Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:1890-1893
Published online before print May 15, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.509885
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/6/1890    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.509885v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow patientINFORMation
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerse, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kerse, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical
Right arrow Epidemiology

(Stroke. 2008;39:1890.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Research Letters

Falls After Stroke

Results From the Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) Study, 2002 to 2003

Ngaire Kerse, PhD; Varsha Parag, MSc; Valery L. Feigin, PhD; Harry McNaughton, PhD; Maree L. Hackett, PhD; Derrick A. Bennett, PhD; Craig S. Anderson, PhD the Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) Study Group

From the School of Population Health (N.K.), University of Auckland, New Zealand; the Clinical Trials Research Unit (V.P., V.L.F., M.L.H., C.S.A.), University of Auckland, New Zealand; the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand (H.M.), Wellington, New Zealand; the George Institute for International Health (M.L.H., C.S.A.), University of Sydney and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia; and the Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (D.A.B.), University of Oxford, UK.

Correspondence to A/Prof Ngaire Kerse, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail n.kerse{at}auckland.ac.nz

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Falls are an important issue in older people. We aimed to determine the incidence, circumstances, and predictors of falls in patients with recent acute stroke.

Methods— The Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) study was a prospective population-based stroke incidence study conducted in Auckland, New Zealand (NZ) during 2002 to 2003. Among 6-month survivors, the location and consequences of any falls were ascertained by self-report as part of a structured interview. Multivariable logistic regression was used to establish associations between risk factors and "any" and "injurious" falls.

Results— Of 1104 stroke survivors who completed an interview, 407 (37%) reported at least 1 fall, 151 (37% of fallers, 14% of stroke survivors) sustained an injury that required medical treatment, and 31 (8% of fallers, 3% of stroke survivors) sustained a fracture. The majority of falls occurred indoors at home. Independent factors associated with falls were depressive symptoms, disability, previous falls, and older age. For injurious falls, the positively associated factors were female sex and NZ/European ethnicity and dependence before the stroke, whereas higher levels of activity and normal cognition were negatively associated factors.

Conclusions— Falls are common after stroke, and their predictive factors are similar to those for older people in general. Falls prevention programs require implementation in stroke services.


Key Words: falls • injury • stroke • risk factors

Falls are an important public health issue, with 30% of all older people falling and 10% sustaining injury.1 For those who have a stroke, the consequences of falls add to their morbidity.2 Preventative strategies including activity programs and home hazard assessments reduce the risk of falls in community dwelling individuals.3 We aimed to determine the frequency, circumstances, and predictors of falls and fall-related injury after stroke.

Methods

The Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) study details have been described elsewhere.4 In brief, multiple overlapping sources were used to ascertain all first-ever and recurrent cases of stroke among residents (aged ≥15 years) of Auckland, NZ over 12-month calendar period in 2002 to 2003. The Auckland Ethics Committee approved the study.

Measures
All patients (or their proxy) were interviewed by a trained research nurse after onset and at 1 and 6 months poststroke. Baseline information included demographics, medical history, history of falls, and use of psychotropic medication. Each stroke was categorized into a major underlying pathological type (neuroimaging was used in over 90%). Level of severity was based on the Barthel index in the week after onset categorised as "independent" (score 20), "intermediate" (scores 10 to 19), and "dependent" (scores 0 to 10) for analyses.

During follow-up, "cognitively competent" patients were defined on the basis of them scoring greater than 6 on the Hodkinson Mental Test (HMT). Higher levels of functioning were assessed using the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), scored from 15 ("low") to 45 ("high"). Mood was evaluated using a single question "Do you often feel sad or depressed?".

Falls and Injury
The question: "Have you fallen in the last 6 months?" and "if so how many times?" and the question "Have you received medical treatment for a fall?" were answered. The location of the fall(s) was also recorded and receipt of medical treatment was a proxy for injury.

Statistical Analyses
All analyses were restricted to patients who survived to 6 months poststroke and completed the interview questions. Exposure variables were compared between patients with and without falls, and with and without "injurious falls." In univariate logistic regression models, the significance of independent variables (including all demographic, health, medication, physical, and psychological function) and dependent outcome (falls) were determined. Variables that demonstrated significant association (P<0.2) with the outcome in univariate models were considered for inclusion in a multivariable model. The initial covariate selection procedure for multiple logistic regression used the backward selection algorithm available in SAS 9.1 using complete participant analysis. The following variables were forced into all models: age, sex, prestroke history of falls, previous stroke at baseline, and cognition (HMT) score. When there was considerable correlation between variables, the variable with the most significant contribution to the model was included. Variables were retained in the final model if they remained significant (P<0.05). A sensitivity analysis compared those sustaining injury with those who had not fallen (excluding those who fell but did not sustain injury).

Results

Of a total of 1938 stroke patients registered initially, 608 had died and 158 were unavailable for interview at 6 months. Of 1172 6-month stroke survivors, 1104 answered the questions about falls; those unable to contribute such information were more dependent but had similar age, sex, and stroke subtype profile to those with this information. Before their stroke 314 (28%) participants had fallen. Of the 407 (37% of participants, 34% of all survivors) who reported a fall in the 6 months since their stroke, 149 (37%) had fallen before the stroke. Almost a half of fallers fell only once (196, 48%), and 43 (12%) fell more than 5 times. Of those who had fallen since the stroke, one third (51, 37% of fallers) reported receiving medical treatment and 31 (8% of fallers, 3% of stroke survivors) sustained a fracture. Most patients had sustained their fall at home (77%), and 77% of the falls had occurred indoors. Of the 93 patients who fell away from home, 42 (45%) had fallen indoors.

Table 1 shows a comparison between fallers and nonfallers. Age, prior fall, previous stroke, premorbid dependency, medication use, poor cognitive status, abnormal mood, and high levels of activity were associated with falls after stroke. Table 2 shows that sex was, and premorbid dependency was not, associated with fall-related injury after stroke.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients by Fall Status During Follow-Up After Stroke


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Characteristics of Those Sustaining Injury From Fall (n=151) Compared With All Other Stroke Survivors (n=951, Including Those Sustaining Noninjurious Fall) at 6 Months

Table 3 shows that in a multivariable model, prior falls, increased age, low levels of functioning, and abnormal mood were independent risk factors for falls. Sustaining an injurious fall was related to female sex, NZ/European ethnicity and poor cognitive function, whereas high FAI levels and premorbid dependency were negatively associated. Our sensitivity analysis achieved similar results.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Independent Risk Factors for Falls and Injurious Falls Among Stroke Survivors at 6 Months*

Discussion

This large population-based study has shown that stroke patients are at high risk of falls and injury. Our finding, that 37% of stroke patients fall in 6 months, is much higher than reported previously,2 and is higher than for older people in long-term residential care.1 These findings emphasize the need to incorporate falls prevention strategies in stroke services.

We found a high frequency of fractures (3% overall; 8% of fallers in 6 months), which is greater than seen among people in long-term residential care over 12 months (3% to 5%).5 Interestingly, type of stroke was not related to fall risk. The factors associated with falls observed here are similar to those identified in residential care and community populations.1 As home hazard assessment prevents falls3 it would seem reasonable for such strategies to be incorporated in resettlement at home. Although the relationship between mobility and falls is complex, fall prevention activity programs are effective3 and should be considered as part of rehabilitation after stroke.

Stroke survivors with abnormal mood were more likely to have sustained a fall. However, as mood was ascertained cross-sectionally, it is possible that falls themselves triggered the onset of depression. Other studies have shown an association between abnormal gait pattern and depression in older people,6 suggesting that falls are based more on abnormal physiology than abnormal psychology. Depression is also an independent risk factor for fractures.7 Falls and depression will complicate recovery from stroke, and irrespective of the direction of causality, both require appropriate prevention, early recognition, and nonpharmacological intervention.

A limitation of this study is that some patients were unable to participate in the follow-up assessments. Nonparticipants had higher levels of disability than participants, suggesting that we may have underestimated the frequency of falls and the impact of functional status as a risk factor. Furthermore, we were unable to obtain specific physical performance measures. Our use of patient recall to ascertain falls was less accurate than using calendar diaries and almost certainly underestimated frequency of falls.8

In summary, our study confirms that falls and fall-related injury are major morbidity issues among patients with stroke. Falls prevention interventions should be emphasized as part of routine stroke rehabilitation services.

Acknowledgments

We thank the research nurses, the ARCOS participants and their families and friends, and the ARCOS Steering Committee.

Sources of Funding

The study was funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand. During the completion of this work Maree Hackett was in receipt of an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, and Ngaire Kerse was supported by a visiting scholarship to the Robert Graham Center of the American Academy of Family Physicians. Neither funding body had a role in the conduct or reporting of this report.

Disclosures

None.

Received November 14, 2007; accepted December 3, 2007.

References

  1. American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel of Fall Prevention. Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001; 49: 664–672.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Langhorne P, Stott DJ, Robertson L, MacDonald J, Jones L, McAlpine C, Dick F, Taylor GS, Murray G. Medical complications after stroke: A multicenter study. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1223–1229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Gillespie L, Gillespie W, Robertson M, Lamb S, Cumming R, Rowe B. Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. Cochr Datab Syst Rev. 2006; 4.
  4. Anderson C, Carter K, Hackett M, Feigin V, Barber P, Broad J, Bonita R. on behalf of the Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) Study Group. Trends in stroke incidence in Auckland, New Zealand, during 1981 to 2003. Stroke. 2005; 36: 2087–2093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cali C, Kiel D. An epidemiologic study of fall-related fractures among institutionalised older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995; 43: 1336–1340.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Herman T, Giladi N, Gurevich T, Hausdorff JM. Gait instability and fractal dynamics of older adults with a "cautious" gait: Why do certain older adults walk fearfully? Gait Post. 2005; 21: 178–185.[CrossRef]
  7. Whooley MA, Kip KE, Cauley JA, Ensrud KE, Nevitt MC, Browner WS. Depression, falls, and risk of fracture in older women. Study of osteoporotic fractures research group. Arch Int Med. 1999; 159: 484–490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Perry B. Falls among the elderly: A review of the methods and conclusions of epidemiological studies. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1982; 30: 367–371.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Find additional patient-related information at:

Read a summary of this article at americanheart.org



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/6/1890    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.509885v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow patientINFORMation
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerse, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kerse, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical
Right arrow Epidemiology