Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:2997-3002
Published online before print August 7, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521617
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/11/2997    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.521617v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boussel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Saloner, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boussel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Saloner, D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Brain Aneurysm
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebral Aneurysm, AVM, & Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

(Stroke. 2008;39:2997.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Aneurysm Growth Occurs at Region of Low Wall Shear Stress

Patient-Specific Correlation of Hemodynamics and Growth in a Longitudinal Study

Loic Boussel, MD; Vitaliy Rayz, PhD; Charles McCulloch, PhD; Alastair Martin, PhD; Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton, PhD; Michael Lawton, MD; Randall Higashida, MD; Wade S. Smith, MD, PhD; William L. Young, MD David Saloner, PhD

From the Radiology Service (L.B., V.R., G.A.-B., D.S.), VA Medical Center, and the Departments of Radiology (L.B., A.M., R.H., D.S.), Biostatistics (C.M.), Neurological Surgery (M.L., R.H., W.L.Y.), Neurology (R.H., W.S.S., W.L.Y.), and Anesthesia and Perioperative Care (R.H., W.L.Y.), University of California, San Francisco.

Correspondence to Loïc Boussel, Department of Radiology, VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco 94121, USA. E-mail loic.boussel{at}gmail.com


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Evolution of intracranial aneurysmal disease is known to be related to hemodynamic forces acting on the vessel wall. Low wall shear stress (WSS) has been reported to have a negative effect on endothelial cells normal physiology and may be an important contributor to local remodeling of the arterial wall and to aneurysm growth and rupture.

Methods— Seven patient-specific models of intracranial aneurysms were constructed using MR angiography data acquired at two different time points (mean 16.4±7.4 months between the two time points). Numeric simulations of the flow in the baseline geometries were performed to compute WSS distributions. The lumenal geometries constructed from the two time points were manually coregistered, and the radial displacement of the wall was calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis. This displacement, corresponding to the local growth of the aneurysm, was compared to the time-averaged wall shear stress (WSSTA) through the cardiac cycle at that location. For statistical analysis, radial displacement was considered to be significant if it was larger than half of the MR pixel resolution (0.3 mm).

Results— Mean WSSTA values obtained for the areas with a displacement smaller and greater than 0.3 mm were 2.55±3.6 and 0.76±1.5 Pa, respectively (P<0.001). A linear correlation analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between WSSTA and surface displacement (P<0.001).

Conclusions— These results indicate that aneurysm growth is likely to occur in regions where the endothelial layer lining the vessel wall is exposed to abnormally low wall shear stress.


Key Words: magnetic resonance • aneurysm • hemodynamics • endothelium


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
With the development of noninvasive cerebrovascular imaging techniques, the frequency of diagnosis of unruptured cerebral aneurysms has increased because the incidence of those aneurysms in the general population is thought to be as high as 4.1%.1 Intracranial aneurysms present a major threat to a patient’s life because of the risk of rupture, thrombo-emboli, or compression of adjacent tissue. Most aneurysms, however, remain asymptomatic. Finding an unrupted intracranial aneurysm often leads to difficulties in the choice of treatment because of limited diagnostic criteria by which to predict the risk of rupture of the untreated aneurysm, or the risks of surgical intervention itself. Determining accurate criteria for predicting aneurysm growth and rupture would be important for therapeutic decision-making (eg, medical follow-up, endovascular treatment, or surgery) as well as for planning of the specific surgical intervention to be used. In this context, studying intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic forces, particularly wall shear stress (WSS) which is the tangential force produced by blood moving across the endothelial surface, is of great interest as there is increasing evidence that it plays a role in the evolution of aneurysmal disease. This stress acts on endothelial cell function and gene expression as well as on cell shape and structure. High WSS has recently been demonstrated to initiate aneurysm formation,2 whereas low WSS leads to spatial disorganization of endothelial cells and a disregulation of antioxidant and antiinflammatory mediators resulting in arterial wall remodeling.3 This factor could be a major contributor to arterial aneurysm growth, because slow recirculating flow leading to large regions of low WSS is observed in most aneurysms.4–6

The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between low WSS and local aneurysm growth in intracranial aneurysms, using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations based on patient-specific models obtained from serial in vivo MRI studies.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Population
Seven patients were included in this study, and IRB approval and informed consent were obtained for each patient. They were selected from an ongoing prospective study involving 14 patients presenting with intracranial arterial aneurysms unsuitable for direct surgical treatment, such as clipping or coiling, because of an unfavorable anatomy or high operative risk. All patients were monitored with repeated MRI studies scheduled at 6 to 12 months intervals. For each of the patients selected for our analysis, the initial and most recent study were included resulting in a mean value of 16.4±7.4 months between the two time points. To be sure that the shear stress is applied directly to endothelium that abuts the arterial wall, 5 patients who were shown to have substantial intraaneurysmal thrombus (assessed by MRI, see below) were excluded. Two other patients were excluded from analysis because their vascular anatomy did not permit a meaningful CFD simulation. One of these patients had a proximal lesion that was so stenotic that it prevented MR visualization of the residual lumen. The other patient had multiple branch vessels emanating from the body of the aneurysmm and it was not possible to determine the flow boundary conditions for this anatomy. The 7 included patients and their aneurysm data are summarized in the Table.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table. Patients and Aneurysms Data

MR Protocol and Modeling of the Aneurysm
MR studies were performed on a 1.5-Tesla scanner (Intera, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). A 3-step imaging protocol was used.

First, the absence of thrombus was confirmed using a 3D balanced Fast Field Echo (bFFE) sequence with TR=6ms, TE=2ms, flip angle=60°, number of averages=3, field of view=220 mm, matrix=256x256, slice thickness=1 mm, image resolution=0.86 mmx0.86 mmx1 mm=0.74 mm3, number of partitions=50, and acquisition time of about 4 minutes.

Then a contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) was performed using a 3D slab covering the vessels of interest with an injection of 18 mL GdDTPA followed by 15 mL of saline all delivered at 2 mL/s. The CE-MRA sequence used elliptic-centric phase reordering, and data were acquired using parallel imaging with an acceleration factor of 2. Imaging parameters included: TR/TE/flip angle=5/2/30°. Images were acquired from a 54 mm para-coronal slab, with an FOV of 240 mm and an acquisition matrix of 400x380x45 zero-filled to 512x512x90. The resultant images had a resolution of 0.6 mmx0.6 mmx1.2 mm=0.43 mm3 and were interpolated to 0.47 mmx0.47 mmx0.6 mm=0.13 mm3. Total acquisition time was of the order of 35 s.

Finally, to measure the aneurysm inlet flowrate for CFD modeling, through-plane phase-contrast MRI was performed transverse to the artery that supplied flow to the aneurysm. The MR angiogram was examined to determine a level where the proximal artery or arteries had a relatively straight course. The image slice was then placed perpendicular to the artery of interest on two orthogonal long-axis views. In the case of basilar artery aneurysms, this was performed separately for each vertebral. In addition, all imaging planes were chosen so that there were no branch vessels between the level where flow was determined, and the aneurysmal segment. Acquisition parameters were as follows: slice thickness=5 mm, field of view=150 mm, in-plane pixel size=1.1x1.1 mm, velocity-encoding level=50 cm/s. Approximately 15 time points were acquired through the cardiac cycle, providing the time-varying inlet boundary conditions required for the pulsatile flow simulations. Images were examined after acquisition to ensure that there was no aliasing.

Model Construction and Numeric Simulations
For each patient, CE-MRA data files obtained at the two time points were transferred to custom-built software to form three-dimensional isosurfaces.7 To obtain these isosurfaces, a threshold intensity value was selected that defined the intralumenal volume of the vessels. For the first, or baseline time point, a threshold was selected and the resulting lumenal surface was superimposed on the native MR gray scale images. The threshold value was then incrementally adjusted until the generated lumenal surface visually matched the lumenal boundary of the MR gray-scale data. This method has been found to be highly reproducible with variations in estimates of the lumenal volume that are less than 3%. To provide consistent threshholding from baseline to follow-up, we identified on the baseline study a reference healthy vessel segment that was assumed to remain unchanged over time (eg, disease free segment of internal carotid). For the second or follow-up time point, subsequent thresholding was then constrained to produce identical volume measurements on that reference segment.

The obtained surfaces were then transferred into a 3D modeling software, Rapidform (INUS Technology), where the background noise and smaller vessels were removed from the main vessels of interest and a polygonal surface was formed. Remaining singularities and spikes were then removed, holes in the surface were filled, and Laplacian smoothing, which conserves global volume, was applied to make the surfaces continuous and regular. In the final stage, the surfaces were manually divided into rectangular patches, to be used as boundaries for the computational mesh. Total volume of the aneurysm was recorded for each time point.7

To determine the role of WSS in aneurysmal disease progression, numeric simulations of the flow in the baseline geometry were carried out for each patient. Although flow patterns evolve over time as the geometry changes, differences in velocity fields and therefore WSS distribution for baseline geometries and follow-up geometries were found to be extremely small, even for the subject with the greatest interval growth. A finite-volume package, Fluent (Fluent Inc), was used to solve the governing Navier-Stokes equations. This solver has been successfully used in various biological fluid dynamics applications and has been extensively validated with experimental data.6,8,9 For each patient, the baseline surface was imported into the Fluent preprocessor, Gambit, to generate the computational mesh. All patient models included extended sections of the parent vessels (with lengths that were more than several diameters long) as the aneurysmal flow is strongly dependent on the proximal geometry.10 An unstructured mesh with a nominal resolution of 0.3 mm was generated on the domain, resulting in approximately half a million computational cells in each aneurysm model. To ensure that the calculated results did not depend on the resolution of the mesh, the numeric solution was repeated with increasingly refined meshes. The finest resolution below which results remained constant was then used for all patients as the aneurysm sizes were of the same order.

The flow was assumed to be laminar and Newtonian, which are good assumptions regarding the size of the studied intracranial vessels.11 The waveform at each of the inlet vessels was specified from the MR phase velocity measurements at the corresponding location.12 The arterial walls were assumed rigid consistent with our observations from cine-mode studies that there was no observable pulsatile displacement of the aneurysm wall in our subjects. The unsteady flow simulations were performed through three pulsatile cycles to eliminate the influence of initial transients. The WSS distribution was computed for each phase of the cardiac cycle and the results were exported in a generic format commonly used in postprocessing and computational software (Ensight, Computational Engineering International).

To assess the local aneurysm growth for each patient, manual coregistration of aneurysmal geometries obtained from two consecutive time points (baseline and follow-up) was performed. Coregistration was performed using internal fiducial markers, the most important being vessel bifurcations and vessel junctions. Confirmation that coregistration had been achieved was provided by noting that there was excellent matching of surfaces in nonaneurysmal vessel segments. For each cell of the baseline surface mesh, a normal vector was generated. A ray was then extended in two directions along the length of this vector, starting from the iso-center of the considered cell and ending at the intersection with the surface of the lumen from the follow-up time point. The distance between these starting and ending points corresponds to the so-called radial wall displacement. The sign of the radial displacement was positive (aneurysm expansion) if the follow-up surface was outside the baseline or negative (aneurysm contraction) if the follow-up surface was inside the baseline. Computing this radial wall displacement for all the cells resulted in a displacement map that could be displayed on the surface of the baseline aneurysm. As the displacement map and the corresponding WSS distribution map obtained from CFD results were generated as data sets on separate unstructured grids, we transformed them into the same structured grid at a reduced resolution so that data display and comparison could be readily performed (Figure 1). These results were simultaneously displayed for each cardiac phase in order to visualize the relationship between the descriptors (Figure 2).


Figure 1521617
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Displacement map: The baseline shape (blue, left) is coregistered with the shape at the follow-up time point (green, middle). The displacement map is then generated (right): red indicates larger displacement; blue corresponds to an unchanged surface from one time point to the next.


Figure 2521617
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Visual comparison of WSS map (left) and displacement map (right). Areas with low WSS (blue, left) match with areas of larger displacement (red, right). Similarly, areas of high WSS (red, left) correspond to no growth regions (blue, right).

Finally, to obtain a quantitative comparison between radial wall displacement and WSS, regular discrete patches (approximately 100 patches per aneurysm) were distributed over the aneurysm surface and the radial displacement and WSS at the location of each patch was calculated. The size of each patch was 1 mm2 which corresponds to about 1000 endothelial cells.13 The proximal and distal vessels were excluded from the analysis and the patches were considered only for the aneurysmal segment (Figure 3).


Figure 3521617
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Sampling on the aneurysm: Patches are placed at regular intervals over the surface. White lines indicate the cut planes. Only the body of the aneurysm is taken into account in the statistical analysis.

The whole process, including: the extraction of aneurysmal geometry at follow-up; registration with the baseline geometry; calculation of radial displacement; and calculation of total volume was repeated. The values of aneurysmal volumes and radial displacement expressed in the result section correspond to the mean values of these two registration measurements. In addition, the whole process was also repeated for the reference vessel to assess the variability of the method.

Statistical Analysis
For each surface patch, the mean value of the radial wall displacement and the mean value of the WSS at different heart phases were recorded. The time-averaged WSS (WSSTA) was then calculated for each patch as the average of WSS values through the cardiac cycle.

The mean local displacement for each patch was plotted as a function of the inverse of the WSSTA together with the LOWESS curves and a linear regression line. The LOWESS curve is useful to establish an overview of the relationship between the two parameters and unlike the linear regression line is not biased by outliers. A generalized estimating equation regression with robust standard errors was used to account for clustering by patient and to test the statistical significance of the association between displacement and inverse WSSTA. Displacement was considered to be significant if it was greater than half of the MRA pixel resolution (ie, greater than 0.3 mm). WSSTA values in each category (lower and greater than 0.3 mm) were compared by using an unpaired t test with unequal variance.

The intratechnique variability of the radial displacement was expressed as the standard deviation, for each patch, of the differences between the two registration experiments for the aneurysms and for the reference vessel. The 95% confidence interval was also calculated.

The error in volume measurement for each reference vessel and each aneurysm at follow-up was calculated as the absolute value of the difference of the two measurements divided by the average of the two measurements.14

All statistical analysis was made with Intercooled Stata 9.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
A complete analysis was carried out for all patients. Mean aneurysmal volume at baseline was 1703±956 mm3 (range 476 to 2877). Mean change in volume was 7.0±9.1% (range –1.3 to 24.3). A total of 738 one square millimeter surface patches were analyzed from the 7 patients.

Mean radial wall displacement was 0.19±0.34 mm (range –0.26 to 1.96); 592 patches (80%) were found to have a displacement of less than 0.3 mm and 146 (20%) had a displacement equal to or greater than 0.3 mm.

Mean WSSTA was 2.55±3.65 Pa (range 0.03 to 21.87) and 0.76±1.51 Pa (range 0.03 to 9.44) for patches with a displacement lower and greater than 0.3 mm, respectively (t=9.15; P<0.001).

The Lowess curve shows a trend for patches with higher inverse WSSTA values to have a larger wall displacement. The estimated change in displacement was 0.24 mm per standard deviation change in inverse WSSTA (95% CI: 0.18 to 0.30, P<0.001; Figure 4).


Figure 4521617
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Scatter Plot of the local displacement as a function of the inverse of time-averaged WSS (WSSTA) showing a clear trend for increased growth (high values of displacement) at patches that experience low WSS through the cardiac cycle (ie, high values of inverse WSSTA). A linear regression (black) fit to the data (P<0.001). The LOWESS curve (gray) closely follows the linear regression curve, confirming that linear regression is reasonable both locally and globally and is not biased by outliers.

The standard deviation of the differences in radial displacement between the two registration experiments was 0.09 mm for patches on the aneurysmal segment (resulting in a 95% CI of ±0.17 mm for the values of radial displacement), and 0.05 mm (95% CI of ±0.1) for the reference vessels.

The mean error in volume measurement was 2.0±1.0% (range: 0.1 to 3.0%) for the aneurysms at follow-up, and 1.1±0.8% (range: 0 to 2.0) for the reference vessels.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study uses data from noninvasive imaging performed in longitudinal studies on subjects with untreated intracranial aneurysms to establish a relationship between local aneurysm growth and areas of low wall shear stress at the lumenal surface. This is the first report in a series of patients where quantitative analyses, in three dimensions, of changes in geometric morphology at specific locations on the aneurysm surface were related to the hemodynamic forces at those locations, determined on a patient-specific basis.

Wall shear stress is created by the flow of blood over the endothelial cell surface. Even if details of the cell transduction pathway remain unknown (action on cell membrane, mechanoreceptor, or directly on the cytoskeleton15–17), WSS is increasingly understood as a major physiological stimulus for the vessel endothelium. Indeed, regular physiological WSS, as observed in healthy blood vessels, promotes endothelial cell survival and quiescence, alignment in the direction of the flow, and secretion of substances that promote vasodilatation and anticoagulation.3,18 Both excess and lack of the stimulus can lead to pathological phenomena that cause changes in the arterial wall biomechanical properties. Pathologically high wall shear values can damage the layer of endothelial cells.19,20 Meng et al2 recently demonstrated, in an animal model where they created an arterial T bifurcation, that a high supraphysiological level of WSS contributes to aneurysm initiation and development. They showed a good agreement between the areas of high WSS and high WSS spatial gradients at the apices of arterial bifurcations and aneurysm-type wall remodeling (disrupted internal elastic lamina and endothelium, thinned media and smooth muscle cells loss) at histology.

Conversely, low WSS has been reported to be related to aneurysmal growth21 and rupture5 as it promotes various mechanisms that cause arterial wall remodeling. Indeed, a low level of WSS (lower than 0.4 Pa) generates endothelial proliferation3 and apoptosis.22 It is also responsible for changes in endothelial cell secretion, leading to abnormal hyper-production of vasoconstrictive agents23 and inflammatory, proadhesive, and prothrombotic mediators.24,3 Similarly, it decreases the production of vasodilators25 and antioxidant enzymes.26

To summarize, it appears that, after an initial injury that might result from excessive WSS on the endothelial cells (caused by a localized jet, for example2), progressive changes in aneurysm shape occur with a trend for the cross section to become more elliptical. This generates a progressive decrease of WSS4,27,28 leading to endothelial dysfunction, wall remodeling, and aneurysm growth.

In our study we establish the relationship between low levels of the time-averaged WSS that is applied on the endothelium through the cardiac cycle and local aneurysm growth in intracranial aneurysms. The methodology we propose is based on a combination of techniques that has not been reported previously and presents several advantages. First, noninvasive in vivo monitoring of the aneurysm over time allows observation of actual changes in aneurysm shapes without making any assumptions about theoretical evolution that need hypotheses on arterial wall composition or biomechanical properties.29,30 Then, use of a point-by-point study of the displacement permits an accurate display of the morphology of wall displacement allowing both qualitative, visual, and quantitative comparisons between local changes in volume and the local wall shear stress. MR imaging of both the lumen and the wall permits identification of aneurysms where there is substantial intralumenal thrombus. Subjects with intralumenal thrombus must be excluded from an analysis of the kind reported here because that condition substantially alters the direct impact of hemodynamics on the vessel wall. Finally, CFD modeling allows an accurate estimation of WSS5 on a patient-specific basis. WSS calculations, based on the velocity gradient at the wall, require a resolution of the velocity field that cannot currently be achieved by in vivo flow measurement techniques in intracranial arteries. Indeed, although there are recent reports that MRI is able to estimate WSS in an in vitro study at 3T,4 the image resolution (0.47x0.47x2 mm) is insufficient to provide accurate measurements of the gradient of velocities at the wall. Nevertheless, although unsuited for the accurate determination of WSS data, MRI is able to determine the flowrates through the inlet vessels, quantities that are crucial for CFD calculations which are strongly dependent on inlet flow conditions.

In this study we have focused on the time-averaged WSS applied to the endothelium over the cardiac cycle as it represents the average intensity of the stimulus acting on endothelial cells. A number of other hemodynamic parameters can be used as descriptors of how this stimulus is experienced by the endothelium (such as WSS spatial gradient, amplitude or frequency of the oscillation of WSS through the cardiac cycle, or changes of WSS direction). Although each of those could be an important mechanism in influencing aneurysm growth, it is difficult to separate out the effects of one from another because they often occur simultaneously. These effects are also difficult to evaluate from an imaging standpoint as their determination requires extremely high-resolution data. Further, little is known about how those detailed interactions are felt by the cells. For example, we do not know if a spatial gradient should be computed on a cell-by-cell basis or by grouping a number of neighboring cells (even more if paracrine communication plays an active role). Finally, the manner in which the stimulus is applied is more relevant when the level of WSS is high than when it is low, or close to zero.2

A limitation of our study relates to the way displacement is computed. Radial wall displacement measurement is certainly a good approximation of local aneurysm growth, but it does not take into account several parameters such as constraints coming from neighboring structures (for example a bone structure limiting the extension of the aneurysm in one direction) or modification resulting from distant changes in the arterial wall that result in a "sliding" displacement of a different part of the aneurysm. It is possible that our radial model could be improved by fitting the observed change using a mathematical model.27,29

Another limitation is the potential errors in CFD flow field calculation related to geometric uncertainties.31 Partial volume effects in MRI studies or inaccuracy of thresholding of the data when extracting the shape from the MRI images may alter the CFD results. However, we attempted to minimize all those potential sources of errors in the methodology by using high-resolution MR angiography, consistent thresholding for the baseline and follow-up studies, and visual control of the fit between the extracted shapes and the original dataset.

Summary
The analysis in this study uses a tool that is based on noninvasive 3D MR imaging of the vessel lumen, wall, and inlet flow conditions. From the imaging results, both a sensitive map of regional geometric changes and a computational model of the velocity fields can be derived. The study demonstrates the correlation between regions of low WSS and aneurysm progression in intracranial aneurysms. This could be helpful in predicting where and when aneurysm growth might occur which would be of interest in therapeutic decision-making and in surgical planning.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Nancy Quinnine RN for coordinating and managing patient participation.

Sources of Funding

Loic Boussel acknowledges support from the Société Française de Radiologie, 20, Ave RAPP, 75007 Paris, France. This work has been supported in part by grants from PHS grants NS047921, HL067912; and a VA Merit Review Award.

Disclosures

None.

Received March 27, 2008; accepted April 17, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Krex D, Schackert HK, Schackert G. Genesis of cerebral aneurysms–an update. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001; 143: 429–448;discussion 448–429.

2. Meng H, Wang Z, Hoi Y, Gao L, Metaxa E, Swartz DD, Kolega J. Complex hemodynamics at the apex of an arterial bifurcation induces vascular remodeling resembling cerebral aneurysm initiation. Stroke. 2007; 38: 1924–1931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA. 1999; 282: 2035–2042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Ahn S, Shin D, Tateshima S, Tanishita K, Vinuela F, Sinha S. Fluid-induced wall shear stress in anthropomorphic brain aneurysm models: Mr phase-contrast study at 3 t. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25: 1120–1130.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Shojima M, Oshima M, Takagi K, Torii R, Hayakawa M, Katada K, Morita A, Kirino T. Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: Computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke. 2004; 35: 2500–2505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Valencia AA, Guzman AM, Finol EA, Amon CH. Blood flow dynamics in saccular aneurysm models of the basilar artery. J Biomech Eng. 2006; 128: 516–526.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Dispensa BP, Saloner DA, Acevedo-Bolton G, Achrol AS, Jou LD, McCulloch CE, Johnston SC, Higashida RT, Dowd CF, Halbach VV, Ko NU, Lawton MT, Martin AJ, Quinnine N, Young WL. Estimation of fusiform intracranial aneurysm growth by serial magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 26: 177–183.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Hassan T, Ezura M, Timofeev EV, Tominaga T, Saito T, Takahashi A, Takayama K, Yoshimoto T. Computational simulation of therapeutic parent artery occlusion to treat giant vertebrobasilar aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25: 63–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Jou LD, Wong G, Dispensa B, Lawton MT, Higashida RT, Young WL, Saloner D. Correlation between lumenal geometry changes and hemodynamics in fusiform intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26: 2357–2363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Castro MA, Putman CM, Cebral JR. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: Effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006; 27: 1703–1709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Berger SA, Jou LD. Flows in stenotic vessels. Ann Rev Fluid Mech. 2000; 32: 347–384.[CrossRef]

12. Rayz V, Boussel L, Acevedo-Bolton G, Martin AJ, Young WL, Lawton MT, Higashida R, Saloner D. Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: Comparison of cfd results and in vivo mri measurements. J Biomech Eng. In press.

13. Adamson RH. Microvascular endothelial cell shape and size in situ. Microvasc Res. 1993; 46: 77–88.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1: 307–310.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Ali MH, Schumacker PT. Endothelial responses to mechanical stress: Where is the mechanosensor? Crit Care Med. 2002; 30: S198–206.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Schwarz G, Callewaert G, Droogmans G, Nilius B. Shear stress-induced calcium transients in endothelial cells from human umbilical cord veins. J Physiol. 1992; 458: 527–538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Wang N, Butler JP, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science. 1993; 260: 1124–1127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Paszkowiak JJ, Dardik A. Arterial wall shear stress: Observations from the bench to the bedside. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2003; 37: 47–57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. DePaola N, Gimbrone MA Jr, Davies PF, Dewey CF Jr. Vascular endothelium responds to fluid shear stress gradients. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992; 12: 1254–1257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Fry DL. Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circ Res. 1968; 22: 165–197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Jou LD, Quick CM, Young WL, Lawton MT, Higashida R, Martin A, Saloner D. Computational approach to quantifying hemodynamic forces in giant cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24: 1804–1810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Kaiser D, Freyberg MA, Friedl P. Lack of hemodynamic forces triggers apoptosis in vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997; 231: 586–590.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Rieder MJ, Carmona R, Krieger JE, Pritchard KA Jr, Greene AS. Suppression of angiotensin-converting enzyme expression and activity by shear stress. Circ Res. 1997; 80: 312–319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Korenaga R, Ando J, Kosaki K, Isshiki M, Takada Y, Kamiya A. Negative transcriptional regulation of the vcam-1 gene by fluid shear stress in murine endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273: C1506–C1515.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Rubanyi GM, Romero JC, Vanhoutte PM. Flow-induced release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Am J Physiol. 1986; 250: H1145–H1149.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Topper JN, Cai J, Falb D, Gimbrone MA Jr. Identification of vascular endothelial genes differentially responsive to fluid mechanical stimuli: Cyclooxygenase-2, manganese superoxide dismutase, and endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase are selectively up-regulated by steady laminar shear stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 10417–10422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Feng Y, Wada S, Tsubota K, Yamaguchi T. A model-based numerical analysis in the early development of intracranial aneurysms. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2005; 1: 607–610.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Utter B, Rossmann JS. Numerical simulation of saccular aneurysm hemodynamics: Influence of morphology on rupture risk. J Biomech. 2007; 40: 2716–2722.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Baek S, Rajagopal KR, Humphrey JD. A theoretical model of enlarging intracranial fusiform aneurysms. J Biomech Eng. 2006; 128: 142–149.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Chatziprodromou I, Poulikakos D, Ventikos Y. On the influence of variation in haemodynamic conditions on the generation and growth of cerebral aneurysms and atherogenesis: A computational model. J Biomech. 2007.

31. Hoi Y, Woodward SH, Kim M, Taulbee DB, Meng H. Validation of cfd simulations of cerebral aneurysms with implication of geometric variations. J Biomech Eng. 2006; 128: 844–851.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. Chien, M.A. Castro, S. Tateshima, J. Sayre, J. Cebral, and F. Vinuela
Quantitative Hemodynamic Analysis of Brain Aneurysms at Different Locations
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2009; 30(8): 1507 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. K. Wakhloo, M. J. Deleo III, and M. M. Brown
Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology
Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e305 - e312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/11/2997    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.521617v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boussel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Saloner, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boussel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Saloner, D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Brain Aneurysm
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebral Aneurysm, AVM, & Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging