Published online before print February 28, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.494476
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2008;39:1324.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Research Letters |
Variation in the Estrogen Receptor 
Gene and Risk of Stroke
The Rotterdam Study
From Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (M.J.B., A.H., A.G.U., M.M.B.B.), Department of Neurology (M.J.B., P.J.K.), and Department of Internal Medicine (S.C.E.S., A.G.U.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Correspondence to M.M.B. Breteler, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail m.breteler{at}erasmusmc.nl
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background and Purpose— Variations in the –397T>C (rs2234693) and –351A>G (rs9340799) single nucleotide polymorphisms of the estrogen
receptor (ESR1) gene were found to be strongly associated with risk of ischemic heart disease, although not all studies could replicate this finding. One study also reported an association with stroke. We assessed whether variations in the ESR1 gene are associated with the risk of stroke in the general population. Methods— This prospective population-based study was based on 6229 Rotterdam Study participants who at baseline (1990–1993) were aged 55 years or older, free from stroke, and had assessment of the ESR1 rs2234693 and rs9340799 single nucleotide polymorphisms. Follow-up for incident stroke was complete until January 1, 2005. Data were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models for men and women separately with adjustment for age.
Results— During an average follow-up time of 10.1 years, 659 strokes occurred, of which 386 were ischemic. Three common haplotypes were identified: –397T/–351A (carried by 78% of all participants), –397C/–351G (carried by 57%), and –397C/–351A (carried by 22%). Although we had at least 89% power to detect a relative risk of 1.5 (=0.05) in all subgroups, we did not find any association between ESR1 haplotype carriership and risk of stroke and ischemic stroke.
Conclusions— We have not been able to replicate the previously reported association between variations in the ESR1 gene and risk of stroke.
Key Words: cerebrovascular disease • risk factors • stroke
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The relatively low incidence rate of ischemic heart disease in premenopausal women has drawn attention to the role of estrogen in cardiovascular disease. Estrogen exerts its effect through estrogen receptors
and β. Previous research has demonstrated that the estrogen receptor is involved in atherosclerosis,1 and several epidemiological studies found associations between variations in the –397T>C (rs2234693) and –351A>G (rs9340799) single nucleotide polymorphisms of the estrogen receptor (ESR1) gene and risk of ischemic heart disease,2–5 which could not be replicated by 2 other studies, however.6,7 Studies on the association between variations in the –397T>C single nucleotide polymorphism and risk of stroke are also contradictory.7,8 We assessed whether variations in the ESR1 gene are associated with the risk of stroke in the general population. |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The present study was part of the Rotterdam Study, a prospective study on chronic and disabling diseases in 7983 white Dutch (98.5%) community-dwelling participants aged 55 years and older (participation rate 78%).9 The Medical Ethics Committee of Erasmus University Rotterdam approved of the study. Written informed consent to retrieve information from treating physicians was obtained from all participants.
All Rotterdam Study participants who at baseline (1990–1993) were free from stroke and had successful assessment of both ESR1 single nucleotide polymorphisms were included in the present study (N=6229; 2511 men). After enrollment into the Rotterdam Study, participants were continuously monitored for strokes through automated linkage of the study database with files from general practitioners and the municipality. Strokes were subclassified as ischemic strokes, hemorrhagic strokes, and unspecified strokes, as described previously.9 Follow-up was complete until January 1, 2005, for 97.1% of potential person-years.
All participants were genotyped for the –397T>C (rs2234693) and –351A>G (rs9340799) polymorphisms as described previously.2 We used the genotype data for each of the 2 polymorphisms to infer the haplotype alleles present in the population by using the program PHASE, which implements a Bayesian statistical method for reconstructing haplotypes.10 Haplotype alleles were numbered in order of decreasing prevalence.
We calculated HRs and 95% CIs for the associations between ESR1 haplotypes (dominant model) and risk of stroke and ischemic stroke using Cox proportional hazards models with SPSS for Windows (Rel. 11.0.1).
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
During an average follow-up time of 10.1 years, 659 strokes occurred, of which 386 were ischemic, 62 were hemorrhagic, and 211 could not be subclassified. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Neither in women nor in men were variations in individual single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with risk of stroke and ischemic stroke (P>0.37). Of all participants, 78% carried haplotype 1 (–397T/–351A; 29% homozygous), 57% carried haplotype 2 (–397C/–351G; 12% homozygous), 22% carried haplotype 3 (–397C/–351A; 1.3% homozygous), and 1 participant carried haplotype 4 (–397C/–351A). For women there was no association between ESR1 haplotypes and risk of stroke and ischemic stroke (Table 2). For men, risk of stroke and ischemic stroke might be slightly increased in haplotype 1 carriers compared to noncarriers (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.64 for stroke; and HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.94 to 2.09 for ischemic stroke), but this was not statistically significant (
=0.05). Further adjustment did not change the associations.
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
ESR1 haplotypes were not associated with risk of stroke in our population-based cohort.
For men, our power (=0.05) to detect RR of 1.3 in haplotype carriers compared to noncarriers ranged from 50% for haplotype 1 (H1) to 80% for haplotype 2 (H2), the power to detect RR of 1.4 ranged from 74% (H1) to 96% (H2); and the power to detect RR of 1.5 ranged from 89% (H1) to 100% (H2). For women, the power to detect RR of 1.3 ranged from 66% for H1 to 83% for H2, the power to detect RR of 1.4 ranged from 88% (H1) to 97% (H2), and the power to detect RR of 1.5 ranged from 98% (H3) to 100% (H2). Therefore, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that the risk of stroke might be slightly increased (with HR<1.5) in male haplotype 1 carriers compared to noncarriers; similarly, the risk of ischemic stroke might be slightly increased in male haplotype 3 carriers compared to noncarriers.
Strengths of our study are the large study population (N=6229), the intense stroke case finding, and the nearly complete follow-up (loss of potential person-years 2.9%). Our stringent stroke monitoring procedures enabled the ascertainment of stroke cases that were not referred to a hospital. Because in these cases neuroimaging was often lacking, 32% of the total number of strokes could not be subclassified into ischemic or hemorrhagic.
Four large studies with a total of 7134 participants found an association between variation in the ESR1 gene and the risk of ischemic heart disease,2–5 whereas 1 study with 4868 participants could not replicate this finding.6 According to a study in 2709 men, those with the –397CC genotype were at higher risk for stroke than those with –397CT or TT (adjusted HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.48).8 A study in 5063 participants found no relation between this polymorphism and risk of stroke.7 We found no associations between variations in the ESR1 gene and risk of stroke, neither in 3718 women nor in 2511 men.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have not been able to replicate the previously reported association between variations in the ESR1 gene and risk of stroke.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The contributions of the general practitioners and pharmacists of the Ommoord district to the Rotterdam Study are gratefully acknowledged.
Sources of Funding
The Rotterdam Study is supported by Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, the Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW), the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE), the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, and the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports.
This study was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) grants 904-61-093, 014-93-015, and 918-46-615.
Disclosures
None.
Received June 19, 2007; revision received July 20, 2007; accepted August 21, 2007.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Losordo DW, Kearney M, Kim EA, Jekanowski J, Isner JM. Variable expression of the estrogen receptor in normal and atherosclerotic coronary arteries of premenopausal women. Circulation. 1994; 89: 1501–1510.
2. Schuit SC, Oei HH, Witteman JC, Geurts van Kessel CH, van Meurs JB, Nijhuis RL, van Leeuwen JP, de Jong FH, Zillikens MC, Hofman A, Pols HA, Uitterlinden AG. Estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2004; 291: 2969–2977.
3. Shearman AM, Cooper JA, Kotwinski PJ, Miller GJ, Humphries SE, Ardlie KG, Jordan B, Irenze K, Lunetta KL, Schuit SC, Uitterlinden AG, Pols HA, Demissie S, Cupples LA, Mendelsohn ME, Levy D, Housman DE. Estrogen receptor alpha gene variation is associated with risk of myocardial infarction in more than seven thousand men from five cohorts. Circ Res. 2006; 98: 590–592.
4. Shearman AM, Cupples LA, Demissie S, Peter I, Schmid CH, Karas RH, Mendelsohn ME, Housman DE, Levy D. Association between estrogen receptor alpha gene variation and cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2003; 290: 2263–2270.
5. Lu H, Higashikata T, Inazu A, Nohara A, Yu W, Shimizu M, Mabuchi H. Association of estrogen receptor-alpha gene polymorphisms with coronary artery disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 817–823.
6. Koch W, Hoppmann P, Pfeufer A, Mueller JC, Schomig A, Kastrati A. No replication of association between estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to myocardial infarction in a large sample of patients of European descent. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2138–2142.
7. Kjaergaard AD, Ellervik C, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Axelsson CK, Gronholdt ML, Grande P, Jensen GB, Nordestgaard BG. Estrogen receptor alpha polymorphism and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and hip fracture. Circulation. 2007; 115: 861–871.
8. Shearman AM, Cooper JA, Kotwinski PJ, Humphries SE, Mendelsohn ME, Housman DE, Miller GJ. Estrogen receptor alpha gene variation and the risk of stroke. Stroke. 2005; 36: 2281–2282.
9. Bos MJ, Schipper CM, Koudstaal PJ, Witteman JC, Hofman A, Breteler MM. High serum C-reactive protein level is not an independent predictor for stroke: The Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1591–1598.
10. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001; 68: 978–989.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. Markoula, N. Xita, L. Lazaros, S. Giannopoulos, A. P. Kyritsis, and I. Georgiou Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Gene Haplotypes and Diplotypes in the Risk of Stroke Stroke, November 1, 2008; 39(11): e172 - e173. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Uitterlinden, M. Bos, P. J. Koudstaal, and M. M.B. Breteler Response to Letter by Markoula et al Stroke, November 1, 2008; 39(11): e174 - e174. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||