Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:e107
Published online before print May 22, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.516922
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/7/e107    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.516922v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reitz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Breteler, M. M.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reitz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Breteler, M. M.B.

(Stroke. 2008;39:e107.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Response to Letter by Thacker

Christiane Reitz, MD, PhD Monique M.B. Breteler, MD, PhD

Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Response:

We appreciate the interest by Dr Thacker in our study exploring the relation between stroke and poststroke dementia (PSD) and the impact of prestroke level of cognitive function on this relationship.1

In our study incident stroke was associated with a more than doubled risk of subsequent dementia, and this association was independent on prestroke cognitive function and other risk factors for cognitive decline. In Kaplan–Meier analyses (the Figure), the cumulative proportion of survivors in persons without incident stroke was 97.6%. Among this group (n=6011), dementia-free survival was 96.0% in persons with an MMSE score of <26 at study entry, and 98.8% in persons with an MMSE score of ≥26, corresponding with an age, sex, education and APOE genotype adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for dementia of 1.9 (1.53 to 2.34) for people with a low versus a high MMSE score at study entry. In individuals experiencing a stroke during follow-up (n=713), the cumulative proportion of survivors without dementia at the end of the follow-up period was 87.8% in the group with a MMSE score of <26 at last follow-up before incident stroke, and 92.5% in the group with a MMSE score of ≥26 at last follow-up before stroke, corresponding to an age, sex, education and APOE genotype adjusted hazard ratio for dementia of 1.5 (1.02; 1.96) for people with a low versus a high MMSE score before stroke.


Figure 1516922
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure. Age- and sex-adjusted cumulative proportion of persons surviving without developing dementia.

In Cox models relating the individual effect of incident stroke as a time-varying exposure with the risk of poststroke dementia, persons with incident stroke had a 2-fold increased risk of subsequent dementia compared to persons remaining free of stroke during follow-up. This risk did not differ between strata of MMSE performance before stroke (sex, age, education, and apoE{epsilon}4 genotype adjusted hazard ratio for high prestroke MMSE score 2.1 (95% CI, 1.53 to 2.94) and for low prestroke MMSE score 2.1 (95% CI, 1.51 to 2.90).

We fully agree that a mere dichotomization of probability values at the completely arbitrary cut-off level of 0.05 is uninformative, which is why we presented the absolute probability values. Indeed, effect estimates in combination with the confidence intervals of those effect estimates better reflect the information in the data than probability values. When we explored the impact of prestroke cognitive function on the association between incident stroke and subsequent dementia by adding an interaction term to the model that contained variables for incident stroke (yes/no) and prestroke cognitive performance, the estimate of the interaction term of incident strokexprestroke cognitive performance was close to 1.0 (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.79, P=0.7) strongly suggesting that the effect of stroke on cognitive function is truly independent of prestroke cognitive function.

Acknowledgments

Disclosures

None.

References

1. Reitz C, Bos MJ, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM. Prestroke cognitive performance, incident stroke, and risk of dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 2008; 39: 36–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/7/e107    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.516922v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reitz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Breteler, M. M.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reitz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Breteler, M. M.B.