Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:918-923
Published online before print January 31, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.497602
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/3/918    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.497602v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jönsson, A.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Lindgren, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jönsson, A.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Lindgren, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2008;39:918.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Weight Loss After Stroke

A Population-Based Study From the Lund Stroke Register

Ann-Cathrin Jönsson, RN, MSc, PhD; Ingrid Lindgren, RPT, MSc; Bo Norrving, MD, PhD Arne Lindgren, MD, PhD

From the Department of Neurology, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Correspondence to Ann-C. Jönsson, Department of Neurology, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden. E-mail ann-cathrin.jonsson{at}skane.se


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Data on the prevalence and indicators of weight loss in population-based groups of stroke survivors are scarce. We aimed to find the predictors and indicators of weight loss >3 kg as a possible marker of malnutrition after stroke.

Methods— We registered weight at baseline, after 4 months, and 1 year later in 305 survivors from a population-based cohort of first-ever stroke patients. Characteristics of the patients were registered at baseline and follow-ups, including glycosylated hemoglobin at baseline and follow-up II, eating difficulties at both follow-ups, and screening for depression at follow-up II. We used univariate and multivariate analyses to find baseline predictors and follow-up indicators related to weight loss >3 kg from baseline.

Results— Among the 305 patients, 60% were male, the mean age was 72.5 years, and mean body mass index was 25.8 kg/m2. The main stroke types were cerebral infarction (89%), intracerebral hemorrhage (7%), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (4%). Weight loss >3 kg was found in 74 (24%) patients (mean, –6.6 kg) after 4 months and in 79 patients (26%; mean, –8.3 kg) 1 year later. Severe stroke and elevated glycosylated hemoglobin levels were baseline predictors of weight loss >3 kg. Indicators associated with short-term weight loss (at follow-up I) were eating difficulties, low prealbumin value, and dependence (Barthel Index), whereas indicators associated with long-term weight loss (follow-up II) were eating difficulties, hemorrhagic stroke, and low prealbumin value.

Conclusions— Weight loss >3 kg after stroke indicates the need for closer observation regarding nutritional status. Monitoring of body weight may be useful, particularly among patients with severe stroke, eating difficulties, low prealbumin values, and impaired glucose metabolism.


Key Words: albumin • glycosylated hemoglobin • nursing care • malnutrition • outcome • prealbumin • stroke care • weight loss


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Loss of weight in stroke patients may be related to dysphagia,1 depression,2 aspiration,3 decreased dietary intake,2 and other neurologic deficits that contribute to eating difficulties.4 The definition of malnutrition varies between studies. Unintentional weight loss or a low body mass index (BMI <18 kg/m2 for persons <65 years and <22 kg/m2 for persons ≥65 years) has been defined as an indicator of malnutrition in stroke patients.5 Another study used a BMI <20.5 kg/m2 as a risk cutoff for malnutrition.6 Low serum albumin and prealbumin levels have also been associated with malnutrition, impaired functional status, poor outcome, and mortality, especially among the elderly.7–9 Frailty10 and unawareness of weight changes may further add to the risk of weight loss and poor outcome in stroke patients.11,12 Most studies of weight loss and malnutrition after stroke have examined selected subjects, such as patients in rehabilitation units4,5 or nursing homes11,13 or patients selected by different exclusion criteria.8,12 In previous studies, malnutrition, often combined with low albumin and prealbumin values, has been reported as an indicator of poor outcome after stroke.7,8,12 However, data on the prevalence of weight loss after stroke in population-based groups of stroke survivors are scarce. Our aim was to examine the prevalence of weight loss in a population-based group of stroke survivors and to find (1) baseline predictors and (2) follow-up indicators of weight loss >3 kg as possible markers of malnutrition in a short-term as well as a long-term perspective.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
A total of 416 consecutive first-ever stroke patients with stroke onset between March 1, 2001 and February 28, 2002 were included in the Lund Stroke Register. The Lund Stroke Register covers the catchment area of Lund University Hospital, including 8 municipalities with 234 505 inhabitants (as of December 31, 2001). The methods for detecting all first-ever stroke patients and the low rate of dropouts during the defined period have been described previously.14 All patients but 1 with a final diagnosis of first-ever stroke underwent computed tomography of the brain.

All surviving patients were contacted a median of 4 (follow-up I) and 16 (follow-up II) months after stroke onset and offered a personal appointment with a nurse specialist (A.J.) and a physical therapist (I.L.). Data were collected for 327 patients at follow-up I and for 305 patients at follow-up II. Among the 22 patients unable to be followed up twice, 20 were deceased and 2 declined to participate at follow-up II. Thus, 305 patients were followed up twice and constitute the basis for the analyses in this report. Approximately 70% of the patients examined were able to come to the outpatient clinic, whereas the remainder were examined in primary care centers ({approx}10%), nursing homes ({approx}10%), or their own homes ({approx}10%). Abnormal findings were reported to the physician responsible for the care of the patient. The data were not analyzed until after the follow-up had been finished to avoid investigator bias.

Informed consent was obtained from each participant, or, if the patients were confused or had sensory dysphasia, their spouses or significant others. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Lund University.

Baseline Assessments
We registered the following baseline variables: age, sex, main stroke type (cerebral infarction, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracerebral hemorrhage), living situation (living in own home or nursing home), family situation (living alone or with someone), social participation (0 to 9 different activities),15 and diabetes mellitus (fasting blood glucose ≥6.1 mmol/L or plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L at repeated measurements or an earlier diagnosis). Each patient’s functional status was assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). We used a version of the NIHSS that included an item for right- and left-hand motor function (maximum 2 points for each hand).16 In cases where the NIHSS score had not been assessed at the clinic, the score was assigned from medical reports, a method found to have good reliability and validity.17 Weight and height were measured to calculate BMI. BMI was classified as underweight (UW), <18.5 kg/m2; normal weight (NW), a BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2; and overweight (OW)/obese as a BMI >25 kg/m2.18 A BMI <20.5 kg/m2 was used as a cutoff for risk of malnutrition.6 Impaired glucose tolerance is a common cause of metabolic changes that may influence body weight. Therefore, we examined glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) to screen for abnormal glucose tolerance.19 Functional status before stroke onset was assessed by interview regarding ambulation indoors and outdoors, dressing, and toileting.20 If the patients could manage these activities of daily living by themselves, they were considered independent before stroke onset. The frequency of physical activities (walking, gardening, swimming, running, and other sports) before stroke and at follow-up was registered on a scale from 0 (no physical activity) to 4 (almost every day).21 Nutritional status was also examined by measuring plasma albumin and serum prealbumin concentrations.

Follow-Up Assessments
At both follow-ups, functional status was assessed with the Barthel Index (BI)22 and divided into 3 grades of dependence.23 We repeated the baseline measurements at both follow-ups, but HbA1c was repeated only at follow-up II. At both follow-ups, we asked the patients if food intake had declined during the past 3 months due to loss of appetite, digestive problems, chewing or swallowing difficulties (the first question in the Mini Nutritional Assessment),6 and if the answer was yes, we registered this as eating difficulties. Help from informal caregivers or personnel in responding to the questions about eating difficulties was needed by 8 patients at follow-up I and by 10 patients at follow-up II. At follow-up II, we screened for depression in 293 patients (12 patients could not respond due to physical, cognitive, or psychological reasons) with the Swedish adapted Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-20; range, 0 to 20). A score ≥6 indicates possible depression.24,25

We used a prespecified cutoff6 to dichotomize the patients into 2 groups, those who had a weight loss of 3 kg or more (>3 kg) versus the other patients. The analyses were aimed at determining the following: (1) baseline predictors of weight loss >3 kg at follow-up I; (2) indicators assessed at follow-up I that were correlated with weight loss >3 kg between baseline and follow-up I; and (3) indicators assessed at follow-up II that were correlated with weight loss >3 kg between baseline and follow-up II.

Statistical Analysis
The variables HbA1c, albumin, and prealbumin were dichotomized into 2 groups, ie, above/below the lower reference value for albumin <34 g/L according to our clinical chemical laboratory, for prealbumin <0.20 g/L,9 and for HbA1c >5.3%.26 Other dichotomized variables were GDS-20 (≥6 or not), main stroke type (infarction or hemorrhage), diabetes mellitus (yes/no), and independence (BI 95 to 100) or dependence (BI 0 to 90).23 First we analyzed the variables assessed at each measuring point separately by using {chi}2 tests for dichotomous variables and the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables by making comparisons with the dichotomous variable, weight loss >3 kg or not, as the dependent variable. Afterward, we performed a forward logistic-regression analysis with the same variables as in the univariate analyses and also with the dichotomous variable, weight loss >3 kg or not, as the dependent variable. Probability values <0.05 were considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Characteristics
Among the 305 patients, 183 (60%) were male and the mean age at stroke onset was 72.5 years, with a quarter of the patients below retirement age (65 years). Stroke main type was cerebral infarction in 89%, intracerebral hemorrhage in 7%, and subarachnoid hemorrhage in 4%. At baseline, 42 patients had diabetes mellitus and 54 patients had HbA1c levels above the upper reference value; 18 of these 54 patients had not been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus previously. Albumin and prealbumin values below lower reference values were found in 51 of 293 (17%) and 55 of 262 (21%) patients at baseline. The mean/median NIHSS score at stroke onset was 5/3, and the mean/median BMI was 25.8/25.4. Functional status before and after stroke is presented in Table 1, which shows that the patients had good functional status before stroke, with 98% being independent. At both follow-ups, {approx}70% were independent (Table 1). The majority (53% to 55%) of the patients were OW/obese, and only {approx}5% were UW on the 3 assessment occasions when the total group of 305 patients was classified (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Functional Status of 305 Stroke Patients Followed Up Twice


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. BMI of 305 Stroke Patients Followed Up Twice

Baseline Predictors
At follow-up I, weight loss from stroke onset of >3 kg (range, –3.1 to –30.2 kg; mean/median, –6.6/–5.2 kg) was present in 74 (24%) of the 305 patients. Among the other 231 patients, the range of weight differences was –2.9 kg to 9.1 kg, and the mean/median weight difference was 0.6/0.1 kg. For the total group of 305 patients, the mean/median weight loss was –1.1/–0.6 kg. The mean/median NIHSS score was 8/5 in the patients with weight loss >3 kg and 4/3 in the other patients. Baseline predictors of weight loss >3 kg at follow-up I in the univariate analyses were hemorrhagic stroke type, higher (worse) NIHSS score, diabetes mellitus, and HbA1c above the upper reference value. Remaining baseline predictors in the multivariate regression analysis were higher (worse) NIHSS score and HbA1c above the upper reference value (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Stroke Patients With/Without Weight Loss >3 kg

Follow-Up I
Among the 74 patients with weight loss >3 kg at follow-up I, 49 (66%) stated that they had reduced their food intake due to eating difficulties, whereas among the remaining 231 patients, only 21 (9%) reported a reduced food intake. Albumin and prealbumin values below the lower reference value was present in 19% versus 5% and 15% versus 6%, respectively, in the groups of 74 versus 231 patients. The proportions of the different BMI classes differed when we compared the 74 who had lost >3 kg (67.5% were OW at baseline and only 43% at follow-up I) with the other 231 patients (51.5% were OW/obese at baseline and 57% at follow-up I; Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. BMI of Stroke Patients With/Without Weight Loss >3 kg

Indicators of weight loss >3 kg at follow-up I in the univariate analyses were hemorrhagic stroke type, worse functional status (BI), living in a nursing home, living alone, lower physical activity, less social participation, albumin and prealbumin values below the lower reference value, and eating difficulties. The regression analysis detected eating difficulties, prealbumin value below the lower reference value, and worse functional status (BI) to be significant indicators of weight loss >3 kg (Table 3).

Follow-Up II
Weight loss >3 kg (range, –3.3 to –23.8 kg; mean/median, –8.3/–7.5 kg) between stroke onset and follow-up II was detected in 79 (26%) of the 305 patients. Among the other 226 patients, the range of weight differences was –3.0 to 18.1 kg and the mean/median weight difference was 1.9/1.0 kg. Mean/median weight loss from baseline was –0.7/–0.3 kg for the 305 patients. Albumin and prealbumin values below the lower reference value at follow-up II was registered in 19 of 304 and 34 of 304 patients, respectively. A GDS-20 score ≥6 indicative of depression was registered in 118 (39%) patients. The number of patients with HbA1c levels above the upper reference value had increased to 57 of 305 (19%), and 24 (42%) of these 57 patients had no previously known diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The proportion of diabetes was higher in the OW/obese group (18%) than in the group with UW/NW (9%). Also, the proportion with HbA1c above the upper reference value was twice as large in the OW group (24%) as in the UW/NW group (12%). At follow-up II, 36 (46%) of the 79 patients with weight loss >3 kg and 22 (10%) of the other 226 patients stated that they had reduced their food intake because of eating difficulties.

The proportions of different BMI classes differed when we compared the 79 who had lost >3 kg (65% were OW at baseline and only 37% at follow-up II) with the other 226 patients (52% were OW at baseline and 61% at follow-up II; Table 4). Indicators of weight loss at follow-up II in the univariate analyses were hemorrhagic stroke type, GDS-20 score indicative of depression, eating difficulties, and albumin/prealbumin values below the lower reference value. In the regression analysis, weight loss >3 kg was associated with hemorrhagic stroke, eating difficulties, and prealbumin value below the lower reference value (Table 3).

Characteristics of the 20 Patients Who Died Between Follow-Up I and II
The 20 patients (from the original 327 patients examined at follow-up I) who died before follow-up II were older at stroke onset (mean age, 82.3 years; P<0.001) and had a higher (worse) mean/median NIHSS score (11.2/9.5) than the 305 survivors (5/3, P<0.001). Among the 20 patients, no fewer than 11 had lost >3 kg between baseline and follow-up I (P=0.003) compared with survivors (weight could not be measured for 1 person due to severe illness), and 11 had albumin (P<0.001) and prealbumin (P>0.001) values below the lower reference value at follow-up I.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This is the first study to report data on weight loss and its relation to predictors and indicators of weight loss over time in a population-based group of first-ever stroke patients. Previous studies of nutritional problems in stroke patients were performed in selected groups of patients discharged to rehabilitation facilities or nursing homes, who had moderate to severe stroke, and who often had prestroke disabilities and nutritional problems.2,3,12,27 Even though our patients were in good physical condition before stroke onset (98% were independent), no less than a quarter of them had a weight loss >3 kg in the short term as well as the long term. The strongest baseline predictor of weight loss was stroke severity (measured as NIHSS score). On the other hand, obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, has been reported to be a risk factor for stroke, and weight reduction has been emphasized in stroke prevention programs.28 However, a recent Cochrane review concluded that this hypothesis is not based on strong scientific evidence resulting from randomized, controlled clinical trials, at least not for primary prevention.29 Our results indicate a need to follow up weight after stroke to detect unintentional weight loss >3 kg related to possible malnutrition. Otherwise, the large proportion of patients with eating difficulties related to weight loss >3 kg and other factors related to nutritional status might not be detected.

It has been pointed out that there is no "gold standard" for determining nutritional status because there is no universally accepted definition of undernutrition.30 Despite this problem, we agree with the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism guidelines for nutrition screening that it is important to monitor the patients’ nutritional status.6 In our study, we used weight loss >3 kg and albumin/prealbumin levels below lower reference values to assess possible malnutrition. Our results of an association between weight loss >3 kg and albumin/prealbumin values below the lower reference value in postacute stroke care strengthens the view that weight loss >3 kg can be regarded as a possible marker of malnutrition,5 especially because weight loss >3 kg was also a marker of poor outcome. A low serum albumin level has been associated with advanced atherosclerosis, adding to the prognostic information of other inflammatory markers, and can therefore be considered an acute-phase reactant.31 This is in line with our finding that the prevalence of albumin and prealbumin values below the lower reference value was higher at baseline than at both follow-ups. The observation that a larger proportion of patients who died between the 2 follow-ups had lower albumin values than did survivors is corroborated by other reports that low albumin concentrations predict poor outcome and mortality after stroke.7,8,32 Our conclusion is therefore that albumin/prealbumin levels indicate nutritional status in a population-based cohort of first-ever stroke patients in a longer perspective when the patients are more stable (but not in the acute phase).

In accordance with the patient perspective in our study, we registered eating difficulties related to loss of appetite and digestive, chewing, or swallowing problems from the patients’ self-reports.6 All of these problems may be caused directly or indirectly by stroke. In our study, eating difficulties showed a highly significant relation with weight loss >3 kg at both follow-ups, which further strengthens the assumption that weight loss >3 kg is associated with malnutrition.

We found an association between possible depression (GDS-20 score) and weight loss. Depression has not been considered in most other studies of nutrition. In 1 study, poor nutritional status was linked to reduced appetite and depression,2 and in another study, the GDS-20 score was higher (worse) in malnourished subjects.33 The need to assess whether frail patients feel depressed has also been pointed out.10 Even though depression is included in 1 of the questions in the Mini Nutritional Assessment instrument used in some studies,6 the use of a specific depression scale may more accurately analyze the relation between depression and nutrition.

In our study, elevated HbA1c was an independent baseline predictor of weight loss at follow-up I. There may be a lack of attention to blood glucose levels in stroke patients, because 33% and 42% of the patients with HbA1c above the upper reference value at baseline and follow-up II, respectively, had not been diagnosed with diabetes. A lack of attention to impaired glucose tolerance in stroke patients with the risk of adverse outcomes has been reported in other studies.19,34 In another study, hyperglycemia plus a raised HbA1c concentration on admission predicted unrecognized diabetes mellitus with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 94%.35 Impaired glucose tolerance affects metabolism, may be related to nutritional problems, and has been found in 50% of 72 nondiabetic patients with a recent transient ischemic attack or nondisabling ischemic stroke.36 It could therefore be suggested that simple measurement of HbA1c and glucose levels should be used as screening tests in acute as well as in postacute stroke care.

Our results at follow-up I seem to confirm the findings of another study that eating, feeding, and nutritional status of stroke patients may be inadequately treated and cared for in nursing homes.11 However, at follow-up II, we did not find any evidence that weight loss was related to living in a nursing home, indicating that the situation may improve with time. We agree with recently published reports that clinical nutrition must be considered a part of medical treatment and nursing care and not only a service offered to patients in hospitals or residents in nursing homes.37,38 An intervention program has been associated with meaningful changes in nutrition support practices and patient outcomes.39 A systematic observation program regarding eating and nutritional status has also highlighted the complexity of eating problems.4 These programs could be regarded as good examples of methods in secondary prevention of weight loss and subsequent malnutrition in poststroke care.

Conclusion
Weight loss >3 kg after stroke is common and appears to be an indicator of the need for closer observation of nutritional status. Monitoring of body weight may be useful, particularly among patients with severe stroke, eating difficulties, low prealbumin values, and impaired glucose metabolism.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Håkan Lövkvist, statistician, for advice.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by grants from King Gustaf V’s and Queen Victoria’s Foundation, the Swedish Stroke Association, the Pharmacist Hedberg’s Foundation, Magn. Bergvall’s Foundation, the Research Funds of the Department of Neurology, Lund University Hospital, the County Council of Skåne, and Lund University.

Disclosures

None.

Received June 26, 2007; revision received July 19, 2007; accepted August 14, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Finestone HM, Greene-Finestone LS. Rehabilitation medicine, 2: diagnosis of dysphagia and its nutritional management for stroke patients. Can Med Assoc J. 2003; 169: 1041–1044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Perry L, McLaren S. An exploration of nutrition and eating disabilities in relation to quality of life at 6 months post-stroke. Health Soc Care Community. 2004; 12: 288–297.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Smithard DG, O’Neill PA, England RE, Park CL, Wyatt R, Martin DF, Morris J. The natural history of dysphagia following a stroke. Dysphagia. 1997; 12: 188–193.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Westergren A, Karlsson S, Andersson P, Ohlsson O, Hallberg IR. Eating difficulties, need for assisted eating, nutritional status and pressure ulcers in patients admitted for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Nurs. 2001; 10: 257–269.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Poels BJ, Brinkman-Zijlker HG, Dijkstra PU, Postema K. Malnutrition, eating difficulties and feeding dependence in a stroke rehabilitation centre. Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28: 637–643.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening, 2002. Clin Nutr. 2003; 22: 415–421.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Gariballa SE, Parker SG, Taub N, Castleden CM. Influence of nutritional status on clinical outcome after acute stroke. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998; 68: 275–281.[Abstract]

8. Gariballa SE, Parker SG, Taub N, Castleden M. Nutritional status of hospitalized acute stroke patients. Br J Nutr. 1998; 79: 481–487.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Unosson M, Ek AC, Bjurulf P, von Schenck H, Larsson J. Feeding dependence and nutritional status after acute stroke. Stroke. 1994; 25: 366–371.[Abstract]

10. Boockvar KS, Meier DE. Palliative care for frail older adults: ‘there are things I can’t do anymore that I wish I could.’ JAMA. 2006; 296: 2245–2253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Kumlien S, Axelsson K. Stroke patients in nursing homes: eating, feeding, nutrition and related care. J Clin Nurs. 2002; 11: 498–509.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Davalos A, Ricart W, Gonzalez-Huix F, Soler S, Marrugat J, Molins A, Suner R, Genis D. Effect of malnutrition after acute stroke on clinical outcome. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1028–1032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Christensson L, Unosson M, Ek AC. Evaluation of nutritional assessment techniques in elderly people newly admitted to municipal care. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002; 56: 810–818.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Jönsson AC, Lindgren I, Hallström B, Norrving B, Lindgren A. Prevalence and intensity of pain after stroke: a population based study focusing on patients’ perspectives. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006; 77: 590–595.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Hanson BS, Östergren PO. Different social network and social support characteristics, nervous problems and insomnia: theoretical and methodological aspects on some results from the population study ‘men born in 1914,’ Malmö, Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1987; 25: 849–859.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, Larrue V, Bluhmki E, Davis S, Donnan G, Schneider D, Diez-Tejedor E, Trouillas P. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian acute stroke study investigators. Lancet. 1998; 352: 1245–1251.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Kasner SE, Chalela JA, Luciano JM, Cucchiara BL, Raps EC, McGarvey ML, Conroy MB, Localio AR. Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH stroke scale score from medical records. Stroke. 1999; 30: 1534–1537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. World Health Organization. Comparative analysis of food and nutrition policies in WHO European member states. Nutrition and Food Security Programme. 2003. EU/03/5035226A.

19. Vancheri F, Curcio M, Burgio A, Salvaggio S, Gruttadauria G, Lunetta MC, Dovico R, Alletto M. Impaired glucose metabolism in patients with acute stroke and no previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Q J Med. 2005; 98: 871–878.

20. Glader EL, Stegmayr B, Norrving B, Terent A, Hulter-Åsberg K, Wester PO, Asplund K. Sex differences in management and outcome after stroke: a Swedish national perspective. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1970–1975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Ellekjaer H, Holmen J, Ellekjaer E, Vatten L. Physical activity and stroke mortality in women: ten-year follow-up of the Nord-Trondelag health survey, 1984–1986. Stroke. 2000; 31: 14–18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965; 14: 61–65.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Muir KW, Lees KR, Ford I, Davis S. Magnesium for acute stroke (Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy in Stroke trial): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 363: 439–445.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982; 17: 37–49.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Gottfries GG, Noltorp S, Norgaard N. Experience with a Swedish version of the geriatric depression scale in primary care centres. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997; 12: 1029–1034.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Norhammar A, Tenerz A, Nilsson G, Hamsten A, Efendic S, Ryden L, Malmberg K. Glucose metabolism in patients with acute myocardial infarction and no previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: a prospective study. Lancet. 2002; 359: 2140–2144.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Perry L, McLaren S. Eating difficulties after stroke. J Adv Nurs. 2003; 43: 360–369.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Suk SH, Sacco RL, Boden-Albala B, Cheun JF, Pittman JG, Elkind MS, Paik MC. Abdominal obesity and risk of ischemic stroke: the northern Manhattan stroke study. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1586–1592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Curioni C, André C, Veras R. Weight reduction for primary prevention of stroke in adults with overweight or obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD006062.

30. Gariballa S. Editorial comment: protein-energy undernutrition and acute stroke outcome. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1455–1456.[Free Full Text]

31. Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W, Amighi J, Sabeti S, Schlager O, Wagner O, Minar E. Serum albumin predicts cardiac adverse events in patients with advanced atherosclerosis: interrelation with traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Thromb Haemost. 2004; 91: 610–618.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Sullivan DH, Sun S, Walls RC. Protein-energy undernutrition among elderly hospitalized patients: a prospective study. JAMA. 1999; 281: 2013–2019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Thomas DR, Zdrowski CD, Wilson MM, Conright KC, Lewis C, Tariq S, Morley JE. Malnutrition in subacute care. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 75: 308–313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Inzucchi SE, Brass LM, Bravata DM, Shulman GI, McVeety JC. Prevalence of abnormal glucose tolerance following a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165: 227–233.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Gray CS, Scott JF, French JM, Alberti KG, O’Connell JE. Prevalence and prediction of unrecognised diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance following acute stroke. Age Ageing. 2004; 33: 71–77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Kernan WN, Inzucchi SE, Viscoli CM, Brass LM, Bravata DM, Shulman GI, McVeety JC, Horwitz RI. Impaired insulin sensitivity among nondiabetic patients with a recent TIA or ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2003; 60: 1447–1451.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Mossberg T. Clinical nutrition, a natural part of modern health care: metabolic treatment can reduce complications and mortality [in Swedish]. Läkartidningen. 2006; 103: 1697–1698.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Cederholm T. Malnutrition common within Swedish health care: assessment of the evidence status gives clear results: time to concentrate on clinical nutrition! [in Swedish]. Läkartidningen. 2006; 103: 1713, 1715–1717.

39. Perry L, McLaren S. Nutritional support in acute stroke: the impact of evidence-based guidelines. Clin Nutr. 2003; 22: 283–293.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. Bollmann, D. Husser, A. Lindgren, M. Stridh, B. M. Hardig, C. Piorkowski, A. Arya, L. Sornmo, and S. B. Olsson
Atrial fibrillatory rate and risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation
Europace, May 1, 2009; 11(5): 582 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/3/918    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.497602v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jönsson, A.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Lindgren, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jönsson, A.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Lindgren, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke