, Jialal I. C-reactive protein increases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression and activity in human aortic endothelial cells: implications for the metabolic syndrome and atherothrombosis. Circulation. 2003; 107: 398–404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Verma S, Li SH, Badiwala MV, Weisel RD, Fedak PW, Li RK, Dhillon B, Mickle DA. Endothelin antagonism and interleukin-6 inhibition attentuate the protherogenic effects of C-reactive protein. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1890–1896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Verma S, Wang CH, Li SH, Dumont AS, Fedak PW, Badiwala MV, Dhillon B, Weisel RD, Li RK, Mickle DA, Stewart DJ. A self-fulfilling prophecy: C-reactive protein attenuates nitric oxide production and inhibits angiogenesis. Circulation. 2002; 106: 913–919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Rothwell PM, Villagra R, Gibson R, Donders R, Warlow CP. Evidence of a chronic systemic cause of instability of atherosclerotic plaques. Lancet. 2000; 355: 19–24.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/4/1263    most recent
01.STR.0000259890.18354.d2v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlager, O.
Right arrow Articles by Schillinger, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlager, O.
Right arrow Articles by Schillinger, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.
Right arrow Other Stroke