| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2008;39:483.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Research Letters |
From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit (L.H.B., P.A.L., S.T.E.) and Department of Radiology (S.G.W.), University Hospital Basel, and Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit (J.G., R.W.B.), University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland.
Correspondence to Stefan T. Engelter, MD, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail EngelterS{at}uhbs.ch
Abstract
Background and Purpose— In stroke attributable to spontaneous dissection of the internal carotid artery (sICAD), arterial patency may influence the pattern and extent of cerebral ischemia.
Methods— In 40 consecutive patients with stroke caused by sICAD, we compared the number, size and pattern of cerebral diffusion-weighted imaging lesions between patients with stenotic sICAD (n=15) and occlusive sICAD (n=25).
Results— Patients with stenotic sICAD had more ischemic lesions (median 5, interquartile range 1 to 10) than patients with occlusive sICAD (2, 1 to 3; P=0.014). Lesion diameters were larger in occlusive sICAD (62, 50 to 99 mm) than in stenotic sICAD (25, 10 to 50 mm; P=0.007). Border-zone infarction occurred only in stenotic sICAD (7/15, 47%). Most patients with occlusive sICAD had territorial infarcts (22/25, 88%).
Conclusions— In stroke attributable to sICAD, diffusion-weighted imaging characteristics may be influenced by the patency of the carotid artery. Differences in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia might exist between patients with stenotic and those with occlusive sICAD.
Key Words: DWI internal carotid artery dissection occlusion stenosis stroke
Spontaneous dissection of the cervical internal carotid artery (sICAD) is an important cause of stroke in young adults.1 The intramural hematoma in sICAD may result in stenosis or complete occlusion of the ICA.2 The pattern and extent of cerebral infarction in sICAD may vary depending on arterial patency.
The aim of this exploratory study was to test whether characteristics of brain infarction assessed by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) differ between ICA-stenosis and ICA-occlusion caused by sICAD.
Subjects and Methods
Study Population and Diagnosis of sICAD
Fourty-four consecutive patients from 2 Swiss University hospitals (inclusion periods 84 and 93 months) were selected with: (1) First acute ischemic stroke attributable to sICAD. (2) sICAD diagnosed based on
1of the following criteria3: (i) intimal flap visible on carotid ultrasound (present in 11/43 patients); (ii) mural hematoma visible on MRI (33/43) or CT (3/5); (iii) a nonatherosclerotic, tapered, flame-shaped ICA-occlusion or a string-like ICA-stenosis. (3) DWI. (4) Assessment of ICA patency on carotid ultrasound (n=43) and
1 angiographic study (MR angiography [MRA]: n=43, CT angiography n=5, digital subtraction angiography [DSA] n=2).
ICA patency was dichotomized into stenotic sICAD and occlusive sICAD according to ultrasound and angiography (nultrasound+angiography= 42, nonly ultrasound=1, nDSA+MRA=1) results. In 4 patients (9%) ultrasound and angiography findings were inconsistent. They were excluded from further analyses.
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
DWI was performed using previously published protocols.4,5 We assessed number, size (largest axial diameter4), and vascular territories6 of all hyperintense DWI-lesions with hypo-/isointense appearance on apparent diffusion coefficient maps. The following 4 lesion patterns were distinguished, using a published classification system7,8 with mild modifications: pattern 1 (territorial infarct involving cortical and subcortical structures); pattern 2 (subcortical infarct in the territory of deep perforating branches); pattern 3 (multiple, mainly cortical lesions in the distal territory of the MCA); pattern 4 (border-zone infarction with lesions predominantly involving the junction of cerebral vascular territories).
Statistical Analysis
Number and diameter of DWI lesions were compared between groups with Mann-Whitney tests. Contingency between DWI-lesion patterns and patient groups was tested with Fisher exact test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR).
Results
Fifteen patients with stenotic sICAD and 25 patients with occlusive sICAD were included. Clinical findings are provided in the Table.
|
DWI was performed 5 (IQR, 2–7) days after stroke onset in patients with stenotic sICAD and after 2 (IQR, 0–4) days in occlusive sICAD (P=0.024). The number of DWI-lesions was higher in patients with stenotic sICAD (5 [IQR, 1–10]) than in those with occlusive sICAD (2 [IQR, 1–3]; P=0.014). Lesion diameters were larger in occlusive sICAD (62 mm [IQR, 50–99]) than in stenotic sICAD (25 mm [IQR, 10–50]; P=0.007). The distribution of DWI-lesion patterns differed between the 2 groups (P<0.001). Territorial infarcts (pattern 1) were present in 22/25 patients (88%) with occlusive sICAD compared with 5/15 patients (33%) with stenotic sICAD. Border-zone infarction (pattern 4) exclusively occurred in stenotic sICAD (7/15, 47%; Table, and Figures 1 and 2
).
|
|
Discussion
This exploratory comparison of DWI-lesion characteristics between stenotic and occlusive sICAD yielded the following results: (1) patients with stenotic sICAD had more DWI lesions than patients with occlusive sICAD; (2) DWI-lesions were larger in occlusive sICAD; and (3) border-zone infarction only occurred in stenotic sICAD, whereas most patients with occlusive sICAD had territorial infarcts.
Multiple acute DWI-lesions—a marker of embolism9—were found in two thirds of our study population, supporting previous reports in sICAD.8,10 Our results therefore substantiate the concept of arterial thromboembolism in the pathogenesis of stroke in sICAD. As a novel observation, number and size of DWI lesions were influenced by ICA patency. Furthermore, border-zone infarction, which had been reported frequently in sICAD,8 was only seen in stenotic sICAD in our population. In turn, most patients with occlusive sICAD had territorial infarcts. The different distribution of DWI-lesion patterns between ICA stenosis and ICA occlusion resembles that of atherosclerotic ICA disease7 but has not been reported in sICAD.
Our findings might reflect differences in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia between stenotic and occlusive sICAD. Ischemia due to stenotic sICAD seems to be characterized by multiple small emboli, often located in border-zone territories where the clearance of emboli may be reduced.11 In contrast, the larger territorial infarcts in occlusive sICAD suggest single, large emboli. Future research should investigate whether the suggested pathogenetic importance of arterial patency in sICAD may translate into a potential role in treatment decisions. With this goal in mind, arterial patency should be assessed in ongoing and future therapeutic trials in sICAD.
The most important limitation of our study is the small sample size. Thus, our results should be considered as tentative only. Confirmation in a larger dataset is required. Moreover, the sample size disallowed analyses of associations between different degrees of luminal narrowing and DWI-lesion characteristics. Furthermore, the retrospective analysis of a databank population lead to heterogeneity in usage and timing of diagnostic tools. In addition, the distinction between severe ICA stenosis and ICA occlusion is challenging in sICAD. In order to minimize the risk of misclassification, all patients with inconsistent findings on ultrasound and angiography (n=4, 9%) were excluded.
In conclusion, our study suggested that characteristics of cerebral infarction in sICAD may be influenced by the patency of the carotid artery.
Acknowledgments
Sources of Funding
This study was supported by the Basel Stroke Fund. S.G.W. was supported, in part, by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (320000-113492).
Disclosures
None.
Received June 15, 2007; accepted June 27, 2007.
References
1. Leys D, Bandu L, Henon H, Lucas C, Mounier-Vehier F, Rondepierre P, Godefroy O. Clinical outcome in 287 consecutive young adults (15 to 45 years) with ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2002; 59: 26–33.
2. Baumgartner RW, Arnold M, Baumgartner I, Mosso M, Gonner F, Studer A, Schroth G, Schuknecht B, Sturzenegger M. Carotid dissection with and without ischemic events: local symptoms and cerebral artery findings. Neurology. 2001; 57: 827–832.
3. Engelter ST, Lyrer PA, Kirsch EC, Steck AJ. Long-term follow-up after extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. Eur Neurol. 2000; 44: 199–204.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Bonati LH, Lyrer PA, Wetzel SG, Steck AJ, Engelter ST. Diffusion weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient maps and stroke etiology. J Neurol. 2005; 252: 1387–1393.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Caso V, Budak K, Georgiadis D, Schuknecht B, Baumgartner RW. Clinical significance of detection of multiple acute brain infarcts on diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005; 76: 514–518.
6. Tatu L, Moulin T, Bogousslavsky J, Duvernoy H. Arterial territories of the human brain. In: Bogousslavsky J, Caplan LR, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001: 375–404.
7. Szabo K, Kern R, Gass A, Hirsch J, Hennerici M. Acute stroke patterns in patients with internal carotid artery disease: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. 2001; 32: 1323–1329.
8. Lanczik O, Szabo K, Hennerici M, Gass A. Multiparametric MRI and ultrasound findings in patients with internal carotid artery dissection. Neurology. 2005; 65: 469–471.
9. Baird AE, Lovblad KO, Schlaug G, Edelman RR, Warach S. Multiple acute stroke syndrome: marker of embolic disease? Neurology. 2000; 54: 674–678.
10. Koch S, Rabinstein AA, Romano JG, Forteza A. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in internal carotid artery dissection. Arch Neurol. 2004; 61: 510–512.
11. Caplan LR, Hennerici M. Impaired clearance of emboli (washout) is an important link between hypoperfusion, embolism, and ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 1998; 55: 1475–1482.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |