| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2008;39:3137.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine (A.R., M.E., B.S.), Umeå University, Sweden; and the Department of Medicine (M.E.), Sunderby Hospital, Luleå, Sweden.
Correspondence to Aslak Rautio, Läkarhuset Hermelinen, Sandviksgatan 60, SE-972 33 Luleå, Sweden. E-mail aslak.rautio{at}telia.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods— This study was based on the Northern Sweden MONICA Project Stroke registry during 1985 to 2003. 15 382 patients, aged 35 to 74 years, were included in the study. 11 605 had a first-ever stroke and 3777 had a recurrent stroke. In both men and women previously diagnosed diabetes was found in 22.8%.
Results— The incidence of stroke was 5 and 8 times higher in diabetic subjects than in nondiabetics, in men and women, respectively. Incidence of first-ever stroke decreased for nondiabetic men, probability value <0.001, and for diabetic women, probability value=0.012. Recurrent stroke incidence declined highly significant, probability value <0.001, in all but diabetic men. For diabetic women, the decrease in incidence in first and recurrent stroke was significantly greater than in nondiabetic women. Case-fatality and mortality in stroke declined for all groups except diabetic women with first-ever stroke. The time trends in case fatality and mortality did not differ significantly between nondiabetic and diabetic patients.
Conclusion— The incidence of stroke declined in both nondiabetic and diabetic subjects except for diabetic men and for nondiabetic women with first-ever stroke. Case-fatality in first-ever stroke declined for all but diabetic women. This led to a decreased mortality over the 19-year period for both groups. This is the first time that the decline in stroke incidence is reported in this MONICA population.
Key Words: time trends incidence mortality diabetes stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The case fatality and mortality in stroke is declining in Western Europe and the United States.6–8 However, the results regarding the incidence of stroke in the Western world have been inconsistent. Previous studies report declining,9,10 as well as, unchanged incidence8 and increasing incidence.11 Decline in stroke severity is described in most studies with a shift toward more patients presenting with mild symptoms.12,13
Little is known if these beneficial time trends in stroke also apply to patients with DM. However, one study from Norway reports a decline of self-reported stroke morbidity and impairment due to other physical diseases in subjects with diabetes.14 A retrospective cohort study from Ontario, Canada, between 1992 and 2000 reported similar reductions in case-fatality rates related to acute myocardial infarction and stroke for diabetic and nondiabetic subjects.15
With increasing incidence in some parts of the world and increasing prevalence almost everywhere, mostly due to an aging population, the impact of diabetes on burden of disease is growing.16,17 However, in Northern Sweden MONICA area no increase in prevalence of known diabetes in subjects 25 to 64 years of age between 1986 and 1999 was seen.18
Several questions need to be answered. First of all, are the results from previous studies, showing favorable time trends in case-fatality and mortality for the whole stroke population, also valid for the diabetic population? It is also important to study how we manage to treat first-ever stroke and prevent recurrent stroke, especially in diabetic subjects? Previous studies describe time trends in first-ever or in all strokes, but trends for recurrent stroke have not been as well described. Recurrent strokes reflect the effects of acute medical treatment and secondary prevention. Therefore, trends in different patient groups, such as diabetics and men and women separately, are important to determine whether the healthcare system manages to deliver care in an equal manner.
The aim of this study was to compare time trends in incidence, case-fatality and mortality in first-ever and recurrent stroke in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The diagnosis of diabetes was based on WHO diabetes definition.23 Because our aim was to study the impact of previously diagnosed diabetes, the subjects diagnosed with diabetes during the event were not included in the analysis. The estimation of the prevalence of diabetes in the background population was based on the 5 MONICA population surveys between 1986 and 2004.
In this study all strokes, including events occurring outside hospitals in subjects 35 to 74 years old, were registered from January 1, 1985 to December 31, 2003 in the MONICA Stroke event registry.22 All patients with subarachnoidal hemorrhage were excluded because the impact of diabetes as a risk factor for subarachnoidal hemorrhage is more uncertain than it is for brain infarction or for intracranial hemorrhage (Figure 1). All events were validated and registered in a standardized way according to the WHO MONICA manual.24
|
The diagnosis of DM was based on medical records. To estimate the incidence of stroke in a diabetic population, the prevalence of DM in the population needs to be known. For this purpose data from the 5 MONICA population surveys in the same area from between 1986 to 2004 were used. The diabetes prevalence was calculated within 10-year age strata. The prevalence of DM 1986 to 2004 was 3.6% in men and 2.5% in women, ages 35 to 64 years. The total prevalence of diabetes in age group 35 to 64 was 3.1%. For the oldest age group 65 to 74 years the diabetes prevalence was 10.2% in men and 9.1% in women based on data from 1994 to 2004.18,25 The total prevalence of diabetes in age group 65 to 74 was 9.7%. As no significant time trend in diabetes prevalence was evident, the pooled and age stratified estimate for the time period was used. The corresponding number of subjects with diabetes was calculated from the total population in 10-year age strata.
Definitions
The following definitions were used: mortality is defined as the annual number of fatal events in the population. Case-fatality is defined as the proportion of all stroke events that are fatal within 28 days. Stroke is defined according to The WHO MONICA Project stroke definitions: "Rapidly developing signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function lasting 24 hours (unless interrupted by surgery or death), with no apparent nonvascular cause." This definition excluded patients with transient cerebral ischemia.24
Statistical Procedures
The incidence of stroke was based on each years individual population data in the age range 35 to 74. During the study period the population was stable and ranged between 236 000 and 251 000 inhabitants in this age group. Poisson regression was used to test for time trends in annual number of events, and logistic regression was used to test for time trends in annual incidence rates. Probability values <0.05 were considered as significant. The models were built separately for men and women. As a first step we built separate models for groups with and without diabetes to test for time trends within each group. To test if the difference between trends was statistically significant an interaction term "year*diabetes" was included in the models, where diabetes was a dummy variable for diabetes. A variable for age group was included in all regression models to control for possible different age distributions between the groups. When using Poisson regression we calculated trends in annual rates (rt) with the log-linear model, where log denotes the natural logarithm, t the year, and et, the error term of the regression model:
|
|
The estimate 100*[exp (b1)–1] is the average annual percentage change. For small changes, 100*b1 can be used as approximated annual percentage change, which is presented in this article. Confidence intervals for b1 from the regression models were used to estimate confidence intervals for percentage annual change. Similar approximations were done when logistic regression was used. The SAS v.8 software package was used for statistical analysis.
The Northern Sweden MONICA study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Umeå University and data handling procedures by the National Computer Data Inspection Board.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Trends in Incidence of Stroke in Diabetics and Nondiabetics
At the start of the observation period, the stroke incidence for nondiabetic subjects was for men 358/100 000 and for women 204/100 000 in all, both first-ever and recurrent, stroke. At the end of the observation period, the incidence had declined for nondiabetic men and women to 284/100 000 and 183/100 000 respectively. For diabetic subjects the incidence of all stroke at the start of the observation period was for men 1961/100 000 and for women 1921/100 000. At the end of the observation period, the incidence had declined for diabetic men and women 1815/100 000 and 1176/100 000 respectively.
The incidence of stroke was about 5-fold higher among diabetic men as compared with nondiabetic men. In women this increased stroke incidence was even more pronounced with a 7- to 9-fold higher stroke incidence for diabetic women as compared with nondiabetic women. In men this difference in incidence remained unchanged from 1986 through 2003. In women there was a significant decline from an approximately 9-fold higher incidence among diabetic in the beginning of the study period to 6-fold higher incidence at the end of the study period.
For first-ever stroke, a significant declining trend of 0.8% per year (95 CI, 0.3; 1.3) was seen in nondiabetic men, and a smaller insignificant decline, 0.1%, was seen among diabetic men (Table 2). Diabetic women had a significantly more favorable trend than nondiabetic women with a yearly decrease in incidence of 1.5% (CI 0.3; 2.7), whereas first-ever stroke did not change at all in women without diabetes (Table 2, Figure 2a and 2b).
|
|
For recurrent stroke, the decline in incidence was significant for all but diabetic men (Table 3). The greatest decline, 5.4%/yr (CI 3.6; 7.2), was seen in diabetic women whereas nondiabetic women showed only a –2.7% yearly trend (CI 1.5; 3.8; Table 2, Figure 2c and 2d).
|
Trends in Stroke Case-Fatality in Diabetics and Nondiabetics
At the start of the observation period, the case-fatality for nondiabetic subjects was 15.3% in first-ever stroke and 17.8% in recurrent stroke. For diabetic subjects the case fatalities were 18% and 26.2%, respectively. All groups except diabetic women with first-ever stroke had a significant decline in case-fatality over time (Table 3). Trends between nondiabetics and diabetics did not differ significantly (Figure 3). The yearly decline was higher in recurrent stroke than in first-ever stroke.
|
Trends in Stroke Mortality Rates in Diabetics and Nondiabetics
At the start of the observation period, the mortality for nondiabetic men and women, was 38/100 000 and 25/100 000 respectively in first-ever stroke and 16/100 000 and 9/100 000 respectively in recurrent stroke. At the end of the observation period, the mortality had declined for nondiabetic men and women to 22/100 000 and 14/100 000 respectively in first-ever stroke and 5/100 000 and 2/100 000 respectively in recurrent stroke.
For the diabetic subjects the mortality in first-ever stroke was at the start of the observation period 211/100 000 and 241/100 000 for men and women respectively and 163/100 000 and 168/100 000 respectively in recurrent stroke. At the end of the observation period, the mortality had declined for diabetic men and women to 110/100 000 and 148/100 000 respectively in first-ever stroke and 72/100 000 and 31/100 000 respectively in recurrent stroke (Figure 4a–b). Trends in mortality in first and recurrent stroke were similar to those for case fatality with declining mortality in all groups except diabetic women with first-ever stroke (Table 4).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients with diabetes and stroke had similar positive, though less evident, time trends as nondiabetic subjects in mortality and case-fatality. This is particularly true considering recurrent stroke which indicates a successful secondary prevention. On the other hand, we found more recurrent events among diabetic subjects than nondiabetic subjects. This indicates a need for even more intensive secondary prevention for diabetic patients.
In this study we can, for the first time, report declining stroke incidence in Northern Sweden. The fact that patients with diabetes to a great extent had similar favorable time trends as nondiabetic patients is particularly interesting considering that the diabetic patients with myocardial infarction from the same population did not have any positive time trends.29 The question thus raised is why a diabetic population has a different time trend in myocardial infarction as compared with stroke? Hypertension, as a risk factor, has a greater impact in stroke than in coronary heart disease.30 This is probably part of the explanation why there is a difference in time trends in myocardial infarction for diabetic and for nondiabetic subjects but not in stroke. After UKPDS31 the impact of hypertension for diabetic patients has been more in focus, and hypertension may now be more intensively treated in diabetic patients.
The decline in smoking32 and large decreases in cholesterol levels33 in the population during the study period also have contributed to the declining incidence in both diabetic and non diabetic subjects.
Previous studies in stroke epidemiology indicate declining case-fatality7,11,13,34 and declining stroke incidence6,8,35,36 at least in the Western world. Declining incidence combined with declining case-fatality results a decrease in total stroke-mortality. This study confirms declining case-fatality and mortality due to stroke in Northern Sweden MONICA stroke population. Under the study period specialized stroke units had been introduced and established widely in Northern Sweden, providing more accurate management of stroke patients and thus reducing acute stroke case fatality. The fact that stroke units save lives has been shown in a previous meta-analysis.37
The strength in our study is the adherence to the MONICA procedures during event registration. The quality and internal validity in the WHO MONICA Project is well recognized.38 This study has truly population-based data and includes all stroke events not only subjects admitted to hospital.
There are some potential limitations to our study. Firstly, a considerable proportion of patients with stroke may have undiagnosed diabetes or have an impaired glucose tolerance.39 Our aim was to mirror the impact of stroke in subjects with previously clinically diagnosed diabetes and to determine how well the healthcare system has managed to give these subjects treatment to alleviate the burden of stroke disease.
Secondly, the results for trends in incidence among people with diabetes in the population rely heavily on the estimates of the number of diabetic men and women in the background population and are based on the assumption that the number of diabetic people remained stable over time. Over the years the background population has been very stable and the prevalence of known diabetes has been relatively unchanged.18 In addition, the proportion of DM diagnosed with oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was stable over time in the background population between 1986 and 2004 as based on the data from the 5 MONICA population surveys in the same area and population.18,40 For the age group 65 to 74 years, prevalence of known diabetes is available from 3 surveys, 1994 to 2004, and OGTT from 1994 and 2004. Therefore, we believe our estimates on incidence of stroke among the diabetic population are as valid as would be possible to achieve. Thirdly, the MONICA Stroke Registry only covers ages up to 75 years and thus an important segment of the stroke population has not been included. However, we have no reason to believe that the results differ among the eldest. An ongoing study within the registry will address the incidence of stroke in all ages. As discussed previously, this age limit may partially explain the gender differences observed in this study. A limitation for the generalizability of our study is the lack of increase in diabetes prevalence observed in other communities. On the other hand, 2 previous Swedish studies have also reported unchanged diabetes incidence. In the county of Skaraborg diabetes incidence was unchanged between years 1991 to 199541 and in the Laxå municipality both the diabetes incidence and prevalence was unchanged between years 1988 to 2001.42
Our findings are supported by a preliminary report from the Swedish Board of Health and Welfare describing decreasing mortality rates among diabetic subjects between 1980 and 2004.28 In men the improved survival paralleled that of nondiabetic men keeping relative mortality for diabetic men stable at double that of nondiabetic men. In diabetic women, both absolute and relative mortality improved.
We have described favorable time trends in stroke for subjects with diabetes and have confirmed previous results showing large risk increases for stroke among people with diabetes.5 The prevalence of patients with known diabetes in the stroke registry was almost 23% as compared with 5% to 7% known diabetes in the actual population in the same age range. We need to intensify our primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the diabetic population. There were more recurrent events among diabetic subjects than among nondiabetic subjects. Therefore, secondary prevention for the diabetic patient with established cardiovascular disease must be intensified with intervention against all traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia are instrumental to this aim.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are indebted to the Northern Sweden MONICA Project, the Northern Sweden Medical Research Bank, and the funds from Västerbotten and Norrbotten county councils which have supported these projects. Dr Stegmayr is supported by a grant from the Swedish Medical Research Council and King Gustaf V and Queen Viktoria Foundations. Acknowledgments to Salmir Nasic for statistical guidance and supervision.
Disclosures
None.
Received September 6, 2007; revision received March 29, 2008; accepted May 12, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Asplund K, Hägg E, Helmers C, Lithner F, Strand T, Wester PO. The natural history of stroke in diabetic patients. Acta Med Scand. 1980; 207: 417–424.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Kaarisalo MM, Räihä I, Sivenius J, Immonen-Räihä P, Lehtonen A, Sarti C, Mähönen M, Torppa J, Tuomilehto J, Salomaa V. Diabetes worsens the outcome of acute ischemic stroke. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005; 69: 293–298.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Sprafka JM, Virnig BA, Shahar E, McGovern PG. Trends in diabetes prevalence among stroke patients and the effect of diabetes on stroke survival: The Minnesota heart survey. Diabet Med. 1994; 11: 678–684.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Diabetes as a risk factor for stroke. A population perspective. Diabetologia. 1995; 38: 1061–1068.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Immonen- Räihä P, Sarti C, Tuomilehto J, Torppa J, Lehtonen A, Sivenius J, Mononen A, Narva EV. Eleven-year trends of stroke in Turku, Finland. Neuroepidemiology. 2003; 22: 196–203.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Sarti C, Rastenyte D, Cepaitis Z, Tuomilehto J. International trends in mortality from stroke, 1968 to 1994. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1588–1601.
8. Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Stroke in northern Sweden. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2003; 61: 60–69.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Pajunen P, Pääkkönen R, Hämäläinen H, Keskimäki I, Laatikainen T, Niemi M, Rintanen H, Salomaa V. Trends in fatal and nonfatal strokes among persons aged 35 to
85 years during 1991–2002 in Finland. Stroke. 2005; 36: 244–248.
10. Thorvaldsen P, Davidsen M, Bronnum-Hansen H, Schroll M. Stable stroke occurrence despite incidence reduction in an aging population: Stroke trends in the Danish monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease (MONICA) population. Stroke. 1999; 30: 2529–2534.
11. Pessah-Rasmussen H, Engström G, Jerntorp I, Janzon L. Increasing stroke incidence and decreasing case fatality, 1989–1998: A study from the stroke register in Malmö, Sweden. Stroke. 2003; 34: 913–918.
12. Numminen H, Kaste M, Aho K, Waltimo O, Kotila M. Decreased severity of brain infarct can in part explain the decreasing case fatality rate of stroke. Stroke. 2000; 31: 651–655.
13. Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Exploring the declining case fatality in acute stroke. Population-based observations in the northern Sweden MONICA project. J Intern Med. 1996; 240: 143–149.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Naess S, Eriksen J, Midthjell K, Tambs K. Diabetes mellitus and comorbidity. Change between 1984–1986 and 1995–1997: Results of the Nord-Trondelag health study. J Diabetes Complications. 2003; 17: 323–330.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Booth GL, Kapral MK, Fung K, Tu JV. Recent trends in cardiovascular complications among men and women with and without diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29: 32–37.
16. Amos AF, McCarty DJ, Zimmet P, The rising global burden of diabetes and its complications: estimates and projections to the year 2010. Diabet Med. 1997; 14 (Suppl 5): S1–85.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Fox, CS, Pencina, MJ, Meigs JB, Vasan RS, Levitzky YS, D'Agostino, RB, Trends in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus from the 1970s to the 1990s: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2914–2918.
18. Eliasson M, Lindahl B, Lundberg V, Stegmayr B. No increase in the prevalence of known diabetes between 1986 and 1999 in subjects 25–64 years of age in northern Sweden. Diabet Med. 2002; 19: 874–880.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. The world health organization MONICA project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): A major international collaboration. WHO MONICA project principal investigators. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988; 41: 105–114.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Sarti C, Stegmayr B, Tolonen H, Mähönen M, Tuomilehto J, Asplund K. Are changes in mortality from stroke caused by changes in stroke event rates or case fatality? Results from the WHO MONICA project. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1833–1840.
21. Truelsen T, Mähönen M, Tolonen H, Asplund K, Bonita R, Vanuzzo D. Trends in stroke and coronary heart disease in the WHO MONICA project. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1346–1352.
22. Stegmayr B, Lundberg V, Asplund K The events registration and survey procedures in the northern Sweden MONICA project. Scand J Public Health. 2003; (Suppl) 61: 9–17.
23. Diabetes mellitus. Report of a WHO study group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1985; 727: 1–113.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. WHO MONICA project. MONICA manual. Part iv: Event registration. Section 2: Stroke event registration data component. (November 1990). 1990.
25. Eliasson M, Boström G. Chapter 5.2: Major public health problems - diabetes. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2006; 67: 59–68.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Fitzgerald JT, Anderson RM, Davis WK. Gender differences in diabetes attitudes and adherence. Diabetes Educ. 1995; 21: 523–529.
27. Jonsson PM, Sterky G, Gafvels C, Ostman J. Gender equity in health care: the case of Swedish diabetes care. Health Care Women Int. 2000; 21: 413–431.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. National Public Health Report 2005. The National Board of Health and Welfare. 2005.
29. Rautio A, Lundberg V, Messner T, Nasic S, Stegmayr B, Eliasson M. Favourable trends in the incidence and outcome of myocardial infarction in no diabetic, but not in diabetic, subjects: Findings from the MONICA myocardial infarction registry in northern Sweden in 1989–2000. J Intern Med. 2005; 258: 369–377.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Lawes CMM, Bennett DA, Feigin VL, Rodgers A. Blood pressure and stroke: An overview of published reviews. Stroke. 2004; 35: 776–785.
31. Study Group UKPDS. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macro vascular and micro vascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK prospective diabetes study group. BMJ. 1998; 317: 703–713.
32. Stegmayr B, Eliasson M, Rodu B. The decline of smoking in northern Sweden. Scand J Public Health. 2005; 33: 321–324.
33. Eliasson M, Janlert U, Jansson JH, Stegmayr B. Time trends in population cholesterol levels 1986–2004: Influence of lipid-lowering drugs, obesity, smoking and educational level. The northern Sweden MONICA study. JIM. 2006; 260: 551–559.[CrossRef]
34. Numminen H, Kotila M, Waltimo O, Aho K, Kaste M. Declining incidence and mortality rates of stroke in Finland from 1972 to 1991. Results of three population-based stroke registers. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1487–1491.
35. Rothwell PM, Coull AJ, Giles MF, Howard SC, Silver LE, Bull LM, Gutnikov SA, Edwards P, Mant D, Sackley CM, Farmer A, Sandercock PA, Dennis MS, Warlow CP, Bamford JM, Anslow P. Change in stroke incidence, mortality, case-fatality, severity, and risk factors in Oxfordshire, UK, from 1981 to 2004 (Oxford Vascular Study). Lancet. 2004; 363: 1925–1933.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Sivenius J, Tuomilehto J, Immonen-Räihä P, Kaarisalo M, Sarti C, Torppa J, Kuulasmaa K, Mähönen M, Lehtonen A, Salomaa V. Continuous 15-year decrease in incidence and mortality of stroke in Finland: The Finstroke study. Stroke. 2004; 35: 420–425.
37. Langhorne P, Williams BO, Gilchrist W, Howie K. Do stroke units save lives? Lancet. 1993; 342: 395–398.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Eriksson M, Stegmayr B, Lundberg V MONICA quality assessments. Scand J Public Health. 2003; Suppl 61: 25–30.
39. Matz K, Keresztes K, Tatschl C, Nowotny M, Dachenhausenm A, Brainin M, Tuomilehto J. Disorders of glucose metabolism in acute stroke patients: An under recognized problem. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29: 792–797.
40. Eliasson M, Lindahl B, Lundberg V, Stegmayr B Diabetes and obesity in northern Sweden: Occurrence and risk factors for stroke and myocardial infarction. Scand J Public Health. 2003; Suppl 61: 70–77.
41. Berger B, Stenström G, Sundkvist G. Incidence, prevalence, and mortality of diabetes in a large population. A report from the Skaraborg Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22: 773–778.
42. Jansson S, Andersson D, Svärdsudd K. Prevalence and incidence rate of diabetes mellitus in a Swedish community during 30 years of follow-up. Diabetologia. 2007; 50: 703–710.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Harmsen, L. Wilhelmsen, and A. Jacobsson Stroke Incidence and Mortality Rates 1987 to 2006 Related to Secular Trends of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Gothenburg, Sweden Stroke, August 1, 2009; 40(8): 2691 - 2697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Appelros, B. Stegmayr, and A. Terent Sex Differences in Stroke Epidemiology: A Systematic Review Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1082 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |