Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:1159-1164
Published online before print February 21, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.493031
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/4/1159    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.493031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skjelland, M.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skjelland, M.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valvular heart disease
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

(Stroke. 2008;39:1159.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Solid Cerebral Microemboli and Cerebrovascular Symptoms in Patients With Prosthetic Heart Valves

Mona Skjelland, MD; Annika Michelsen, PhD; Frank Brosstad, MD, PhD; Jan L. Svennevig, MD, PhD; Rainer Brucher, PhD David Russell, FRCPE

From the Department of Neurology (M.S., D.R.), the Research Institute for Internal Medicine (A.M., F.B.), and the Department of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery (J.L.S.), Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and the Department of Medical Engineering (R.B.), University of Applied Sciences, Ulm, Germany.

Correspondence to Mona Skjelland, MD, Department of Neurology, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, 0027 Oslo, Norway. E-mail mona.skjelland{at}rikshospitalet.no


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Although cerebral microemboli are often detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in mechanical heart valve patients, the clinical significance of such microemboli is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and composition of cerebral microemboli in a prosthetic heart valve population and to correlate these findings to cerebrovascular symptoms, blood inflammation, and coagulation parameters.

Methods— Seventy-six consecutive patients with a total of 81 prosthetic (54 mechanical, 27 biologic) heart valves were monitored for cerebral microemboli by multifrequency transcranial Doppler ultrasonography 1 year after valve replacement. Cerebrovascular events in the first year were recorded by a neurologist. Inflammation and coagulation markers were measured by immunoassays.

Results— Microemboli were detected in mechanical heart valve patients only (28 patients, 56%). Twelve percent were solid, occurring in 17 (34%) of the mechanical heart valve population. The presence of solid cerebral microemboli was the only variable that was associated with cerebrovascular symptoms after a final regression analysis (P=0.026). The plasma monocyte chemotactic protein-1 level was raised in patients with solid microemboli (P=0.014).

Conclusions— Solid cerebral microemboli were detected by multifrequency transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in 35% of a mechanical heart valve population, and the frequency was higher in patients who experienced cerebrovascular events during the first year after valve replacement. The results suggest that the detection of solid cerebral microemboli may be helpful in predicting the risk of ischemic stroke in mechanical heart valve patients.


Key Words: cerebral microemboli • embolic stroke • prosthetic heart valve • transcranial Doppler ultrasonography


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The frequency of thromboembolic complications in mechanical heart valve (MHV) patients is 1% to 4% per patient-year despite optimal anticoagulation.1,2 The majority of these thromboembolic events involve the cerebral circulation, resulting in an increased frequency of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and ischemic strokes.3 This risk is continuous and cumulative over time. Cerebral microembolic signals (MESs) have been detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) in 35% to 97% of the MHV population.4–7 The large variability in the incidence and frequency of detected cerebral MESs in previous studies is most likely due to differences with regard to detection criteria, unilateral versus bilateral monitoring, and different monitoring durations. The clinical significance of MESs in prosthetic heart valve patients remains unclear. Some authors have found evidence that suggests an increased risk of ischemic injury to the brain,4,8,9 whereas others have not.7,10–12

The first aim of this study was to determine the incidence, frequency, and composition of cerebral microemboli in a prosthetic heart valve population by multifrequency TCD. The second aim was to determine whether the number or type of microemboli is correlated to cerebrovascular symptoms or to platelet activation, coagulation, and inflammatory status of the patients.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
The study prospectively included 75 consecutive patients with a total of 79 prosthetic heart valves. Two patients with an internal carotid artery stenosis (>50%) detected by precerebral color duplex examinations and 1 patient with both a mechanical and a biologic valve were excluded. The mean age of the patients was 67 years (range, 17 to 87 years); 56 (75%) patients were male; and 19 (25%) were female. Sixty-two (79%) of the 79 valves were in the aortic position and 17 (22%) in the mitral position. Four patients had double valve replacement. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with MHVs (n=53) and those with biologic heart valves (BHVs, n=26). The MHV valve types were CarboMedics (CarboMedics Inc, Austin, Tex; 18 valves), Advantage (Medtronic Advantage Medical Carbon Research Institute, Austin, Tex; 11 valves), and On-X (On-X Medical Carbon Research Institute, LLC, Austin, Tex; 24 valves). The BHV group included Perimount (15 valves), Hancock (7 valves), and Freestyle (4 valves). Seventeen (23%) of the 75 patients had atrial fibrillation. Patients in the MHV and BHV groups were comparable with regard to baseline variables except for a higher mean age in the BHV group (77 versus 62 years) and differences with regard to anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Baseline Variables in the MHV and BHV Patient Groups (N=75)

All MHV patients were treated with anticoagulation therapy with a mean international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.6 (SD=0.7; range, 1.1 to 4.5). Thirty-one (62%) patients were within the target INR level of 2.5 to 4.0. Five (10%) patients with an MHV were also receiving antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid) due to cerebrovascular symptoms after valve implantation despite anticoagulation therapy. Seven (28%) patients with BHVs were being treated with anticoagulation therapy due to atrial fibrillation, with a mean INR of 2.7 (SD=0.4; range, 2.0 to 3.0). Fourteen (56%) patients with BHVs were being treated with acetylsalicylic acid due to previous cerebrovascular symptoms or ischemic coronary heart disease.

Cerebrovascular events in the first year after valve replacement were recorded by a neurologist who also performed a clinical neurologic examination of all patients. A cerebral computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging examination was carried out in patients who had experienced cerebrovascular symptoms. All patients gave informed consent before the study, which was approved by the regional ethics committee.

Doppler Monitoring
TCD monitoring of both middle cerebral arteries was carried out for 30 minutes by multifrequency TCD (EmboDop, DWL, Singen, Germany). Cerebral MESs were automatically identified and differentiated, and their time of occurrence was simultaneously registered. The criteria for the automatic detection and differentiation of cerebral MESs by multifrequency TCD were based on those described previously13,14 but refined as follows. The detection level for an MES was a ≥7-dB power increase above background level (dEBR, or embolus blood ratio) that lasted ≥4 ms simultaneously on both 2.0- and 2.5-MHz frequency channels, and the lower dEBR detection limit for solid emboli was y=–0.1x–0.12 dB, where y=dEBR and x=2.0-MHz EBR.15 The insonation and reference gate depths were 55 and 45 mm, respectively, and the sample volume was 12 mm, filter setting was 200 Hz, and power was 188 mW.

Coagulation, Platelet Activation, and Inflammation Assessments
Venous blood was drawn into evacuated tubes (Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Meylan Cedex, France) without any additives (serum) or with anticoagulant (citrate; CTAD or EDTA). Centrifugation (2500g for 25 minutes at 4°C) was performed within 15 minutes (plasma) or after half an hour at room temperature (serum). CTAD-plasma was centrifuged again (11 000g for 4 minutes) to eliminate any remaining platelets. Samples were stored at –70°C until analyzed.

Fibrinogen and D-dimer values were analyzed by STA (Fibrinogen 5 and STA Liatest D-Di, respectively; Stago, Asnières sur Seine, France) on a STA Compact. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was measured by the Tina-quant (Roche Diagnostica, Basel, Switzerland) particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay performed on a Roche Hitachi 917 (Roche). Leukocytes and platelets were counted on a Cell-Dyn 3500 (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill). Concentrations of prothrombin fragments F1+2 were measured with a commercial assay (Enzygnost F1+2 monoclonal, Dade-Behring Marburg GmbH, Marburg, Germany) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Concentrations of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and soluble CD62P were measured with commercial ELISAs (DuoSet, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Measurement of Platelet-Derived Microparticles
After being thawed, 1 aliquot of CTAD-plasma was filtered through 0.1-µm pores (Millipore, Billerica, Mass). Both unfiltered plasma and filtrate (1 volume) were mixed with 1 volume of Delfia assay buffer (Perkin-Elmer Life Science, Boston, Mass) containing 1% of the nonionic detergent Igepal CA-630 (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo) before analysis. The total amount of platelet-derived microparticles (PMPs) was measured in unfiltered plasma (total PMPs), whereas measurements in filtrate were considered to reflect the amount of small PMPs (<0.1 µm). Large PMPs were calculated as the difference between the total amount of PMPs and the amount of small PMPs. This immunometric method has been described in detail previously.16

Statistical Methods
The numbers of MESs during the 30-minute monitoring period are shown as median and range (nonnormal distribution). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics with mean (±SD) and median (range) for continuous variables and number (percentage) for categorical variables. We used Student’s t test for comparison of normally distributed data and nonparametric tests for data with a nonnormal distribution. Pearson’s {chi}2 test was used to assess associations between categorical variables. Multiple logistic-regression analysis was carried out to measure the odds ratio for cerebrovascular events. The explanatory variables were solid microemboli, gaseous microemboli, age, sex, valve type (mechanical or biologic), number of valves, valve position, antiplatelets, and anticoagulation. A probability value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistics were 2-sided. All calculations were carried out with SPSS for Windows statistical software (version 13.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cerebrovascular Symptoms
Patients with MHVs experienced more cerebrovascular symptoms in the first year after valve replacement compared with patients with BHVs (P=0.045, Table 2). Twelve patients (21%) with MHVs experienced a cerebrovascular event: 1 ischemic hemispheric stroke, 9 hemispheric TIAs, and 2 cases of amaurosis fugax. One (4%) of the 27 patients with a BHV had a hemispheric TIA.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Univariate Statistics Between Patients With Cerebrovascular Events and Patients Without Cerebrovascular Events in the First Year After Valve Implantation (N=75)

Cerebral Microemboli
Cerebral microemboli were detected in 28 (56%) of the 50 patients with MHVs. Fifty-six (12%) of these microemboli were classified as solid and 481(88%) as gaseous. Seventeen (34%) of the 50 patients with MHVs had solid microemboli. No emboli were detected in the BHV patients. In the MHV population, the median number of solid emboli was 0 (range, 0 to 15) and 3 gaseous (range, 0 to 79). All patients with solid emboli also had gaseous emboli, and the number of gaseous emboli was higher in these patients (median, 18; range, 2 to 79) compared with patients without solid emboli (median, 0; range, 0 to 12; P<0.001). Patients who had experienced stroke, TIA, or amaurosis fugax had a higher total number (P<0.001), a higher number of solid (P<0.001), and a higher number of gaseous (P<0.001) emboli compared with patients without cerebrovascular symptoms (Table 2). Solid microemboli were, however, the only predictor for cerebrovascular events (odds ratio=18.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 245.5, P=0.026) when a stepwise logistic-regression model was performed with cerebrovascular events during the first year after heart valve replacement as the dependent variable.

The mean age of MHV patients with emboli, for both solid and gaseous emboli, was lower (58 years) compared with patients without emboli (68 years, P=0.022). The position or size of the valve, the number of implanted valves (only 3 patients with a mechanical double valve replacement), or the frequency of atrial fibrillation did not influence the presence, frequency, or type of emboli.

Platelet Function, Coagulation, and Inflammatory Parameters
Patients with MHVs who had solid emboli had higher MCP-1 values compared with patients without solid emboli (P=0.014, Table 3). There was no correlation between MCP-1 values and the frequency of gaseous emboli or cerebrovascular events. (MCP-1 measurements were performed only in 5 patients with cerebrovascular events.) Patients with gaseous emboli had decreased F1+2 (P=0.014) values compared with patients without gaseous emboli, but there were no differences with regard to fibrinogen levels (Table 4). There was no correlation between F1+2 or D-dimer levels and the frequency of solid emboli. Patients with solid emboli had nonsignificantly higher levels of total PMPs and small PMPs (Table 3). There was no significant association between the frequency of solid or gaseous emboli and other tests for inflammation (C-reactive protein, leukocyte count), coagulation (INR), or platelet activity (soluble CD62P, platelet count; Tables 3 and 4Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Differences in Blood Parameters in MHV Patients With Solid Emboli Compared With Patients Without Solid Emboli (N=54 Valves)


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Differences in Blood Parameters in MHV Patients With Gaseous Emboli Compared With Patients Without Gaseous Emboli (N=54 Valves)

MHV Types
The numbers of both solid and gaseous emboli were higher in patients with CarboMedics valves (2 solid; range, 0 to 15; and 8 gaseous; range, 0 to 79) compared with patients with On-x valves (0 solid; range, 0 to 4; P<0.001; and 0 gaseous; range, 0 to 11, P<0.001) or Advantage valves (0 solid; range, 0 to 3, P=0.006; and 0 gaseous; range, 0 to 20, P=0.042). There were also more cerebrovascular events in patients with CarboMedics valves (8 patients, 44%) compared with On-x (3 patient, 12%, P=0.017) and Advantage (0 patients, P=0.011) valves but no difference between patients who had On-x compared with Advantage valves.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this study, we found evidence that suggests that the detection of solid cerebral microemboli may be helpful in predicting the risk for ischemic stroke in MHV patients. Fifty-seven percent of MHV patients had cerebral microemboli, and 12% of these were solid. Patients who had experienced cerebrovascular symptoms had significantly higher numbers of both solid and gaseous emboli compared with those without symptoms, but the presence of solid emboli only was significantly associated with cerebrovascular events after a final stepwise regression analysis was carried out. No emboli were detected in BHV patients.

This is the first study wherein an attempt was made to differentiate cerebral microemboli in a prosthetic heart valve population. We used multifrequency TCD,13,14 which is a relatively new method for embolus differentiation. This method has 3 potential limitations; ie, sensitivity when detecting small, solid emboli (<80 µm, corresponding to an EBR of <7 dB), correctly differentiating small, gaseous emboli (<3 µm, corresponding to an EBR of <7 dB), and counting all of the emboli when several enter the sample volume at the same time.15 It is important to stress, however; that the criteria for automatic embolus detection and differentiation by multifrequency TCD were clearly defined before the study and therefore were exactly the same for all patients. The aforementioned limitations were therefore similar for all patients. This differs from previous studies, wherein embolus detection alone without differentiation was based on the opinion of observers, which may yield considerable variations in the number of emboli counted due to environmental changes and the obvious individual limits of the human auditory system.17,18

Solid microemboli due to MHVs may consist of platelet aggregates or whole blood. Mechanical valve implants may induce platelet activation by increasing shear stress conditions.19 In our study, the mean values of PMPs analyzed by an immunofluorometric method16 were nonsignificantly increased in MHV patients with solid cerebral MESs compared with patients without solid MESs. There was, however, no association between PMP values and cerebrovascular events. This contrasts with the findings of others.20 In our study, other coagulation and platelets parameters such as F1+2, soluble CD62P values, and platelet counts were not associated with solid emboli. A nonsignificant increase in PMPs without a soluble CD62P or F1+2 increase cannot exclude platelet activation in patients with solid emboli, but our results suggest that if present, this activation did not reach the secondary irreversible phase of platelet aggregation.

The present study showed that an increased MCP-1 value was associated with solid emboli in MHV patients, which suggests that monocyte activation and inflammation may contribute to the production of solid emboli. MCP-1 values did not influence the frequency of gaseous emboli. The lack of correlation between MCP-1 and cerebrovascular events may be explained by the small number of patients with cerebrovascular events and MCP-1 measurements. MCP-1 was measured in 41 patients, but only 5 of these had experienced a cerebrovascular event. Previous studies have shown that activated platelets may induce dysregulation of platelet/endothelium interactions, which contribute to vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis.21 Activated platelets induce the secretion of MCP-1, which belongs to a group of cytokines known as chemokines.22 MCP-1 induction enhances monocyte attraction and local inflammation, which in turn leads to an imbalance between the procoagulant and anticoagulant properties of the endothelium. This can cause local stimulation of the coagulation cascade. However, the lack of a correlation between activity of the coagulation system or INR values and the frequency of solid MESs in MHV patients in this study argues against whole-blood clots as the basis for solid emboli. A high D-dimer level in 1 study was the only parameter that predicted the occurrence of thromboembolic events in patients with MHVs,23 whereas this and other studies showed no association with embolization.20,24 Although we excluded patients with severe carotid atherosclerosis, it is impossible to exclude the possibility that some of the solid emboli may have been due to atherosclerosis. We did not, however, detect any MESs in the older BHV patients, who may be expected to have a greater atherosclerotic risk.

The majority of previous studies have indirectly suggested that most cerebral MESs in MHV patients are gaseous.25,26 This study confirms these findings, wherein 88% of the MESs were gaseous. Gaseous emboli are probably cavitation bubbles produced by local high-pressure gradients during valve closure, causing "cavitation," with the release of dissolved blood gases. In vitro studies have shown, however, that cavitation gas emboli usually collapse in <1 ms.27 Interaction between cavitation bubbles and blood components, eg, activated platelets, may, however, lead to their stabilization, and they might then last long enough to reach the cerebral circulation. As cavitation bubbles and platelet injury are probably caused by local high-pressure gradients during valve closure, hemodynamic characteristics of the different valves may influence the frequency of embolization. In vitro studies have shown that valves with different orientations and designs vary with regard to their valve outlet configuration, downstream turbulence, and rate of embolization.28,29 It is therefore reasonable to suppose that the design of MHVs is important for both the degree of cavitation and platelet activation. MHVs with a high local shear stress may lead to both the stabilization of gas bubbles and the promotion of inflammation, which may contribute to the formation of solid emboli. This is a possible explanation as to why all patients who had solid emboli also had gaseous emboli and why there were increased numbers of gaseous emboli in patients with solid emboli compared with patients without solid emboli.

Some previous studies have shown that cerebral embolization depends on valve type,12,30 whereas other could not confirm this difference.7,31 Our study showed more cerebral microemboli and cerebrovascular events in the mechanical CarboMedics valves compared with Advantage or On-x valves. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the very small numbers of patients in the different valve groups.

We found that both gaseous and solid emboli were more frequent in younger patients. Other studies that analyzed the total number of emboli also found an inverse correlation between the total number of emboli and patient age.10,11 Animal models have shown that myocardial contractility affects microembolus frequency.32 Younger patients have better myocardial contractility and a higher left ventricular ejection fraction compared with older MHV patients. An increased frequency of gaseous emboli in younger patients may therefore be due to greater pressure gradients and subsequent cavitation at the site of the valve. The position or size of the valve or the presence of atrial fibrillation did not influence the frequency of MESs, which supports findings from previous studies.4,7,10,12

Conclusions
In conclusion, this study has shown that solid cerebral emboli may be detected by multifrequency TCD in 34% of an MHV population. It also provides the first preliminary evidence that suggests that the presence of solid cerebral microemboli may be helpful in predicting the risk for ischemic stoke in MHV patients. Confirmation of these findings will require larger prospective multicenter studies.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Source of Funding

This work was supported in part by a grant from the Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation.

Disclosures

None.

Received May 6, 2007; revision received August 7, 2007; accepted August 16, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses. Circulation. 1994; 89: 635–641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Edmunds LH. Thrombotic and bleeding complications of prosthetic heart valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987; 44: 430–445.[Abstract]

3. Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Wintzen AR, van der Meer FJM, Vandenbroucke JP, Briet E. Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 11–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Braekken SK, Russell D, Brucher R, Svennevig JL. Incidence and frequency of cerebral embolic signals in patients with a similar bileaflet mechanical heart valve. Stroke. 1995; 26: 1225–1230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Milano A, D’Alfonso A, Codecasa R, De Carlo M, Nardi C, Orlandi G, Landucci L, Bortolotti U. Prospective evaluation of frequency and nature of transcranial high-intensity Doppler signals in prosthetic valve recipients. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999; 8: 488–494.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Georgiadis D, Kaps M, Berg J, Mackay TG, Dapper F, Faichney A, Wheatley DJ, Lees KR. Transcranial Doppler detection of microemboli in prosthetic heart valve patients: dependency upon valve type. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996; 10: 253–257.[Abstract]

7. Dalinin V, Lingaas PS, Hatteland K, Svennevig JL. Carotid Doppler microembolic signals in patients one year after heart valve surgery. Perfusion. 2003; 18: 333–337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Deklunder G, Roussel M, Lecroart JL, Prat A, Gautier C. Microemboli in cerebral circulation and alteration of cognitive abilities in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Stroke. 1998; 29: 1821–1826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Uekermann JSB, Daum I, Kseibi S, Perthel M, Laas J. Neuropsychological deficits after mechanical aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 2005; 14: 338–343.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Kofidis T, Fischer S, Leyh R, Mair H, Deckert M, Haberl R, Haverich A, Reichart B. Clinical relevance of intracranial high intensity transient signals in patients following prosthetic aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002; 21: 22–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Nadareishvili ZG, Beletsky V, Black SE, Fremes SE, Freedman M, Kurzman D, Leach L, Norris JW. Is cerebral microembolism in mechanical prosthetic heart valves clinically relevant? J Neuroimaging. 2002; 12: 310–315.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Sliwka U, Georgiadis D. Clinical correlations of Doppler microembolic signals in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves: analysis of 580 cases. Stroke. 1998; 29: 140–143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Russell D, Brucher R. Online automatic discrimination between solid and gaseous cerebral microemboli with the first multifrequency transcranial Doppler. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1975–1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Brucher R, Russell D. Automatic online embolus detection and artifact rejection with the first multifrequency transcranial Doppler. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1969–1974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Russell D, Brucher R. Embolus detection and differentiation using multifrequency transcranial Doppler. Stroke. 2006; 37: 340–341; author reply 341–342.[Free Full Text]

16. Michelsen AE, Wergeland R, Stokke O, Brosstad F. Development of a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay for quantifying platelet-derived microparticles in human plasma. Thromb Res. 2006; 117: 705–711.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Chung E, Fan L, Degg C, Evans D. Detection of Doppler embolic signals: psychoacoustic considerations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005; 31: 1177–1184.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Chung EML, Fan L, Naylor AR, Evans DH. Adverse impact of clinical environment on the detection of Doppler embolic signals. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006; 21 (Suppl 3): 1–70.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Jesty J, Yin W, Perrotta P, Bluestein D. Platelet activation in a circulating flow loop: combined effects of shear stress and exposure time. Platelets. 2003; 14: 143–149.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Geiser T, Sturzenegger M, Genewein U, Haeberli A, Beer JH. Mechanisms of cerebrovascular events as assessed by procoagulant activity, cerebral microemboli, and platelet microparticles in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Stroke. 1998; 29: 1770–1777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Wagner DD, Burger P. Platelets in inflammation and thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 2131–2137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Gawaz M, Neumann FJ, Dickfeld T, Koch W, Laugwitz K, Adelsberger H, Langenbrink K, Page S, Neumeier D, Schornig A, Brand K. Activated platelets induce monocyte chemotactic protein-1 secretion and surface expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 on endothelial cells. Circulation. 1998; 98: 1164–1171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Giansante C, Fiotti N, Calabrese S, La Verde R, Pandullo C, Scardi S, Guarnieri G. D-dimer and anticoagulation in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves: a 2-year follow-up. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 1320–1324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Sturzenegger M, Beer JH, Rihs F. Monitoring combined antithrombotic treatments in patients with prosthetic heart valves using transcranial Doppler and coagulation markers. Stroke. 1995; 26: 63–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Telman G, Kouperberg E, Sprecher E, Yarnitsky D. The nature of microemboli in patients with artificial heart valves. J Neuroimaging. 2002; 12: 15–18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Georgiadis D, Baumgartner RW, Karatschai R, Lindner A, Zerkowski HR. Further evidence of gaseous embolic material in patients with artificial heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 115: 808–810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Graf T, Fischer H, Reul H, Rau G. Cavitation potential of mechanical heart valve prostheses. Int J Artif Organs. 1991; 14: 169–174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Yin W, Alemu Y, Affeld K, Jesty J, Bluestein D. Flow-induced platelet activation in bileaflet and monoleaflet mechanical heart valves. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004; 32: 1058–1066.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Bluestein D, Li YM, Krukenkamp IB. Free emboli formation in the wake of bi-leaflet mechanical heart valves and the effects of implantation techniques. J Biomech. 2002; 35: 1533–1540.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Georgiadis D, Braun S, Uhlmann F, Bernacca GM, Schulte-Mattler WJ, Zierz S, Zerkowski HR. Doppler microembolic signals in patients with two different types of bileaflet valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001; 121: 1101–1116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Muller HR, Burckhardt D, Casty M, Pfisterer ME, Buser MW. High intensity transcranial Doppler signals (HITS) after prosthetic valve implantation. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994; 3: 602–606.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Conger JL, Deklunder G, Lecroart JL, La Peyre DM, Gregoric I, Rose H, Wieting DW, Clubb F, Frazier OH. A bovine model for detecting high intensity transient signals originating from mechanical heart valves. ASAIO J. 2000; 46: 344–350.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. King and H. S. Markus
Doppler Embolic Signals in Cerebrovascular Disease and Prediction of Stroke Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis * Supplemental Online References
Stroke, December 1, 2009; 40(12): 3711 - 3717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/4/1159    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.493031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skjelland, M.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skjelland, M.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valvular heart disease
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.