| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2008;39:1487.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neurology (J.S.) and Radiology (C.B.L.M.M., O.M.v.D., K.P.v.L., J.A.R.), Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Correspondence to Prof Dr J. Stam, Department of Neurology (H2-226), Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail J.Stam{at}amc.uva.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods— Prospective case series. Patients with sinus thrombosis were selected for thrombolysis if they had an altered mental status, coma, straight sinus thrombosis, or large space-occupying lesions. Urokinase was infused into the sinuses (bolus 120 to 600x103 U; then 100x103 U/h) via a jugular catheter, in 15 cases combined with mechanical thrombus disruption or removal.
Results— We treated 20 patients (16 women), mean age 32 years. Twelve patients were comatose and 14 had hemorrhagic infarcts before thrombolysis. Twelve patients recovered (Rankin score 0 to 2), 2 survived with handicaps, and 6 died. Factors associated with a fatal outcome were leukemia (3/6 versus 0/14, P=0.02) and large hemorrhagic infarcts (4/6 versus 2/14, P=0.04). Seizures were less frequent in the fatal cases (P=0.05). Patients who died had a larger mean lesion surface than survivors (30.5 versus 13.6 cm2; P=0.03), larger midline shift (5.2 versus 1.7 mm; P=0.02), and a more rapid course (2.7 versus 8.2 days; P=0.01). Five patients who died had large hemispheric infarcts and edema before thrombolysis, causing herniation. Five patients had increased cerebral hemorrhage (3 minor, 2 major) after thrombolysis.
Conclusions— Thrombolysis can be effective for severe sinus thrombosis, but patients may deteriorate because of increased cerebral hemorrhage. Patients with large infarcts and impending herniation did not benefit.
Key Words: sinus thrombosis intracranial thrombolytic therapy
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the clinical trials 10% of the patients treated with heparin had a poor outcome. In a large prospective study of 624 patients, the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT), 13.4% had a poor outcome (dead or dependent, Rankin 3 or worse).5 Most patients (83%) were treated with heparin. Factors associated with a poor outcome were age (>37 years), male sex, coma, mental status disorder, thrombosis of the deep cerebral venous system, intracranial hemorrhage, malignancy, and central nervous system infection. About 30% of patients with one or more of these risk factors had a poor outcome despite treatment with heparin. For these patients endovascular thrombolysis might give better results.
Endovascular thrombolysis dissolves the thrombus by infusion of a thrombolytic drug into the occluded sinuses. It is often combined with mechanical techniques, such as thrombus disruption, thrombosuction with a rheolytic catheter, and thrombus removal with a balloon catheter.6 The theoretical advantage of thrombolysis for CVST is that the drug is delivered where needed, and downstream from cerebral venous—often hemorrhagic—infarcts. Mechanical methods result in more rapid recanalization and increase the surface of the thrombus exposed to thrombolytics. We treated 20 patients with severe CVST with endovascular thrombolysis in a prospective study, analyzed the results, and compared them with results of previous studies.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We performed thrombolysis by introducing a catheter via the internal jugular vein and advancing it into a frontal position in the superior sagittal sinus while the thrombus was dissolved with urokinase (bolus 120 to 600x103 IU). If needed and possible we also entered the straight sinus. The catheter was left in situ, and urokinase was infused locally for variable periods of time, usually 24 hours, at a rate of 100.000 IU/h, depending on the degree of recanalisation. Heparin was continued during thrombolytic therapy. In most cases we also applied thrombosuction with a rheolytic catheter, combined with thrombectomy with a Fogerty-catheter. Sinus recanalisation was examined by contrast injection through the thrombolysis catheter or by intraarterial angiography. We assessed the outcome at follow-up visits or by telephone interview, between 3 and 6 months after treatment. Neurological impairment was expressed as a score on the modified Rankin scale (0=complete recovery; 6=death). We analyzed differences between patients who died and survivors with the Mann–Whitney test for scale variables and with Fisher exact test for nominal variables. We compared the outcome of our patients with outcomes in previously reported case series7–12 and in a review of published case reports.13
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
All patients were treated with heparin (conventional or full dose LMW) at the day of the diagnosis or the next day, except for 1 in whom heparin was delayed 5 days because the referring clinicians considered it contraindicated because of a large hemorrhagic infarct (case 6). Two patients (8 and 12) deteriorated and became comatose during treatment with heparin and improved after thrombolysis. In 15 patients we applied thrombolysis and thrombosuction, in 4 thrombolysis only. In 1 case (patient 19) it was impossible to enter the sinuses because of firm organized thrombus.
Nine patients recovered or had minimal residual symptoms (Rankin 0 or 1), 3 came out with a minor handicap (Rankin 2), 2 had a moderate or severe handicap (Rankin 3 and 4), and 6 died. Patients who died more frequently had leukemia (3/6) and large hemorrhagic infarcts (4/6) as compared to survivors (0/14 and 2/14, respectively; P=0.02 and 0.04). Seizures occurred less frequently in the fatal cases (1/6) than in the surviving patients (10/14; P=0.05). Patients who died had a larger mean lesion size than the survivors (30.5 versus 13.6 cm2; P=0.03), larger mean midline shift (5.2 versus 1.7 mm; P=0.02), and a shorter delay between onset and diagnosis than those who survived (2.7 versus 8.2 days; P=0.01). Other potential risk factors (age, coma, straight sinus thrombosis) were not associated with a fatal outcome.
Death was caused by transtentorial herniation in all patients, confirmed by autopsy in one. Five patients who died were already in early or advanced stages of herniation before thrombolysis, consistent with their large unilateral infarcts with midline shift (patients 1, 5, 7), large bilateral lesions (patients 15 and 16), obliterated basal cisterns, and fixed and dilated pupils (one unilaterally, three bilaterally), all before thrombolysis. Patients 15 and 16 were in a very bad clinical condition, and thrombolysis was performed as a last therapeutic option with very little hope for recovery. Four of the patients who died (5, 7, 15, 17) had an increased amount of intraventricular or parenchymal blood on the CT scan after thrombolysis. Patient 17 had a relatively small left temporal hemorrhagic infarct, which became larger and more hemorrhagic after thrombolysis and caused fatal herniation. In one surviving patient (14) thrombolysis was followed by a hemorrhagic infarct and a large local hemorrhage in the neck from the jugular puncture. She recovered with minor residual symptoms.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Three patients who died suffered from ALL. Sinus thrombosis is a well known complication of ALL.15,16 The combination of ALL and sinus thrombosis has a worse prognosis than each condition separately.16 Factors that contribute to poor outcome are effects of chemotherapy (L-aspariginase) and thrombocytopenia. Two patients with ALL (5 and 7) had some increased intraventricular blood on their CT scan after thrombolysis and low thrombocyte counts of 131 and 43x109/L, respectively. Remarkably, the surviving patients more often had seizures than the patients who died. A possible explanation is that patients with multiple seizures in acute sinus thrombosis can be severely ill with impaired consciousness between seizures, even in the absence of severe infarcts or hemorrhages. The presence of seizures may have caused recruitment of some patients with small cerebral lesions and a good prognosis despite their impaired consciousness, in whom standard treatment with heparin and antiepileptics might have been sufficient for a good outcome.
The first case reports of thrombolysis for CVST were published around 1990, initially by neurosurgeons who introduced a catheter via a burr hole into the superior sagittal sinus or applied open thrombectomy, followed by reports of endovascular treatment. A systematic review of all published cases of thrombolysis for CVST up to July 2001 identified 146 patients in 72 publications of single case reports or uncontrolled case series.13 Six larger series have been published,7–12 the largest containing 20 patients.11 Some baseline data and results from these studies are compared with our study in Table 2. This shows that the outcomes of endovascular treatment probably depend strongly on case mix. The best results were obtained in the 6 case series, in patients with the best baseline conditions, followed by the cases reviewed by Canhão. In comparison, in our study more patients were comatose; they more often had hemorrhagic infarcts before treatment, and had the highest death rate.
The main rationale for endovascular thrombolysis is earlier recanalization of the sinuses. In 2 of our patients this seems to have reversed a relentless deterioration in spite of heparin. However, thrombosed cortical veins are probably not opened by thrombolysis of the sinuses. Also, thrombolysis apparently comes too late for patients with impending herniation. Based on this experience, we changed our policy to hemicraniectomy for such patients. Some promising results have been reported.17,18
In conclusion, our results of endovascular treatment for severe CVST are less favorable than the results of earlier studies, which may be explained in part by publication bias and differences in case mix. A randomized clinical trial to compare endovascular treatment with standard treatment (heparin) in selected patients is needed, but will be difficult to realize in this rare condition.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
Received September 4, 2007; revision received October 2, 2007; accepted October 10, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. De Bruijn SF, Stam J. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of anticoagulant treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin for cerebral sinus thrombosis. Stroke. 1999; 30: 484–488.
3. Nagaraja D, Haridas T, Taly AB, Veerendrakumar M, SubbuKrishna DK. Puerperal cerebral venous thrombosis: therapeutic benefit of low dose heparin. Neurol India. 1999; 47: 43–46.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Stam J, de Bruijn S, deVeber G. Anticoagulation for cerebral sinus thrombosis. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1054–1055.
5. Ferro JM, Canhao P, Stam J, Bousser MG, Barinagarrementeria F. Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: results of the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke. 2004; 35: 664–670.
6. Baker MD, Opatowsky MJ, Wilson JA, Glazier SS, Morris PP. Rheolytic catheter and thrombolysis of dural venous sinus thrombosis: a case series. Neurosurgery. 2001; 48: 487–493.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Tsai FY, Wang AM, Matovich VB, Lavin M, Berberian B, Simonson TM, Yuh WT. MR staging of acute dural sinus thrombosis: correlation with venous pressure measurements and implications for treatment and prognosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995; 16: 1021–1029.[Abstract]
8. Horowitz M, Purdy P, Unwin H, Carstens G, III, Greenlee R, Hise J, Kopitnik T, Batjer H, Rollins N, Samson D. Treatment of dural sinus thrombosis using selective catheterization and urokinase. Ann Neurol. 1995; 38: 58–67.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Kim SY, Suh JH. Direct endovascular thrombolytic therapy for dural sinus thrombosis: infusion of alteplase. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997; 18: 639–645.
10. Frey JL, Muro GJ, McDougall CG, Dean BL, Jahnke HK. Cerebral venous thrombosis: combined intrathrombus rtPA and intravenous heparin. Stroke. 1999; 30: 489–494.
11. Wasay M, Bakshi R, Kojan S, Bobustuc G, Dubey N, Unwin DH. Nonrandomized comparison of local urokinase thrombolysis versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for superior sagittal sinus thrombosis. Stroke. 2001; 32: 2310–2317.
12. Soleau SW, Schmidt R, Stevens S, Osborn A, MacDonald JD. Extensive experience with dural sinus thrombosis. Neurosurgery. 2003; 52: 534–544.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Canhao P, Falcao F, Ferro JM. Thrombolytics for cerebral sinus thrombosis: a systematic review. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003; 15: 159–166.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Canhao P, Ferro JM, Lindgren AG, Bousser MG, Stam J, Barinagarrementeria F. Causes and predictors of death in cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke. 2005; 36: 1720–1725.
15. deVeber G, Andrew M. Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in children. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 417–423.
16. Wermes C, Fleischhack G, Junker R, Schobess R, Schwabe D, Sykora KW, Nowak-Gottl U. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia carrying the MTHFR TT677 genotype and further prothrombotic risk factors. Klin Padiatr. 1999; 211: 211–214.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Stefini R, Latronico N, Cornali C, Rasulo F, Bollati A. Emergent decompressive craniectomy in patients with fixed dilated pupils due to cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis: report of three cases. Neurosurgery. 1999; 45: 626–629.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Keller E, Pangalu A, Fandino J, Konu D, Yonekawa Y. Decompressive craniectomy in severe cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005; 94: 177–183.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Ferro JM, Rodrigues T, Bacelor Nicolau L, Canhao P, Crassard I, Bousser M-G, et al. Development of a risk score to predict the prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis (CVT). Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007; 23 (Suppl 2): 141.[CrossRef]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Coutinho, C. B.L.M. Majoie, B. A. Coert, and J. Stam Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Cerebral Sinus Thrombosis: Consecutive Case Series and Review of the Literature Stroke, June 1, 2009; 40(6): 2233 - 2235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |