| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:2549.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Internal Medicine (M.K., C.P.), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; INSERM U780-IRF69 (L.M., B.B.), Villejuif, and University Paris Sud, Kremlin Bicetre, France; the Institute fur Stoffwechselforschung (T.K.), Frankfurt, Germany; the Department of Clinical Sciences Medicine (P.N.), University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; the Department of Endocrinology (P.B.S.), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; and the Department of Technosciences for Medical Application and Research (M.P.), CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy.
Correspondence to Michaela Kozakova, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126 Pisa, Italy. E-mail m.kozakova{at}int.medunipi.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods— The study population consisted of 432 healthy subjects (166 men; mean±SD age, 43±8 years; range, 30 to 60 years) free of carotid atherosclerosis and with low coronary heart disease risk, as determined by the Framingham prediction score sheet. All subjects underwent B-mode ultrasonography of the extracranial carotid arteries and physical activity assessment by actigraph, an accelerometer capable of monitoring the intensity and duration of body movements. The intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery was measured on ultrasound images, along with systodiastolic changes in luminal diameter, and indices of carotid stiffness were calculated.
Results— Intima-media thickness and carotid stiffness increased with age in both men and women (r=0.24 to 0.52, P<0.001). The magnitude of objectively assessed daily physical activity was negatively related to indices of carotid stiffness (r from –0.20 to –0.25, P<0.001) but not to intima-media thickness. In multivariate regression analyses that included several cardiovascular risk factors such as obesity, blood pressure, plasma lipids, and smoking habits, age and physical activity were independently related to carotid stiffness.
Conclusions— This study provides cross-sectional evidence that habitual physical activity is inversely related to the age-dependent increase in carotid wall stiffness in a young to middle-age population at low risk.
Key Words: carotid arteries intima-media thickness aging exercise
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Physical activity is defined as any body movement that results in energy expenditure. Body movements can be continuously monitored by small accelerometers that use piezoelectric transducers and microprocessors to quantify the magnitude and direction of the acceleration.9 An objective estimate of habitual physical activity that comprises activities during occupation, leisure time, sports, transportation, and household behavior might provide an insight on individual lifestyle and might help investigators to understand the possible impact of daily activity on vascular structure and function. Thus, the purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the relations between age, habitual physical activity, and large-artery wall thickness and stiffness in a population of young to middle-age subjects at low cardiovascular risk. An objective assessment of habitual physical activity used accelerometers to monitor body movements during daily behavior.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Medical Data Collection and Standard Biologic Procedures
Medical data were collected during face-to-face interviews according to a standardized questionnaire administered by trained interviewers. Information regarding medical history, drug use, and alcohol and cigarette consumption were collected. Clinical cardiovascular disease was excluded on the basis of medical history and resting ECG. Weight was measured in subjects in undergarments, height was measured by stadiometer, and body mass index was calculated. Waist circumference was measured as the narrowest circumference between the lower rib margin and the anterior superior iliac spine. Brachial BP and resting heart rate were measured 3 times with a digital electronic tensiometer (Omron model 705cp) and with the subject seated for at least 10 minutes. Plasma total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol; triglycerides; fasting and 2-hour plasma glucose; and insulin were measured in a central laboratory. A 10-year absolute risk for total coronary heart disease end points was estimated with the Framingham Heart Study prediction score sheet.11
Carotid Artery Ultrasound Imaging and Analysis
High-resolution B-mode ultrasound was used to assess carotid artery wall thickness and stiffness. In the RISC study, the carotid images were obtained at each recruiting center by trained and certified technicians who followed a standardized protocol2,10 and used high-resolution ultrasound scanners (Acuson Aspen, Acuson Sequoia, ATL 5000 HDL, Agilent Sonos 4500, or Siemens Elegra, all with a 7.5-or 10.0-MHz linear-array transducer). The imaging protocol required acquisition of longitudinal B-mode images of the distal right and left common carotid artery (CCA), the carotid bifurcation, and the origin of the internal carotid artery from the anterior, lateral, and posterior angles, as recommended.2 At the end of the examination, longitudinal B-mode images of the left CCA were recorded on videotape during at least 15 cardiac cycles, and brachial BP was simultaneously measured (Omron model 705cp). Carotid images were analyzed in a centralized reading center (Pisa) by a single reader (M.K.) blinded to clinical data and using a high-resolution videorecorder (Panasonic AG-MD830) coupled to a computer-driven image-analysis system.
For the purpose of this study, longitudinal images of the left CCA recorded during several cardiac cycles were digitized, and the lumen-intima boundaries of the near and far walls were selected in an end-diastolic frame (Figure, A),
10 to 20 mm proximal to the carotid bulb. Lumen-intima boundaries during the cardiac cycle were followed by a contour-tracking system developed at the Institute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy. The location procedure of the system is based on computation of the first-order absolute moment used as an edge detector.12 The changes in carotid diameter during the cardiac cycle were depicted in calibrated distension curves (Figure, B), in which the minimal and the maximal diameters were measured in 5 cardiac cycles. In 30 subjects, left CCA distensions as measured by our off-line contour-tracking system were compared with measurements performed during the same session with the echo-tracking system based on radiofrequency data acquisition and postprocessing (Wall Track System 2, Pie Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands).13 Furthermore, in 60 subjects, the minimal CCA luminal diameter as measured by our tracking system was compared with the diameter measured manually in frozen B-mode end-diastolic images as the distance between the lumen-intima interfaces of the near and far walls.14
|
The IMT of the near and far walls was measured in end-diastolic frames, in the same region where the lumen-intima boundaries were tracked. The measurements were performed manually by the operator14 at 5 measurement points for each wall, and the mean near- and far-wall IMTs were calculated by averaging the measurement points. CCA IMT was calculated as the mean of the near- and far-wall IMTs. CCA end-diastolic diameter (d), distension (
d=maximal minus minimal diameter), and BP measured during ultrasound examination were used to calculate indices of carotid stiffness, ß stiffness index and Youngs elastic modulus (Einc). ß stiffness index indicates the changes in arterial diameter adjusted for distending pressure: ß index=[ln (systolic BP/diastolic BP)]/(
d/d).15 Einc provides an estimate of the intrinsic elastic properties of the arterial wall and is calculated as the ratio of stress and circumferential strain in the vessel wall: Einc=[(systolic BP–diastolic BP)*d2]/2
d*IMT.15 Intraobserver and interobserver variations of all measurements were performed in 100 subjects.
Habitual Physical Activity Estimation
Habitual physical activity was estimated by actigraph, an accelerometer capable of monitoring body movements. The actigraph monitor used (Computer Science Applications model AM7164, Manufacturing Technology, Inc, Fort Walton Beach, Fla) was a single-axis accelerometer that used a piezoelectric transducer to sense accelerations ranging from 0.05 to 2.0g.9 The limited frequency response (from 0.25 to 2.5 Hz) ensured that only normal human motions were detected. The acceleration signal was digitized by an 8-bit analog-to-digital converter at a sampling rate of 10 samples per second. Each digitized signal was summed for a 1-minute interval, and the total activity per minute was saved in memory.
For each subject, the actigraph was secured by a belt at the small of the back from waking up until going to sleep. Subjects were asked to wear the monitor for 7 days if possible, a weekend included, and to behave in their usual manner. In the final analysis of recordings, only those days when the accelerometer was worn for at least 10 hours were included. The summary measure of habitual physical activity was expressed as the average number of counts per day worn.
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data are expressed as mean±SD and categorical data as percentages. ANOVA was used to compare continuous variables, and a
2 test was used for categorical variables. Relations between the 4 outcome variables (CCA IMT, diameter, ß stiffness index, and Einc) and continuous variables were evaluated by univariate Pearson correlation coefficients. Multiple-regression analysis was then used to study the independence of association of continuous variables that did not exhibit excessive colinearity with each other, after adjusting for center. Statistical significance was set at a value of P
0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with JMP software (SAS, Cary, NC).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
d) measured by our off-line contour-tracking system that follows inner-diameter changes (ie, that tracks lumen-intima boundaries) was higher than that measured by the radiofrequency wall-tracking system that follows outer-diameter changes (ie, that tracks media-adventitia boundaries): 0.53±0.13 versus 0.49±0.15 mm (P<0.01).16 The correlation coefficient and mean difference between the 2 measurements were, respectively, 0.91 and 0.04±0.06 mm. Pulse pressure was comparable during both acquisitions (50±8 versus 49±7 mm Hg, P=0.8). Minimal luminal diameter measured by off-line tracking was similar to that measured in frozen end-diastolic images (5.80±0.53 versus 5.77±0.51 mm, P=0.12). The correlation coefficient and mean difference between the 2 measurements were, respectively, 0.97 and 0.03±0.14 mm. The intraobserver and interobserver variabilities of measurements were, respectively, 4.1% and 6.8% for CCA IMT, 3.9% and 5.1% for minimal diameter, and 7.7% and 8.7% for absolute distension.
Characteristics of the Study Population
The population of the present study consisted of 432 subjects, 166 men and 266 women, who satisfied the following criteria: (1) low 10-year coronary heart disease risk as estimated from the Framingham prediction score sheet11; (2) absence of carotid plaque (IMT measured in any carotid segment <1.5 mm); (3) left CCA near- and far-wall lumen-intima boundaries clearly visualized in digitized images in the whole cardiac cycle; and (4) actigraph recording available (average time of actigraph worn=5.5±1.5 days). Because the majority of atherosclerotic risk factors differed between men and women (Table 1), the 2 sexes were evaluated separately. Women had smaller CCA diameter, IMT, and carotid stiffness, as assessed by the ß stiffness index and Einc (Table 2). The average number of counts per day worn was comparable between men and women. The 2 sexes did not differ in smoking habits, but alcohol consumption was lower in women (Table 2). Fifty-five women (20%) were postmenopausal, and 11 of them took hormone replacement therapy.
|
|
Carotid Wall Thickness and Stiffness, Age, and Atherosclerotic Risk Factors
Table 3 demonstrates the relations of carotid structure and function with age, anthropometric parameters, systolic BP, metabolic measures, and physical activity in both men (upper part of Table, in italics) and women (lower part of Table, in bold). CCA IMT, minimal diameter, and indices of stiffness were directly related to age, several atherosclerotic risk factors, and 10-year risk of total coronary events. In both sexes, the magnitude of habitual physical activity, assessed as the average number of counts per day worn, was inversely related to the ß index and Einc but not to CCA IMT. Table 3 also shows the relations between habitual physical activity, atherosclerotic risk factors, and metabolic measures.
|
To assess whether any of the variables that showed a significant association with carotid structure and function in univariate analysis contributed independently to the variability of these indices, a multiple-regression analysis was performed in which standardized IMT, minimal diameter, ß index, and Einc were entered as dependent variables and all their significant correlates were entered as independent variables. Office BP was included among independent variables because office BP was correlated only modestly with BP measured during the ultrasound examination (correlation coefficients in men r=0.56, 0.45, and 0.44, and in women, r=0.61, 0.56, and 0.47 for systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure, respectively). All analyses were adjusted for center, smoking habit, and in women, for menopausal status. Independent factors affecting IMT were age, arterial diameter, and LDL cholesterol in men, and age, arterial diameter, and office systolic BP in women. These factors accounted for 35% and 42% of the variance in IMT (Table 4). Independent correlates of luminal diameter were body mass index in men and waist girth and systolic BP in women. In men, independent correlates of carotid stiffness indices were age and the average number of counts per day worn, which accounted for 23% and 22%, respectively, of their variability. In women, independent correlates of the ß stiffness index were age, menopausal status, fasting insulin, and average number of counts per day worn, and of Einc, menopausal status, office systolic BP, fasting insulin, and average number of counts per day worn. These variables explained 21% and 23%, respectively, of the variability in carotid stiffness (Table 4).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Carotid Artery Wall Thickness and Stiffness Versus Age
In our healthy, young to middle-age men and women at low cardiovascular risk and an IMT within normal limits (range, 403 to 920 µm), independent predictors of CCA wall thickness were age, luminal diameter, and in women, systolic BP. These findings are in keeping with clinical and experimental evidence suggesting that a minor degree of carotid wall thickening may reflect structural changes within the intima and media related to physiologic aging17–20 or even an adaptive response to changes in diameter, distending pressure, and shear stress.14,17,21,22 The independent relation between IMT and plasma LDL cholesterol observed in men might indicate an interaction between physiologic vessel remodeling and early atherosclerosis.
The age-associated increase in carotid wall thickness is accompanied by an increase in wall stiffness1,4,5,18 that is attributed to accelerated fragmentation of elastin and excessive synthesis of collagen within the arterial media.1 In our population, age was the strongest independent predictor of carotid stiffness in men only. Sex differences in the mechanical properties of the large arteries might be linked to endogenous estrogen levels, as estrogens have been shown to modulate the elastin-collagen ratio and smooth muscle cell numbers within the vascular wall.23 Indeed, in our population, a high percentage of women (80%) were premenopausal, and menopausal status was an independent predictor of carotid stiffness.
Carotid Artery Wall Thickness and Stiffness Versus Habitual Physical Activity
Regular physical activity is believed to slow the atherosclerotic process both by reducing atherosclerotic risk factors and by retarding aging of the arterial wall. However, it is not established whether physical activity may attenuate only the age-related increase in arterial stiffness or also the age-associated increase in wall thickness and whether a favorable effect on the arterial wall can be obtained only by endurance exercise training or also by less vigorous activities.
Previous studies assessing the effect of endurance training and cardiorespiratory fitness on carotid structure and function in healthy subjects have demonstrated that endurance exercise and higher aerobic capacity attenuate the age-related increase in arterial stiffness4,5,24 but not in wall thickness.19,24 Studies with self-reported questionnaires to evaluate the effect of habitual physical activity on carotid properties in the general population have produced opposing results. In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, habitual physical activity had no effect on carotid stiffness,6 whereas physical activity at work25 was a protective factor for increased IMT. The protective effect of leisure-time physical activity on IMT has also been observed in the Tromso study,8 and in the Los Angeles Atherosclerotic study,7 activity during leisure was inversely related to the progression of carotid atherosclerosis.
Our results do not indicate that daily physical activity has a protective effect on carotid IMT. The discrepancy with previous studies can be explained by (1) the fact that habitual physical activity was objectively estimated by monitoring body movements during daily behavior and (2) a study population that was at low cardiovascular risk. However, even in this selected population, the magnitude of daily physical activity was inversely related to indices of carotid stiffness. Habitual physical activity was also inversely related to some proatherosclerotic factors, such as central adiposity, BP, plasma lipids, and insulin, a finding that could support the hypothesis that the favorable effect of activity on the vascular wall is mediated by a BP decrease and metabolic profile improvement. However, in a multiple-regression model that included all of these factors, physical activity was independently related to carotid stiffness. Mechanisms by which regular physical activity might directly influence vascular stiffness are still speculative and include the effect of activity on the bioavailability of nitric oxide, connective tissue cross-linking, vascular smooth muscle tone, and gene expression.26–28
Study Limitations
The design of the RISC study, a multicenter European study, allows investigation of a large and well-characterized white population at low risk. However, owing to a high number of recruiting centers, heterogeneous and only conventional ultrasound scanners were used for the carotid studies. To restrict the first limitation, all ultrasound technicians were trained and certified in the ultrasound reading center, the entire carotid imaging procedure was performed according to a standardized protocol,10 and a single reader processed and analyzed all carotid images. All analyses were center-adjusted. The use of conventional B-mode ultrasound scanners and an off-line contour-tracking system, instead of a radiofrequency-based wall-tracking system, which may estimate arterial diameter changes with higher resolution, represents an additional caveat related to the multicenter character of the study. The validation of our contour-tracking system that follows inner-diameter changes against radiofrequency wall tracking that follows outer-diameter changes showed a good correlation between the 2 methods, although the absolute distensions measured by our approach were higher. This observation is in agreement with data showing that with inner-diameter measurements, absolute and relative distensions are significantly larger compared with outer-diameter measurements.16
Brachial BP was used for calculation of carotid stiffness indices after assuming that pulse pressure measured in the brachial artery is representative of pulse pressure in the CCA. Owing to a pressure-amplification phenomenon throughout the arterial tree, pulse pressure is higher in the brachial artery than in more central vessels, and this difference decreases with age. Consequently, with the use of brachial pulse pressure, carotid stiffness can be overestimated, especially in younger subjects.
| Conclusions and Perspectives |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Project Management Board: B. Balkau (Villejuif, France), S.W. Coppack (London, England), J.M. Dekker (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), E. Ferrannini (Pisa, Italy), A. Mari (Padova, Italy), A. Natali (Pisa, Italy), and M. Walker (Newcastle, England).
Core Laboratories and Reading Centers: Lipids—Dublin, Ireland: P. Gaffney, J. Nolan, G. Boran; Hormones—Odense, Denmark: C. Olsen, L. Hansen, H. Beck-Nielsen; Albumin:creatinine—Amsterdam, The Netherlands: A. Kok, J. Dekker; Genetics—Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England: S. Patel, M. Walker; Stable isotope laboratory— Pisa, Italy: A. Gastaldelli, D. Ciociaro; Ultrasound reading center—Pisa, Italy: M. Kozakova; ECG reading—Villejuif, France: M.T. Guillanneuf; Data management—Villejuif, France: B. Balkau, L. Mhamdi; and Mathematical modeling and website management—Padova, Italy: A. Mari, G. Pacini, C. Cavaggion.
Coordinating Office: Pisa, Italy: S.A. Hills, L. Landucci, L. Mota.
Sources of Funding
The RISC Study is supported by European Union grant QLG1-CT-2001-01252, AstraZeneca, and Merck Sante.
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 8, 2007; accepted February 28, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, Rosamond W, Szklo M, Sharett AR, Clegg LX. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid artery wall thickness and major risk factors; the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987–1993. Am J Epidemiol. 1997; 146: 483–494.
3. Matace-Raso F, van der Cammen TJM, Hofman A, van Popele NM, Bots ML, Schalekamp MADH, Asmar R, Reneman RS, Hoeks A, Breteler MMB, Witteman JCM. Arterial stiffness and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 2006; 113: 657–663.
4. Tanaka H, Dinenno FA, Monahan KD, Clevenger CM, DeSouza CA, Seals DR. Aging, habitual exercise, and dynamic arterial compliance. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1270–1275.
5. Vaitkevicius PV, Fleg JL, Engel JH, OConnor FC, Wright JG, Lakatta LE, Yin FCP, Lakatta EG. Effect of age and aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy adults. Circulation. 1993; 88 (pt 1): 1456–1462.
6. Schmitz KN, Arnett DK, Bank A, Liao D, Evans GW, Evenson KR, Stevens J, Sorlie P, Folsom AR. Arterial distensibility and physical activity in the ARIC Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33: 2065–2071.
7. Nordstrom CK, Dwyer KM, Merz NB, Shircore A, Dwyer JH. Leisure time physical activity and early atherosclerosis: the Los Angeles Atherosclerotic study. Am J Med. 2003; 115: 19–25.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Bugge AS, Bonna KH, Joakimsen O. Age and sex differences in the relationship between inherited and lifestyle risk factors and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis: the Tromso study. Atherosclerosis. 2001; 154: 437–448.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30: 777–781.
10. Hills SA, Balkau B, Coppack SW, Dekker JM, Mari A, Natali A, Walker M, Ferrannini E; EGIR-RISC Study groups. The EGIR-RISC Study (the European group for the study of insulin resistance; relationship between insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk), I: methodology and objectives. Diabetologia. 2004; 47: 566–570.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Wilson PWF, DAgostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1837–1847.
12. Paterni M, Demi M, Gemignani V, Benassi A. Real-time assessment of endothelial function. Comput Cardiol. 2001; 28: 449–452.
13. Brands PJA, Hoeks APG, Willigers J, Willekes C, Reneman RS. An integrated system for the non-invasive assessment of the vessel wall and hemodynamic properties of large arteries by means of ultrasound. Eur J Ultrasound. 1999; 9: 257–266.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Bots ML, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Increased common carotid intima-media thickness: adaptive response or a reflection of atherosclerosis? findings from the Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 1997; 28: 2442–2447.
15. Liao D, Arnett DK, Tyroler HA, Riley WA, Chambless LE, Szklo M, Heiss G. Arterial stiffness and the development of hypertension: the ARIC Study. Hypertension. 1999; 34: 201–206.
16. Segers P, Rabben SI, De Backer J, De Sutter J, Gillebert TC, Van Bortel L, Verdonck P. Functional analysis of the common carotid artery: relative distension differences over the vessel wall measured in vivo. J Hypertens. 2004; 22: 973–981.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Homma S, Hirose N, Ishida H, Ishii T, Araki G. Carotid plaque and intima-media thickness assessed by B-mode ultrasonography in subjects ranging from young adults to centenarians. Stroke. 2001; 32: 830–835.
18. Schmidt-Trucksass A, Grathwohl D, Schmid A, Boragk R, Upmeier C, Keul J, Huonker M. Structural, functional and hemodynamic changes of the common carotid artery with age in male subjects. Atheroscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 1091–1097.
19. Tanaka H, Seals DR, Monahan KD, Clevenger CM, DeSouza CA, Dinenno FA. Regular aerobic exercise and the age-related increase in carotid artery intima-media thickness in healthy men. J Appl Physiol. 2001; 192: 1458–1464.
20. Vazquez-Padron RI, Lasko D, Li S, Louis L, Pestana IA, Pamg M, Liotta C, Fornoni A, Aitouche A, Pham SM. Aging exacerbates neointimal formation, increases proliferation and reduces susceptibility to apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells in mice. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 40: 1199–1207.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Tanaka H, Dinenno FA, Monahan KD, DeSouza C, Seals DR. Carotid artery wall hypertrophy with age is related to local systolic blood pressure in healthy men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 21: 82–87.
22. Dobrin PB. Mechanical factors associated with the development of intimal and medial thickening in the vein grafts subjected to arterial pressure. Hypertension. 1995; 26: 38–43.
23. Fisher G, Swain M. Effect of sex hormones on blood pressure and vascular connective tissue in castrated and noncastrated male rats. Am J Physiol. 1977; 232: H617–H621.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Ferreira I, Twisk JWR, Stehouwer CDA, Van Mechelen W, Kemper HCG. Longitudinal changes in VO2max: association with carotid IMT and arterial stiffness. Med Sci Spots Exerc. 2003; 35: 1670–1678.[CrossRef]
25. Folsom AR, Eckfeldt JH, Weitzman S, Ma J, Chambless LE, Barnes RW, Cram KB, Hutchinson RG. Relation of carotid artery wall thickness to diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose and insulin, body size, and physical activity. Stroke. 1994; 25: 66–73.[Abstract]
26. Bruel A, Ortoft G, Oxlund H. Inhibition of cross-links in collagen is associated with reduced stiffness of the aorta in young rats. Atherosclerosis. 1998; 27: 115–119.
27. Spier SA, Laughlin MH, Delp MD. Effect of acute and chronic exercise on vasoconstrictor responsiveness of rat abdominal aorta. J Appl Physiol. 1994; 77: 1829–1833.
28. Schweitzer NB, Alessio HM, Hagerman AE, Roy S, Sen K, Nagy S, Byrnes RN, Philip BN, Woodward JL, Wiley RL. Access to exercise and its relation to cardiovascular health and gene expression in laboratory animals. Life Sci. 2005; 77: 2246–2261.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Forst, B. Wilhelm, A. Pfutzner, W. Fuchs, U. Lehmann, F. Schaper, M. Weber, J. Muller, T. Konrad, and M. Hanefeld Investigation of the vascular and pleiotropic effects of atorvastatin and pioglitazone in a population at high cardiovascular risk Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, November 1, 2008; 5(4): 298 - 303. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |