Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:2853-2859
Published online before print July 24, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.506188
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/10/2853    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.506188v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nagata, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nagata, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Transient Ischemic Attacks

(Stroke. 2008;39:2853.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Targeted Disruption of Hsp110/105 Gene Protects Against Ischemic Stress

Junji Nakamura, MS; Motoaki Fujimoto, MD; Kunihiko Yasuda, PhD; Kiyoshi Takeda, MD, PhD; Shizuo Akira, MD, PhD; Takumi Hatayama, MD, PhD; Yasushi Takagi, MD, PhD; Kazuhiko Nozaki, MD, PhD; Nobuko Hosokawa, MD, PhD Kazuhiro Nagata, PhD

From the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology (J.N., N.H., K.N.), Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Department of Neurosurgery (M.F., Y.T., K.N.), Graduate School of Medicine, and Laboratory of Functional Biology (K.Y.), Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; CREST (J.N., N.H., K.N.), Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama, Laboratory of Immune Regulation (K.T.), Graduate School of Medicine, and Department of Host Defense (S.A.), Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan; and the Department of Biochemistry (T.H.), Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Kyoto, Japan.

Correspondence to Kazuhiro Nagata, PhD, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. E-mail nagata{at}frontier.kyoto-u.ac.jp


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Hsp110/105 belongs to the HSP110 heat shock protein family, which is a subgroup of the HSP70 family. In mammals, Hsp110/105 is constitutively expressed but exhibits particularly high levels in the brain. It has recently been shown that both Hsp110/105 and Hsp70 are elevated after cerebral ischemia. To study the physiological role of this protein in vivo, we generated hsp110/105 knockout (KO) mice and investigate the effect of reduced Hsp110/105 levels on focal cerebral ischemia.

Methods— hsp110/105 KO and wild-type mice were subjected to 30 minutes of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion followed by reperfusion for 24 hours. The infarct volume and neurological scores were measured and compared. The Hsp70 chaperone activity of thermally denatured firefly luciferase was measured in hsp110/105 KO embryonic fibroblasts.

Results— The infarct volume and neurological deficit scores were significantly (P<0.05) reduced in hsp110/105 KO mice compared with wild-type controls. In addition, hsp110/105 KO embryonic fibroblasts exhibited a dose-dependent suppression of Hsp70 chaperone activity by the presence of Hsp110/105.

Conclusions— These results demonstrate that hsp110/105 KO mice are resistant to ischemic injury and that the protective effects of hsp110/105 deficiency in cerebral ischemia may partly be mediated by an increase in the chaperone activity of Hsp70.


Key Words: cerebral ischemia • focal • Hsp70/Hsc70 chaperone activity • Hsp110/105 • knockout • mice


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are classified into several families on the basis of their apparent molecular weights: HSP110, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, HSP40, and small HSPs (25 to 28 kDa).1 In the brain, several studies have shown that HSPs are involved in protecting neurons from a variety of brain injuries, including ischemia, traumatic injury, and neurodegenerative diseases.2,3 The mechanism of this protection has largely been attributed to their chaperone functions that prevent protein aggregation and assist in the refolding of denatured polypeptides.

We have previously cloned 2 members of the Hsp110/105 protein family in mice: Hsp105{alpha} and Hsp105β.4 Hsp105{alpha} is a 105-kDa stress protein, which is expressed constitutively and induced by a variety of stressors, whereas Hsp105β is an alternatively spliced form of Hsp105{alpha} that is specifically induced by heat shock at 42°C.5 Hsp105{alpha} and Hsp105β exist as complexes that are associated with Hsp70 and its cognate protein Hsc70 (Hsp70/Hsc70) in mammalian cells.6,7 The mammalian HSP110 family is known to have diverged from the HSP70 family and consists of 3 members: Hsp110/105, Apg-1/Osp94, and Apg-2/Irp94.4,8–12 Hsp110/105 is present in all of the cerebral neuronal regions, including those in the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. Using a murine model of cerebral ischemia, it has been reported that not only Hsp110/105, but also Apg-1 and Apg-2/Irp94 are induced in neurons of the cerebral cortex and hippocampus either at mRNA and/or protein levels.12–16

Hsp110/105 has been reported to suppress the chaperone activity of Hsp70/Hsc70 by inhibiting its ATPase.17 This is in contrast to the role of Hsp40 (Hdj-1), which has been shown to enhance the function of Hsp70/Hsc70 by stimulating nucleotide hydrolysis.18 The reported inhibitory function of Hsp110/105 against Hsp70 ATPase activity is controversial because a conflicting study describes that Sse1, a yeast ortholog of mammalian Hsp110/105, synergistically stimulates the yeast Hsp70 Ssa1 ATPase activity with Hsp40. Recently, yeast Sse1 and mammalian Hsp110/105 have been reported to act as potent nucleotide exchange factors for their respective Hsp70s by accelerating the dissociation of nucleotide from Hsp70/ADP complexes.19–21 Interestingly, the effect of Hsp110/105 on the refolding cycles of denatured substrates by Hsp70 in vitro and in vivo is also controversial.17,19–21 In contrast to Hsp70, very little is known about the functions of Hsp110/105.

To address the physiological mechanism that regulates Hsp70 chaperone activity by Hsp110/105 in vivo, we generated hsp110/105 knockout (KO) mice and examined the effect of Hsp110/105 on transient focal ischemia.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Gene Targeting and Generation of hsp110/105-Deficient Mice
Genomic clones containing the murine hsp110/105 locus were isolated from the 129/SvJ {lambda}-phage genomic library by Southern blotting using probes corresponding to the murine hsp110/105 cDNA. The genomic organization of the locus was determined by subcloning portions of these genomic inserts into pBluescript II SK (+) (STRATAGENE). One of the genomic clones containing the first to seventh exons of hsp110/105 was used to construct the targeting vector. The neomycin resistance gene was flanked by the 2.4-kb SalI/XhoI 5' genomic fragment and the 5.0-kb SalI/NotI 3' fragment. The HSV-TK negative selection cassette was introduced at the 3' end of the genomic fragment. E14.1 embryonic stem cells were electroporated with the linearized targeting vector and selected with G418 and ganciclovir. Homologous recombination in doubly resistant clones was screened by Southern blotting and polymerase chain reaction analysis. Heterozygous embryonic stem clones were microinjected into C57BL/6 blastocysts to generate chimeric mice. Chimeric male mice were mated with C57BL/6 female mice to generate heterozygous mice. Germline transmission was confirmed by Southern blotting using the probe indicated in Figure 1A. hsp110/105 KO mice were backcrossed into the C57BL/6 strain over 10 generations and obtained by heterozygous intercrosses. All experimental procedures were approved and carried out in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kyoto University.


Figure 1506188
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Targeted disruption of the hsp110/105 gene and genotyping analysis of hsp110/105 KO mice. Restriction enzyme site map of the hsp110/105 gene, targeting construct and predicted structure of targeted hsp110/105 gene alleles (A). A neomycin gene was inserted to replace the first exon of the hsp110/105 gene, which contained the translational initiation codon ATG by homologous recombination. Restriction enzymes: B, BamHI; H, HindIII; S, SacI. Southern blot analysis of the offspring from heterozygote intercrosses (B). Genomic DNA obtained from the tails of WT, heterozygous (Het), and homozygous (KO) littermates was digested with BamHI and hybridized with the 5' external probe shown in A. DNA fragments of WT and mutant allele were detected at 16 and 3 kb, respectively. Western blot analysis (C). Lysates (20 µg/lane) from WT and hsp110/105 KO mouse brain were analyzed by Western blotting using the antibodies shown on the right of each panel. The first lane shows upregulation of Hsp70 in hsp110/105 KO MEFs recovered at 37°C for 24 hours after heat shock at 42°C for 8 hours.

Focal Cerebral Ischemia Models
C57BL/6 male mice (wild-type [WT]) and hsp110/105 KO mice weighing 25 to 30 g were subjected to cerebral ischemia using the standard intraluminal middle cerebral artery occlusion method.22 Briefly, each mouse was anesthetized with 1% halothane in 30% oxygen and 70% nitrous oxide using a face mask. Rectal temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5°C with a thermostat-controlled heating pad. After a midline skin incision, the left external carotid artery and its branches were isolated and ligated. A 8–0 nylon monofilament coated with silicon was introduced into the left internal carotid artery through the common carotid artery to occlude the origin of middle cerebral artery. After 30 minutes of occlusion, the monofilament was withdrawn and the mouse was placed in a thermally controlled incubator (32.0°C) for 2 hours before being returned to its cage. In randomly selected animals, the left femoral artery was cannulated to facilitate blood pressure monitoring (iWorx) and sampling. Blood samples were taken before, during (15 minutes after occlusion), and after the first 15 minutes of reperfusion; samples were analyzed for blood gasses (PaO2 and PaCO2) and pH using a blood gas analyzer (FUSO). Regional cerebral blood flow at the middle cerebral artery territory was monitored by a laser Doppler flowmetry (OMEGAWAVE). Only mice that satisfied the criteria that the regional cerebral blood flow in the middle cerebral artery territory was reduced to <25% of the baseline during ischemia and that it recovered to >55% of the baseline during reperfusion were used in subsequent experiments. According to these criteria, 10 of 15 of WT and 11 of 15 of hsp110/105 KO mice were selected, among which one mouse in each group died during reperfusion. At 24 hours after reperfusion onset, neurological deficit scores were evaluated as described23: 0, no neurological deficit; 1, flection of torso and contralateral forepaw when lifted by the tail; 2, turning to the contralateral side; 3, circling to the contralateral side; and 4, no spontaneous walking with depressed level of consciousness.

Measurement of Infarct Volume
Each brain was sectioned (20 µm thick) at 600-µm intervals at coronal levels (+2.0, +1.4, +0.8, +0.2, –0.4, –1.0, –1.6 mm from the bregma) on a cryostat. Sections were stained with 0.1% cresyl violet to identify viable tissue. The infarct area was quantified by using image analysis software (ImageJ, Version 1.36). Infarct volumes were calculated by the integration of infarcted areas on each brain slice.

Western Blot Analysis
Proteins were extracted from the cerebral cortex. Aliquots of the lysate containing 20 µg protein were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and were subsequently transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The primary antibodies used were mouse anti-Hsp110/105 (1:500; Transduction Laboratories), mouse anti-Hsp90 (1:1000; StressGen), rabbit anti-Hsp70/Hsc70 (1:1000; a gift from Dr K. Ohtsuka), and mouse anti-Actin (1:1000; Chemikon). The secondary antibodies were either alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antimouse IgG (BIOSOURCE) or antirabbit IgG (BIOSOURCE). The immunoreaction was detected using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate and nitro blue tetrazolium Buffered Substrate Tablets (Sigma).

Establishment of hsp110/105 Knockout Embryonic Fibroblasts and Luciferase Refolding Assay
Primary embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were prepared from day 13.5 hsp110/105 KO mice embryos. The tissue was dissociated into individual cells with trypsin. The reactivation of thermally denatured luciferase was estimated as described previously.24 Briefly, the cells were transfected with firefly luciferase (Promega), human hsp70 (pCMV-hsp70, a gift from Dr K. Ohtsuka), mouse hsp110/105WT, and mutant hsp110/105K69A, which lacks ATP-binding activity using Lipofectamine and Plus Reagent (Invitrogen). Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were preincubated in a medium containing cycloheximide (20 µg/mL) for 30 minutes at 37°C to inhibit HSPs and luciferase synthesis, and subsequently luciferase was inactivated by heat shock for 15 minutes at 45°C. After the specified recovery periods at 37°C allowing the reactivation of luciferase, luciferase activity was determined with the luciferase reporter assay system (Promega).

Statistical Analysis
The data are expressed as mean±SEM. Comparison among multiple groups was performed using an analysis of variance (Dunnett’s test), whereas comparisons between 2 groups were achieved using the Student t test. Differences with P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Targeted Disruption of the hsp110/105 Gene and Generation of hsp110/105-Deficient Mice
To investigate the physiological function of Hsp110/105, we generated hsp110/105 KO mice by gene targeting. A null mutation was introduced in 129/Sv embryonic stem cells by replacing exon 1 of the hsp110/105 gene with a neomycin resistance cassette (Figure 1A). DNA from the tails of the resulting littermates was analyzed by Southern blotting (Figure 1B) and by polymerase chain reaction (data not shown). The absence of protein expression in hsp110/105 KO mice was confirmed by Western blot analysis using mouse brain lysates (Figure 1C). The hetero- and homozygous mice are viable and fertile and show no gross developmental abnormalities. Because Hsp110/105 expression were reported during various stages in the development of the nervous system,4,25 we anticipated that the disruption of Hsp110/105 would cause postnatal abnormalities in brain structure. However, histological and morphological analyses revealed no differences compared with their WT littermates.

We next examined the expression of Hsp90, Hsp70, and Hsc70 in the brains of hsp110/105 KO mice because overexpression of these proteins could functionally compensate for the loss of hsp110/105 expression. The constitutive expression of Hsp90 and Hsc70 did not significantly change, and the expression of inducible Hsp70 was not observed in either WT or hsp110/105 KO mice (Figure 1C). These results suggest that the loss of Hsp110/105 expression in the brain is not compensated for by increased expression of Hsp90 or Hsp70/Hsc70 under normal physiological conditions.

Hsp110/105 Deficiency Reduces Infarct Volume and Improves Neurological Scores
To generate a focal ischemia model in C57BL/6 mice, we occluded the left middle cerebral artery for 30 minutes followed by 24 hours of reperfusion. Laser Doppler flowmetry confirmed that the mean±SEM values of regional cerebral blood flow in the middle cerebral artery territory reduced satisfactorily both in WT and hsp110/105 KO mice (16.2±1.7% in WT [n=10] and 15.9±1.3% in hsp110/105 KO [n=11] mice, expressed as a percentage of preischemic baseline). Similar levels of regional cerebral blood flow recovery were also observed after the onset of reperfusion (71.1±3.4% and 73.7±4.1% in WT and hsp110/105 KO mice, respectively). There were no differences in physiological parameters such as arterial blood gasses and blood glucose between WT and hsp110/105 KO mice before, during, and after reperfusion (Table). The mice were euthanized 24 hours after reperfusion and the infarct volume was evaluated by Nissl staining of the coronal brain sections (Figure 2A). hsp110/105 KO mice exhibited a smaller infarct area than WT mice in all of the 5 coronal sections (Figure 2B). We calculated the infarct volume and found that it was significantly smaller in hsp110/105 KO mice than in WT mice (Figure 2C; 5.71±1.64 and 8.21±2.88 mm3, respectively). We evaluated the severity of the neurological deficit scores of these mice 24 hours after reperfusion by quantifying the mouse behavior using a 5-point score (see "Materials and Methods"). The degree of neurological deficits in hsp110/105 KO mice was significantly less severe than that observed in WT mice (Figure 3; 0.73±0.19 and 1.40±0.22, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table. Physiological Parameters Before, During, and After Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion*


Figure 2506188
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Cerebral infarct size in hsp110/105 KO mice after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Decreased infarction size in hsp110/105 KO mice. Representative slices of Nissl-stained coronal brain sections obtained 24 hours after reperfusion in WT and hsp110/105 KO mice (A). The infarct area (B) and volume (C) were significantly smaller in hsp110/105 KO mice (n=11) than in WT mice (n=10). Data are expressed as mean±SEM. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 versus WT mice (Aspin-Welch’s t test).


Figure 3506188
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Improvement of neurological scores in hsp110/105 KO mice. The degree of neurological deficits in hsp110/105 KO mice (n=11) was significantly less severe than that in WT mice (n=10) 24 hours after reperfusion. Data are expressed as mean±SEM. *P<0.05 versus WT mice (Student t test). 0, no neurological deficit; 1, flexion of torso and contralateral forepaw when lifted by the tail; 2, turning to the contralateral side; 3, circling to the contralateral side; 4, no spontaneous walking with depressed level of consciousness.

Hsp110/105 Suppresses Hsp70 Chaperone Activity
Because the disruption of Hsp110/105 caused the suppression of infarct volume and improved the neurological scores after ischemia and reperfusion, we next examined the possible effect of Hsp110/105 on the function of Hsp70, because Hsp70 is one of the major molecular chaperones involved in the protection against ischemic stresses. To examine whether Hsp110/105 affects Hsp70 chaperone activity, we transiently expressed Hsp110/105 and examined the luciferase-refolding activity in hsp110/105 KO MEFs. When firefly luciferase was expressed in the cells, and treated at high temperature, the luciferase activity was recovered through its refolding from the denatured state with the aid of the chaperone activity of Hsp70 in a dose-dependent manner during the recovery period after heat shock (Supplemental Figure I, available online at http://stroke.ahajournals.org). Under the conditions used here, Hsp70 was not induced during 2 hours recovery after heat shock (Supplemental Figure II) and we have already confirmed that Hsp110/105 itself did not exert any chaperone activity (Supplemental Figure III). The cells were also cotransfected with hsp110/105WT or hsp110/105K69A, a substitution mutant that lacks ATP binding activity and cannot interact with Hsp70 (N. Yamagishi, K. Ishihara, Y. Saito, and T. Hatayama, unpublished data, 2004). When increasing amounts of hsp110/105WT were transfected into the cells, we observed a significant decrease in Hsp70 chaperone activity (Figure 4A). In contrast to Hsp110/105WT, Hsp110/105K69A did not affect the Hsp70 chaperone activity, indicating that the effect of Hsp110/105WT was dependent on the interaction with Hsp70 (Figure 4B).


Figure 5506188
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure I. The chaperone activity of Hsp70 in a dose-dependent manner during the recovery period after heat shock. The chaperone activity of Hsp70 was assessed as described in "Materials and Methods." The hsp110/105 KO MEFs were transfected with human hsp70 plasmid (0.00 to 0.80 µg). Overexpression of Hsp70 alone was sufficient to reactivate luciferase activity (n=1).


Figure 6506188
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure II. Hsp70 was not induced during 2 hours recovery after heat shock. At 24 hours after transfection, the hsp110/105 KO MEFs were preincubated in a medium containing cycloheximide (20 µg/mL) for 30 minutes at 37°C and heated for 15 minutes at 45°C. During a subsequent recovery period at 37°C, samples were taken at 0 and 2 hours after heat shock and assayed for the expression of Hsp70 by Western blotting. Under physiological conditions, Hsp70 was not expressed in the cells (lane 1). The expression of Hsp70 increased significantly during 24 hours recovery after heat shock at 42°C for 8 hours (lane 2). However, under the conditions used to measure luciferase activity, Hsp70 was not induced during 2 hours recovery after heat shock (lanes 3 to 6). It was noted that the mild expression of Hsp70 in mock transfected cells might be induced by the cell stress of transfection reagent (lanes 3 and 5).


Figure 7506188
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure III. Hsp110/105 itself did not exert any chaperone activity. The hsp110/105 KO MEFs were transfected with hsp110/105WT plasmid (0.00 to 1.60 µg). Unlike Hsp70, Hsp110/105 itself did not exert any chaperone activity (n=1).


Figure 4506188
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Luciferase refolding activity in hsp110/105 KO MEFs. The chaperone activity of Hsp70, assessed as its ability to refold transfected firefly luciferase, was measured in the cells, and the effect of Hsp110/105 was investigated by the addition of hsp110/105 plasmid (0.0 to 0.8 µg). Luciferase refolding activity was measured at the indicated time points and plotted relative to the activity of Hsp70 alone (100%) after a 1-hour recovery period (n=4 to 8). Hsp110/105WT suppresses Hsp70 chaperone activity in a dose-dependent manner (A), but the Hsp110/105 mutant defective in ATP and Hsp70 binding activity (K69A) did not suppress Hsp70 chaperone activity (B). Data are expressed as mean±SEM. ***P<0.001 versus control (Dunnett’s multiple comparison test).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this study, we examined the function of Hsp110/105 in vivo by generating mice lacking the hsp110/105 gene. We found that the hsp110/105 gene is not a gene that is essential for mouse development. To further examine the role of Hsp110/105 under conditions of stress in vivo, hsp110/105 KO mice were subjected to transient focal cerebral ischemia. Unexpectedly, hsp110/105 KO mice were protected from ischemic injury induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion. Behavioral observation demonstrated that neurological deficits in hsp110/105 KO mice were significantly lower than those in WT mice. These data suggest that hsp110/105 KO mice are more resistant to ischemic injury than WT mice.

The induction of several classes of HSP after cerebral ischemia has been extensively investigated in animal models. In the central nervous system, HSPs are specifically induced in response to a variety of brain injuries, including focal and global ischemia, and function to protect neurons against cell death.26,27 As described for other HSPs, it has been reported that HSP110 family members are also upregulated after cerebral ischemia.12–16 Consistent with previously reported observations,13 we observed a significant upregulation of hsp110/105 and hsp70 mRNAs 24 hours after reperfusion in the ipsilateral ischemic hemisphere of WT mice (data not shown).

Because previous studies have demonstrated that Hsp110/105 exists as complexes associated with Hsp70/Hsc70 in mammalian cells,6,7 and suppresses Hsp70/Hsc70 chaperone activity by inhibiting the ATPase activity of Hsp70/Hsc70,17 we speculate that the inhibition of Hsp110/105 on Hsp70 chaperone functions may contribute to the neuroprotective effect we observed in hsp110/105 KO mice. To confirm this, we assessed the Hsp70 chaperone activity in hsp110/105 KO MEFs and found that the luciferase refolding activity was suppressed by Hsp110/105WT. Under pathological conditions such as cerebral ischemia, unfolded or misfolded proteins exposing their hydrophobic segments accumulate in the affected neurons and these denatured proteins are prone to aggregate, which subsequently cause cytotoxicity.28,29

To avoid aggregation within the cells, abnormal proteins are either stimulated to refold by the Hsp70/Hsp40 chaperone system or are quickly degraded by the ubiquitin/proteasome system.18 We propose that Hsp110/105 functions as a negative regulator of Hsp70 both in vitro and in vivo. Although the studies presented previously17 and here favor the notion that Hsp110/105 inhibits Hsp70 chaperone activity by inhibiting the hydrolysis of ATP bound to Hsp70, Hsp110/105 and yeast homolog Sse1 have been recently shown to possess nucleotide exchange factor activity.19–21 Further studies will be needed to address the precise mechanism as to whether Hsp110/105 inhibits or promotes the Hsp70/Hsp40 refolding cycle.

It is also reported that Hsp70 protects neurons through antiapoptotic mechanisms.30 Hsp70 blocks the apoptosis death cascade at several different levels. The ischemic insult (30 minutes of middle cerebral artery occlusion) used in this study is mild, which is known to induce cell death limited to ischemic penumbra mainly through the induction of apoptosis. Therefore, it is also possible to expect that neuroprotective effect in hsp110/105 KO mice is caused by the enhancement of Hsp70 antiapoptotic function in the absence of Hsp110/105, although it is not examined whether Hsp110/105 affects antiapoptotic function of Hsp70.

In conclusion, we have shown that an hsp110/105 gene deficiency confers resistance against ischemic brain injury in mice. An increase in the Hsp70 chaperone activity detected in hsp110/105 KO MEFs may contribute to the neuronal protection in these hsp110/105 KO mice. These results suggest that Hsp110/105 could be a therapeutic target for stroke.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank N. Yamagishi for technical advice and helpful discussions.

Source of Funding

Parts of this work were supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

Disclosures

None.

Received October 9, 2007; revision received March 3, 2008; accepted March 11, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Lindquist S, Craig EA. The heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 1988; 22: 631–677.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Ohtsuka K, Suzuki T. Roles of molecular chaperones in the nervous system. Brain Res Bull. 2000; 53: 141–146.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Sharp FR, Massa SM, Swanson RA. Heat-shock protein protection. Trends Neurosci. 1999; 22: 97–99.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Yasuda K, Nakai A, Hatayama T, Nagata K. Cloning and expression of murine high molecular mass heat shock proteins, HSP105. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270: 29718–29723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Yasuda K, Ishihara K, Nakashima K, Hatayama T. Genomic cloning and promoter analysis of the mouse 105-kDa heat shock protein (HSP105) gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999; 256: 75–80.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Hatayama T, Yasuda K. Association of HSP105 with HSC70 in high molecular mass complexes in mouse FM3A cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998; 248: 395–401.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Wakatsuki T, Hatayama T. Characteristic expression of 105-kDa heat shock protein (HSP105) in various tissues of nonstressed and heat-stressed rats. Biol Pharm Bull. 1998; 21: 905–910.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Kaneko Y, Kimura T, Kishishita M, Noda Y, Fujita J. Cloning of apg-2 encoding a novel member of heat shock protein 110 family. Gene. 1997; 189: 19–24.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Kaneko Y, Nishiyama H, Nonoguchi K, Higashitsuji H, Kishishita M, Fujita J. A novel hsp110-related gene, apg-1, that is abundantly expressed in the testis responds to a low temperature heat shock rather than the traditional elevated temperatures. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 2640–2645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Kojima R, Randall J, Brenner BM, Gullans SR. Osmotic stress protein 94 (Osp94). A new member of the Hsp110/sse gene subfamily. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271: 12327–12332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Lee-Yoon D, Easton D, Murawski M, Burd R, Subjeck JR. Identification of a major subfamily of large hsp70-like proteins through the cloning of the mammalian 110-kDa heat shock protein. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270: 15725–15733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Yagita Y, Kitagawa K, Taguchi A, Ohtsuki T, Kuwabara K, Mabuchi T, Matsumoto M, Yanagihara T, Hori M. Molecular cloning of a novel member of the HSP110 family of genes, ischemia-responsive protein 94 kDa (irp94), expressed in rat brain after transient forebrain ischemia. J Neurochem. 1999; 72: 1544–1551.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Kim H, Huh PW, Kim C, Kim YJ, Park EM, Park YM. Cerebral activation and distribution of inducible hsp110 and hsp70 mRNAs following focal ischemia in rat. Toxicology. 2001; 167: 135–144.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Lee MY, Choi YS, Choi JS, Min DS, Chun MH, Kim ON, Lee SB, Kim SY. An immunohistochemical study of APG-2 protein in the rat hippocampus after transient forebrain ischemia. Brain Res. 2002; 924: 237–241.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Xue JH, Fukuyama H, Nonoguchi K, Kaneko Y, Kido T, Fukumoto M, Fujibayashi Y, Itoh K, Fujita J. Induction of Apg-1, a member of the heat shock protein 110 family, following transient forebrain ischemia in the rat brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998; 247: 796–801.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Yagita Y, Kitagawa K, Ohtsuki T, Tanaka S, Hori M, Matsumoto M. Induction of the HSP110/105 family in the rat hippocampus in cerebral ischemia and ischemic tolerance. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001; 21: 811–819.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Yamagishi N, Ishihara K, Hatayama T. Hsp105alpha suppresses Hsc70 chaperone activity by inhibiting Hsc70 ATPase activity. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 41727–41733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Frydman J. Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001; 70: 603–647.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Dragovic Z, Broadley SA, Shomura Y, Bracher A, Hartl FU. Molecular chaperones of the Hsp110 family act as nucleotide exchange factors of Hsp70s. EMBO J. 2006; 25: 2519–2528.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Raviol H, Sadlish H, Rodriguez F, Mayer MP, Bukau B. Chaperone network in the yeast cytosol: Hsp110 is revealed as an Hsp70 nucleotide exchange factor. EMBO J. 2006; 25: 2510–2518.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Shaner L, Sousa R, Morano KA. Characterization of Hsp70 binding and nucleotide exchange by the yeast Hsp110 chaperone sse1. Biochemistry. 2006; 45: 15075–15084.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Asahi M, Wang X, Mori T, Sumii T, Jung JC, Moskowitz MA, Fini ME, Lo EH. Effects of matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene knock-out on the proteolysis of blood–brain barrier and white matter components after cerebral ischemia. J Neurosci. 2001; 21: 7724–7732.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Huang Z, Huang PL, Panahian N, Dalkara T, Fishman MC, Moskowitz MA. Effects of cerebral ischemia in mice deficient in neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Science. 1994; 265: 1883–1885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Michels AA, Nguyen VT, Konings AW, Kampinga HH, Bensaude O. Thermostability of a nuclear-targeted luciferase expressed in mammalian cells—destabilizing influence of the intranuclear microenvironment. Eur J Biochem. 1995; 234: 382–389.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Hatayama T, Takigawa T, Takeuchi S, Shiota K. Characteristic expression of high molecular mass heat shock protein HSP105 during mouse embryo development. Cell Struct Funct. 1997; 22: 517–525.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Kirino T. Ischemic tolerance. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002; 22: 1283–1296.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Sharp FR, Lu A, Tang Y, Millhorn DE. Multiple molecular penumbras after focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000; 20: 1011–1032.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Hu BR, Janelidze S, Ginsberg MD, Busto R, Perez-Pinzon M, Sick TJ, Siesjo BK, Liu CL. Protein aggregation after focal brain ischemia and reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001; 21: 865–875.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Taylor JP, Hardy J, Fischbeck KH. Toxic proteins in neurodegenerative disease. Science. 2002; 296: 1991–1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Arya R, Mallik M, Lakhotia SC. Heat shock genes-integrating cell survival and death. J Biosci. 2007; 32: 595–610.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/10/2853    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.506188v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nagata, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nagata, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Transient Ischemic Attacks