Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:e16
Published online before print March 15, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.474551
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/5/e16    most recent
STROKEAHA.106.474551v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menon, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Norris, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menon, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Norris, J.

(Stroke. 2007;38:e16.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Recurrent Carotid Artery Vasospasm or Dissection?

Ranjith K. Menon, MD

Clinical Neurosciences, St. Georges University of London, London, UK

John Norris, MD

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, St. Georges Hospital Medical School, London, UK

To the Editor:

We find the article by Janzarik et al1 reporting extracranial artery vasospasm very unconvincing.

As the authors say, it is a rare phenomenon, if it ever occurs at all. Vasospasm was said to occur during direct insertion of the needle into the extracranial cervical arteries during angiography, but we suspect that in most if not all cases, the arterial narrowing was much more likely attributable to traumatic dissection.

In both patients we believe the authors’ initial diagnosis of carotid dissection was correct. The MRI illustrating the "string sign" would support this diagnosis, and the rapid resolution is completely compatible with healing of dissection. In any case, ultrasound diagnosis of dissection is much less accurate than MRI.2 In addition both patients were young and the second patient had migraine, further supporting the diagnosis of cervical artery dissection.

The misdiagnosis of dissection as vasospasm has serious clinical implications because the current practice of giving antithrombotic treatment in patients with acute dissection would be inappropriate if the patient really has "idiopathic vasospasm".

Acknowledgments

Disclosures

None.

References

  1. Janzarik WG, Ringleb PA, Reinhard M, Rauer S. Recurrent extracranial carotid artery vasospasms: report of 2 cases. Stroke. 2006; 37: 2170–2173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Benninger DH, Georgiadis D, Gandjour J, Baumgartner RW. Accuracy of color duplex ultrasound diagnosis of spontaneous carotid dissection causing ischemia. Stroke. 2006; 37: 377–381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/5/e16    most recent
STROKEAHA.106.474551v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menon, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Norris, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menon, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Norris, J.