Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:2226-2230
Published online before print June 19, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504498
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/8/2226    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.504498v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines

(Stroke. 2008;39:2226.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Associations of Proinflammatory Cytokines With the Risk of Recurrent Stroke

Paul Welsh, BSc; Gordon D.O. Lowe, DSc; John Chalmers, MD, PhD; Duncan J. Campbell, MD, PhD; Ann Rumley, PhD; Bruce C. Neal, PhD; Stephen W. MacMahon, PhD Mark Woodward, PhD

From the Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences (P.W., G.D.O.L., A.R., M.W.), University of Glasgow, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland; The George Institute for International Health (J.C., B.C.N., S.W.M., M.W.), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; St. Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research and the Department of Medicine (D.J.C.), University of Melbourne, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; and Mount Sinai Medical School (M.W.), New York, NY.

Correspondence to Prof Gordon D.O. Lowe, Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth Building, Royal Infirmary, 10 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK. E-mail g.d.lowe{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— There are few reports on proinflammatory cytokines and risk of primary or recurrent stroke. We studied the association of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) with recurrent stroke in a nested case-control study derived from the Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS).

Methods— We performed a nested case-control study of 591 strokes (472 ischemic, 83 hemorrhagic, 36 unknown subtype) occurring during a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of perindopril-based therapy in 6105 patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Controls were matched for age, treatment group, sex, region, and most recent qualifying event at entry to the parent trial.

Results— IL-6 and TNF-{alpha}, but not IL-18, were associated with risk of recurrent ischemic stroke independently of conventional risk markers. Adjusted odds ratios comparing the highest to lowest third of their distributions were 1.33 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.78) for IL-6 and 1.46 (1.02 to 2.10) for TNF-{alpha}. No inflammatory marker was associated with hemorrhagic stroke risk. In multivariable models, IL-6 and TNF-{alpha} fully explained observed associations of C-reactive protein and fibrinogen with risk of ischemic stroke, but TNF-{alpha} retained borderline significance after full adjustment.

Conclusions— Inflammatory markers associated with the acute-phase response (IL-6, TNF-{alpha}, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen, but not IL-18) are associated with risk of recurrent stroke. These markers are dependent on each other in multivariable models, and once all were included, only TNF-{alpha} retained a borderline association. Markers of generalized inflammation of the acute-phase response are associated with recurrent stroke, rather than IL-6, C-reactive protein, or fibrinogen in particular.


Key Words: stroke • inflammation • acute-phase response • epidemiology


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
There is increasing evidence that inflammatory variables are associated with atherogenesis and predict risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).1,2 The acute-phase reactants C-reactive protein (CRP)3 and fibrinogen4 have been shown to predict risk of primary ischemic stroke. One recent report suggests that CRP may be a better risk predictor for stroke than for coronary heart disease (CHD),5 another that the associations are similar,6 and 1 that CRP is a moderate predictor of ischemic stroke risk and adds no information to the Framingham assessment.7 The association between stroke risk and proinflammatory markers therefore requires further investigation. It is possible that inflammatory markers "upstream" of the acute-phase response (APR) may explain associations between acute-phase reactants (such as CRP and fibrinogen) and CV events.1 Prediction of recurrent stroke is clinically important. We have previously demonstrated that CRP and fibrinogen predict risk of recurrent ischemic stroke independently of conventional stroke risk markers,8 and a meta-analysis of 3 other studies has also shown this association with fibrinogen.9

The proinflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) have all been implicated as risk markers for CHD.10–19 This association may reflect observed experimental roles in atherogenesis and atherothrombosis for these markers,20–25 although caution must be used in implicating causality.2 Despite recent interest in positive associations of IL-6 gene polymorphisms with stroke,26–29 this biomarker has been understudied as a risk marker for ischemic stroke, and IL-18 and TNF-{alpha} have only been prospectively studied as risk markers of stroke in cohort studies with composite end points and few stroke patients.17–19 We aimed to extend current data by examining the association between IL-6, IL-18, and TNF-{alpha} and recurrent stroke, as well as relating these to the associations of fibrinogen and CRP with recurrent stroke, which we have previously reported.8


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The design,30 principal results,31 and case-control study results8 of the Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) have been published previously. In brief, in the principal study, 6105 patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack were recruited, and each patient was randomly assigned active treatment (n=3051) or placebo (n=3054). For those deemed suitable by the responsible physician, mono or dual therapy was allocated: perindopril and/or indapamide, or single/double placebo. Patients were followed up for a mean of 3.9 years, during which time stroke occurred in 307 (10%) in the active treatment group and in 420 (14%) in the placebo group (relative risk reduction=28%; 95% CI, 17 to 38; P<0.0001). At baseline, venous blood samples collected from 5918 (97%) patients were anticoagulated with K2EDTA and centrifuged at 2000g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Aliquots (1.5 mL) of plasma were stored at –80°C. Owing to the high proportion of patients from whom blood samples were taken, no imputation of the missing samples was necessary.

The base population for the case-control study comprised all those who had plasma frozen and stored within 48 hours of venipuncture and whose most recent qualifying event (classified as ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or transient ischemic attack) at baseline in the clinical trial occurred >1 month ago. These restrictions give protection against deterioration of the blood samples and confounding attributable to acute-phase reactant increases in blood variables as a result of the incident stroke or its acute complications.

Stroke cases comprised anyone with a stroke recorded during follow-up. By standard methodology for nested case-control studies and as previously described,8 each case was randomly matched to between 1 and 3 controls selected from all those free of recurrent stroke at the time of recurrent stroke for that case. Matching variables were age, sex, treatment allocation, therapy, region, and most recent qualifying event at trial baseline, the latter variable being the best classification available to us to describe a patient’s previous CV history. Prespecified ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke substudies isolated those cases and their matched controls who had ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes as their first recorded stroke event.

Plasma fibrinogen and high-sensitivity CRP were both measured by immunonephelometry as previously described.8 IL-18, high-sensitivity IL-6, and high-sensitivity TNF-{alpha} were all assayed by ELISA (R&D Systems, Oxon, UK). Intra-assay variation was 5.6% for IL-18, 7.5% for IL-6, and 8.4% for TNF-{alpha}. Corresponding interassay coefficients were 10.4%, 8.9%, and 12.5%, respectively.

We compared inflammatory markers and potential confounding variables between cases and unique controls by t tests or the {chi}2 test, as appropriate. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated according to equal thirds of the distributions of each of the inflammatory markers, and trends across these thirds were tested by using conditional logistic-regression models.32 These were computed both with and without adjustment for potential confounding factors (systolic blood pressure, smoking, prevalence of peripheral artery disease, statin use, and antiplatelet use) not controlled for in the matching variables. A previous report from this study8 that used identical methods found fibrinogen and CRP to have independent effects on ischemic stroke, but not on hemorrhagic stroke. Thus, another model added these 2 additional inflammatory variables to the adjustment set, together with the inflammatory variables measured for the current report, to assess the relative independent contributions of the inflammatory markers to risk of ischemic stroke.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this nested case-control study, there were 591 cases (472 ischemic strokes, 83 hemorrhagic strokes, and 36 of unknown type) and 1182 controls who did not subsequently become cases. In this substudy of PROGRESS, there were few missing values for IL-6, IL-18, fibrinogen, or CRP (<1%) but several for TNF-{alpha}, because of its being the last of the assays performed on the limited available plasma samples. Sample sizes for TNF-{alpha} were 433 cases and 859 controls (73% of the total).

Table 1 summarizes the baseline demographic data and shows risk factor data according to whether the subject became a case or not during PROGRESS. In the ischemic stroke group, IL-6 was significantly (P=0.003) higher in cases than in controls (but not IL-18 or TNF-{alpha}), as were several conventional risk factors for stroke (complete results shown previously8). In the hemorrhagic stroke study, there were no significant differences in cases and controls for the cytokines, nor for any conventional CV risk factors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Baseline Summary Data for All Subjects in the Nested Case-Control Study Classified by Whether or Not They Developed Either of the Major Subtypes of Stroke During PROGRESS

On analysis by thirds of their distributions, none of the cytokines showed significant associations with hemorrhagic stroke (Table 2). The highest third of TNF-{alpha} had a moderately elevated risk compared with the lowest third, the adjusted OR being 1.23, although the 95% CI was wide (0.55 to 2.75) owing to small numbers. For ischemic stroke, IL-6 showed a stepwise increase in OR across thirds, and although the trend was reduced to borderline significance after adjustment for conventional risk factors, the highest third still had an increased risk compared with the lowest: OR=1.33; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.78. TNF-{alpha} showed somewhat similar associations, although the significance of its trend was entirely due to the excess risk comparing the highest with the lowest third: OR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.10, after adjustment. For total stroke, both IL-6 and TNF-{alpha} had a more significant trend in risk across thirds compared with the major subtypes of stroke (owing to increased case numbers and smaller CIs). Estimates of associations were relatively unaffected by the addition of hemorrhagic and unknown strokes to ischemic stroke (largely owing to the predominance of ischemic stroke). IL-18 showed no association with risk of hemorrhagic, ischemic, or total stroke in any model.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. ORs (95% CIs) for Hemorrhagic, Ischemic, and Total Stroke by Thirds of Each Variable

Previously,8 we found significant independent effects of fibrinogen and CRP: comparing the extreme thirds, the OR for fibrinogen was 1.34 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.78) and for CRP it was 1.39 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.85), after adjustment for systolic blood pressure, smoking, prevalent peripheral artery disease, statin use, and antiplatelet use. A summary of a multivariable model, including classic risk markers and all 5 inflammatory markers at once, is shown in Table 3. Inclusion of all 5 markers in the same model produced ORs for any of the markers with ischemic stroke to near unity, with the exception of the OR comparing the extreme thirds of TNF-{alpha}, which was 1.43 (95% CI, 0.98 to 2.10) and hence borderline significant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. ORs (95% CIs) for Ischemic Stroke by Thirds for Each of the 5 Variables Adjusted for the Other 4 and for Systolic Blood Pressure, Smoking, Peripheral Artery Disease Prevalence, Statin Use, Diabetes, and Antiplatelet Use


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
To our knowledge, this is the first reported study of the association between the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-18, and TNF-{alpha} and risk of recurrent stroke. We found that IL-6 and TNF-{alpha}, but not IL-18, were significant risk predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke. IL-6 appeared to show stepwise increases in risk through thirds of this population, although the trend was less notable after adjusting for potential confounders. For TNF-{alpha}, only the top third of the population was at statistically increased risk after adjusting for classic risk factors. This finding is consistent with a previous study of recurrent myocardial infarction, which found that only those with very high TNF-{alpha} expression were at increased risk.15

The absence of an association of any of the inflammatory markers with hemorrhagic stroke may be due to small numbers, although we believe it is more likely that the observed differences are due to differing underlying pathologies of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Chronic low-grade inflammation is believed to be a key factor in atherogenesis,1,2,20–25 which may ultimately lead to the atherothrombotic complications of plaque rupture such as ischemic stroke. In contrast, hemorrhagic stroke often occurs as a result of rupture of small intraparenchymal vessels, and such events are often the result of hypertension or other factors not necessarily directly causally related to atherosclerosis or inflammation.33

A major biologic property of IL-6 and TNF-{alpha} is that these cytokines may actively participate in the hepatic stimulation of the APR.1 There is little evidence to suggest that IL-18, which was not associated with any major stroke subtype in this study, directly contributes to the APR.34 As we have previously noted in this study,8 the acute-phase reactant behavior of fibrinogen, CRP, or any inflammatory marker may be viewed as a potential confounder of associations with recurrent stroke. This is because the underlying association may be due to "generalized inflammation" (as proximally measured by the APR) rather than the causal behavior of any individual inflammatory marker per se.2 However, adjusting acute-phase reactants (CRP and fibrinogen) only for each other to remove potential APR confounding assumes that the APR is an absolute event, with roughly equal effects on circulating CRP and fibrinogen levels. This may not be an accurate assumption.35

By simultaneously adjusting for CRP, fibrinogen, IL-6, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-18 (not associated with risk), we have shown that markers of the APR (fibrinogen and CRP) and the chief stimulator of the APR (IL-6) almost completely explain each other’s association with recurrent stroke. This suggests that despite evidence that IL-6, IL-18, and TNF-{alpha} are involved in experimental atherogenesis and atherothrombosis,20–25 potential associations with recurrent stroke are almost fully explained by conventional risk markers and proximity to the APR. Equally, this suggests that CRP and fibrinogen themselves are associated with recurrent stroke because they are acute-phase reactants rather than that they necessarily make additional inflammatory contributions to atherothrombosis. The exception to this trend is TNF-{alpha}, which retained borderline associations with risk of recurrent ischemic stroke in this cohort after adjusting for conventional risk factors and the APR. TNF-{alpha} is a pluripotent cytokine and may be involved in atherogenesis and atherothrombosis in mechanisms independent of the APR, perhaps particularly in those with very high circulating concentrations of the cytokine,15 eg, in those with rheumatoid arthritis.36 Despite this, the risk association in the current cohort by thirds of the population is modest and unlikely to provide appreciable clinical utility, although this requires verification in larger cohorts. The lack of association of IL-18 with risk of recurrent stroke is in contrast to some studies that prospectively showed that IL-18 was associated with risk of CHD events.13,14 However, this finding has not been universal in cohorts after full adjustment for potential confounders in multivariable models.37 Thus, IL-18 may be related to CHD as a heavily confounded variable, such as by associations with lipid parameters, which are not strongly related to ischemic stroke.38 Residual associations of IL-18 with CHD risk may be due to specific roles in inflammatory pathways (eg, interferon-{gamma}–dependent atherogenesis39), which have yet to be directly related to risk of recurrent ischemic stroke.

Just as caution must be used in drawing conclusions of causality in epidemiologic studies,2 it is equally important not to exclude causality on the same basis. It is quite possible (perhaps probable) that some inflammatory markers actively participate in atherogenesis and atherothrombosis, at least partially through other conventional risk factors (eg, the association of inflammation with smoking or cholesterol levels). However, associations of inflammatory markers of the APR (IL-6, CRP, and fibrinogen) with recurrent stroke were fully explained by conventional risk markers and APR confounding in this model. This suggests that from the inflammatory markers measured in this study, it is only "general inflammation" rather than a particular marker that is strongly associated with secondary ischemic stroke. More studies are required to expand on these findings, both for primary and secondary stroke as well as CHD.

Summary
Inflammatory markers associated with the APR (IL-6, TNF-{alpha}, CRP, and fibrinogen, but not IL-18) are associated with risk of recurrent stroke. These markers are dependent on each other in multivariable models, and once all were included, only TNF-{alpha} retained a borderline association. This suggests that markers of generalized inflammation of the APR are associated with recurrent stroke, rather than IL-6, CRP, or fibrinogen in particular.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

This study was funded by grants from the Australian Health Management Group, National Institutes of Health (5 R01 HL071685), the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, and the National Heart Foundation of Australia. B.C.N. is a recipient of a career development award from the National Heart Foundation of Australia. D.J.C. is a recipient of a Senior Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (grant ID 395508). PROGRESS was funded by grants from Servier, the Health Research Council of New Zealand, and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

Disclosures

Duncan Campell has had research contracts with Solvay Pharmaceutical Company and Novartis in the last 5 years and has been a member of an advisory board for Novartis. John Chalmers and Stephen MacMahon hold research grants from Servier, as Chief Investigators for PROGRESS and ADVANCE, administered by the University of Sydney. John Chalmers, Bruce Neal, Mark Woodward, and Stephen MacMahon have received honoraria from Servier for speaking in relation to PROGRESS and/or ADVANCE at scientific meetings.

Received October 17, 2007; revision received December 24, 2007; accepted January 8, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1685–1695.[Free Full Text]

2. Lowe GD. Circulating inflammatory markers and risks of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular disease. J Thromb Haemost. 2005; 3: 1618–1627.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Di Napoli M, Schwaninger M, Cappelli R, Ceccarelli E, Di Gianfilippo G, Donati C, Emsley HC, Forconi S, Hopkins SJ, Masotti L, Muir KW, Paciucci A, Papa F, Roncacci S, Sander D, Sander K, Smith CJ, Stefanini A, Weber D. Evaluation of C-reactive protein measurement for assessing the risk and prognosis in ischemic stroke: a statement for health care professionals from the CRP Pooling Project members. Stroke. 2005; 36: 1316–1329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Fibrinogen Studies Collaboration. Plasma fibrinogen level and the risk of major cardiovascular diseases and nonvascular mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005; 294: 1799–1809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Everett BM, Kurth T, Buring JE, Ridker PM. The relative strength of C-reactive protein and lipid levels as determinants of ischemic stroke compared with coronary heart disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48: 2235–2242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Tzoulaki I, Murray GD, Lee AJ, Rumley A, Lowe GD, Fowkes FG. Relative value of inflammatory, hemostatic, and rheological factors for incident myocardial infarction and stroke: the Edinburgh Artery Study. Circulation. 2007; 115: 2119–2127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Bos MJ, Schipper CM, Koudstaal PJ, Witteman JC, Hofman A, Breteler MM. High serum C-reactive protein level is not an independent predictor for stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1591–1598.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Woodward M, Lowe GD, Campbell DJ, Colman S, Rumley A, Chalmers J, Neal BC, Patel A, Jenkins AJ, Kemp BE, MacMahon SW. Associations of inflammatory and hemostatic variables with the risk of recurrent stroke. Stroke. 2005; 36: 2143–2147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Power DA, Gutnikov SA, Algra A, van Gijn J, Clark TG, Murphy MFG, Warlow CP, Cerebrovascular Cohort Studies Collaboration. Fibrinogen concentration and risk of ischemic stroke and acute coronary events in 5113 patients with transient ischemic attack and minor ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2004; 35: 2300–2305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N. C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 836–843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rossow JE, Siscovick DS, Mouton CP, Rifai N, Wallace RB, Jackson RD, Pettinger MB, Ridker PM. Inflammatory biomarkers, hormone replacement therapy, and incident coronary heart disease: prospective analysis from the Women’s Health Initiative observational study. JAMA. 2002; 288: 980–987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Lowe GD, Rumley A, McMahon AD, Ford I, O'Reilly DS, Packard CJ. Interleukin-6, fibrin D-dimer, and coagulation factors VII and XIIa in prediction of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 1529–1534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Blankenberg S, Tiret L, Bickel C, Peetz D, Cambien F, Meyer J, Rupprecht HJ, AtheroGene Investigators. Interleukin-18 is a strong predictor of cardiovascular death in stable and unstable angina. Circulation. 2002; 106: 24–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Blankenberg S, Luc G, Ducimetiere P, Arveiler D, Ferrieres J, Amouyel P, Evans A, Cambien F, Tiret L. Interleukin-18 and the risk of coronary heart disease in European men: the Prospective Epidemiological Study of Myocardial Infarction (PRIME). Circulation. 2003; 108: 2453–2459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer M, Sacks F, Lepage S, Braunwald E. Elevation of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and increased risk of recurrent coronary events after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2149–2153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Koukkunen H, Penttila K, Kemppainen A, Halinen M, Penttila I, Rantanen T, Pyorala K. C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} in the prognostic classification of unstable angina pectoris. Ann Med. 2001; 33: 37–47.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Cesari M, Penninx BW, Newman AB, Kritchevsky SB, Nicklas BJ, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Rubin SM, Ding J, Simonsick EM, Harris TB, Pahor M. Inflammatory markers and onset of cardiovascular events: results from the Health ABC study. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2317–2322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Kip KE, Marroquin OC, Shaw LJ, Arant CB, Wessel TR, Olson MB, Johnson BD, Mulukutla S, Sopko G, Merz CN, Reis SE. Global inflammation predicts cardiovascular risk in women: a report from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Am Heart J. 2005; 150: 900–906.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Blankenberg S, McQueen MJ, Smieja M, Pogue J, Balion C, Lonn E, Rupprecht HJ, Bickel C, Tiret L, Cambien F, Gerstein H, Munzel T, Yusuf S, HOPE Study Investigators. Comparative impact of multiple biomarkers and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in the context of conventional risk factors for the prediction of recurrent cardiovascular events in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study. Circulation. 2006; 114: 201–208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Mallat Z, Corbaz A, Scoazec A, Besnard S, Leseche G, Chvatchko Y, Tedgui A. Expression of interleukin-18 in human atherosclerotic plaques and relation to plaque instability. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1598–1603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Barath P, Fishbein M, Cao J, Berenson J, Helfant R, Forrester J. Detection and localization of tumor necrosis factor in human atheroma. Am J Pathol. 1990; 65: 297–302.

22. Gerdes N, Sukhova GK, Libby P, Reynolds RS, Young JL, Schonbeck U. Expression of interleukin (IL)-18 and functional IL-18 receptor on human vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages: implications for atherogenesis. J Exp Med. 2002; 195: 245–257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Canault M, Peiretti F, Mueller C, Kopp F, Morange P, Rihs S, Portugal H, Juhan-Vague I, Nalbone G. Exclusive expression of transmembrane TNF-{alpha} in mice reduces the inflammatory response in early lipid lesions of aortic sinus. Atherosclerosis. 2004; 172: 211–218.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Branen L, Hovgaard L, Nitulescu M, Bengtsson E, Nilsspn J, Jovinge S. Inhibition of tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 2137–2142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Schieffer B, Selle T, Hilfiker A, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Grote K, Tietge UJ, Trautwein C, Luchtefeld M, Schmittkamp C, Heeneman S, Daemen MJ, Drexler H. Impact of interleukin-6 on plaque development and morphology in experimental atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2004; 110: 3493–3500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Yamada Y, Metoki N, Yoshida H, Satoh K, Ichihara S, Kato K, Kameyama T, Yokoi K, Matsuo H, Segawa T, Watanabe S, Nozawa Y. Genetic risk for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 1920–1925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Lalouschek W, Schillinger M, Hsieh K, Endler G, Greisenegger S, Marculescu R, Lang W, Wagner O, Cheng S, Mannhalter C. Polymorphisms of the inflammatory system and risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006; 44: 918–923.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Chamorro A, Revilla M, Obach V, Vargas M, Planas AM. The -174G/C polymorphism of the interleukin 6 gene is a hallmark of lacunar stroke and not other ischemic stroke phenotypes. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005; 19: 91–95.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Tso AR, Merino JG, Warach S. Interleukin-6 174G/C polymorphism and ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2007; 38: 3070–3075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. PROGRESS Management Committee. Blood pressure lowering for the secondary prevention of stroke: rationale and design for PROGRESS. J Hypertens. 1996; 14 (suppl 2): s41–s46.

31. PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. 2001; 358: 1033–1041.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Woodward M. Epidemiology: Study Design and Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Fla: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 2005.

33. Woodward M, Barzi F, Feigin V, Gu D, Huxley R, Nakamura K, Patel A, Ho S, Jamrozik K. Associations between high density lipoprotein cholesterol and both stroke and coronary heart disease in the Asia Pacific region. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28: 2653–2660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Stuyt RJ, Netea MG, Verschueren I, Dinarello CA, Kullberg BJ, van der Meer JW. Interleukin-18 does not modulate the acute-phase response. J Endotoxin Res. 2005; 11: 85–88.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Marquardt L, Ruf A, Mansmann U, Winter R, Buggle F, Kallenberg K, Grau AJ. Inflammatory response after acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2005; 236: 65–71.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Sattar N, McInnes IB. Vascular comorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis: potential mechanisms and solutions. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2005; 17: 286–292.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Koenig W, Khuseyinova N, Baumert J, Thorand B, Loewel H, Chambless L, Meisinger C, Schneider A, Martin S, Kolb H, Herder C. Increased concentrations of C-reactive protein and IL-6 but not IL-18 are independently associated with incident coronary events in middle-aged men and women: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg case-cohort study, 1984–2002. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 2745–2751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Shahar E, Chambless LE, Rosamond WD, et al. Plasma lipid profile and incident ischemic stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Stroke. 2003; 34: 623–631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Whitman SC, Ravisankar P, Daugherty A. Interleukin-18 enhances atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E(–/–) mice through release of interferon-{gamma}. Circ Res. 2002; 90: e34–e38.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. J Stott, P. Welsh, A. Rumley, M. Robertson, I. Ford, N. Sattar, R. G J Westendorp, J W. Jukema, S. M Cobbe, and G. D O Lowe
Adipocytokines and risk of stroke in older people: a nested case-control study
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2009; 38(1): 253 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
R. B Schnabel and S. Blankenberg
Commentary: Circulating cytokines and risk stratification of stroke incidence--will we do better in future?
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2009; 38(1): 261 - 262.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/8/2226    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.504498v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines