| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2008;39:1321.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Research Letters |
From CHESS, Stockholm University/Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Correspondence to Susanna Toivanen, MSc, Centre for Health Equity Studies, CHESS, Stockholm University/Karolinska Institute, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail susanna.toivanen{at}chess.su.se
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods— This was a register-based cohort study of nearly 3.5 million working people (25 to 64 years of age in the 1990 Swedish Census) with a 5-year follow-up for stroke mortality. Job control was aggregated to the data from a secondary data source (job exposure matrix). Gender-specific Poisson regressions were performed.
Results— Compared with high job control occupations, low job control was significantly related to hemorrhagic (relative risk, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.17) and all-stroke mortality (relative risk, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.03) in women but not in men. The significance of job control in women was independent of all confounders included (marital status, education level, and occupational class). Class-specific analyses indicated a consistent effect of job control for most classes (significant for female lower nonmanuals). However, low job control did not increase the risk of stroke mortality in upper nonmanuals.
Conclusions— Job control was significantly related to hemorrhagic and all-stroke mortality in women but not in men.
Key Words: epidemiology job control mortality occupational class stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mean job control exposures (0 to 10) stratified by gender and age groups (16 to 29, 30 to 44, 45 to 64) have been estimated based on the Swedish Surveys of Working Conditions (nearly 50 000 respondents) for the period 1989 to 1997 for 320 occupational families (3-digit Nordic Occupational Classification Codes).8 Information from this job exposure matrix was used to impute exposures to each occupational code in the census (exposure among 16 to 29 year olds used for those 25 to 29 years in our data). First, we classified job control into gender-specific quintiles (Q1 to Q5). High job control (Q1) was used as the reference group and compared with intermediate (Q2 to Q4) and low job control (Q5). Second, we performed analyses using the continuous (0 to 10) job control variable.
Five-year age groups, marital status (never married, married, divorced, widowed), education level (unknown, 6 levels), and occupational class (7 classes) were included as potential confounders in gender-specific multivariate Poisson regressions. Job control is defined on the basis of 3-digit occupational codes and occupational classes on the basis of 5-digit occupational codes. Therefore, a specific job control exposure may be the same for up to 5 occupational classes. Thus, the objective job control measure is not biased by having been classified on the same aggregate occupational level as class.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Because job control was significant in women, class-specific analyses were justified for them. In the present cohort, there was variation in job control within most classes (except for farmers) as well as across genders and age groups. Standard deviations in mean job control scores were greater among unskilled manuals (1.11) and lower nonmanuals (1.08) than among higher nonmanuals (0.86). In the class-specific analyses, entrepreneurs and farmers (self-employed) and intermediate and higher nonmanuals (upper nonmanuals) were combined, and 4 education levels (unknown, basic, secondary, tertiary) were controlled for to increase power. Job control was significant for lower nonmanuals (Figure). The effect was similar, yet not significant, for manual and self-employed classes. There was no effect of job control for upper nonmanuals.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effect of job control was consistent in all classes except for upper nonmanuals, in which the overall level of job control is high and the variability is small. In women, we observed similar effects of low job control in manual workers and lower nonmanuals. One possible explanation is that, in these occupations, low job control is often combined with high psychological ("job strain") or physical demands. Womens experience of domestic stressors may also interact with harmful job exposures. Testing these hypotheses, however, would require individual-level data.5
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS), grant no. 2001-2934 and 2005-1723, and the Department of Sociology, Stockholm University.
Disclosures
None.
Received June 4, 2007; revision received August 20, 2007; accepted August 28, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Schnall PL, Landsbergis PA, Baker D. Job strain and cardiovascular disease. Annu Rev Public Health. 1994; 15: 381–411.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Kuper H, Marmot M, Hemingway H. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies of psychosocial factors in the etiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Semin Vasc Med. 2002; 2: 267–314.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Uchiyama S, Kurasawa T, Sekizawa T, Nakatsuka H. Job strain and risk of cardiovascular events in treated hypertensive Japanese workers: hypertension follow-up group study. J Occup Health. 2005; 47: 102–111.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Kuper H, Adami HO, Theorell T, Weiderpass E. The socioeconomic gradient in the incidence of stroke. A prospective study in middle-aged women in Sweden. Stroke. 2007; 38: 27–33.
6. Macleod J, Davey Smith G, Heslop P, Metcalfe C, Carroll D, Hart C. Are the effects of psychosocial exposures attributable to confounding? Evidence from a prospective observational study on psychological stress and mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001; 55: 878–884.
7. Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M, Siegrist J, Theorell T, Luukkonen R, Riihimäki H, Vahtera J, Kirjonen J, Leino-Arjas P. Is the effect of work stress on cardiovascular mortality confounded by socioeconomic factors in the Valmet study? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004; 58: 1019–1020.
8. Fredlund P, Hallqvist J, Diderichsen F. Psykosocial yrkesexponeringsmatris. En uppdatering av ett klassifikationssystem för yrkesrelaterade psykosociala exponeringar [Psychosocial job exposure matrix.]. Arbete och hälsa. 2000; 11: 1–37.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kivimaki, D. Gimeno, J. E Ferrie, G D. Batty, T. Oksanen, M. Jokela, M. Virtanen, P. Salo, T. N Akbaraly, M. Elovainio, et al. Socioeconomic position, psychosocial work environment and cerebrovascular disease among women: the Finnish public sector study Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2009; 38(5): 1265 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tsutsumi, K. Kayaba, K. Kario, and S. Ishikawa Prospective Study on Occupational Stress and Risk of Stroke Arch Intern Med, January 12, 2009; 169(1): 56 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |