Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:1997-1998
Published online before print April 19, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.482877
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/6/1997    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.482877v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sprigg, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bath, P. M.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sprigg, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bath, P. M.W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction

(Stroke. 2007;38:1997.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cochrane Corner

Colony Stimulating Factors (Blood Growth Factors) Are Promising but Unproven for Treating Stroke

Nikola Sprigg, MRCP Philip M.W. Bath, MD

From the Division of Stroke Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Correspondence to Philip M.W. Bath, Division of Stroke Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom NG5 1PB. E-mail philip.bath{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Graeme J. Hankey MD, FRCP Section Editor


Key Words: colony-stimunlating factors • recovery • stem cells • stroke


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
*Introduction
down arrowSearch Strategy
down arrowMain Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowImplications for Future Research
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
Colony stimulating factors (CSFs), also called hematopoietic growth factors, regulate bone marrow production of circulating blood cells. They have been shown to be neuroprotective in experimental stroke. Some CSFs also mobilize the release of bone marrow stem cells into the circulation; these could help brain repair processes after stroke. We systematically assessed the effects of CSFs on functional outcome and hematology measures in patients with recent stroke.


*    Search Strategy
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
*Search Strategy
down arrowMain Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowImplications for Future Research
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index. Principal investigators of trials were also contacted. Unconfounded randomized controlled trials recruiting patients with acute or subacute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke were included. CSFs included stem cell factor, erythropoietin (EPO), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony–stimulating factor (GM-CSF), macrophage colony–stimulating factor (M-CSF, CSF-1), and thrombopoietin, or analogues of these. The primary outcome was functional outcome (assessed as combined death or disability and dependency using scales such as the modified Rankin Scale or Barthel Index) at the end of the trial. Secondary outcomes included safety at the end of treatment (death, impairment, deterioration, extension or recurrence), death at the end of follow-up, and hematology measures. Data on measures by intention to treat were collected and analyzed using random-effects models.


*    Main Results
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSearch Strategy
*Main Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowImplications for Future Research
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
No large trials were identified. EPO therapy was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in death or dependency in 1 small trial (n=40 participants, odds ratio 0.66; 95% CI, 0.19 to 2.31; Figure) but had no significant effect on hematological measures.1 G-CSF was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in death and dependency in 2 small trials (n=46, odds ratio 0.21; 95% CI, 0 to 57.52)2,3 (Figure) and significantly elevated white cell count in 3 trials (n=91, weighted mean difference 27.56; 95% CI, 17.56 to 37.56).2–4


Figure 1482877
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Forest-plot showing the effect of CSF on combined death or disability and dependency at end of trial.

Further randomized controlled trials of CSFs are underway or recently completed; these include 1 with EPO5 and 2 with G-CSF.6,7 No trials of stem cell factor, GM-CSF, M-CSF, thrombopoietin, were identified.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSearch Strategy
up arrowMain Results
*Discussion
down arrowImplications for Future Research
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
It is apparent that at least 2 paradigms are being studied with CSF in the treatment of stroke. First, CSFs such as EPO and G-CSF are neuroprotective in animal models of acute stroke, and this potential mechanism is under investigation in patients with acute stroke.1,5,6 Second, stem cell mobilizing CSFs (as with stem cell factor, G-CSF, and GM-CSF) could contribute to brain repair through neurogenic-related mechanisms, again as has been seen in experimental models of stroke; 3 trials have investigated this approach, with a further trial ongoing.7


*    Implications for Future Research
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSearch Strategy
up arrowMain Results
up arrowDiscussion
*Implications for Future Research
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
Further studies need to address mechanisms by which CSFs might work; for example, preclinical studies suggest that CSF could be neuroprotective whereas those factors which mobilize endogenous stem cells could enhance neurogenesis. Understanding potential mechanisms of action will help investigators decide when to administer treatment for testing in phase III trials: for example, during the hyperacute or subacute phases of stroke. Whether CSFs aid recovery in chronic stroke also needs to be addressed.


*    Conclusion
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSearch Strategy
up arrowMain Results
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowImplications for Future Research
*Conclusion
down arrowReferences
 
No large trials of EPO, G-CSF or other CSFs have been performed, and it is too early to know whether CSFs improve functional outcome.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

The authors are running an independent phase II trial of G-CSF funded by a UK charity, The Stroke Association. P.B. has acted as a consultant to Axaron (who are developing G-CSF) and Lundbeck (who are developing an EPO analogue); no monies received in consultancy fees from Axaron or Lundbeck were used in any way whatsoever for the development of the protocol, and neither company had any influence over the initiation, planning or production of the protocol.

Received January 18, 2007; accepted February 2, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSearch Strategy
up arrowMain Results
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowImplications for Future Research
up arrowConclusion
*References
 

  1. Ehrenreich H, Hasselblatt M, Dembowski C, Cepek L, Lewczuk P, Stiefel M, Rustenbeck HH, Breiter N, Jacob S, Knerlich F, Bohn M, Poser W, Ruther E, Kochen M, Gefeller O, Gleiter C, Wessel TC, De Ryck M, Itri L, Prange H, Cerami A, Brines M, Siren AL. Erythropoietin therapy for acute stroke is both safe and beneficial. Molecular Medicine. 2002; 8: 495–505.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Shyu WC, Lin SZ, Yang HI, Tzeng YS, Pang CY, Yen PS, Li H. Functional recovery of stroke rats induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-stimulated cells. Circulation. 2004; 110: 1847–1854.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sprigg N, Bath P, Zhao L, Willmot M, Gray LJ, Walker M, Dennis MS, Russel N. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor mobilizes bone marrow stem cells in patients with sub-acute ischaemic stroke: The Stem cell Trial of recovery EnhanceMent after Stroke (STEMS) pilot randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2006; 37: 2979–2983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Zhang J, Deng M, Zhang Y, Sui W, Wang L, Sun A, Song H, Lu M, Fan D. A short-term assessment of recombinant human granulocyte-stimulating factor (rhg-csf) in treatment of acute cerebral infarction. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2006; 21 (suppl 4): 143. Abstract.
  5. Ehrenreich H. The Multicenter-Erythropoietin-Stroke trial. Available at: http://www.epo-study.de/index_eng.html. Accessed August 2006.
  6. Axaron Bioscience A. Treatment with ax200 for acute ischemic stroke. Available at: http://clinicaltrialsgov. Accessed August 2006.
  7. Bath PMW. Stem cell Trial of recovery EnhanceMent after Stroke 2 (STEMS2): pilot randomised placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in mobilising bone marrow stem cells in sub-acute stroke. Available at:http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN63336619. Accessed November 2006.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/6/1997    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.482877v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sprigg, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bath, P. M.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sprigg, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bath, P. M.W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction