| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2008;39:1597.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Research Letters |
From the Departments of Internal Medicine and Cardiology (K.S., T.H., S.I., H.O., T.O., N.S., H.Y., S.E., T.K., M.Y.) and Pathology (M.U.), Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; and the Department of Cardiology (J.Y.), Osaka Ekisaikai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Correspondence to Takeshi Hozumi, MD, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan. E-mail take-hzm{at}wb3.so-net.ne.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods— The study population consisted of 104 stable patients with CAD who had preserved left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction
45%). All patients underwent carotid ultrasound for evaluation of carotid artery plaque score defined by the sum of plaque thickness, maximum percent area stenosis, and carotid arterial stiffness index β calculated by a combination of changes in carotid arterial diameter and blood pressure.
Results— Plaque score and percent area stenosis correlated with the extent of CAD defined as the number of diseased coronary vessels (P<0.001 and 0.002, respectively), but arterial stiffness β did not (P=0.39). Using logistic regression analyses adjusting for confounding coronary risk factors and arterial stiffness β, plaque score and percent area stenosis were independently correlated with multivessel CAD (P=0.001 and 0.004, respectively).
Conclusions— Carotid artery plaque burden, but not arterial stiffness, is associated with the extent of CAD, suggesting morphological rather than functional changes in the carotid artery may be a more accurate predictor of the extent of CAD and multivessel CAD independent of left ventricular function.
Key Words: atherosclerosis carotid arteries coronary artery disease ultrasonography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
45%). Patients were excluded from the study if they had atrial fibrillation or flutter, significant valvular heart disease, acute coronary syndrome, a history of coronary bypass grafting, or carotid surgery. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed using the CMSQCA system (CMS-MEDIS; Medical Imaging System). The extent of CAD was coded as 1, 2, or 3 according to the number of major coronary vessels with luminal stenosis
50% or with a history of percutaneous coronary intervention. Left main stenosis
50% was scored as 2-vessel disease.
Carotid Ultrasound
Carotid scans were acquired using high-resolution ultrasound (SSA-700A Aplio; Toshiba Medical System) with a 7.5-MHz or 12-MHz liner array transducer. Plaque was defined as any focal structure that protruded in the lumen of the vessel for at least intima media thickness >1.1 mm.8 Plaque score (PS) was defined as the sum of the maximal thickness of all plaques in the bilateral carotid arteries in the scanning area.2,8 Maximum percent area stenosis (%AS) was measured as: [1–(the area of residual lumen/the area of the normal vessels)]x100 using serial cross-sectional images on B-mode ultrasound.4 For the assessment of carotid artery stiffness, the maximum (Dmax) and minimum (Dmin) inside diameter of the right common carotid artery was measured approximately 2 cm proximal to the carotid bifurcation at a plaque-free site on M-mode images from the recordings over 5 cardiac cycles.9 Blood pressure was simultaneously measured by cuff sphygmomanometry. Carotid arterial stiffness β was then calculated as follows: β=ln(systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure)/([Dmax–Dmin]/Dmin), where ln is the natural logarithm.5,10
Statistical Analysis
Group differences in continuous variables were assessed with the unpaired Student t test or one-way analysis of variance as appropriate. Subgroup differences were analyzed post hoc using the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Correlations between continuous and categorical variables were assessed with Pearson or Spearman methods as appropriate. Multiple liner regression analyses, including all univariate correlates of PS, with %AS as an independent variable, were performed. For the presence of multivessel coronary artery disease such as 2- or 3-vessel disease, logistic regression analyses were performed. Values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Both PS and %AS correlated with the extent of CAD (r=0.33, P<0.001 and r=0.32, P=0.002, respectively) and there was a stepwise increase in both PS and %AS with the extent of CAD (one-vessel disease versus 2-vessel disease versus 3-vessel disease: 3.2±3.2 versus 5.6±5.0 versus 6.6±4.0 mm, P=0.002 and 15±21 versus 26±18 versus 31±20%, P=0.006, respectively; Figure). PS was significantly associated with body mass index (r=0.21, P=0.035) and hypercholesterolemia (r=0.27, P=0.005) and %AS with body mass index (r=0.31, P=0.002). On multiple regression analysis, the relations of PS and %AS to the extent of CAD remained significant (P<0.001 in both cases).
|
There was no significant correlation between carotid arterial stiffness β and the extent of CAD (P=0.39), and stiffness β was similar among the 3 groups described (one-vessel disease versus 2-vessel disease versus 3-vessel disease: 11.9±3.9 versus 12.0±6.2 versus 13.0±6.3, P=0.63). Stiffness β was significantly associated with age (r=0.31, P=0.001) and smoking (r=0.22, P=0.024).
On logistic regression analyses after adjusting for age, body mass index, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and stiffness β, PS (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.48; P=0.001) and %AS (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.09; P=0.004) correlated independently with the presence of multivessel CAD (Table 2).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A direct association between functional changes of artery and coronary atherosclerosis has been reported in previous studies.5,6 However, these studies concluded that this association was stronger for aortic stiffness than carotid arterial stiffness, suggesting that in the larger artery, stiffness could be a significant marker of the severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Within a patient group with preserved LV function in the present study, we did not find a significant relationship between carotid arterial stiffness and the extent of CAD. Recently, several studies have demonstrated that carotid arterial stiffness is closely associated with LV systolic and diastolic function in patients with hypertension and CAD.7 Thus, a possible explanation for our results may be because this study population excluded patients with multivessel CAD with LV dysfunction accompanied by markedly high carotid arterial stiffness. Furthermore, in the previous studies,5,6 there was a significant difference in carotid arterial stiffness between patients without CAD and patients with multivessel CAD, but only a modest difference among patients with CAD. Therefore, carotid arterial stiffness might be similar in the limited population comprising only patients with CAD in this study.
As a limitation of this study, we assessed only carotid arterial stiffness β as the functional parameter. Although the arterial stiffness β is less affected by arterial pressure changes and more useful than other parameters,5,10 other functional parameters need to be confirmed in future investigations.
Conclusion
Morphological changes in the carotid artery may be better predictors of the extent of CAD and multivessel CAD, independent of LV function, than functional changes.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
Received August 22, 2007; accepted September 21, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Tanaka H, Nishino M, Ishida M, Fukunaga R, Sueyoshi K. Progression of carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease. Stroke. 1992; 23: 946–951.
3. Kallikazaros I, Tsioufis C, Sideris S, Stefanadis C, Toutouzas P. Carotid artery disease as a marker for the presence of severe coronary artery disease in patients evaluated for chest pain. Stroke. 1999; 30: 1002–1007.
4. Tanimoto S, Ikari Y, Tanabe K, Yachi S, Nakajima H, Nakayama T, Hatori M, Nakazawa G, Onuma Y, Higashikuni Y, Yamamoto H, Tooda E, Hara K. Prevalence of carotid artery stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease in Japanese population. Stroke. 2005; 36: 2094–2098.
5. Hirai T, Sasayama S, Kawasaki T, Yagi S. Stiffness of systemic arteries in patients with myocardial infarction. A noninvasive method to predict severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1989; 80: 78–86.
6. Giannattasio C, Capra A, Facchetti R, Viscardi L, Bianchi F, Failla M, Colombo V, Grieco A, Mancia G. Relationship between arterial distensibility and coronary atherosclerosis in angina patients. J Hypertens. 2007; 25: 593–598.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Vinereanu D, Nicolaides E, Boden L, Payne N, Jones CJ, Fraser AG. Conduit arterial stiffness is associated with impaired left ventricular subendocardial function. Heart. 2003; 89: 449–450.
8. Handa N, Matsumoto M, Maeda H, Hougaku H, Kamada T. Ischemic stroke events and carotid atherosclerosis: results of the Osaka Follow-up Study for Ultrasonographic Assessment of Carotid Atherosclerosis (the OSACA Study). Stroke. 1995; 26: 1781–1786.
9. Juo SH, Rundek T, Lin HF, Cheng R, Lan MY, Huang JS, Boden-Albala B, Sacco RL. Heritability of carotid artery distensibility in Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Family Study. Stroke. 2005; 36: 2357–2361.
10. Sugioka K, Hozumi T, Sciacca RR, Miyake Y, Titova I, Gaspard G, Sacco RL, Homma S, Di Tullio MR. Impact of aortic stiffness on ischemic stroke in elderly patients. Stroke. 2002; 33: 2077–2081.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |