| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2008;39:2760.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Comprehensive Stroke Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham.
Correspondence to Anne W. Alexandrov, PhD, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Comprehensive Stroke Center, RWUH M-226, 619 19th St South, Birmingham, AL 35249-3280. E-mail annealex{at}uab.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods— Healthy volunteers were recruited and screened for exclusions. Bilateral 2-MHz pulsed wave transcranial Doppler (TCD) probes were mounted by head frame, and baseline M1 MCA TCD measurements were obtained. ECP was then initiated using standard procedures for 30 minutes, and TCD readings were repeated at 5 and 20 minutes. Physiological correlates associated with ECP-TCD waveform morphology were identified, and measurable criteria for TCD assessment of ECP arterial mean flow velocity (MFV) augmentation were constructed.
Results— Five subjects were enrolled in the study. Preprocedural M1 MCA TCD measurements were within normal limits. Onset of ECP counterpulsation produced an immediate change in TCD waveform configuration with the appearance of a second upstroke at the dicrotic notch, labeled peak diastolic augmented velocity (PDAV). Although end-diastolic velocities did not increase, both R-MCA and L-MCA PDAVs were significantly higher than baseline end-diastolic values (P<0.05 Wilcoxon rank-sum test) at 5 and 20 minutes. Augmented MFVs (aMFVs) were also significantly higher than baseline MFV in the R-MCA and L-MCA at both 5 and 20 minutes (P<0.05).
Conclusions— ECP induces marked changes in cerebral arterial waveforms and augmented peak diastolic and mean MCA flow velocities on TCD in 5 healthy subjects.
Key Words: cerebral blood flow cerebral hemodynamics transcranial Doppler external counterpulsation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
External counterpulsation (ECP) is an approved noninvasive therapy for angina, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock that augments blood flow to cardiac and systemic circuits.1–3 ECP uses ECG-triggered pressure during ventricular diastole delivered by air-filled cuffs around the lower vascular tree. The hemodynamic effects of ECP include 20% to 25% improvement in flow volume in the carotid, renal, and hepatic arteries, with a 20% to 40% improvement in coronary artery blood flow and a 12% increase in left ventricular stroke volume.4 Direct cardiac catheterization during ECP demonstrates significantly increased diastolic pressure augmentation (71±10 to 137±21 mm Hg; P<0.0001) with improved mean intracoronary pressures (88±9 to 102±16 mm Hg; P<0.006) and a 28% increase in coronary flow on Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia (TIMI) grading (P=0.001).5
In angina refractory to medical therapy, ECP has shown similar findings to coronary artery bypass and percutaneous coronary interventions including improvement in cardiac functional class, decreased anginal episodes, and reduction in nitroglycerin use.6–10 Reduction of anginal episodes and improved quality of life have been sustained to 2 years after ECP in patients with EF <35% and refractory angina.11 ECP effects have also been studied using treadmill exercise tests and 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) at rest and with dipyridamole before/after ECP, alongside measurement of neurohumoral factors and nitric oxide, suggesting that ECP may promote development and recruitment of collateral vessels in ischemic territories.12
ECP noninvasive hemodynamic effects are similar to intraaortic balloon pumps (IABP),13 yet carry less implementation risk. Lastly, ECP has been shown to increase CBF and renal perfusion.14 As a first step in developing methods for clinical stroke trials, we sought to determine the effect of ECP on MCA blood flow augmentation using TCD in normal controls.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Once enrolled, continuous ECG and preprocedural systemic hemodynamics were obtained using indirect oscillometric BP and transthoracic bioimpedance cardiac output (CO) to observe for cardiac changes that may affect intracranial blood flow. ECP leg garments were placed and ECP was initiated using model MC-2 (Vasomedical). This equipment consists of an air compressor, a console, a treatment table, and 2 sets of 3 pressure cuffs which are wrapped and Velcro-secured to subjects lower extremities. Using compressed air, pressure is applied via the cuffs to the lower extremities in a sequence synchronized with the cardiac cycle as follows:
Bilateral 2-MHz pulsed wave TCD probes were mounted by standard head frame (Marc series, Spencer Technologies) for constant angle of insonation, and M1 MCA waveforms were monitored at 50- to 55-mm depth. Baseline TCD measurements (peak systolic velocity [PSV], end-diastolic velocity [EDV], mean flow velocity [MFV=(PSV–EDV)/3+EDV] and Gosling-King pulsatility index [PI]) were simultaneously recorded in both MCAs. Continuous bilateral TCD monitoring was then initiated for the duration of ECP. Two sets of TCD waveforms were recorded at 5 and 20 minutes, and a third measured immediately after ECP termination. Counterpulsation lasted 30 minutes; settings were adjusted to the level when diastolic velocity increased on spectral TCD waveforms in a manner similar to IABP counterpulsation.15 Inflation/deflation rhythmic artifact precluded continuous CO measurement, therefore, a panel of systemic hemodynamic measures was recorded after ECP discontinuation. Nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon rank-sum test) were used for all statistical analyses.
ECP waveforms were analyzed in relation to cardiac cycle and baseline measures. Physiological correlates to IABP waveform morphology were identified using the methods we have previously published,15,16 and knowledge of these characteristics was applied to construct measurable criteria for TCD assessment of ECP flow augmentation.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
PDAVs in the right and left MCA were statistically higher than baseline end-diastolic values (Table 2). Overall augmented mean flow velocity (aMFV) was calculated using the formula in Figure 2, to capture the increased flow of ECP during diastole similar to IABP counterpulsation. Augmented MFVs were significantly higher than baseline MFVs in the right and left MCA (Table 2). Post-ECP measures were not significantly different from baseline (Table 1), and all subjects completed the 30 minute counterpulsation period without difficulty or complications.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The forerunner to ECP, IABP, is a well established therapy for the management of many cardiac conditions.17,18 Others have documented deflation flow gaps during IABP counterpulsation,16,19–21 but our ECP methods did not produce these on TCD spectra. Additionally, IAB use requires significant staff education and training on both cardiac and systemic arterial hemodynamic waveform morphology to ensure safe use of the device with appropriate prescription of inflation/deflation sequences in relation to the cardiac cycle.
ECP carries few risks and is likely to be more feasible in stroke treatment than either invasive IAB or intra-aortic inflation devices (Neuroflo),22 and comparison of ECP and IAB counterpulsation has demonstrated equivalent hemodynamic effects.13 ECP has greater potential for widespread use and is less expensive than invasive technology, in that catheterization procedures and central access devices/monitoring are unnecessary.
ECP cardiac therapy is prescribed as a course of 35 sessions applied as 1, 1-hour daily session, 5 days a week, for 7 weeks; it has been used in both hospital and outpatient settings. We provide formulas and magnitude of expected response in normal subjects, enabling incorporation of TCD into future ECP stroke feasibility and dose finding studies. The cardiac arteriogenesis effects of ECP should be studied in neurovascular patients, as a therapy for management of complete/chronic carotid occlusions, Moya Moya and TIA.
Certain limitations of the present report need to be acknowledged. For one, our study was limited to only 5 healthy subjects, and it may be beneficial to replicate this experiment using a larger subject pool. Secondly, the increase in MFV observed in our study was modest, and straightforward extrapolation of velocity increases to actual blood flow increases cannot be assured by our methods in this small sample of subjects. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, no beneficial effects have been associated with improved cerebral perfusion in patients with completed infarct, and the utility of these methods on recruitment of collaterals and preservation of at-risk ischemic tissue remains unknown. In addition, further research is required to determine the potential beneficial effects of ECP in relation to stroke mechanism (eg, embolism versus thrombosis). Finally, we developed and used new measurable criteria for TCD assessment of ECP flow augmentation. Further validation of these criteria by independent groups is necessary.
Medical exclusions for ECP include arrhythmias interfering with ECG-triggering, bleeding diathesis, active thrombophlebitis, severe lower extremity vasoocclusive disease, aortic aneurysm, and pregnancy. Additional precautions include control of pretreatment BP and tachycardia, and cautious use with cardiac valvular insufficiency.2,3 Stroke patients are vasculopaths and will require vigilant assessment for candidacy in any ECP study. IABP counterpulsation has been shown to augment intracranial blood flow even in high resistance states such as cerebral circulatory arrest.23 The ability of counterpulsation devices such as ECP to overcome resistance to blood flow attributable to partial arterial occlusions remains unknown, but given our previous findings suggesting a high prevalence of acute ischemic strokes with partial occlusions,24 investigation of the safety and efficacy of ECP as a mechanism for improving blood flow in patients outside the window for intravenous thrombolysis or IA rescue is warranted.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
Received December 11, 2007; revision received March 6, 2008; accepted March 14, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Lawson WE. Current use of enhanced external counterpulsation and patient selection. Clinical Cardiology. 2002; 25: 1116–1121.
3. Linnemeier G. Enhanced external counterpulsation – A therapeutic option for patients with chronic cardiovascular problems. J Cardiovasc Manag. 2002; 13: 20–25.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Werner D, Schneider M, Weise M, Nonnast-Daniel B, Daniel WG. Pneumatic external counterpulsation: A new noninvasive method to improve organ perfusion. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84: 950–952, A7–8.
5. Michaels AD, Accad M, Ports TA, Grossman W. Left ventricular systolic unloading and augmentation of intracoronary pressure and Doppler flow during enhanced external counterpulsation. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1237–1242.
6. Arora RR, Chou TM, Jain D, Fleishman B, Crawford L, McKiernan T, Nesto RW. The multicenter study of enhanced external counterpulsation (MUST-EECP): Effect of EECP on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and anginal episodes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33: 1833–1840.
7. Urano H, Ikeda H, Ueno T, Matsumoto T, Murohara T, Imaizumi T. Enhanced external counterpulsation improves exercise tolerance, reduces exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and improves left ventricular diastolic filling in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 93–99.
8. Soran O, Kennard ED, Kelsey SF, Holubkov R, Strobeck J, Feldman AM. Enhanced external counterpulsation as treatment for chronic angina in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: A report from the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR). Congest Heart Failure. 2002; 8: 297–302.[CrossRef]
9. Fitzgerald CP, Lawson WE, Hui JC, Kennard ED; IEPR Investigators. Enhanced external counterpulsation as initial revascularization treatment for angina refractory to medical therapy. Cardiology. 2003; 100: 129–135.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Michaels AD, Linnemeier G, Soran O, Kelsey SF, Kennard ED. Two-year outcomes after enhanced external counterpulsation for stable angina pectoris (from the International EECP Patient Registry [IEPR]. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 93: 461–464.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Soran o, Kennard ED, Kfoury AG, Kelsey SF; IEPR Investigators. Two-year clinical outcomes after enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy in patients with refractory angina pectoris and left ventricular dysfunction (Report from the International EECP Patient Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97: 17–20.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Masuda D, Nohara R, Hirai T, Kataoka K, Chen LG, Hosokawa R, Inubushi M, Tadamura E, Fujita M, Sasayama S. Enhanced external counterpulsation improved myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve in patients with chronic stable angina. Eur Heart J. 2001; 22: 1451–1458.
13. Taguchi I, Ogawa K, Oida A, Abe S, Kaneko N, Sakio H. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of enhanced external counterpulsation and intra-aortic balloon pumping in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86: 1139–1141, A9.[CrossRef]
14. Applebaum RN, Kasliwal R, Tunick PA, Konecky N, Katz ES, Trehan N, Kronzon I. Sequential external counterpulsation increases cerebral and renal blood flow. Am Heart J. 1997; 133: 611–615.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Wojner AW. Assessing the five points of the intra-aortic balloon pump waveform. Critical Care Nurse. 1994; 14: 48–52.[Abstract]
16. Wojner AW. Integrated assessment of systemic and intracranial hemodynamics. In Alexandrov AV. Cerebrovascular Ultrasound in Stroke Prevention and Treatment, New York: Blackwell Futura, 2004; 41–61.
17. Quaal SJ. Comprehensive Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation, II ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993.
18. Stone GW, Ohman EM, Miller MF, Joseph DL, Christenson JT, Cohen M, Urban PM, Reddy RC, Freedman RJ, Staman KL, Ferguson JJ. Contemporary utilization and outcomes of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction: The benchmark registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 1940–1945.
19. Brass LM. Reversed intracranial blood flow in patients with an intra-aortic balloon pump. Stroke. 1990; 21: 484–487.
20. Applebaum RM, Wun HH, Katz ED, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Effects of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation on carotid artery blood flow. Am Heart J. 1998; 135: 850–854.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Ober D, Kalman J, Weinberger J. Doppler pulse waveform analysis of carotid and middle cerebral artery flow in a patient with an intra-aortic balloon pump. J Neuroimaging. 1999; 9: 126–128.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Lylyk P, Vila JF, Miranda C, Ferrario A, Romero R, Cohen JE. Partial aortic obstruction improves cerebral perfusion and clinical symptoms in patients with symptomatic vasospasm. Neurolog Res. 2005; 27: S129–S135.
23. van der Naalt J, Baker AJ. Influence of the intra-aortic balloon pump on the transcranial Doppler flow pattern in a brain-dead patient. Stroke. 1996; 27: 140–142.
24. Labiche LA, Malkoff M, Alexandrov AV. Residual flow signals predict complete recanalization in stroke patients treated with tPA. J Neuroimaging. 2003; 13: 28–33.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R Novakovic, G Toth, and P D Purdy Review of current and emerging therapies in acute ischemic stroke JNIS, July 1, 2009; 1(1): 13 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |