Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:1916-1923
Published online before print April 19, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.480061
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/6/1916    most recent
STROKEAHA.106.480061v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, A.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Su, D.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, A.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Su, D.-F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Genetics of Stroke

(Stroke. 2007;38:1916.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Arterial Baroreflex

A Novel Target for Preventing Stroke in Rat Hypertension

Ai-Jun Liu, MD, PhD; Xiu-Juan Ma, PhD; Fu-Ming Shen, MD, PhD; Jian-Guo Liu, MD; Hong Chen, MD, PhD Ding-Feng Su, MD, PhD

From the Department of Pharmacology (A.-J.L., X.-J.M., F.-M.S., J.-G.L., D.-F.S.), School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; and the Department of Pharmacology (H.C.), Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Correspondence to Ding-Feng Su, Professor, MD, PhD, Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, 325 Guo He Road, Shanghai 200433, China. E-mail dfsu{at}citiz.net


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Arterial baroreflex is one of the most important mechanisms in the regulation of cardiovascular activities. Arterial baroreflex function can be expressed as baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). The present study was designed to test 2 hypotheses: (1) BRS is a new independent predictor for the incidence of stroke in hypertension, and (2) restoration of BRS can prevent stroke in hypertension.

Methods— First, 82 stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR-SP) aged 28 to 30 weeks were used. After measuring blood pressure and BRS, the survival time was observed. Second, 12 SHR-SP aged 8 months were used. Blood pressure and BRS were determined separately before and after intragastric administration of ketanserin (0.3 and 3.0 mg/kg). Third, SHR-SP aged 5 months were treated with ketanserin for 12 weeks (0.3 mg and 3.0 mg/kg per day). At the end of the treatment, blood pressure and BRS were determined and the end-organ damage was evaluated. Last, SHR-SP aged 3 months were treated with ketanserin (0.3 and 3.0 mg/kg per day) for life and the survival time was recorded.

Results— Stroke was significantly delayed in rats with high BRS than those with low BRS (time to 50% death was 1.47-fold longer than low BRS group; P<0.01). Ketanserin of 3.0 mg/kg per day decreased blood pressure and enhanced BRS, whereas 0.3 mg/kg per day only enhanced the BRS. Fatal stroke incidences were markedly reduced by treatment with both doses (P<0.0001 versus control group).

Conclusions— The present study provides evidence that BRS is an independent predictor for stroke in hypertension. Restoration of BRS may be a new strategy for the prevention of stroke.


Key Words: arterial baroreflex • baroreflex sensitivity • hypertension • stroke • stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In many countries, including China, stroke is the third leading cause of death only preceded by heart disease and total cancer.1 According to recent estimates published by the World Health Organization, approximately 15 million people per year fall victim to stroke worldwide, of whom 5 million die and another 5 million are left permanently disabled. Many stroke survivors become dependent and require lifelong assistance. Therefore, prevention is the only possible way to curb the stroke pandemic.2 Blood pressure level is one of the most consistent and powerful predictor of stroke, so blood pressure control is an important way to reduce the morbidity of stroke.3–5 However, blood pressure level is not the unique determinant for stroke. Here we propose another important determinant for stroke: the function of arterial baroreflex (ABR).

ABR is one of the most important mechanisms in the regulation of cardiovascular activities. Since the end of 1980s, the pathological importance of ABR function has attracted the attention of many investigators. Baroreflex function, expressed as baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), was found as an important determinant of cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction.6,7 There is also established evidence of abnormal BRS in animal models of stroke8,9 and patients with chronic cerebrovascular disease.10,11 Indeed, it was found that BRS was impaired after acute stroke.12,13 Poststroke patients with impaired BRS had a poor prognosis. However, to our knowledge, there is no report about BRS on predicting stroke. The first aim of this study was therefore to investigate whether BRS can be a new predictor for stroke incidence.

Ketanserin is an antihypertensive drug with affinity for both 5-HT2A and {alpha}1 receptors. Our previous studies demonstrated that ketanserin could significantly decrease blood pressure and improve BRS in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats. Interestingly, a small dose of ketanserin below the threshold of blood pressure reduction could enhance BRS.14 It might be a good tool for studying the effect of restoration BRS on stroke incidence without blood pressure reduction. The second aim of this study was to investigate whether restoration of BRS can prevent or delay the occurrence of stroke in hypertension. The present work was therefore designed to test both hypotheses.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals
Stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR-SP) of either sex were provided by the animal center of our university. They were housed with controlled temperature (23 to 25°C) and lighting (8:00 AM to 8:00 PM light, 8:00 PM to 8:00 AM dark) and with free access to standard food and drinking water. All the animals used in this experiment received humane care in compliance with institutional guidelines for health and care of experimental animals.

Blood Pressure and Heart Period Measurements
Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate were continuously recorded using previously described technique.15–17 Briefly, rats were anesthetized with a combination of ketamine and diazepam. A polyethylene catheter was inserted into the lower abdominal aorta through the left femoral artery for blood pressure measurement and another catheter was inserted into the left femoral vein for phenylephrine administration. In experiment 2, a third catheter was placed into the stomach through a midabdominal incision for drug (ketanserin) administration. The catheters were exteriorized through the interscapular skin. After a 2-day recovery period, the animals were placed for blood pressure recording in individual cylindrical cages containing food and water. The aortic catheter was connected to a blood pressure transducer through a rotating swivel that allowed the animals to move freely in the cage. After approximately 4 hours habituation, the blood pressure signal was digitized by a microcomputer. SBP, DBP, and heart rate values were determined online. The mean values of these parameters during a period of time were calculated.

Determination of Baroreflex Sensitivity
In the previously mentioned blood pressure recording condition, BRS was measured in the conscious rat by using the previously described method.14,16,18 Briefly, a bolus injection of phenylephrine was used to induce blood pressure elevation. The dose of phenylephrine (5 to 10 µg/kg) was adjusted to raise SBP approximately 30±10 mm Hg. There exists a delay (approximately 1 second) between the elevation of blood pressure (stimulus) and the prolongation of heart rate (response) for ABR. In rats, the heart rate is approximately 5 or 6 per second. So, heart period was plotted against SBP for linear regression analysis for 2 to 8 shifts (calculated by computer); the slope with the largest correlation coefficient (r) of heart period/SBP was expressed as BRS (ms/mm Hg). The mean of 2 measurements with proper dose was taken as the final result.

Stroke Symptom Observation
To detect the stroke symptoms, the movement of limbs, respiration, diet, fur, and consciousness of all SHR-SP were observed twice daily (at 8 AM and 6 PM).

Morphological Examination
In experiments 1 and 4, when the rats died, the brain was removed, and the signs of hemorrhage, edema, or infarction were examined and then photographed. Brains without these distinct signs were immersed in a solution of 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and then the brain was dissected and fixed in this solution for 24 hours. The specimens were then washed, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and embedded in paraffin. Sections cut transversely at 5-µm thickness separated by 100 µm from the anterior to the posterior extremity were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for light microscopic study. Other tissues, including the heart and kidney, were also detected grossly.

In experiment 3, the right kidney, thoracic aorta, and heart were dissected quickly after deep anesthesia. Gross detections were performed in the heart (weight and wall thickness), right kidney (appearance, weight, and thickness), and aorta (weight). The ratio of cardiac weight to body weight (mg/g), aortic weight to length (mg/cm), renal weight to body weight, and the ratio of thickness between the renal cortex and medulla were used as indices of cardiac, aortic hypertrophy, and lesion of kidney, respectively.17–21

Protocol
Experiment 1: Effect of Baroreflex Sensitivity and Systolic Blood Pressure in the Prediction of Fatal Stroke in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Ninety SHR-SP at the age of 28 to 30 weeks of either sex were used in this experiment. After approximately 4 hours habituation (from 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM), blood pressure and heart rate were recorded during a period of 4 hours (from 12:00 to 4:00 PM), then BRS was measured using the previously mentioned methods at conscious state (from 4:00 to 5:00 PM, average blood pressure increase is 30±10 mm Hg). After blood pressure and BRS measurements, these rats were replaced in the animal house with the previously mentioned condition. When rats died from fatal stroke, the survival time (from birth to 600 days) was recorded; dead rats without stroke were discarded.

Experiment 2: Effects of a Single Dose of Ketanserin on Blood Pressure and Baroreflex Sensitivity in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
The experiment was performed in 8-month-old male SHR-SP. They were randomly divided into two groups (n=6 in each group) and received ketanserin of 0.3 and 3.0 mg/kg (intragastric), respectively. After approximately 4 hours habituation (from 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM), blood pressure was recorded during a period of 60 minutes (from 12:00 to 1:00 PM) and BRS was measured using the previously mentioned methods. These values were taken as basal control values. A single dose of ketanserin was given through an intragastric catheter. Approximately 30 minutes after drug administration, blood pressure was recorded for another 60 minutes and BRS was determined again.

Experiment 3: Effects of Long-Term Treatment of Ketanserin on Blood Pressure, Baroreflex Sensitivity, and End-Organ Damage in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
The experiment was performed in 5-month-old male SHR-SP. They were randomized into 3 groups: control rats (n=9) and 2 groups treated with ketanserin (low-dose group, 0.3 mg/kg per day, n=10; high-dose group, 3.0 mg/kg per day, n=10). The drugs were mixed into food and administrated consecutively for 12 weeks. After hemodynamic measurement, the animals were killed and the right kidney, thoracic aorta, and heart were dissected quickly. Morphological examination was performed using the previously mentioned methods.

Experiment 4: Effects of Lifelong Treatment of Ketanserin on Stroke Incidence in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
The experiment was performed in 3-month-old male SHR-SP. They were randomly divided into 3 groups: control rats (n=31) and two groups treated with ketanserin (low-dose group, 0.3 mg/kg per day, n=24; high-dose group, 3.0 mg/kg per day, n=23). The drugs were mixed into food and administrated consecutively. The survival time was observed (from birth to 600 days, dead rats without stroke had been discarded).

Statistical Analysis
Investigators were blind to the procedures during blood pressure and heart rate recording, BRS determination, weighing, and morphological examination. Statistical analysis data are expressed as the mean±SD. The comparisons between pre- and postdrug were made by paired t tests and between 2 groups by unpaired t tests. In experiments 1 and 4, Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate survival probabilities. Log-rank testing was used to evaluate equality of survival curves. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. In experiments 2 and 3, the comparisons among 4 or 3 groups were made by one-way analysis of variance. In experiment 1, the relationships between SBP, BRS, and heart rate and survival time were assessed by univariate regression analysis. The Pearson r values were calculated. Furthermore, the stepwise multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate the independent effect and relative importance of SBP, DBP, heart rate, and BRS on the survival time of SHR-SP. F to enter and F to remove were set at P<0.05 and P>0.15, respectively. The selected variables were ranked according to the absolute value of their standardized effect quantified by the standardized partial regression coefficients. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experiment 1: Effect of Baroreflex Sensitivity and Systolic Blood Pressure in the Prediction of Stroke in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Among 90 rats studied, 82 animals that died from stroke were confirmed by displaying neurological symptoms of stroke and/or brain pathological examination (Figure 1). The survival rate is shown in Figure 2. According to the mean BRS value (0.3 ms/mm Hg), 82 SHR-SP were divided into 2 groups: group BRS–low with BRS less than 0.3 ms/mm Hg (n=34) and group BRS–high with BRS more than 0.3 ms/mm Hg (n=48). There was no difference in blood pressure level between these 2 groups. The survival time expressed by Kaplan–Meier survival curves is shown in the Figure 2A. There existed an obvious difference between the 2 curves (log-rank testing {chi}2=7.601, P=0.0058). When half of the animals died, it was 406 days in group BRS–high, whereas it was 276 days in group BRS–low from birth. The survival time was approximately 1.47-fold longer in group BRS–high than group BRS–low. When the 82 rats were divided into 2 groups according to mean SBP level (220 mm Hg), we had group SBP–high with SBP more than 220 mm Hg (n=41) and group SBP–low with SBP less than 220 mm Hg (n=41). The BRS was not different between these 2 groups. A significant difference was seen between the curves (log rank testing {chi}2=5.847, P=0.016). When half of the rats died, it was 398 days in group SBP–low, whereas it was 279 days in group SBP–high. It was approximately 1.43-folder longer in group SBP–low than group SBP–high. When rats were divided into 2 groups according to the mean heart rate, the curves were not different between the high heart rate group and low heart rate group (log rank testing {chi}2=0.095, P=0.757, figure not shown).


Figure 1480061
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Brain lesions in SHR-SP. Brains of dead SHR-SP with neurological sings displayed hemorrhages and edema.


Figure 2480061
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. BRS and SBP predict stroke death in SHR-SP. First, 82 rats were divided into 2 groups according to BRS: group BRS-H: BRS more than 0.3 ms/mm Hg (n=34); group BRS-L: BRS less than 0.3 ms/mm Hg (n=48). A, Kaplan–Meier survival curve by subgroup of BRS in SHR-SP. B, Representative scatter plots showed the significant and positive relationships between survival time and BRS. C, The blood pressure has no difference between the 2 groups. D, The mean heart rate of group BRS-L (open bar, 157±27.2 ms) is significantly lower than the group BRS-H (black bar, 168±30.1 ms). Second, rats were divided into 2 groups according to SBP: group SBP-H: SBP more than 220 mm Hg (n=41); group SBP-L: SBP less than 220 mm Hg (n=41). E, Kaplan–Meier survival curve by subgroup of SBP in SHR-SP. F, Representative scatterplots showed the significant and negative relationships between survival time and SBP. G, The BRS has no difference between the 2 groups. H, The mean heart rate of group SBP-H (black bar, 163±27.1 ms) is higher than group SBP-L (open bar, 151±20.2 ms).*P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus group SBP-L.

Univariate Regression Analysis
The associations among BRS, SBP, and survival time are presented in Figures 2B and 2F. The survival time is significantly and positively correlated with BRS (r=0.441, P<0.0001) and significantly and negatively correlated with SBP (r=–0.392, P<0.001), whereas not significantly correlated with heart rate (r=–0.013, P=0.905).

Stepwise Multivariate Regression Analysis
The independent effects and relative importance of SBP, DBP, heart rate, and BRS on the survival time are assessed by stepwise multivariate regression analysis. The regression analysis shows that only SBP and BRS are significant at the 0.05 level (BRS: P<0.0005; SBP: P<0.005), which indicates they may have independent effects on survival time. The standard partial regression coefficients of BRS were 0.195, and the value of SBP is 0.083. These values mean that the independent BRS and SBP explain 19.5% and 8.3% of the variation in the survival time in SHR-SP, respectively.

Experiment 2: Effects of a Single Dose of Ketanserin on Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, and Baroreflex Sensitivity in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
The effects of ketanserin on blood pressure in conscious SHR-SP are summarized in Figure 3. The large dose (3.0 mg/kg) of ketanserin decreased SBP by 34 mm Hg and the small dose (0.3 mg/kg) did not lower SBP. The decrease in DBP was similar to SBP but much slighter. Neither dose of ketanserin affected heart rate. The BRS is less than 0.3 ms/mm Hg in most SHR-SP in the conscious state. Ketanserin significantly enhanced BRS in both dose groups (Figures 3 and 4Down). The enhancement of BRS by ketanserin was not dose-dependent and had a similar effect on BRS (small dose, 0.41±0.12 versus 0.19±0.11 ms/mm Hg; large dose, 0.40±0.13 versus 0.17±0.08 ms/mm Hg).


Figure 3480061
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Effect of a single dose of ketanserin (0.3 mg/kg, 3.0 mg/kg) on SBP, DBP, heart rate, and BRS in conscious SHR-SP. Open bars, before intragastric administration of ketanserin; solid bars, after intragastric administration of ketanserin. *P<0.05 after ketanserin versus before ketanserin. N=6 in each group. Left: linear figure; right: columnar figure.


Figure 4480061
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Scatterplots showed the effects of a single dose of ketanserin (0.3 mg/kg, 3.0 mg/kg) on BRS in conscious SHR-SP. A and C, Before intragastric administration; B and D, after intragastric administration of ketanserin (B, 0.3 mg/kg, D, 3.0 mg/kg). *P<0.05 after ketanserin versus before ketanserin. N=6 in each group.

Experiment 3: Effects of Long-Term Treatment With Ketanserin on Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, Baroreflex Sensitivity, and End-Organ Damage in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Compared with the control group, long-term treatment with ketanserin did not affect the body weight in SHR-SP. The effects of ketanserin on blood pressure, heart rate, and BRS in conscious SHR-SP were similar to the results of experiment 2. The large dose (3.0 mg/kg per day) of ketanserin decreased SBP by 29 mm Hg and the small dose (0.3 mg/kg per day) did not lower SBP (Figure 5A). Two doses did not affect heart rate. Compared with the control group, small and large doses significantly enhanced BRS (0.37±0.16, 0.36±0.13 versus 0.16±0.09ms/mm Hg).


Figure 5480061
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Effects of long-term treatment of ketanserin (12 weeks) on SBP, DBP, heart rate, BRS, and end-organ damage in conscious SHR-SP. BW, body weight; HW, heart weight; VW, ventricular weight; LVW, left ventricular weight; LVT, left ventricular thick; RVT, right ventricular thick; RKW, right kidney weight; RCT, right kidney cortex thick; RMT, right kidney medulla thick. AW, aortic weight. Open bars, control group; gray bars, 0.3 mg/kg per day; black bars, 3.0 mg/kg per day. N=9 in control group, n=10 in each of the other 2 groups.*P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus control group.

Compared with control group, a small dose of ketanserin (0.3 mg/kg) did not significantly affect cardiac weights, whereas the large dose (3.0 mg/kg) markedly reduced the cardiac hypertrophy. The ratio of kidney weight to body weight as well as the thickness ratio of renal cortex to medulla was significantly increased in rats treated with the small dose. The aortic weight to length ratio was markedly decreased in rats treated with a small or large dose.

Experiment 4: Effects of Lifelong Treatment of Ketanserin on Stroke Incidence in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
The survival time expressed by Kaplan–Meier survival curves is shown in Figure 6. There existed an obvious difference between the control group and the 2 doses of ketanserin groups (log rank testing {chi}2=59.13, P<0.0001). When half of the animals died, it was 319 days in the control group, whereas it was 406 days in the small dose (0.3 mg/kg) group and 426 days in the large dose (3.0 mg/kg) group. Compared with the control group, survival time was approximately 1.27-fold longer in the small dose group and approximately 1.34-fold longer in the large dose group.


Figure 6480061
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Effects of lifelong treatment of ketanserin on the stroke death in SHR-SP. The rats were randomly divided into 3 groups: control group (n=31), group ketanserin 0.3 mg/kg (n=24), group ketanserin 3.0 mg/kg (n=23). Kaplan–Meier survival curves by these 3 subgroups.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Blood pressure level is an important determinant for stroke. The risk of stroke is increased by approximately 25% with each 10 mm Hg increase in SBP.3,4,22,23 In the present work, when the rats were divided into 2 groups according to SBP level, the stroke was significantly delayed in the relatively lower SBP group compared with the higher SBP group. Using the parameter measuring the time when 50% of the rats died, it was found that the survival time was 1.43-fold longer in the SBP–low group than in the SBP–high group. The univariate regression analysis also confirmed that the survival time of SHR-SP was significantly associated with blood pressure level. However, heart rate had no effect on the prediction of stroke.

Most interestingly, our results intensively demonstrate that BRS is a new predictor for stroke in hypertension. The survival time was 1.47-fold longer in the BRS–high group than in the BRS–low group. The univariate and step multivariate regression analysis also confirmed the significant association between survival time and BRS. These results indicate that BRS is a very important and independent novel predictor for stroke in hypertension. The value of standard partial regression coefficients of BRS is higher than SBP. It means that BRS is more important than SBP in the determination of survival time of SHR-SP. However, it should be noted that the baseline of blood pressure level is very high in these animal models, which may influence this analysis.

Many researchers had confirmed that baroreflex dysfunction was associated with many diseases.7,13,24,25 La Rovere and colleagues assessed BRS within 30 days of acute myocardial infarction. During a follow-up period of 2 years, they found the mortality rate is 50% in patients with a BRS less than 3.0 ms/mm Hg, whereas it was 3% in patients with a BRS more than 3.0 ms/mm Hg.26 Robinson and colleagues reported that poststroke patients with impaired BRS values (≤5.0 ms/mm Hg) had a significantly poorer prognosis than patients without impaired BRS (>5.0 ms/mm Hg).13 Recently, a series of studies concerning the baroreflex dysfunction and cardiovascular diseases in rats was performed in our department. It was found that baroreflex dysfunction was related to the severity of atherosclerosis induced by a high-cholesterol diet, the survival times in coronary artery ligature-induced myocardial infarction, in aconitine-induced ventricular arrhythmia, and in endotoxin-induced shock.27–29 Concerning the present work, to our knowledge, it is the first time it has been demonstrated that BRS is a very important predictor for the most important complication in hypertension: stroke.

Because baroreflex dysfunction contributes importantly to the poor prognosis of many cardiovascular diseases, it is reasonable to propose that restoration of impaired BRS might be as a new strategy for cardiovascular diseases. However, little information on this aspect is available until now. In the present work, ketanserin was used to enhance BRS in SHR-SP and the hypothesis that restoring BRS could prevent stroke in hypertension was tested.

Our previous work14 showed that ketanserin significantly decreased blood pressure and improved BRS in the conscious SHR. The effect of ketanserin on BRS was not secondary to a decrease in blood pressure attributable to the following facts: a small dose (0.3 mg/kg) of ketanserin did not decrease blood pressure but enhanced BRS. This finding was repeatedly confirmed in our experiments. It was found that the large dose (3.0 mg/kg) of ketanserin markedly decreased SBP, whereas the small dose (0.3 mg/kg) did not. Ketanserin significantly enhanced BRS in both 2-dose groups. The enhancement of BRS by ketanserin was not dose-dependent or blood pressure-dependent. It possesses a direct action on BRS. Recently, we reported that the action site of ketanserin enhancing baroreflex function is within the rostral ventrolateral medulla in anesthetized rats and mediated by 5-HT2A receptors.30

The most exciting finding of the present work is that, without blood pressure reduction, restoration of BRS by the small dose of ketanserin significantly prevented stroke in SHR-SP. Indeed, the lifelong treatment with the small dose of ketanserin significantly delayed the occurrence of stroke. The effects produced by the small dose nearly approached those produced by the large dose of ketanserin. Because the small dose of ketanserin did not significantly lower blood pressure level, its effects on stroke may be mainly attributable to the restoration of impaired BRS in SHR-SP. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that other unknown beneficial effects besides the restoration of BRS are also involved in the protection of ketanserin against stroke.

Finally, it should be noted that it is not clear why restoration of BRS leads to the extension of survival time. Further investigations are necessary to elucidate the possible mechanisms.

In conclusion, the present study provides evidence that BRS is a new and important predictor for stroke incident in hypertension. Restoration of ABR function is a new target for the prevention of stroke.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30330650, 30672456 and 30670833) and the Science and Technology Development Foundation of Shanghai (No. 03JC14001, 04JC14001).

Disclosures

None.

Received December 13, 2006; accepted January 3, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. He J, Gu D, Wu X, Reynolds K, Duan X, Yao C, Wang J, Chen CS, Chen J, Wildman RP, Klag MJ, Whelton PK. Major causes of death among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 1124–1134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mackay J, Mensah G. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
  3. Luepker RV, Arnett DK, Jacobs DR Jr, Duval SJ, Folsom AR, Armstrong C, Blackburn H. Trends in blood pressure, hypertension control, and stroke mortality: the Minnesota Heart Survey. Am J Med. 2006; 119: 42–49.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, Giampaoli S, Hense HW, Joffres M, Kastarinen M, Poulter N, Primatesta P, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Stegmayr B, Thamm M, Tuomilehto J, Vanuzzo D, Vescio F. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA. 2003; 289: 2363–2369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Editorial. Reducing the burden of stroke. Lancet. 2005; 366: 1752.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. La Rovere MT, Pinna GD, Hohnloser SH, Marcus FI, Mortara A, Nohara R, Bigger JT Jr, Camm AJ, Schwartz PJ; ATRAMI Investigators. Autonomic tone and reflexes after myocardial infarction. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in the identification of patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias: implications for clinical trials. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2072–2077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. La Rovere MT, Bigger JT, Marcus FI, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ for the ATRAMI Investigators. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1998; 351: 478–484.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Doba N, Reis DJ. Role of central and peripheral adrenergic mechanisms in neurogenic hypertension produced by brainstem lesions in rat. Circ Res. 1974; 34: 293–301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Cechetto DF, Wilson JX, Smith KE, Wloski D, Silver MD, Hachinski VC. Autonomic and myocardial changes in middle cerebral artery occlusion: stroke models in the rat. Brain Res. 1989; 502: 296–305.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Appenzeller O, Descarries L. Circulatory reflexes in patients with cerebrovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1964; 271: 820–823.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Gross M, Circulatory reflex in cerebral ischaemia involving different vascular territories. Clin Sci. 1970; 38: 491–502.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Robinson T, James M, Youde J, Panerai R, Potter J. Cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity is impaired after acute stroke. Stroke. 1997; 28: 1671–1676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Robinson TG, Dawson SL, Eames PJ, Panerai RB, Potter JF. Cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity predicts long-term outcome after acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34: 705–712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fu YJ, Shu H, Miao CY, Wang MW, Su DF. Restoration of baroreflex function by ketanserin is not blood pressure dependent in conscious freely moving rats. J Hypertens. 2004; 22: 1165–1172.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Wang J, Shen FM, Wang MW, Su DF. Effects of nine antihypertensive drugs on blood pressure variability in sinoaortic-denervated rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2006; 27: 1013–1017.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Gu XW, Xie HH, Wang J, Shen FM, Su DF. Arterial baroreflex is not involved in salt preference in rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006; 33: 607–611.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Miao CY, Xie HH, Zhan LS, Su DF. Blood pressure variability is more important than blood pressure level in determination of end-organ damage in rats. J Hypertens. 2006; 24: 1125–1135.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Xie HH, Shen FM, Miao CY, Su DF. Blood pressure, baroreflex sensitivity, and end organ damage in hybrid offspring of spontaneously hypertensive rats and Sprague-Dawley rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2005; 26: 1049–1056.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Van Vliet BN, Hu L, Scott T, Chafe L, Montani JP. Cardiac hypertrophy and telemetered blood pressure 6 wk after baroreceptor denervation in normotensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271: R1759–R1769.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Burrell LM, Risvanis J, Kubota E, Dean RG, MacDonald PS, Lu S, Tikellis C, Grant SL, Lew RA, Smith AI, Cooper ME, Johnston CI. Myocardial infarction increases ACE2 expression in rat and humans. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 369–375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Liu JG, Xu LP, Chu ZX, Miao CY, Su DF. Contribution of blood pressure variability to the effect of nitrendipine on end-organ damage in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 2003; 21: 1961–1967.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Fang XH, Zhang XH, Yang QD, Dai XY, Su FZ, Rao ML, Wu SP, Du XL, Wang WZ, Li SC. Subtype hypertension and risk of stroke in middle-aged and older Chinese: a 10-year follow-up study. Stroke. 2006; 37: 38–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Fang XH, Longstreth WT Jr, Li SC, Kronmal RA, Cheng XM, Wang WZ, Wu S, Du XL, Dai XY. Longitudinal study of blood pressure and stroke in over 37,000 people in China. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001; 11: 225–229.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Mortara A, La Rovere MT, Pinna GD, Prpa A, Maestri R, Febo O, Pozzoli M, Opasich C, Tavazzi L. Arterial baroreflex modulation of heart rate in chronic heart failure: clinical and hemodynamic correlates and prognostic implications. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3450–3458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gerritsen J, Dekker JM, TenVoorde BJ, Kostense PJ, Heine RJ, Bouter LM, Heethaar RM, Stehouwer CD. Impaired autonomic function is associated with increased mortality, especially in subjects with diabetes, hypertension, or a history of cardiovascular disease: the Hoorn Study. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 1793–1798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. La Rovere MT, Specchia G, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ. Baroreflex sensitivity, clinical correlates, and cardiovascular mortality among patients with a first myocardial infarction. A prospective study. Circulation. 1988; 78: 816–824.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cai GJ, Miao CY, Xie HH, Lu LH, Su DF. Arterial baroreflex dysfunction promotes atherosclerosis in rats. Atherosclerosis. 2005; 183: 41–47.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Shu H, Yi-Ming W, Xu LP, Miao CY, Su DF. Increased susceptibility of ventricular arrhythmia to aconitine in anesthetized rats is attributed to the inhibition of baroreflex. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2004; 31: 249–253.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Shen FM, Guan YF, Xie HH, Su DF. Arterial baroreflex function determines the survival time in lipopolysaccharide-induced shock in rats. Shock. 2004; 21: 556–560.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Fu YJ, Wang WZ, Cai GJ, Wang MW, Su DF. Action site of ketanserin enhancing baroreflex function is within the rostral ventrolateral medulla in anesthetized rats. Auton Neurosci. 2006; 124: 31–37.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/6/1916    most recent
STROKEAHA.106.480061v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, A.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Su, D.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, A.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Su, D.-F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Genetics of Stroke