Published online before print January 31, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.496695
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2008;39:768.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Social Support and Stroke and Coronary Heart Disease
The JPHC Study Cohorts II
From Public Health (A.I., H.I.,), Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan; Department of Society, Human Development, and Health (A.I., I.K.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; Department of Public Health Medicine (K.Y.), Doctoral Program in Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health (K.Y.), School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minn; Epidemiology and Prevention Division (M.I., S.T.), Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Correspondence to Hiroyasu Iso, MD, PhD, MPH, Public Health, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University. Suita-shi, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. E-mail fvgh5640{at}mb.infoweb.ne.jp
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendixReferences |
|---|
Background and Purpose— Studies conducted in Western countries have found a robust association between social support and cardiovascular outcomes (eg, prognosis after myocardial infarction and functional recovery after stroke). However, less is known about the influence of social support on the same outcomes among Asian populations. In this prospective cohort study, we sought to examine the impact of social support on the incidence and mortality of coronary heart disease and stroke among the Japanese.
Methods— We examined prospectively the association between social support and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke incidence and mortality within a cohort of 44 152 Japanese men and women aged 40 to 69 years, free of previous diagnosis of cancer and cardiovascular disease. A total of 301 cases of newly diagnosed coronary heart disease, 1057 strokes, 191 coronary heart disease deaths, and 327 stroke deaths occurred between the baseline questionnaire (1993–1994) and the end of follow-up in January 2004.
Results— The multivariate hazard ratios and 95% CI for stroke mortality in the highest social support versus lowest social support group was 1.45 (1.00 to 2.10) overall, 1.59 (1.01 to 2.51) for men, and 1.25 (0.63 to 2.46) for women. Social support was not associated with stroke incidence or coronary heart disease incidence and mortality.
Conclusions— Low social support was associated with higher risk of stroke mortality in men. However, social support was not associated with stroke incidence, suggesting social support may be more important in stroke prognosis than preventing incidence.
Key Words: coronary heart disease • follow-up study • social support • stroke
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendixReferences |
|---|
Social support, particularly emotional support, has been linked to improved prognosis after myocardial infarction (MI)1–4 and improved functional recovery after stroke5–7 in observational studies. The association between social support and cardiovascular disease prognosis has been shown to be independent of clinical markers of disease severity. Few studies have demonstrated an association between social support and incidence of cardiovascular disease.8,9
The mechanisms underlying the association between social support and cardiovascular disease prognosis have not been completely elucidated, although plausible explanations include improved adherence to medical regimens, behavior change (eg, smoking cessation after heart attack), as well as buffering of stress through neuroendocrine mechanisms.10,11 Despite the wealth of observational studies suggesting a link between social support and cardiovascular disease prognosis, 2 major gaps in knowledge remain. First, the few randomized controlled trials among coronary disease and stroke survivors that were specifically designed to increase perceived social support have not borne out the findings of the observational studies, ie, they have yielded null results with respect to improvements in prognosis or functional recovery.12,13 Although the results of randomized trials may signify that social support is not a causal determinant of cardiovascular disease prognosis, an alternative interpretation is that effective interventions to deliver social support in clinical settings have yet to be devised. The randomized trials conducted so far have attempted to deliver social support through cognitive behavioral therapy,12 social support groups,12 or family systems interventions.13 One possibility is that the duration, timing, or intensity (ie, the "dose") of social support provided in these trials to cardiovascular disease survivors was insufficient to affect clinical prognosis. Alternatively, it is possible that only some patient subgroups benefited from social support provision. For example, in the Enhancing Recovery In Coronary Heart Disease Trial, social support appeared to benefit coronary disease recurrence and mortality outcomes in men but not in women, so that the overall results were null.14 Further studies are thus warranted to determine whether social support can be effectively packaged and delivered in clinical settings to improve cardiovascular prognosis.
Meanwhile, a second gap in knowledge concerns the lack of studies on social support and health in non-Western countries. The majority of studies in this area have been conducted in North America and Europe, and it is not established whether similar patterns occur in other contexts and cultures where the meanings "social support" may differ within social relationships. For example, in Japanese culture, which is characterized by extensive patterns of reciprocity and exchanges of favors (especially within kinship ties), a high level of social support may simultaneously imply a high level of indebtedness to others as well as obligations to reciprocate favors. The meaning of social support (and, hence, the health consequences) may further vary according to gender. We therefore sought to test the association between social support and cardiovascular incidence and prognosis within a large-scale Japanese cohort study.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendixReferences |
|---|
Study Cohort
The first cohort of the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study (JPHC Study) was initiated in 1990 (cohort I), whereas the second cohort was initiated in 1993 (cohort II) within 27 administrative districts throughout the country. Details of the study have been described elsewhere.15 The present study was conducted in the second cohort, because items on social support were not included in cohort I. In brief, the study population was defined as all residents (n=62 398) aged 40 to 69 years at baseline who had registered in 13 administrative districts. Of these residents, 102 residents were excluded because of non-Japanese nationality (n=22) and late reports of emigration occurring before the start of the follow-up period (n=80). Therefore, 62 296 residents were remained eligible for the study. A baseline self-administered questionnaire on various lifestyles was given to residents in 1993 and 1994; 52 234 residents responded to the questionnaire and were included in the study cohort. The overall response rate was 84%. The JPHC Study was approved by the institutional review board of the National Cancer Center, Tokyo Japan.
Baseline Questionnaire Survey
A baseline self-administered questionnaire on various lifestyles was given to participants in 1993 and 1994. The questionnaire included personal and family medical history, psychosocial factors such as perceived stress, perceived social support, and personality, and lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol habits, dietary habits, and physical activity. Perceived emotional support was defined as receipt of confidant support and esteem support from family members or friends. Confidant support was assessed by 2 items: "Do you have someone that you can share your intimate feelings and secrets with? (no or yes)" and "Do you have someone that you feel safe and comfortable with? (no or yes)". Esteem support was assessed by a single item: "Do you have someone who is supportive of your opinions and actions? (no or yes)". Social isolation was defined as not having a friend whom the respondent knew well enough to meet at least once per week; it was assessed by the item: "How many friends do you meet at least once per week: none, 1 to 3 friends, more than 4 friends?". These 4 items were then combined into an overall index of social support. Questions with yes/no responses were scored 1/0, whereas the question with 3 response categories were scored from 0 ("none") to 2 for the highest category. Thus, the overall index of social support had a possible range from 0 (lowest social support) to 5 (highest level of social support). The index had acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach 
coefficient of 0.75). The items on social support in the JPHC study were modeled after existing social support scales.16 A total of 45 972 participants provided valid responses to all of these questions. We also excluded 1820 participants from the analysis because of history of MI, angina pectoris, stroke, or cancer at study baseline. Therefore, a total of 20 985 men and 23 167 women were used for the analysis.
Confirmation of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Incidence
A total of 34 hospitals were registered within administrative districts of the JPHC cohort. All were major hospitals with the capability of treating patients with acute coronary heart disease and stroke. Physicians blinded to the patients’ lifestyle data reviewed the medical records at each hospital. Acute coronary and stroke events were included in the study if they occurred after the date of return of the baseline questionnaire and before January 1, 2004.
Myocardial infarction was confirmed in the medical records according to the criteria of the MONICA (Monitoring Trends and Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease) project,17 which requires evidence from ECGs, cardiac enzymes, or autopsy. In the absence of a diagnosis of MI, deaths that occurred within 1 hour from onset of symptoms were regarded as sudden cardiac deaths.
Strokes were confirmed according to the criteria of the National Survey of Stroke,18 which requires the presence of focal neurological deficits of sudden or rapid onset lasting at least 24 hours or until death. Strokes were further classified as subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, or ischemic stroke (thrombotic or embolic). All registered hospitals were equipped with computer tomographic scans or magnetic resonance scans. A definite diagnosis was established based on examination of CT or MRI images or autopsy.
To complete the surveillance for nonfatal MI and stroke, we asked participants by letter or telephone concerning the occurrence of coronary or stroke events and sought permission to review relevant medical records. Altogether 148 subjects reported a diagnosis of MI and 379 subjects reported a diagnosis of stroke by the 10-year follow-up questionnaire and had not already been registered as having had a coronary or stroke event by the procedures described. Of the 148 individuals reporting MI, 127 (86%) were contacted and 47 provided information consistent with suspected MIs. Of these 47 individuals, 39 (83%) provided written informed consent for their medical records to be reviewed by physicians. Among these participants, we confirmed definite MIs in 30 individuals, and these cases were therefore included among definite MIs in the analysis. Of the 379 individuals reporting stroke, 340 (90%) were contacted and 76 provided information consistent with suspected strokes. Of these 76 individuals, 62 (82%) provided written informed consent for their records to be reviewed by physicians. Among these participants, we confirmed definite strokes in 57 individuals, who were thus included in the analyses.
Confirmation of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Mortality
All death certificates were forwarded centrally to the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Labor and coded for the National Vital Statistics. Registration of death is required by the Family Registration Law and is believed to be complete in Japan. The underlying causes of deaths were defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision as follows: deaths from stroke (codes I60 to I69), for each subtype of stroke, ie, subarachnoid hemorrhage (I60), intraparenchymal hemorrhage (I61), and ischemic stroke (I63), and coronary heart disease (I20 to I25). Coronary and stroke deaths were included in the analyses if they occurred after the date of return of the baseline questionnaire and before January 1, 2004. Among the study subjects, 3094 died, 2756 moved out of the study areas, and 22 were lost to follow-up within the 10-year follow-up period.
Statistical Analysis
Person-years were counted from the date of the return of the baseline survey until one of the following end points. For the analysis of coronary heart disease or stroke incidence, person-years were censored at the date of disease diagnosis, the date of emigration from the study area, the date of death, or the end of study period (December 31, 2003), whichever came first. For the analysis of coronary heart disease and stroke deaths, person-years were censored at the date of emigration from the study area, the date of death, or the end of the study period, whichever came first. For persons who were lost to follow-up, the last confirmed date of their presence in the study area was used as the date of censoring.
Analysis of covariance and 
2 tests were used to compare sex-specific age-adjusted mean values and proportions of cardiovascular risk factors, using the Dunnett multiple comparison method. The outcomes for this study were defined as newly occurring coronary heart disease and stroke incidence and deaths during the study period. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% CIs were calculated after adjustment for age and other potential confounding factors using Cox proportional-hazards models. Confounding variables included age (years), smoking status (never, former, or current), ethanol intake (nondrinkers and former drinkers, less than weekly, <150 g/wk, or 
150 g/wk), body mass index (kg/m2 in quartiles), leisure time sports activity (<1 day/mo, 1 to 3 days/mo, or 1 day/wk), perceived stress (less, moderate, or high) and occupation (unemployed, housewife, professional, managerial, administrative, sales and services, manual labor, farming, forestry, fishery, or others). To check for effect modification, we also stratified analyses according to age group (40 to 64 years and 65 years or older), risk profile (with and without history of hypertension, diabetes, and past or current smoking), and high perceived stress (yes and no). We also checked for statistical interactions by using cross-product terms of social support and stratifying variables. We tested the assumption of proportional hazards by using both time-dependent covariate method and linear correlation test and found no violation of proportionality. All analyses were conducted using the SAS statistical package Version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc).
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendixReferences |
|---|
During 470 734 person-years of follow-up (average follow-up period, 10.7 years) a total of 301 cases of newly diagnosed coronary heart disease (219 men and 82 women), 1057 strokes (637 men and 420 women), 191 coronary heart disease deaths (131 men and 60 women), and 327 stroke deaths (200 men and 127 women) occurred among the 44 152 subjects (20 985 men and 23 167 women).
We separately examined social support in relation to cardiovascular risk factors among men and women (Table 1). Subjects were categorized into 4 levels of social support based on the distribution of our combined index: low (scores of 0 or 1, 10%), medium (scores of 2 or 3, 19%), high (score of 4, 42%), or very high (score of 5, 29%). Men with lower levels of social support were younger (P<0.001), less likely to be current smokers (P=0.02), and more likely to have lower body mass index (P<0.001). Lower social support among men was also associated with sedentary lifestyle (P<0.001), higher perceived stress (P<0.001), and higher unemployment rate (P<0.001). Among women, lower social support was associated with younger age (P<0.001), more sedentary lifestyle (P<0.001), higher perceived stress (P<0.001), higher unemployment rate (P<0.001), lower body mass index (P=0.008), as well as high ethanol intake (P=0.03).
|
Table 2 shows the HRs of incidence and mortality from coronary heart disease and stroke according levels of social support. For men and women combined, persons with the lowest level of social support had 
1.5-fold higher risk of mortality from stroke in multivariable-adjusted models (P for linear trend: 0.03). Men with the lowest level of social support had a 1.6-fold higher risk of mortality from stroke in multivariable-adjusted models (P for linear trend: 0.03). However, social support was not statistically significantly associated with risk of stroke mortality in women (although the social support/sex interaction term did not reach formal levels of statistical significance; P for interaction: 0.16). We also found no significant associations between social support and incidence of stroke or coronary heart disease in either men or women. We further examined the associations between levels of social support and mortality from specific stroke subtypes (data not shown). We found no difference in the associations between subtypes of stroke mortality. For example, the multivariable HRs for mortality (95% CI) for the highest social support versus lowest social support groups were 1.53 (0.81 to 2.90) for intraparenchymal hemorrhagic stroke and 1.34 (0.64 to 2.80) for ischemic stroke.
|
Tables 3 and 4
show the HRs of incidence and mortality from coronary heart disease and stroke, respectively, according to levels of each constituent item that make up the social support index. Social isolation was associated with 1.6-fold higher multivariable-adjusted risk of stroke mortality for men and women combined. The lack of confidant support, especially item 1 (lacking someone to share intimate personal feelings and secrets), was also associated with 1.2-fold higher multivariable-adjusted risk of stroke incidence for men and women combined. Among men, social isolation and the lack of esteem support were associated with 1.5- to 1.8-fold higher risks of stroke mortality, and the lack of someone to share personal feelings and secrets was associated with 1.2-fold higher risk of stroke incidence. In contrast to men, no significant associations were found for any of the outcomes for women. Thus, the combined findings for men and women appear to be driven by the associations among men.
|
|
We next checked for potential effect modification by stratifying the analyses by age group (40 to 64 and 65 to 69 years), cardiovascular risk profile (with and without history of hypertension, diabetes, and past or current smoker), and high levels of perceived stress (yes and no) (data not shown). We found there was an interaction by age for the association between social support and stroke incidence (despite no association being found for subjects overall). The excess risk of stroke incidence was stronger in older persons with lower levels of social support (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.35) compared with younger persons (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.21; for interaction, P=0.07), but there was no interaction by age for stroke mortality. There were no statistically significant interactions between social support and perceived stress status or cardiovascular risk profile for any of the outcomes studied.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendixReferences |
|---|
In this large prospective analysis in a Japanese population, we found that after adjustment of potentially confounding variables, the risk of mortality from stroke was 1.6-fold higher for men with the lowest levels of social support compared with those with the highest levels. The association between low social support and stroke mortality was not statistically significant in women. Furthermore, we found no associations between social support and the incidence of stroke or coronary heart disease. We found some evidence of effect modification by age, ie, there was a suggestion of an effect of social support on stroke incidence among subjects aged 65 years or older, but not for younger subjects (nor for the overall sample).
The relationship between social support and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (particularly for coronary heart disease) has been well documented in previous studies conducted in western countries.1–9 The effect of social support on coronary heart disease incidence and mortality after MI has been reported to be stronger in men than in women, and men appeared to be more likely than women to experience protective effects of social support on incidence8,9 and prognosis1 after coronary heart disease. However, the results form these studies may not be generalizable to other cultures. A prospective study among Japanese-American men residing in Hawaii reported that social networks were not associated with the incidence of nonfatal MI, although the study did not measure social support.19
In contrast to studies involving coronary heart disease outcomes, there have been far fewer studies of social support and stroke incidence or survival (although >70 studies have examined social support as a predictor of functional recovery after stroke).6 A recent prospective study has reported that low social support was associated with fatal and nonfatal stroke incidence, although the association became nonsignificant after adjustment for stroke risk factors.20
Two distinct models have been proposed concerning the influence of social support on health outcomes. The "stress buffering" model posits that social support benefits health only in the presence of a stressor, whereas the "main effects" model posits that social support is beneficial regardless of the presence of stress. The new onset of stroke is a source of stress in patients’ lives. Viewed this way, our findings support the stress-buffering model, ie, social support improved prognosis after the onset of stroke, but did not affect the risk of incidence. However, we did not find evidence of an interaction between social support and perceived stress in predicting stroke outcomes, although we hasten to add that stress was measured only at baseline, ie, predating the onset of stroke. The protective effect of social support on cardiovascular disease prognosis appeared to be specific to stroke in this Japanese cohort. In the present study, we found no difference in the association between subtypes of stroke mortality. Furthermore, we could find no association between social support and either coronary disease incidence or mortality.
Social support is hypothesized to buffer stress (and, hence, improve clinical outcomes) through multiple mechanisms, including improved therapeutic compliance (eg, not forgetting to take blood pressure medications) and accessibility to medical emergency care and treatment, health-promoting behavior change, as well as through direct neuroendocrine effects. With regard to the latter, social support may lead to more benign appraisals of stress and, hence, reduce or eliminate the affective reaction to a stressful event. Stress activates neuroendocrine components including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system.12 The long-term activation of these axes may induce a sustained increase in cortisol,12 norepinephrine secretions,21 inflammatory proteins,22 platelet abnormalities,23 and endothelial dysfunction,24 which may in turn exacerbate other cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension,12,25 heart rate,26 hyperlipidemia,12 diabetes,12 and the progression of atherosclerosis.12 By promoting more benign appraisals of stress, social support may reduce the intensity or duration of these neuroendocrine responses.
In the present study, a protective effect of social support on stroke mortality was found in Japanese men, but not in women. A possible reason for this gender-based discrepancy may be that, unlike the case of men, Japanese women are more likely to be exposed to tight interpersonal relationships involving reciprocity exchanges. Many of the study subjects in the present study were recruited from Japanese rural areas (Mito, Kashiwazaki, Kamigotou, and Miyako), which are characterized by dense networks involving reciprocity and mutual aid, especially among middle-aged women. A recent study suggested that the stress buffering effect of social support on depressive symptoms were significant only for middle-aged Japanese men.27 Japanese men tend to participate in more activity-oriented relationships, whereas women tend to maintain more emotionally intimate relationships.28 In the present study, women were more likely to report receiving emotional support than men, even though they were less likely to benefit from support in terms of stroke outcomes. For example, the proportion of those who received confidant support, ie, the positive response to the either of the 2 related questions, was higher in women (78%) compared with men (69%). The JPHC Study did not assess provision of social support to others. However, it is possible that in the Japanese context, reporting high receipt of social support (specifically among women) may be a marker for higher provision of social support to others (and, hence, higher levels of stress associated with feelings of indebtedness and expectations to reciprocate).
We note several limitations of our study. First, there is the possibility of residual confounding by unmeasured variables such as personality and negative emotions. Second, social support was assessed in our study through simple questions relating to emotional support and social isolation. We did not specifically inquire about other aspects of social support such as instrumental support or different sources of social support (eg, from health care professionals, community-based organizations, voluntary groups, neighbors, etc). Thus, we were unable to pin down the domains of social support that are most effective in influencing outcomes after stroke. Finally, because the study was not designed to analyze the effect of transitions, we were not able to assess changes in social support as a predictor of cardiovascular disease outcomes. For example, poststroke disability may lead to greater social isolation as a result of difficulties with communication (eg, dysarthrias or aphasia) as well as withdrawal form community activities.
The strengths of our study are its prospective design and large sample size, yielding good statistical power for detecting the effects of social support, stratified by gender. We were also able to distinguish between the effects of social support on disease incidence versus disease prognosis.
In summary, low social support was associated with a higher risk of stroke mortality, especially for Japanese men. However, social support was not associated with stroke incidence, suggesting social support may be more important in promoting recovery than in preventing disease. Our findings have health policy relevance given the current decline in the marriage rate in Japan29 as well as the rapid population aging in that society.29
|
Appendix |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendixReferences |
|---|
Study Group Members
Members of the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study (JPHC Study, principal investigator: S. Tsugane) Group members are: S. Tsugane, M. Inoue, T. Sobue, and T. Hanaoka, National Cancer Center, Tokyo; J. Ogata, S. Baba, T. Mannami, A. Okayama, and Y. Kokubo, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka; K. Miyakawa, F. Saito, A. Koizumi, Y. Sano, I. Hashimoto, and T. Ikuta, Iwate Prefectural Ninohe Public Health Center, Iwate; Y. Miyajima, N. Suzuki, S. Nagasawa, Y. Furusugi, and N. Nagai, Akita Prefectural Yokote Public Health Center, Akita; H. Sanada, Y. Hatayama, F. Kobayashi, H. Uchino, Y. Shirai, T. Kondo, R. Sasaki, Y. Watanabe, Y. Miyagawa, and Y. Kobayashi, Nagano Prefectural Saku Public Health Center, Nagano; Y. Kishimoto, E. Takara, T. Fukuyama, M. Kinjo, M. Irei, and H. Sakiyama, Okinawa Prefectural Chubu Public Health Center, Okinawa; K. Imoto, H. Yazawa, T. Seo, A. Seiko, F. Ito, and F. Shoji, Katsushika Public Health Center, Tokyo; A. Murata, K. Minato, K. Motegi, and T. Fujieda, Ibaraki Prefectural Mito Public Health Center, Ibaraki; K. Matsui, T. Abe, M. Katagiri, and M. Suzuki, Niigata Prefectural Kashiwazaki and Nagaoka Public Health Center, Niigata; M. Doi, A. Terao, Y. Ishikawa, and T. Tagami, Kochi Prefectural Chuo-higashi Public Health Center, Kochi; H. Sueta, H. Doi, M. Urata, N. Okamoto, and F. Ide, Nagasaki Prefectural Kamigoto Public Health Center, Nagasaki; H. Sakiyama, N. Onga, H. Takaesu, and M. Uehara, Okinawa Prefectural Miyako Public Health Center, Okinawa; F. Horii, I. Asano, H. Yamaguchi, K. Aoki, S. Maruyama, M. Ichii, and M. Takano, Osaka Prefectural Suita Public Health Center, Osaka; Y. Tsubono, Tohoku University, Miyagi; K. Suzuki, Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels Akita, Akita; Y. Honda, K. Yamagishi, and S. Sakurai, Tsukuba University, Ibaraki; M. Kabuto, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Ibaraki; M. Yamaguchi, Y. Matsumura, S. Sasaki, and S. Watanabe, National Institute of Health and Nutrition, Tokyo; M. Akabane, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo; T. Kadowaki, Tokyo University, Tokyo; M. Noda, International Medical Center of Japan, Tokyo; Y. Kawaguchi, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Y. Takashima, Kyorin University, Tokyo; K. Nakamura, Niigata University, Niigata; S. Matsushima and S. Natsukawa, Saku General Hospital, Nagano; H. Shimizu, Sakihae Institute, Gifu; H. Sugimura, Hamamatsu University, Shizuoka; S. Tominaga, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Aichi; H. Iso, Osaka University, Osaka; M. Iida, W. Ajiki, and A. Ioka, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease, Osaka; S. Sato, Osaka Medical Center for Health Science and Promotion, Osaka; E. Maruyama, Kobe University, Hyogo; M. Konishi, K. Okada, and I. Saito, Ehime University, Ehime; N. Yasuda, Kochi University, Kochi; S. Kono, Kyushu University, Fukuoka.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors thank all staff members in each study area and in the central office for their painstaking efforts to conduct the baseline survey and follow-up.
Sources of Funding
This study was supported by grants-in-aid for Cancer Research and for the Third Term Comprehensive Ten-Year Strategy for Cancer Control from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan. Dr Ai Ikeda was also supported by the postdoctoral fellowship program of the Uehara memorial foundation (Tokyo, Japan).
Disclosures
None.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Reprint requests to Shoichiro Tsugane, MD, Epidemiology and Prevention Division, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. E-mail stsugane@ncc.go.jp
Received June 14, 2007; revision received August 7, 2007; accepted August 14, 2007.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendixReferences |
|---|
1. Berkman LF, Leo-Summers L, Horwitz RI. Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction. A prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117: 1003–1009.
2. Welin C, Lappas G, Wilhelmsen L. Independent importance of psychosocial factors for prognosis after myocardial infarction. J Intern Med. 2000; 247: 629–639.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Horsten M, Mittleman MA, Wamala SP, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Orth-Gomer K. Depressive symptoms and lack of social integration in relation to prognosis of CHD in middle-aged women. The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21: 1072–1080.
4. Lett HS, Blumenthal JA, Babyak MA, Strauman TJ, Robins C, Sherwood A. Social support and coronary heart disease: epidemiologic evidence and implications for treatment. Psychosom Med. 2005; 67: 869–878.
5. Glass TA, Matchar DB, Belyea M, Feussner JR. Impact of social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke. 1993; 24: 64–70.
6. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke–a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing. 1996; 25: 479–489.
7. Tsouna-Hadjis E, Vemmos KN, Zakopoulos N, Stamatelopoulos S. First-stroke recovery process: the role of family social support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: 881–887.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Rosengren A, Wilhelmsen L, Orth-Gomer K. Coronary disease in relation to social support and social class in Swedish men: a 15 year follow-up in the study of men born in 1933. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25: 56–63.
9. Kuper H, Adami HO, Theorell T, Weiderpass E. Psychosocial determinants of coronary heart disease in middle-aged women: a prospective study in Sweden. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 164: 349–357.
10. Uchino BN, Cacioppo JT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. The relationship between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychol Bull. 1996; 119: 488–531.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Davidson KW, Saab OG, Kubzansky L The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice. The emerging field of behavioral cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005, 637–651.
12. Berkman LF, Blumenthal J, Burg M, Carney RM, Catellier D, Cowan MJ, Czajkowski SM, DeBusk R, Hosking J, Jaffe A, Kaufmann PG, Mitchell P, Norman J, Powell LH, Raczynski JM, Schneiderman N; Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients Investigators (ENRICHD). Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2003; 289: 3106–3116.
13. Glass TA, Berkman LF, Hiltunen EF, Furie K, Glymour MM, Fay ME, Ware J. The Families In Recovery From Stroke Trial (FIRST): primary study results. Psychosom Med. 2004; 66: 889–897.
14. Schneiderman N, Saab PG, Catellier DJ, Powell LH, DeBusk RF, Williams RB, Carney RM, Raczynski JM, Cowan MJ, Berkman LF, Kaufmann PG; ENRICHD Investigators. Psychosocial treatment within sex by ethnicity subgroups in the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease clinical trial. Psychosom Med. 2004; 66: 475–483.
15. Inoue M, Sobue T, Tsugane S; JPHC Study Group. Impact of body mass index on the risk of total cancer incidence and mortality among middle-aged Japanese: data from a large-scale population-based cohort study—the JPHC study. Cancer Causes Control. 2004; 15: 671–680.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. ENRICHD Investigators. Enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease patients (ENRICHD): study design and methods. The ENRICHD Investigators. Am Heart J. 2000; 139: 1–9.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Amouyel P, Arveiler D, Rajakangas AM, Pajak A, for WHO MONICA Project. Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project. Registration procedures, event rates and case fatality in 38 populations from 21 countries in 4 continents Circulation. 1994; 90: 583–612.
18. Walker AE, Robins M, Weinfeld FD. The national Survey of Stroke: clinical findings. Stroke. 1981; 119: 837–839.
19. Reed D, McGee D, Yano K, Feinleib M. Social networks and coronary heart disease among Japanese men in Hawaii. Am J Epidemiol. 1983; 117: 384–396.
20. Kuper H, Adami HO, Theorell T, Weiderpass E. The socioeconomic gradient in the incident of stroke: A prospective study in middle-aged women in Sweden. Stroke. 2007; 38: 27–33.
21. Carney RM, Freedland KE, Veith RC. Depression, the autonomic nervous system, and coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med. 2005; 67: 29–33.[CrossRef]
22. Anisman H, and Merali Z. Cytokines, stress, and depressive illness. Brain Behav Immun. 2002; 16: 513–524.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Grignani G, Pacchiarini L, Zucchella M, Tacconi F, Canevari A, Soffiantino F, Tavazzi L. Effect of mental stress on platelet function in normal subjects and in patients with coronary artery disease. Haemostasis. 1992; 22: 138–146.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Ghiadoni L, Donald AE, Cropley M, Mullen MJ, Oakley G, Taylor M, O’Connor G, Betteridge J, Klein N, Steptoe A, Deanfield JE. Mental stress induces transient endothelial dysfunction in humans. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2473–2478.
25. Wirtz PH, von Kanel R, Mohiyeddini C, Emini L, Ruedisueli K, Groessbauer S, Ehlert U. Low social support and poor emotional regulation are associated with increased stress hormone reactivity to mental stress in systemic hypertension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91: 3857–3865.
26. Kelsey RM, Blascovich J, Tomaka J, Leitten CL, Schneider TR, Wiens S. Cardiovascular reactivity and adaptation to recurrent psychological stress: effects of prior task exposure. Psychophysiology. 1999; 36: 818–831.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Okamoto K, Tanaka Y. Gender differences in the relationship between social support and subjective health among elderly persons in Japan. Prev Med. 2004; 38: 318–322.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Kawachi I, Berkman LF. Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health. 2001; 78: 458–467.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. The fourth national survey on household changes in Japan; 1999.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  K. Karelina, G. J. Norman, N. Zhang, J. S. Morris, H. Peng, and A. C. DeVries Social isolation alters neuroinflammatory response to stroke PNAS, April 7, 2009; 106(14): 5895 - 5900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. A. Ertel, M. M. Glymour, and L. F. Berkman Social networks and health: A life course perspective integrating observational and experimental evidence Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2009; 26(1): 73 - 92. [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||