Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:483-485
Published online before print December 27, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.496760
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/2/483    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.496760v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonati, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Engelter, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonati, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Engelter, S. T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Carotid and Vertebral A. Dissection
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

(Stroke. 2008;39:483.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Research Letters

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Stroke Attributable to Internal Carotid Artery Dissection

The Significance of Vessel Patency

Leo H. Bonati, MD; Stephan G. Wetzel, MD; Joubin Gandjour, MD; Ralf W. Baumgartner, MD; Philippe A. Lyrer, MD Stefan T. Engelter, MD

From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit (L.H.B., P.A.L., S.T.E.) and Department of Radiology (S.G.W.), University Hospital Basel, and Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit (J.G., R.W.B.), University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland.

Correspondence to Stefan T. Engelter, MD, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail EngelterS{at}uhbs.ch

Abstract

Background and Purpose— In stroke attributable to spontaneous dissection of the internal carotid artery (sICAD), arterial patency may influence the pattern and extent of cerebral ischemia.

Methods— In 40 consecutive patients with stroke caused by sICAD, we compared the number, size and pattern of cerebral diffusion-weighted imaging lesions between patients with stenotic sICAD (n=15) and occlusive sICAD (n=25).

Results— Patients with stenotic sICAD had more ischemic lesions (median 5, interquartile range 1 to 10) than patients with occlusive sICAD (2, 1 to 3; P=0.014). Lesion diameters were larger in occlusive sICAD (62, 50 to 99 mm) than in stenotic sICAD (25, 10 to 50 mm; P=0.007). Border-zone infarction occurred only in stenotic sICAD (7/15, 47%). Most patients with occlusive sICAD had territorial infarcts (22/25, 88%).

Conclusions— In stroke attributable to sICAD, diffusion-weighted imaging characteristics may be influenced by the patency of the carotid artery. Differences in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia might exist between patients with stenotic and those with occlusive sICAD.


Key Words: DWI • internal carotid artery dissection • occlusion • stenosis • stroke

Spontaneous dissection of the cervical internal carotid artery (sICAD) is an important cause of stroke in young adults.1 The intramural hematoma in sICAD may result in stenosis or complete occlusion of the ICA.2 The pattern and extent of cerebral infarction in sICAD may vary depending on arterial patency.

The aim of this exploratory study was to test whether characteristics of brain infarction assessed by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) differ between ICA-stenosis and ICA-occlusion caused by sICAD.

Subjects and Methods

Study Population and Diagnosis of sICAD
Fourty-four consecutive patients from 2 Swiss University hospitals (inclusion periods 84 and 93 months) were selected with: (1) First acute ischemic stroke attributable to sICAD. (2) sICAD diagnosed based on ≥1of the following criteria3: (i) intimal flap visible on carotid ultrasound (present in 11/43 patients); (ii) mural hematoma visible on MRI (33/43) or CT (3/5); (iii) a nonatherosclerotic, tapered, flame-shaped ICA-occlusion or a string-like ICA-stenosis. (3) DWI. (4) Assessment of ICA patency on carotid ultrasound (n=43) and ≥1 angiographic study (MR angiography [MRA]: n=43, CT angiography n=5, digital subtraction angiography [DSA] n=2).

ICA patency was dichotomized into stenotic sICAD and occlusive sICAD according to ultrasound and angiography (nultrasound+angiography= 42, nonly ultrasound=1, nDSA+MRA=1) results. In 4 patients (9%) ultrasound and angiography findings were inconsistent. They were excluded from further analyses.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
DWI was performed using previously published protocols.4,5 We assessed number, size (largest axial diameter4), and vascular territories6 of all hyperintense DWI-lesions with hypo-/isointense appearance on apparent diffusion coefficient maps. The following 4 lesion patterns were distinguished, using a published classification system7,8 with mild modifications: pattern 1 (territorial infarct involving cortical and subcortical structures); pattern 2 (subcortical infarct in the territory of deep perforating branches); pattern 3 (multiple, mainly cortical lesions in the distal territory of the MCA); pattern 4 (border-zone infarction with lesions predominantly involving the junction of cerebral vascular territories).

Statistical Analysis
Number and diameter of DWI lesions were compared between groups with Mann-Whitney tests. Contingency between DWI-lesion patterns and patient groups was tested with Fisher exact test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR).

Results

Fifteen patients with stenotic sICAD and 25 patients with occlusive sICAD were included. Clinical findings are provided in the Table.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table. Clinical and DWI Characteristics

DWI was performed 5 (IQR, 2–7) days after stroke onset in patients with stenotic sICAD and after 2 (IQR, 0–4) days in occlusive sICAD (P=0.024). The number of DWI-lesions was higher in patients with stenotic sICAD (5 [IQR, 1–10]) than in those with occlusive sICAD (2 [IQR, 1–3]; P=0.014). Lesion diameters were larger in occlusive sICAD (62 mm [IQR, 50–99]) than in stenotic sICAD (25 mm [IQR, 10–50]; P=0.007). The distribution of DWI-lesion patterns differed between the 2 groups (P<0.001). Territorial infarcts (pattern 1) were present in 22/25 patients (88%) with occlusive sICAD compared with 5/15 patients (33%) with stenotic sICAD. Border-zone infarction (pattern 4) exclusively occurred in stenotic sICAD (7/15, 47%; Table, and Figures 1 and 2Down).


Figure 1496760
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Number and size (largest axial diameter of the largest lesion in each patient) of DWI-lesions. Bars indicate median and IQR.


Figure 2496760
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. DWI-lesion patterns. Frequency of each pattern is shown in percentages. Pattern 1: territorial infarct; pattern 2: subcortical infarct; pattern 3: multiple disseminated lesions; pattern 4: border-zone infarct.

Discussion

This exploratory comparison of DWI-lesion characteristics between stenotic and occlusive sICAD yielded the following results: (1) patients with stenotic sICAD had more DWI lesions than patients with occlusive sICAD; (2) DWI-lesions were larger in occlusive sICAD; and (3) border-zone infarction only occurred in stenotic sICAD, whereas most patients with occlusive sICAD had territorial infarcts.

Multiple acute DWI-lesions—a marker of embolism9—were found in two thirds of our study population, supporting previous reports in sICAD.8,10 Our results therefore substantiate the concept of arterial thromboembolism in the pathogenesis of stroke in sICAD. As a novel observation, number and size of DWI lesions were influenced by ICA patency. Furthermore, border-zone infarction, which had been reported frequently in sICAD,8 was only seen in stenotic sICAD in our population. In turn, most patients with occlusive sICAD had territorial infarcts. The different distribution of DWI-lesion patterns between ICA stenosis and ICA occlusion resembles that of atherosclerotic ICA disease7 but has not been reported in sICAD.

Our findings might reflect differences in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia between stenotic and occlusive sICAD. Ischemia due to stenotic sICAD seems to be characterized by multiple small emboli, often located in border-zone territories where the clearance of emboli may be reduced.11 In contrast, the larger territorial infarcts in occlusive sICAD suggest single, large emboli. Future research should investigate whether the suggested pathogenetic importance of arterial patency in sICAD may translate into a potential role in treatment decisions. With this goal in mind, arterial patency should be assessed in ongoing and future therapeutic trials in sICAD.

The most important limitation of our study is the small sample size. Thus, our results should be considered as tentative only. Confirmation in a larger dataset is required. Moreover, the sample size disallowed analyses of associations between different degrees of luminal narrowing and DWI-lesion characteristics. Furthermore, the retrospective analysis of a databank population lead to heterogeneity in usage and timing of diagnostic tools. In addition, the distinction between severe ICA stenosis and ICA occlusion is challenging in sICAD. In order to minimize the risk of misclassification, all patients with inconsistent findings on ultrasound and angiography (n=4, 9%) were excluded.

In conclusion, our study suggested that characteristics of cerebral infarction in sICAD may be influenced by the patency of the carotid artery.

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding

This study was supported by the Basel Stroke Fund. S.G.W. was supported, in part, by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (320000-113492).

Disclosures

None.

Received June 15, 2007; accepted June 27, 2007.

References

1. Leys D, Bandu L, Henon H, Lucas C, Mounier-Vehier F, Rondepierre P, Godefroy O. Clinical outcome in 287 consecutive young adults (15 to 45 years) with ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2002; 59: 26–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Baumgartner RW, Arnold M, Baumgartner I, Mosso M, Gonner F, Studer A, Schroth G, Schuknecht B, Sturzenegger M. Carotid dissection with and without ischemic events: local symptoms and cerebral artery findings. Neurology. 2001; 57: 827–832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Engelter ST, Lyrer PA, Kirsch EC, Steck AJ. Long-term follow-up after extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. Eur Neurol. 2000; 44: 199–204.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Bonati LH, Lyrer PA, Wetzel SG, Steck AJ, Engelter ST. Diffusion weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient maps and stroke etiology. J Neurol. 2005; 252: 1387–1393.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Caso V, Budak K, Georgiadis D, Schuknecht B, Baumgartner RW. Clinical significance of detection of multiple acute brain infarcts on diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005; 76: 514–518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Tatu L, Moulin T, Bogousslavsky J, Duvernoy H. Arterial territories of the human brain. In: Bogousslavsky J, Caplan LR, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001: 375–404.

7. Szabo K, Kern R, Gass A, Hirsch J, Hennerici M. Acute stroke patterns in patients with internal carotid artery disease: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. 2001; 32: 1323–1329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Lanczik O, Szabo K, Hennerici M, Gass A. Multiparametric MRI and ultrasound findings in patients with internal carotid artery dissection. Neurology. 2005; 65: 469–471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Baird AE, Lovblad KO, Schlaug G, Edelman RR, Warach S. Multiple acute stroke syndrome: marker of embolic disease? Neurology. 2000; 54: 674–678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Koch S, Rabinstein AA, Romano JG, Forteza A. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in internal carotid artery dissection. Arch Neurol. 2004; 61: 510–512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Caplan LR, Hennerici M. Impaired clearance of emboli (washout) is an important link between hypoperfusion, embolism, and ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 1998; 55: 1475–1482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/2/483    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.496760v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonati, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Engelter, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonati, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Engelter, S. T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Carotid and Vertebral A. Dissection
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging