| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2008;39:2783.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Radiology (S.G., P.J., S.P.), Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; the Service de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Thérapeutique (V.P., T.K., F.T., P.L.), Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, France; and the Departments of Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery (T.K.), University Hospital Aachen, Germany.
Correspondence to Timo Krings, MD, PhD, Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52057 Aachen, Germany. E-mail tkrings{at}ukaachen.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods— Three hundred consecutive cases (159 females, 141 males; mean age: 47 years; range, 0 to 87 years) were reviewed for patient demographics, clinical presentation, multiplicity, presence of cortical and spinal venous reflux, and outflow restrictions and classified into the 3 mentioned groups.
Results— The ventral epidural group (n=150) showed a female predominance, more benign clinical presentations, lower rate of cortical and spinal venous reflux, and no cortical and spinal venous reflux without restriction of the venous outflow. The dorsal epidural group (n=67) had a lower mean age and a higher rate of multiplicity. The lateral epidural group (n=63) presented later in life with a male predominance, more aggressive clinical presentations, and cortical and spinal venous reflux without evidence of venous outflow restriction. All differences were statistically significant (P<0.001).
Conclusion— Dural arteriovenous shunts predictably drain either in pial veins or craniofugally depending on the compartment involved by the dural arteriovenous shunt. Associated conditions (outflow restrictions, high-flow shunts) may change that draining pattern. The significant differences between the groups of the new classification support the hypothesis of biological and/or developmental differences in each epidural region and suggest that dural arteriovenous shunts are a heterogeneous group of diseases.
Key Words: classification cranial dural arteriovenous fistula epidemiology epidural veins, clinical aspects spinal dural arteriovenous fistula
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Different classifications have been proposed for these lesions,1–3 but the most widely used are those that focus on the presence or absence of cortical venous reflux; it is generally accepted that this angiographic finding constitutes the major clinical consideration regarding the natural history and, therefore, the therapeutic strategies for these lesions.4
Until now, the classification systems, being based on the various topographies, arterial feeders, and the drainage pattern, have been mainly descriptive. The different role played by each epidural area involved, as revealed during development and embryology of the venous system, were not considered. Issues concerning spinal versus cranial homologies or classic sex dominance in some localizations were not specifically addressed.
The basis for the new classification of DAVSs proposed in this study relies on the characteristics of venous afferent patterns of the various epidural spaces according to the evolution and embryological development of the venous drainage of the central nervous system and surrounding structures (vertebra, skull base, calvarium) by which 3 different epidural spaces can be differentiated as outlined subsequently.
| Developmental Considerations of the Venous System of the Brain, Spine, and Adjacent Bony Structures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During the third week, angioblasts initially form small cell clusters (blood islands) within the embryonic and extraembryonic mesoderm. Recent studies have shown that arteries and veins are in part genetically determined by their endothelial types before the blood starts to flow inside the lumen.6
The neural tube starts to develop into the ventricular spaces at the fourth week.7 In the same period (corresponding to Pagets 5-mm stage embryo), the blood traversing the capillary network at the surface of the brain is drained on either side by 3 "meningeal" (leptomeningeal) venous plexuses arranged craniocaudally (anterior, middle, and posterior); cranially, these open into a corresponding "primary head sinus" (epidural) and which will further develop by coalescence into "primitive sinuses."8,9
The development of the choroid plexus starts at Pagets 8- to 11-mm stage embryo10 with venous drainage into the median prosencephalic vein, which functions as the venous drainage route for the early immature brain and choroid plexuses. Secondarily, it may collect the deep cerebral venous afferents and basal vein, thereafter becoming the great cerebral vein or vein of Galen.
Development of the intrinsic venous drainage of the spinal cord starts after closure of the neural tube. Two longitudinal collector systems form in the subarachnoid space at the dorsal and ventral surface of the cord, later joining the epidural space laterally through numerous emissary-bridging veins. Contrary to arteries, these veins are not embryologically (metamerically) linked with the spinal nerves and thus do not follow a nerve root nor do they exit the subarachnoid space with them. Up to 40% of them exit through a separate dural foramen between the spinal nerves8; thus, they should not be confused with the minute radicular veins draining the roots. They may instead be named emissary-bridging veins (transdural) to differentiate them from the so-called emissary veins (transosseous), which drain the intracranial venous sinuses outside of the skull.
The spinal venous system, being the basic one, will exhibit homologous features at its cranial counterpart for the 3 cephalic vesicles. However, the volume of developing brain will progressively alter the simple pattern of the spinal and spinal cord venous drainage. The emissary-bridging vein of the rhombencephalon is the medullary vein opening laterally into the condyloid vein at the level of the foramen magnum. For the mesencephalon, it is the petrous vein that drains the middle and upper brainstem. Longitudinal pial veins anastomoses will allow significant additional cranial contributions from the basal vein system. At the prosencephalic level, the base of the brain venous circle (interbasal venous anastomotic circle)11 and its outlets will represent the most cranial equivalent of the basic spinal and hindbrain pial venous system. During development, the earliest venous outlet of the anastomotic circle corresponds to the lateromesencephalic vein opening into the petrous vein and in the superior petrosal sinus as illustrated in the epsilon-shaped drainage in aneurysmal malformations of the vein of Galen.12 Posteriorly, the great cerebral vein (Galen vein) and anteriorly the deep sylvian vein openings correspond to phylogenetically more recent pathways as, respectively, shown by their late or postnatal development in humans.
During development, the draining veins of the archicerebellum (flocculonodular and lateral recess veins) and archicerebrum (anterior cerebral, uncate, and olfactory veins) will open into these older (previously existing) venous systems (basal vein, lateromesencephalic vein, pontine vein, and medullary vein) and thereafter through the petrosal vein or medullary emissary-bridging vein to the superior petrosal sinus or condyloid vein.
As the intrinsic venous system of the cortex further develops with its increase in cerebral territory (volume), it tends to be directed laterally to drain into the primitive tentorial sinus.9 The embryonic "tentorial sinus" at that point is likely to represent the most cranial portion of the lateral epidural venous system of the spine. Subsequently, the Breschet sinus, superior petrosal sinus, and straight sinuses are also included in that group. In short, the basal vein anastomotic circle; its afferent veins; and its mesencephalic, cavernous, and galenic (telencephalic and diencephalic) outlets are the cranial homologs of the emissary-bridging veins of the hindbrain and spinal cord.11
Considering the volume increase of the cerebrum and cerebellum (paleo- and neopallium) observed throughout phylogeny, the venous drainage will finally require additional outlets, which will be illustrated by the appearance of new dorsal pathways, like the superior sagittal (for the brain) and transverse sinuses (for the cerebellum) that are not present at the spinal level.
The development of the cranial vault sinuses into the epidural space results from the coalescence of the leptomeningeal vein contribution from the central nervous system with the osseous venous drainage. The secondary modeling into the adult-type sinuses is largely dependent on the growth of the skull.8,9 At the spine and skull, 2 types of bone can be distinguished, the endochondral type (cartilaginous bone–vertebral bodies, basioccipital, basisphenoid, and the petromastoid bone) and the intramembranous type (membranous bone–spinous process, laminae, and cranial vault).13–15 The creation of the dorsal midline-located sinuses and confluences is, nevertheless, linked to the falces (cerebri and cerebelli) and the tentorium cerebelli16; both are associated with an epidural confluence and coalescence of the venous vascular spaces at their bony attachment later to become the superior sagittal sinus, medial occipital sinus, and transverse sinuses.17 Their role in the venous drainage of the paleo- and neocerebrum and paleo- and neocerebellum is a recent phylogenetic acquisition; they will further evolve postnatally after regression of the medial occipital sinus and maturation of the jugular bulbs.
The sigmoid sinuses and jugular bulbs are dependent on the growth of the petrous bone and skull base as they collect petromastoid veins and do not receive any direct afferent from the leptomeningeal space. Thus, they are rather behaving like a conduit to bring the transverse and medial occipital sinus blood to the jugular vein.
The cavernous plexus at birth and the basilar venous plexus do not drain any cerebral vein either. After birth, the so-called cavernous capture may bring the remnant of the tentorial sinus or the deep sylvian vein to open into the cavernous plexus.12 The sigmoid sinus and cavernous and basilar plexuses therefore correspond to the ventrally located venous plexus of the spine. They share large midline communications as well as their unique role in draining the spongiosus parts of the related bones. Because the cranial sutures serve as intramembranous growth sites,18 the evolution of the dorsal dural sinuses closely follows development of the adjacent sutures.
In summary, 3 main observations of the venous development of the brain and spinal cord during embryology therefore contribute to the generation of the new classification:
Although the epidural space changes its configuration, from the spinal to the intracranial regions at the level of magnum foramen, it keeps the same analogous characteristics. All 3 epidural venous spaces remain compartmented and converge secondarily to join the jugular, azygos, lumbar, or sacral, paraspinal venous collectors. We suggest that DAVSs in these 3 different areas will drain according to the specific role of the venous system of each region, unless there are associated conditions such as constraint placed on the venous outlet or high-flow arteriovenous shunts. These venous outlet restrictions (ie, occlusion or stenosis) can be either adjacent to the shunting area, most commonly from thrombosis rather than endothelial proliferation, and/or remote from the shunt such as seen in jugular bulb dysmaturation in pediatric patients.
| New Classification |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Ventral Epidural Shunts (osteo[cartilaginous]-epidural)
Dural arteriovenous shunts in these regions involve mainly the epidural space and are in direct contact with the adjacent osseous structures that they may invade or recruit the blood supply from (Figures 2 and 3
). The venous afferents of these regions are closely related to the bony structures and they drain outside the bony limits, thus resulting in no subarachnoid (spinal or cortical) venous reflux (CVR). However, some factors may precipitate development of CVR in these regions such as thrombosis within the epidural space surrounding, remote, or distal to the shunt. This will produce reflux in the lateral epidural space as seen in rare cases of ventral epidural spinal shunts with perimedullary venous reflux.19,20 CVR can also be encountered in high-flow shunts forcing the emissary-bridging vein opening after reflux in the lateral epidural space.21 In this group, the following locations are encountered: "vertebral body," basioccipital, sigmoid sinus, petrous pyramid, basisphenoid and adjacent sphenoid wings, and related dural structures.
|
|
Dorsal Epidural Shunts (osteo[membranous]-epidural)
At the spinal level, they are exceptional and clinically present with epidural hematoma (Figures 4 and 5
). The venous pressure within the dural sinuses is usually low, thus antegrade, craniofugal flow of the shunts is normally observed. CVR may occur after associated venous outflow restriction, or with high-flow shunts; in case of variations of the venous opening into this system such as presence of an accessory epidural sinus, distal restriction of the sinus opening will rapidly produce CVR. In this group, the following DAVS locations are encountered: "dorsal spinal epidural DAVS," marginal sinus (dorsal portion), medial occipital sinus, torcular, transverse and accessory epidural sinuses, and superior sagittal sinus.
|
|
Lateral Epidural Shunts
At the spinal level, these shunts correspond to the typical spinal DAVFs and are located lateral where the pial emissary bridging vein pierces the dura (Figures 6 and 7
). Intracranial locations include DAVS draining into emissary-bridging veins of the brainstem and their homologs draining deep cerebral structures. The drainage is always directed to the cortical or perimedullary veins; therefore, the DAVS developing there are always considered to be aggressive.22–24 In this group, the following locations are encountered: spinal dural arteriovenous shunts, marginal sinus (lateral portion-foramen magnum) with the emissary-bridging vein to the condyloid vein, falcotentorial (vein of Galen), petrosal and basitentorial, Breschet sinus, paracavernous region (embryonic tentorial sinus remnants), intraorbital shunts, and lamina cribriformis.
|
|
The goal of our study was to compare in 300 consecutive patients the demographic, angiographic, and clinical aspects of DAVSs that develop in these 3 different epidural spaces and to assess whether they truly present according to the predicted role of each epidural space in the venous drainage of the central nervous system and adjacent bony structures. Although the latter would confirm the validity of the classification system, the former may demonstrate that the 3 different DAVSs also constitute separate clinical entities with possible different age and sex distributions and pathomechanisms.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The clinical symptoms were separated into 2 groups, benign and aggressive.25 The benign group consists of incidental diagnosis, nonspecific headaches, cranial nerve deficits, chemosis/proptosis, midline bruit, mass lesions, and cardiac insufficiency. Aggressive symptoms included seizures, intracranial hemorrhage, motor or sensory deficits, visual field defects, aphasia, global neurological deficits (dementia, delayed psychomotor development, macrocrania), and other nonhemorrhagic neurological deficits such as incontinence.
On angiographic terms, benign and aggressive lesions were defined by absence or presence of CVR, respectively,26 and were grouped also using the classification systems of Borden2 and Cognard.3 Borden 1 (sinus drainage only), Cognard I (antegrade sinus drainage) and IIa (antegrade and retrograde sinus drainage) were considered as "benign" DAVSs, whereas all the higher grades (which have cortical and spinal drainage with or without sinus drainage) were grouped as "aggressive" DAVSs.27
Venous outflow restrictions (stenosis/occlusion) were defined as adjacent to the shunt, remote from it, or both (mixed). In addition, we evaluated whether the restriction occurred proximal or distal to the shunt or both. The cavernous sinus lesions were excluded from this item, because nonvisualization of the outflow pathways could mean either thrombosis or compartmentalization of the cavernous sinus. However, if there was stenosis or occlusion of the venous system elsewhere, they were added and classified as a remote type. The spinal lesions were also excluded because nonvisualization of the draining spinal cord veins is part of the diagnosis of this location and reflects the spinal cord venous congestion leading to neurological symptoms.28 In addition, thrombosis or fibrosis of pial emissary-bridging veins of the cord occur with normal aging.8
The DAVSs were classified into the 3 groups of the new classification. Crosstabulations with the sex, age groups, clinical symptoms, presence of CVR, and types of venous outflow modifications were performed.
Statistical significance was calculated for each group using
2 and one-way analysis of variance tests.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Male versus Female
There was a female predominance in patients having VE lesions (117 of 167 [70%]; P<0.001) and a strong male predominance in patients with LE-type lesions (54 of 67 [81%]; P<0.001). There was no definite sex predominance (female:male=41:46; P=0.225) for the DE lesions.
Age
The mean consultation ages of patients with only VE, DE, and LE lesions were 51, 28, and 56 years, respectively. The mean age in the DE group was significantly lower than the VE and LE lesions (P<0.001) with 31 of 67 (46.3%) being in the pediatric population. Patients with LE-type lesions also presented later in life with no patients presenting before the age of 30.
Benign Versus Aggressive Clinical Symptoms
In 150 patients of the VE group, 139 (92%) had benign clinical symptoms, whereas in the LE group, 54 of 63 (86%) patients had aggressive clinical symptoms (P<0.001). There was a slight trend to more aggressive symptoms in the DE group (42 of 67 [63%]) without statistical significance at 99% CI (P=0.038). Concerning the patients with multiplicity of DAVS, whenever a LE lesion was present in these patients, the symptoms were aggressive, demonstrating that these lesions are dominant in terms of risks for the patient, whereas in only 7 of 16 patients who had both VE and DE shunts, aggressive clinical symptoms were present.
Multiplicity
The DE shunts had a higher rate of multiple lesions, 31 of 86 (36%), whereas only 20 of 167 (12%) shunts of the VE type and 6 of 67 (9%) shunts of the LE type had multiple lesions (P<0.001).
Comparison With Cognard/Borden
Because the LE lesions are located within the laterally located epidural space, which drains primarily into the cortical or spinal veins, all of them were classified as aggressive and, subsequently, had classifications of Types III, IV, and V according to Cognard and Type 3 according to Borden. If multiplicity of shunts was present, the lateral epidural location always determined the aggressiveness and could therefore be determined as the primary risk factor. Drainage pattern of the cranial VE and DE type of DAVSs was primarily through the sinuses, resulting in Types I, IIa, IIb, and IIab according to the Cognard classification and Type 1 and Type 2 according to the Borden classification depending on outflow restrictions. Refer to supplemental Tables II and III
, available online at http://stroke.ahajournals.org, for a detailed comparison of the Cognard and Borden classifications with the new classification scheme.
|
|
Cortical/Spinal Venous Reflux
Cortical/spinal venous reflux was less common in patients with only VE shunts, being present in only 45 of 150 (30%) of the patients, all of the noncavernous shunts having stenosis/thrombosis of the venous outflow. The percentage of CVR increased in patients with DE and LE shunts, being 43 of 67 (64%) of the only DE shunts and all (100%) of the LE shunts (P<0.001). In the multiple type of VE+DE lesions, CVR was present in 13 of 16 (81%) cases.
Venous Outflow Restriction
In the noncavernous VE lesions, 39 of 52 cases (75%) had evidence of venous outflow restriction, which occurred surrounding the shunt in 30 of 39 cases (77%; P<0.001). Sixty of 67 cases (90%) with only DE lesions had stenosis/occlusion of the venous outflow and the majority (35 of 60 [58%]) were of the multiple type that had thrombosis surrounding and remote to the shunt location (P<0.001). In the 35 patients with nonspinal LE type of DAVSs, only 6 patients (17%) had restrictions of venous outflow, being remote from the shunt location in 4 of those (P<0.001).
In the VE group, no cortical or spinal reflux was present when there was no modification of the venous outflow pattern (13 of 13 [100%]). In the remaining patients in the VE group, the venous outflow restriction usually occurred surrounding the shunt and most of the patients with this type did not have CVR (27 of 30 [90%]; P=0.001). There was also a higher chance of CVR when the restriction occurred surrounding the shunting zone (5 of 8 [63%]) or in mixed type patterns (31 of 35 [89%]) in this group than when the restriction occurred remote to the shunt (6 of 17 [35%]; P<0.001). All of the LE lesions drained directly into the cerebral or spinal cord veins with CVR and in the majority (29 of 35 [83%]) of the nonspinal patients, there was no venous outflow restriction. Refer to supplemental Table IV for tabulation of the data concerning the type of thrombosis in relation to CVR in each group.
|
In the DE shunts, the venous stenosis was usually distal to the shunt or of the mixed type with the rate of CVR being higher in the mixed type group (20 of 35 [57%] versus 22 of 25 [88%]; P=0.001). No statistical significance was found in the other groups. Refer to supplemental Table V for tabulation of the data concerning the location of thrombosis in relation to CVR in each group.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Dorsal Epidural Shunts
There was no significant sex predominance. The characteristics are summarized in Table 3. The infantile type and dural sinus malformations of the pediatric DAVSs are within this group,30,31 therefore significantly reducing the average age of patients compared with the other groups in which children are poorly represented. CVR is more frequently observed in patients who have venous outflow restriction; the more extensive the thrombosis or venous occlusion, the higher the percentage of CVR.
|
Multiplicity of the shunts was more commonly found in the DE group (36% increasing up to 46% with the pediatric group excluded), frequently being within adjacent regions of the same epidural type. Multifocality of dural arteriovenous lesions in children has already been reported previously.32 Although the etiology of these shunts is not known, there seems to be clinical and radiological evidence that they are evolutionary lesions and it has been suggested that they may have been induced by venous sump from the sinus draining the DAVSs.32 In the adult population, multifocality may be due to venous hypertension, typically from sinus thrombosis,33 although the exact pathomechanism is as yet unclear. In the literature, it has been reported that the subgroup with multiple DAVFs had a 3 times higher rate of hemorrhagic presentation compared with a single DAVFs due to a higher rate of CVR.34
Lateral Epidural Shunts
There was a strong male predominance, approximately 4:1, within this group. The characteristics are summarized in Table 4. The patients also present at a later age compared with the other groups. As previously described in patients with spinal DAVFs, these shunts most likely manifest themselves after spinal cord draining veins have been obliterated by fibrosis from aging.35,36 The drainage into the cortical or perimedullary spinal cord veins results in increased pial venous pressure with a high rate of neurological symptoms ranging from venous infarctions, global neurological deficits to hemorrhage in the brain or congestive venous myelopathy in the cord.37,38 Due to the role played by veins in cranial locations, the shunts will involve the subarachnoid portion of the draining cortical vein causing venous ectasias that may be associated with hemorrhage from rupture of the venous pouches.22–24
|
Treatment Considerations
The decision to treat or not to treat still depends on the presence of cortical or spinal venous reflux regardless of the symptoms present.26 As multiple other previous reports have already emphasized, the presence of cerebral or spinal venous reflux should prompt immediate treatment, because their natural history is always aggressive with a high rate of morbidity and mortality.4,27,39
Conclusions
The roles of venous afferents of the 3 epidural spaces established during embryological development of the central nervous system and craniospinal structures are different. This reference to embryology allows analyzing both cranial and spinal homologs and, therefore, is the basis for a classification system that can be applied to all types of lesions developing in these spaces.
This new classification has the ability to predict the drainage of shunts located in different locations based on the craniospinal venous anatomy and the presence of associated venous outflow restriction (stenosis/occlusion), usually thrombosis, which could be either an etiology or comorbidity of the disease. Because venous thrombosis is uncommon in the general population, it may reflect an underlying biological disorder in these patients with possible different geographic (population) impact.
The significant difference of the patient characteristics (sex and age) between the groups of the new classification suggests biological/hormonal differences within the epidural venous system in each region and may point toward a different etiology of the 3 different groups of arteriovenous shunts. Grouping DAVFs into a single entity may hide the fundamental differences existing in each location. We presume that the new classification proposed in this study will contribute to a better understanding of these lesions and to their respective disease mechanisms.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
SG received a Research Grant of the World Federation of Interventional Neuroradiology (WFITN).
Disclosures
None.
Received February 5, 2008; accepted March 3, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Borden JA, Wu JK, Shucart WA. A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg. 1995; 82: 166–179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Cognard C, Gobin YP, Pierot L, Bailly AL, Houdart E, Casasco A, Chiras J, Merland JJ. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology. 1995; 194: 671–680.
4. van Dijk JM, ter Brugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC. Clinical course of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with long-term persistent cortical venous reflux. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1233–1236.
5. Fleming A, Keynes RJ, Tannahill D. The role of the notochord in vertebral column formation. J Anat. 2001; 199: 177–180.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Eichmann A, Yuan L, Moyon D, Lenoble F, Pardanaud L, Breant C. Vascular development: from precursor cells to branched arterial and venous networks. Int J Dev Biol. 2005; 49: 259–267.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. O'Rahilly R, Muller F. Neurulation in the normal human embryo. Ciba Found Symp. 1994; 181: 70–82;discussion 82–89.
8. Lasjaunias P, Berenstein A, ter Brugge KG. Surgical Neuroangiography. 1. Clinical Vascular Anatomy and Variations. Berlin: Springer; 2001.
9. Padget DH. The cranial venous system in man in reference to development, adult configuration, and relation to the arteries. Am J Anat. 1956; 98: 307–355.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. O'Rahilly R, Muller F. Ventricular system and choroid plexuses of the human brain during the embryonic period proper. Am J Anat. 1990; 189: 285–302.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Cullen S, Ozanne A, Alvarez H, Mercier PH, Brassier G, Lasjaunias P. The anastomotic venous circle of the base of the brain. Interv Neuroradiol. 2005; 11: 325–332.
12. Alvarez H, Garcia Monaco R, Rodesch G, Sachet M, Krings T, Lasjaunias P. Vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2007; 17: 189–206.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Friede H. Normal development and growth of the human neurocranium and cranial base. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981; 15: 163–169.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Labrom RD. Growth and maturation of the spine from birth to adolescence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89 (suppl 1): 3–7.
15. Wilson DB. Embryonic development of the head and neck: part 5, the brain and cranium. Head Neck Surg. 1980; 2: 312–320.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Lasjaunias P, Kwok R, Goh P, Yeong KY, Lim W, Chng SM. A developmental theory of the superior sagittal sinus(es) in craniopagus. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004; 20: 526–537.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Piske RL, Lasjaunias P. Extrasinusal dural arteriovenous malformations. Report of three cases. Neuroradiology. 1988; 30: 426–432.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Opperman LA. Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites. Dev Dyn. 2000; 219: 472–485.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Krings T, Mull M, Bostroem A, Otto J, Hans FJ, Thron A. Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistula with perimedullary drainage. Case report and pathomechanical considerations. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006; 5: 353–358.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Pirouzmand F, Wallace MC, Willinsky R. Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistula with intramedullary reflux. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1997; 87: 633–635.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Goyal M, Willinsky R, Montanera W, terBrugge K. Paravertebral arteriovenous malformations with epidural drainage: clinical spectrum, imaging features, and results of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999; 20: 749–755.
22. Kai Y, Hamada J, Morioka M, Yano S, Mizuno T, Kuratsu J. Arteriovenous fistulas at the cervicomedullary junction presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage: six case reports with special reference to the angiographic pattern of venous drainage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26: 1949–1954.
23. Komotar RJ, Connolly ES Jr, Lignelli AA, Mack WJ, Mocco J, Harbaugh RE. Clinicoradiological review: bilateral ethmoidal artery dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurgery. 2007; 60: 131–135;discussion 135–136.
24. Kothbauer K, Huber P. Dural arteriovenous fistula in the falx cerebri. Neuroradiology. 1994; 36: 616–618.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Lasjaunias P, Chiu M, ter Brugge K, Tolia A, Hurth M, Bernstein M. Neurological manifestations of intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1986; 64: 724–730.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Lasjaunias P, ter Brugge K, Chiu M. Dural AVM. Dural AVM. Neurosurgery. 1985; 16: 435–436.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Davies MA, ter Brugge K, Willinsky R, Coyne T, Saleh J, Wallace MC. The validity of classification for the clinical presentation of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg. 1996; 85: 830–837.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Krings T, Mull M, Gilsbach JM, Thron A. Spinal vascular malformations. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15: 267–278.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Stiebel-Kalish H, Kalish Y, Bar-On RH, Setton A, Niimi Y, Berenstein A, Kupersmith MJ. Presentation, natural history, and management of carotid cavernous aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2005; 57: 850–857;discussion 850–857.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Barbosa M, Mahadevan J, Weon YC, Yoshida Y, Rodesch G, Alvarez H, Lasjaunias P. Dural sinus malformations (DSM) with giant lakes, in neonates and infants: review of 30 consecutive cases. Interv Neuroradiol. 2003; 9: 407–417.
31. Lasjaunias P, ter Brugge K, Berenstein A. Surgical Neuroangiography. 3: Clinical and Interventional Aspects in Children, II Edition. Berlin: Springer; 2006.
32. Garcia-Monaco R, Rodesch G, Terbrugge K, Burrows P, Lasjaunias P. Multifocal dural arteriovenous shunts in children. Childs Nerv Syst. 1991; 7: 425–431.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Kusaka N, Sugiu K, Katsumata A, Nakashima H, Tamiya T, Ohmoto T. The importance of venous hypertension in the formation of dural arteriovenous fistulas: a case report of multiple fistulas remote from sinus thrombosis. Neuroradiology. 2001; 43: 980–984.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. van Dijk JM, ter Brugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC. Multiplicity of dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg. 2002; 96: 76–78.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Andersson T, van Dijk JM, Willinsky RA. Venous manifestations of spinal arteriovenous fistulas. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2003; 13: 73–93.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Van Dijk JM, ter Brugge KG, Willinsky RA, Farb RI, Wallace MC. Multidisciplinary management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical presentation and long-term follow-up in 49 patients. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1578–1583.
37. Awad IA, Little JR, Akarawi WP, Ahl J. Intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations: factors predisposing to an aggressive neurological course. J Neurosurg. 1990; 72: 839–850.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Willinsky R, ter brugge K, Montanera W, Mikulis D, Wallace MC. Venous congestion: an MR finding in dural arteriovenous malformations with cortical venous drainage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994; 15: 1501–1507.[Abstract]
39. van Dijk JM, ter Brugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC. Selective disconnection of cortical venous reflux as treatment for cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg. 2004; 101: 31–35.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Jung, B.J. Kwon, O.-K. Kwon, S.K. Baik, M.H. Han, J.E. Kim, and C.W. Oh Intraosseous Cranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Treated with Transvenous Embolization AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2009; 30(6): 1173 - 1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Krings and S. Geibprasert Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2009; 30(4): 639 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |