| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2008;39:397.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Psychiatry (C.L.C., J.H.K.), University of California, San Francisco Medical Center; the Department of Neurology (S.A.J.), Stroke Sciences Group, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center; the Department of Neurology (D.M., B.R.R.), University of California, Davis Medical Center; the Department of Radiology (N.S., M.W.W.), University of California, San Francisco Medical Center; and the VA Medical Center (H.C.C.), Department of Neurology Department of Neurology, University of Southern California. Current affiliation for C.L.C.: Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego.
Correspondence to Catherine L. Carey, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, 150 W. Washington, 2nd Floor San Diego, CA 92103. E-mail ccarey{at}ucsd.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
55 years) with quantitative MRI and psychometrically robust neuropsychological measures within a multivariate model. Converging evidence suggests that SIVD selectively impairs frontal-executive tasks by disrupting frontal-subcortical circuits. We therefore hypothesized that MRI markers of SIVD would be selectively associated with worse executive functioning. Methods— We studied 94 participants who were cognitively and functionally normal. Volumetric measures of white matter signal hyperintensity (WMH), subcortical lacunes, hippocampal volume, and cortical gray matter were obtained to predict performance on composite measures of executive functioning and episodic memory.
Results— Hierarchical regression demonstrated that after controlling for demographic variables, MMSE, and total intracranial volume, the total number of subcortical lacunes was the only significant predictor, with a greater number of lacunes associated with poorer executive performance. Hippocampal volume best predicted episodic memory performance.
Conclusions— Results suggest that SIVD in the form of silent lacunes corresponds to poorer executive functioning even in otherwise normal elderly, which is consistent with the hypothesis that SIVD preferentially disrupts frontal-subcortical circuits. The clinical importance of these findings is highlighted by the fact that 33% of the normal elderly participants in this study had lacunar infarcts.
Key Words: cerebral lacunes cognition elderly magnetic resonance imaging
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies of the effect of these MRI markers in cognitively normal elderly suffer from various limitations. Cognitive assessment has typically included mainly or exclusively global measures such as the MMSE, which lacks sensitivity to detect subtle cognitive changes, particularly those such as executive functioning thought to be mediated by the frontal lobes where SIVD is often most prevalent.10,11 Executive function describes a set of cognitive abilities that control and regulate other abilities and behaviors and are necessary for goal-directed behavior, abstract thinking, and conceptualizing. They include the ability to initiate and stop actions, to monitor and change behavior as needed, and to plan future behavior when faced with novel tasks and situations.
Additional limitations of previous studies of SIVD include qualitative MRI methods, such as semiquantitative visual rating scales that yield highly variable nonvolumetric values,12 which decrease the sensitivity for demonstrating structure/function relationships.13 Also, "normal" elderly samples are frequently poorly characterized with terms such as cognitively normal, functionally normal, and medically healthy being used interchangeably. Finally, cooccurring neuropathological factors such as coexistent lacunes and WMH have been rarely controlled for with multivariate models.1,4,14,15
The current study attempted to address these limitations by investigating the relationship between SIVD and cognition within a well-characterized sample of cognitively and functionally normal elderly using quantitative structural MRI and psychotmetrically complete composite scales of cognition. We examined the independent contribution of lacunes, along with structural volumes of WMH, hippocampi, and cortical gray matter, to global cognitive functioning. We hypothesized that MRI volumetric markers of SIVD would be selectively associated with frontally mediated cognitive abilities such as executive function even in cognitively normal individuals.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects were included in the present analyses if they were normal elderly (ie,
55) as defined by: (1) designation of cognitively normal by the clinical team after completion of the evaluation; (2) CDR score of 0; (3) Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score equal to or greater than 26; and (4) scores within normal limits across the comprehensive battery of neuropsychological testing. The median number of days between neuroimaging and neuropsychological testing was 33 (IQR=17.0 to 86.25).
MRI
MRI acquisition occurred between 1995 and 2001. MRI variables of interest included total WMH volume, cortical gray matter volume, total hippocampal volume, and number of subcortical lacunes. MR studies were performed on a 1.5-T MR scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen Germany). A sagittal T1-weighted localizer image was obtained, followed by oblique axial double spin-echo images aligned parallel to the planum sphenoidale with the following parameters: 3000/20/80 (repetition time/echo times of first and second signal, respectively), single excitation (NEX=1), in-plane resolution of 1x1.4 mm2, and 3-mm-thick sections with no section gap, covering the entire brain from the inferior cerebellum to the vertex. Furthermore, a volumetric T1-weighted magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence was acquired with the following parameters: 10/4/300 (repetition time/echo time/inversion time), NEX=1, an inplane resolution of 1x1 mm2, and 1.4-mm-thick partitions. The scalp and skull were first extracted from the images, followed by estimation and removal of radio frequency field inhomogeneity with a low pass filter on each image section.
Proton density and T2-weighted MR images from the double spin-echo sequence and T1-weighted images from MPRAGE were used together as inputs for segmenting the brain into gray matter, white matter, and CSF based on a k-means cluster analysis algorithm as described in more detail in a study by Cardenas and colleagues (2001).18 FLAIR sequences were not acquired as full brain coverage with FLAIR could not be obtained because the number of slices was limited on this MRI system and interleaved acquisitions to offset partial coverage were often degraded by motion.
All segmented brains were then further edited by trained operators, both blinded to demographic and clinical information, into areas of ventricular and sulcal CSF, cortical gray matter (CGM), subcortical gray matter (SCGM), and WMH. In addition, total intracranial volume (TIV) was computed by summing over all voxels within the intracranial vault.
Lacunes were defined as small (>2 mm) areas of subcortical gray and white matter with increased signal relative to CSF on proton density MRI. Isointense lesions on proton density MRI at the level of the anterior commissure or inferior putamen were termed perivascular spaces; outside that region, they were defined as cavitated lacunes if they were
3 mm at maximum width. Lacunes were further classified into the following anatomical subregions: subcortical white matter, caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, and thalamus.
As previously described, semi-automated hippocampal volumetry was carried out using a commercially available high dimensional brain mapping tool (Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technologies), that has been recently validated and compared with manual tracing of the hippocampus.19,20
Cognitive Function
Participants received a standardized battery of neuropsychological tests that took approximately 1 hour to administer. All personnel involved in test administration were trained in scoring procedures, and cross-center observation and cross-scoring of test protocols were used to assure data quality. Select tests were used to compile 2 composite scales of memory and executive function to be used as the cognitive outcome measures in this study. The Memory Scale was comprised of items from the Memory Assessment Scale, specifically the immediate recall trials (1 and 3), delayed free recall, and delayed cued recall trials. Donor items for the Executive Scale included the Initiation-Perseveration subscale of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS), letter fluency (FAS), Digit Span Backward, and Visual Memory Span Backward.
The composite scales were developed using Item Response Theory (IRT) analytic methods21 in an effort to ensure that they be psychometrically matched (ie, equivalent reliability and sensitivity) and possess linear properties (ie, equivalency along an ability range). In other words, a given change in ability in one part of the ability continuum will result in the same change in the scale score as would an equal change in ability in a different part of the ability continuum. Details of the construction and characteristics of these particular scales have been previously described.22 Briefly, they were developed based on a larger sample of 400 older participants with cognitive function ranging from normal to demented. Both measures demonstrated high reliability (r>0.90) from about –2.0 SD below the mean of the overall development sample to 2.0 SD above the mean, and did not have appreciable floor or ceiling effects. Additionally, the scales were near-normally distributed, which presents advantages for statistical analyses.
The Memory and Executive measures were transformed so that scores were referenced to the distribution of the cognitively normal group in the development sample from this project and so that the scale of measurement corresponded to a traditional scale with a mean of 100 and SD of 15. Thus, a score of 85 represents 1 SD below the mean of the cognitively normal individuals from the development sample.
Data Analysis
Statistical data analyses were performed using SPSS version 12.0 for windows. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between the MRI variables of interest and the 2 cognitive scales (ie, to assess how well each of those variables predict both executive functioning and memory performances while accounting for the contribution of the other MRI variables). Hierarchical regression was used so that the researchers could control the order of entry of the predictor variables to determine how well the MRI variables of interest could predict cognitive performance over and above the effects of demographic factors (age, education, and sex), MMSE, and total intracranial volume. The same procedure was used to predict both executive functioning and memory. Specifically, in the first step of each model, demographic variables and MMSE were entered as independent variables to predict cognitive performance (ie, the Executive scale and the Memory scale) because those factors are known to be associated with cognitive performance. The F test was used to predict the significance of that first set of variables in accounting for variance in cognitive functioning, and R2 is reported to give the actual percent of variance in the dependent variable that is explained. In the next step, total intracranial volume was entered into the model to account for differences in head size (ie, as a control for the MRI variables to come). The F test was again used to demonstrate how well this newly added variable predicted cognition in combination with the previously entered demographic variables. The change in F reflects whether the newly added variable(s) improved prediction significantly. The change in R2 quantifies how much more variance is explained by the added variable(s). Finally, in the last stage of the model the MRI variables of interest (ie, total number of lacunes, WMH, cortical gray matter volume, and hippocampi volume) are added to determine how well they will predict cognitive performance above and beyond demographic variables, MMSE, and total intracranial volume.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
After controlling for demographic variables, MMSE, and total intracranial volume in step 1 and step 2, MRI variables explained an additional 10.2% of the variance in the Executive scale (F Change[4,84]=2.76; P=0.033) as shown in Table 2. The total number of lacunes was the only independently significant MRI variable to contribute to executive functioning (β=–0.222; P=0.046). WMH was not significantly associated (β=–0.207; P=0.083). The Figure demonstrates the negative linear relationship between lacunes and executive functioning performance (R2=0.20; P<0.0001) and describes the number of participants that evidenced from 0 to 8 total lacunes. Post hoc group comparisons revealed that participants without lacunes performed significantly better on the executive functioning composite measure than participants with lacunes (103.67 [SD=12.0] versus 95.72 [SD=16.3]; P<0.009).
|
|
We conducted additional post hoc analyses to determine the relationship between lacune anatomical location (ie, caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, thalamus, and subcortical white matter), and executive functioning. Across the sample, 15 total lacunes were found in the caudate, 17 in the putamen, 2 in the globus pallidus, 23 in the thalamus, and 25 in subcortical white matter. Nonparametric correlations (Spearmans rho) demonstrated no significant associations between any of the anatomical subregions and the Executive scale (P>0.10).
Regression results for memory functioning are summarized in Table 3. After controlling for demographic variables, MMSE, and total intracranial volume, only hippocampal volume contributed significantly to memory performance (β=0.247; P=0.047).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One possible mechanism underlying the relationship between subcortical lacunes and executive dysfunction may be related to cortical hypometabolism. FDG-PET studies have demonstrated lacunes to be associated with frontal hypometabolism, particularly within the prefrontal cortex, which in turn relates to poorer executive functioning.23,24 Frontal hypometabolism may in fact be a result of strategically located infarcts (ie, in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and/or frontal white matter), which directly damage frontal-subcortical circuits, thereby leading to reduced connectivity to the prefrontal cortex, reduced metabolism, and ultimately executive dysfunction. When we examined the relationship between executive functioning and specific lacune location, we did not find any significant associations. However it is important to note that the anatomical data were significantly positively skewed and restricted in range, which likely limited the robustness of these analyses.
Another possibility is that the relationship between executive functioning and subcortical lacunes is somehow mediated or driven exclusively by arterial hypertension, which several studies have demonstrated to be associated with WMH, lacunes, and cognitive dysfunction, particularly in the domains of verbal memory, attention, and abstract reasoning.25,26 We cannot rule out this possibility entirely, as reliable measures of hypertension were not available to use as covariates in our analyses. However, the fact that lacunes were specifically related to executive dysfunction and not also memory impairment makes the contribution of hypertension a less likely explanation as it would be expected to affect both cognitive areas equally.
Although WMH was not a statistically significant independent predictor of either executive functioning or memory when controlling for the presence of other cooccurring pathological variables, it did demonstrate a nonsignificant trend with greater volume associated with poorer executive functioning. The lack of statistical significance was similar to findings obtained in an autopsy series of prospectively studied elderly individuals.27 In that study, once the presence of lacunes was accounted for in a multivariate model, WMH was no longer a significant predictor of cognition. However, this phenomenon contrasts with the results of several structural neuroimaging studies that found the opposite occurrence (ie, WMH but not lacunes was related to cognitive performance in the elderly, when controlling for both).16,28 Both of those studies compared groups of subjects with and without lacunes along a spectrum of cognition based on their CDR alone, perhaps limiting their sensitivity to detect subtle cognitive differences. In addition, previous studies have investigated the volume of lacunes, not the total number, perhaps masking the linearity of the relationship.28 Our study using detailed cognitive assessments and rigorous MRI measures points to number of lacunes as the most significant predictor of executive dysfunction in these normal individuals.
Although the significant association between hippocampal volume and memory performance in the current study is consistent with previous studies of individuals with mild cognitive impairment29 and patients with dementia,30,31 this relationship has not been as consistently established in cognitively normal elderly.32 The lack of a significant contribution from either lacunes or WMH to memory highlights the selectivity of SIVD to other areas of cognition, particularly executive functioning.
The current study had several advantages. First, we used comprehensive and psychometrically robust measures of cognition that were reliable, fairly normally distributed, and did not have ceiling effects. Second, this study used quantitative MRI variables, which have been shown to yield more reliable associations than subjective qualitative ratings. Third, carefully characterizing a well screened cognitively and functionally normal elderly sample decreased the likelihood that concomitant neurodegenerative disease was impacting cognition and simultaneously masking any effects of SIVD markers. The fact that significant effects were demonstrated in a cognitively and functionally normal sample of healthy subjects with relatively modest volumes of SIVD is salient, particularly when considering 33% of the sample had evidence of lacunes. Fourth, we used multivariate statistical modeling to simultaneously consider several MRI variables as predictors of cognitive change, taking into account the strength of their interaction.
One major limitation of this study is that we used whole brain gray matter as a predictor variable, which did not significantly contribute to cognition in this group. This is a limitation because it is possible that some regional gray matter atrophy might correlate with cognition, but when the entire brain gray matter is used as a whole, the effects of regional change are lost. Another limitation relates to the observational nature of the study design and specifically the unpredictable and frequently unbalanced distribution of key variables of interest, which in this case is the presence of lacunes. Finally, it is important to mention that there were a number of patients in this study without evidence of lacunes, who had lower executive scores. This suggests the possibility that the assumption of more lesions equaling greater dysfunction as measured by linear regression may not fully explain the complex relationship.
The cognitive dysfunction demonstrated in these normal individuals suggests that these MRI markers, particularly lacunes, may not be truly "silent," especially with reference to higher order executive abilities. These findings may also have important implications for the independent performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs; eg, medication management), given the recognized association between executive dysfunction and IADL dependence.33 In addition, individuals who present with a high burden of lacunes on MRI might be considered for neuropsychological evaluation or intervention, even in the absence of evidence of gross neurological dysfunction. Prospective trials of aggressive vascular risk factor modification in these patients may help prevent further decline in these individuals.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This research was supported in part by NIA Grants AG12435, AG22983, the State of California Alzheimers Disease Research Center of California (ARCC) grant 01-154-20, and the Hillblom Foundation grant 2002/2F.
Disclosures
None.
Received April 20, 2007; revision received June 14, 2007; accepted July 5, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Price TR, Manolio TA, Kronmal RA, Kittner SJ, Yue NC, Robbins J, Anton-Culver H, OLeary DH. Silent brain infarction on magnetic resonance imaging and neurological abnormalities in community-dwelling older adults. The cardiovascular health study. Chs collaborative research group. Stroke. 1997; 28: 1158–1164.
3. Vermeer SE, Den Heijer T, Koudstaal PJ, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Breteler MM. Incidence and risk factors of silent brain infarcts in the population-based rotterdam scan study. Stroke. 2003; 34: 392–396.
4. Breteler MM, van Amerongen NM, van Swieten JC, Claus JJ, Grobbee DE, van Gijn J, Hofman A, van Harskamp F. Cognitive correlates of ventricular enlargement and cerebral white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. The rotterdam study. Stroke. 1994; 25: 1109–1115.[Abstract]
5. Liao D, Cooper L, Cai J, Toole J, Bryan N, Burke G, Shahar E, Nieto J, Mosley T, Heiss G. The prevalence and severity of white matter lesions, their relationship with age, ethnicity, gender, and cardiovascular disease risk factors: The aric study. Neuroepidemiology. 1997; 16: 149–162.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Lindgren A, Roijer A, Rudling O, Norrving B, Larsson EM, Eskilsson J, Wallin L, Olsson B, Johansson BB. Cerebral lesions on magnetic resonance imaging, heart disease, and vascular risk factors in subjects without stroke. A population-based study. Stroke. 1994; 25: 929–934.[Abstract]
7. Longstreth WT Jr, Manolio TA, Arnold A, Burke GL, Bryan N, Jungreis CA, Enright PL, OLeary D, Fried L. Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3301 elderly people. The cardiovascular health study. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1274–1282.
8. Soderlund H, Nyberg L, Adolfsson R, Nilsson LG, Launer LJ. High prevalence of white matter hyperintensities in normal aging: Relation to blood pressure and cognition. Cortex. 2003; 39: 1093–1105.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Ylikoski R, Ylikoski A, Erkinjuntti T, Sulkava R, Raininko R, Tilvis R. White matter changes in healthy elderly persons correlate with attention and speed of mental processing. Arch Neurol. 1993; 50: 818–824.
10. Cummings JL. Vascular subcortical dementias: Clinical aspects. Dementia. 1994; 5: 177–180.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Tullberg M, Fletcher E, DeCarli C, Mungas D, Reed BR, Harvey DJ, Weiner MW, Chui HC, Jagust WJ. White matter lesions impair frontal lobe function regardless of their location. Neurology. 2004; 63: 246–253.
12. Mantyla R, Erkinjuntti T, Salonen O, Aronen HJ, Peltonen T, Pohjasvaara T, Standertskjold-Nordenstam CG. Variable agreement between visual rating scales for white matter hyperintensities on mri. Comparison of 13 rating scales in a poststroke cohort. Stroke. 1997; 28: 1614–1623.
13. Gunning-Dixon FM, Raz N. The cognitive correlates of white matter abnormalities in normal aging: A quantitative review. Neuropsychology. 2000; 14: 224–232.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. de Groot JC, de Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, van Gijn J, Hofman A, Jolles J, Breteler MM. Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: The rotterdam scan study. Ann Neurol. 2000; 47: 145–151.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Kramer JH, Reed BR, Mungas D, Weiner MW, Chui HC. Executive dysfunction in subcortical ischaemic vascular disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002; 72: 217–220.
16. Fein G, Di Sclafani V, Tanabe J, Cardenas V, Weiner MW, Jagust WJ, Reed BR, Norman D, Schuff N, Kusdra L, Greenfield T, Chui H. Hippocampal and cortical atrophy predict dementia in subcortical ischemic vascular disease. Neurology. 2000; 55: 1626–1635.
17. Morris J. Clinical dementia rating: A reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the alzheimer type. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997; Suppl 1: 173–176discussion 177–178.
18. Cardenas VA, Ezekiel F, Di Sclafani V, Gomberg B, Fein G. Reliability of tissue volumes and their spatial distribution for segmented magnetic resonance images. Psychiatry Res. 2001; 106: 193–205.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Hsu YY, Schuff N, Du AT, Mark K, Zhu X, Hardin D, Weiner MW. Comparison of automated and manual mri volumetry of hippocampus in normal aging and dementia. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002; 16: 305–310.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Christensen GE, Joshi SC, Miller MI. Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997; 16: 864–877.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage 1991.
22. Mungas D, Reed BR, Kramer JH. Psychometrically matched measures of global cognition, memory, and executive function for assessment of cognitive decline in older persons. Neuropsychology. 2003; 17: 380–392.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Reed BR, Eberling JL, Mungas D, Weiner M, Jagust WJ. Frontal lobe hypometabolism predicts cognitive decline in patients with lacunar infarcts. Arch Neurol. 2001; 58: 493–497.
24. Reed BR, Eberling JL, Mungas D, Weiner M, Kramer JH, Jagust WJ. Effects of white matter lesions and lacunes on cortical function. Arch Neurol. 2004; 61: 1545–1550.
25. van Boxtel MPJ, Henskens LHG, Kroon AA, Hofman PAM, Gronenschild EHBM, Jolles J, de Leeuw PW. Ambulatory blood pressure, asymptomatic cerebrovascular damage, and cognitive function in essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2006; 20: 50–13.
26. Waldstein SR, Manuck SB, Ryan CM, Muldoon MF. Neuropsychological correlates of hypertension: Review and methodologic considerations. Psychol Bull. 1991; 110: 451–468.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Gold G, Kovari E, Herrmann FR, Canuto A, Hof PR, Michel JP, Bouras C, Giannakopoulos P. Cognitive consequences of thalamic, basal ganglia, and deep white matter lacunes in brain aging and dementia. Stroke. 2005; 36: 1184–1188.
28. Mungas D, Jagust WJ, Reed BR, Kramer JH, Weiner MW, Schuff N, Norman D, Mack WJ, Willis L, Chui HC. Mri predictors of cognition in subcortical ischemic vascular disease and alzheimers disease. Neurology. 2001; 57: 2229–2235.
29. Grundman M, Jack CR Jr, Petersen RC, Kim HT, Taylor C, Datvian M, Weiner MF, DeCarli C, DeKosky ST, van Dyck C, Darvesh S, Yaffe K, Kaye J, Ferris SH, Thomas RG, Thal LJ. Hippocampal volume is associated with memory but not monmemory cognitive performance in patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Mol Neurosci. 2003; 20: 241–248.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Kramer JH, Schuff N, Reed BR, Mungas D, Du AT, Rosen HJ, Jagust WJ, Miller BL, Weiner MW, Chui HC. Hippocampal volume and retention in alzheimers disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004; 10: 639–643.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Petersen RC, Jack CR Jr, Xu YC, Waring SC, OBrien PC, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Boeve BF, Kokmen E. Memory and mri-based hippocampal volumes in aging and ad. Neurology. 2000; 54: 581–587.
32. Van Petten C. Relationship between hippocampal volume and memory ability in healthy individuals across the lifespan: Review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia. 2004; 42: 1394–1413.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol Rev. 2003; 13: 181–197.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. V. Bowler and P. B. Gorelick Advances in Vascular Cognitive Impairment Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e315 - e318. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Murray Cognitive and Communicative Consequences of Cardiovascular Disease Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, December 1, 2008; 18(4): 152 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |