| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2009;40:261.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Pharmacology (V.J., T.J.-F.L.), Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Ill; the Department of Neurosurgery (A.J.), Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass; the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology (V.J.), Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, Calif; and Research Department (T.J.-F.L., M.-F.C.), Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital and Tzu Chi University Center for Vascular Medicine (M.-F.C., T.J.-F.L.), College of Life Sciences, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Correspondence to Tony Jer-Fu Lee, PhD, College of Life Sciences, Tzu Chi University, 701 Sec 3, Chung Yang Road, Hualien, Taiwan. E-mail tlee{at}siumed.edu; tlee@mail.tcu.edu.tw
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods— The standard in vitro tissue-bath technique was used for measuring changes in isolated porcine basilar arterial tone. Calcium imaging and nitric oxide estimation along with immunohistochemical analysis for cyclo-oxygenase-1, cyclo-oxygenase-2, EP1 receptor, PGE synthase, and neuronal nitric oxide synthase were done in cultured sphenopalatine ganglia and basilar artery.
Results— Selective EP1 receptor antagonists (SC-19220 and SC-51322) inhibited relaxation of endothelium-denuded basilar arterial rings elicited by transmural nerve stimulation (2 and 8 Hz) without affecting that induced by nicotine or sodium nitroprusside (a nitric oxide donor). The SC-19220 inhibition of transmural nerve stimulation-elicited relaxation was blocked by cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors (salicylic acid and naproxen) but was not affected by guanethidine (a sympathetic neuronal blocker) or atropine. Perivascular cyclo-oxygenase-1- and cyclo-oxygenase-2-immunoreactive fibers were observed in basilar arteries. PGE synthase and EP1 receptor immunoreactivities were coincident with neuronal nitric oxide synthase immunoreactivities in perivascular nerves of the basilar arteries and the sphenopalatine ganglia.
-conotoxin (an N-type calcium channel blocker) significantly blocked transmural nerve stimulation-induced relaxation, which was further attenuated by SC-19220. In cultured sphenopalatine ganglia neurons, exogenous PGE2 significantly increased calcium influx and diaminofluorescein fluorescence indicative of nitric oxide synthesis. Both responses were blocked by SC-19220.
Conclusions— These results suggest that neuronal PGE2 facilitates nitric oxide release from the cerebral perivascular parasympathetic nitrergic nerve terminals by increasing neuronal calcium influx through activation of presynaptic EP1 receptors. PGE2 may play an important role in regulating the nitrergic neurovascular transmission in the cerebral circulation.
Key Words: cyclo-oxygenase (COX) parasympathetic neurotransmission perivascular nitrergic nerves porcine cerebral arteries presynaptic EP1 receptor prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostanoids including prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) also are important modulators of vascular functions in health and disease.14 Ample evidence indicates that PGE2 is implicated in cerebrovascular physiology14–17 as well as in many cerebrovascular disorders, including septic shock,18 migraine,19 subarachnoid hemorrhage,20 and cerebral ischemia.21–25 PGE2 has been shown to modulate neurotransmission of both adrenergic and cholinergic nerves in many peripheral tissues.26–28 The role of PGE2 in the autonomic regulation of the cerebral vascular tone and circulation, however, has not been clarified. The present study, therefore, was designed to investigate the functional significance and mechanism of endogenous PGE2 in modulating neurogenic NO-mediated dilation in porcine basilar arteries.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transmural nerve stimulation (TNS) at 2, 4, and 8 Hz and nicotine (100 µmol/L) were applied to induce relaxation. For TNS, tissues were electrically, transmurally stimulated with a pair of electrodes through which 100 biphasic square-wave pulses of 0.6 msec in duration and 200 mA in intensity were applied at various frequencies.29 Data were obtained using 2 and 8 Hz only. The arteries were washed with Krebs solution (37°C) for 6 times over 90 minutes (every 15 minutes) before repeating TNS and nicotine application to avoid tachyphylaxis to nicotine.6,10 Control TNS responses at 2 Hz and 8 Hz were obtained after inducing similar magnitude of active muscle tone with U-46619. Effects of selective EP1 receptor antagonists, SC-19220 (3 to 30 µmol/L) and SC-51322 (3 µmol/L)17,30 on TNS- and nicotine-induced relaxations were tested individually by administering the antagonists 15 minutes beforehand. TNS- and nicotine-induced relaxations were obtained to show recovery postwashout. The neurogenic origin of TNS-induced response was verified by its complete blockade by tetrodotoxin (1.0 µmol/L).6,10
In separate experiments, SC-19220 modulation of TNS-induced relaxation was investigated in the presence and absence of cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors, salicylic acid and naproxen (300 µmol/L each), in the same tissue. TNS-induced relaxation was recorded before and after SC-19220 application. The tissue was incubated in salicylic acid or naproxen for 1 hour before repeating the same. Similarly, the effect of atropine on SC-19220 modulation of TNS-induced relaxation was examined 15 minutes after application of atropine (0.1 µmol/L).11
The magnitude of a vasodilator response was expressed as a percentage of the maximum relaxation induced by 100 µmol/L papaverine added at the end of each experiment. Drugs were added directly to the tissue bath as indicated and the final concentrations were reported. The same tissue served as own control in each preparations. The arterial endothelium was denuded and verified by using nitro-L-arginine (30 µmol/L) as previously described.6,10
Immunohistochemistry
Fluorescent immunostaining was done on postfixed dissected arterial segments and sphenopalatine ganglia (SPG; 100-µm slices) using standard techniques as previously described.17 The following primary polyclonal antibodies were used: rabbit anti-EP1 receptor and anticytosolic prostaglandin E synthase antibodies (1:50 dilution; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Mich), rabbit anti-COX-1 and anti-COX-2 antibodies (1:100 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif), and mouse antineurofilament 200 (1:100 dilution; Sigma Inc) or neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS; 1:100 dilution; Transduction Labs) monoclonal antibodies as required.
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Cell Cultures
Freshly dissected porcine sphenopalatine ganglia (SPG) were cleaned in ice cold Neurobasal culture medium (Life Technologies, Rockville, Md). The ganglia were cut into small pieces in Mg++/Ca++-free Hanks balanced salt solution containing papain (2 U/mL; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Mo), collagenase D (1.2 mg/mL; Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind), and Dispase (4.8 mg/mL; GIBCO, Gaithersburg, Md). SPG from 3 pigs were pooled together to ensure an adequately confluent primary culture. The cells were released by gentle triturating every 20 minutes during the incubation (1 hour at 37°C). The cell suspension was centrifuged at 300 g for 5 minutes. The pellet was gently resuspended in Neurobasal culture medium containing B27 (1:50 dilution), L-glutamine (0.5 mmol/L), and nerve growth factor (50 ng/mL; Alomone Laboratory Ltd, Jerusalem, Israel). The cell suspension was plated into a 4-well culture plate with a poly-D-lysine-coated glass coverslip.
Intracellular Calcium Imaging
Calcium imaging was done as previously described10 on porcine SPG cells between 3 and 7 days in culture using 5 µmol/L Fluo 4-AM dye (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Ore). Calcium influx was measured after adding PGE2 (5 µmol/L) followed by KCl (50 mmol/L). In some experiments, SC-19220 (30 µmol/L) was added 15 minutes before the application of PGE2 and KCl. Fluo 4 was excited at 488 nm, and emitted fluorescence was filtered with a 535±25-nm bandpass filter. The images taken at 1 minute after drug application were examined with a Fluoview Olympus confocal microscope and analyzed using Fluoview software.
Assay for Nitric Oxide Production
NO release was detected in 3 to 7 days cultured porcine SPG cells using 4,5-diaminofluorescein diacetate (Calbiochem, San Diego, Calif) as previously described.31 The cells were incubated with 5 µmol/L 4,5-diaminofluorescein diacetate in physiological buffer for 20 minutes at 37°C. After washing with buffer, PGE2 (5 µmol/L) was applied, and the NO release (fluorescence) was measured with an Olympus Fluoview laser scanning confocal microscope using an argon laser at 488 nm, and images taken at 1 minute after drug application were examined with Fluoview software.
Drugs and Statistical Analysis
The results were computed as means±SEM. Paired t tests were used to compare control to active treatment. The following drugs were used: PGE2, KCl, nitro-L-arginine, sodium salicylate, atropine, papaverine, nicotine, tetrodotoxin, and U-46619 were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co; SC-19220 was obtained from Cayman Chemicals. Guanethidine (Ismelin sulfate) was obtained from CIBA Pharmaceutical Co, a division of CIBA-GEIGY Corp. Naproxen was obtained from Syntex Labs and SC-53122 was from Biomol Research Labs. Drugs were dissolved in deionized water or stock solutions made in DMSO and then diluted in deionized water as per requirement and manufacturers instructions. The P<0.05 level of probability was accepted as significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
6) and SC-51322 (3 µmol/L; n
6; Figure 1E). The attenuation by these antagonists was fully recovered after washing them off. Similarly, SC-19220 (30 µmol/L) significantly inhibited the TNS-induced relaxation in endothelium-preserved porcine basilar arteries (n=7, data not shown) with complete recovery after wash. Some of the recovery responses are rather robust after washing off the antagonist leading to a rebound phenomenon.
|
Furthermore, the SC-19220 blockade of TNS-elicited neurogenic vasodilation was not prevented by atropine (0.1 µmol/L), a muscarinic receptor antagonist (Figure 2A, n=8). The present result, however, was similar to previous findings that atropine significantly increased the TNS-elicited relaxation in endothelium-denuded porcine basilar arteries.11 In each of these preparations, SC-19220 at the same concentrations when given alone inhibited the TNS-elicited relaxation.
|
Guanethidine Does Not Affect SC-19220 Inhibition of Transmural Nerve Stimulation-Induced Relaxation
Guanethidine, a sympathetic neuronal blocker,6,32 was used to examine any possible sympathetic influence on the adjacent parasympathetic nerve. Guanethidine (30 µmol/L), which alone did not affect TNS-induced relaxation (n=5, data not shown) similar to earlier reports,6 did not have any effect on the SC-19220-induced inhibition of TNS-induced dilation in endothelium-denuded basilar arteries (Figure 2B, n=7). Guanethidine at a similar concentration, however, abolished the nicotine-induced neurogenic vasodilation, a result similar to previous reports.6,10 Both TNS- and nicotine-induced relaxations were fully recovered after washing off SC-19220 and guanethidine in the bath.
Cyclo-Oxygenase-1- and Cyclo-Oxygenase-2-Immunoreactive Perivascular Fibers
In whole-mount (Figures 3A.i–iii and 3B.i–iii) and cross-sectioned (Figures 3A.iv–vi and 3B.iv–vi) basilar arteries, both COX-1 and COX-2 immunoreactivities were identified in the nerve bundles and fine nerve fibers in the adventitia of the arteries. Both COX-1 and COX-2 immunoreactivities were completely coincident with immunoreactivities for neurofilament 200 (n-200), a specific marker for perivascular neurons (Figures 3A.iii and vi and 3B.iii and vi, n=6). COX-1, but not COX-2, immunoreactivities were present throughout the entire medial layer of the arteries (Figures 3A.iv and 3B.iv, respectively). Both COX-1 and COX-2 immunoreactivities (Figure 3Biv–vi) were observed in the endothelial layers.33 For negative controls, no COX-1 or COX-2 immunoreactivities were observed in whole-mount arteries by omitting the respective primary antibody or secondary antibody (data not shown). In each set of experiments, 2 controls were used: (1) omission of primary antibody with the presence of secondary antibody; and (2) the presence of primary antibody and omission of secondary antibody. Preserving or denuding the endothelium did not affect the distribution of immunoreactivities.
|
EP1-Receptor and Prostaglandin Synthase Immunoreactivites Are Coincident With Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase Immunoreactivities in Cerebral Perivascular Nerves and the Sphenopalatine Ganglia
Consistent with our previous findings,17 EP1 receptor immunoreactivities on adventitial nerve bundles and thin fibers were found in the whole mount porcine basilar arteries (Figure 3C.i, n=6). The EP1 receptor immunoreactivities were also evident in the sectioned porcine SPG (Figure 3C.iv, n=4), a primary source of cerebral perivascular cholinergic-nitrergic nerves.5 PGE synthase immunoreactivities also were present in perivascular nerves innervating porcine basilar arteries (Figure 3D.i, n=6) and in the porcine SPG neurons (Figure 3D.iv, n=4). Both EP1 receptor and PGE synthase immunoreactivities were completely coincident (Figures 3C.iii and vi and 3D.iii and vi) with nNOS immunoreactivities in perivascular nerve bundles and fine fibers in basilar arteries and the SPG neurons. In addition, both EP1 receptor and PGE synthase immunoreactivities were completely coincident with neurofilament-200 immunoreactivities (data not shown). No immunoreactivities were observed in negative controls by omitting the respective primary or secondary antibodies (data not shown). Preserving or denuding the endothelium did not affect the distribution of immunoreactivities (data not shown).
Cyclo-Oxygenase Inhibitors Abolish SC-19220 Blockade of Transmural Nerve Stimulation-Induced Relaxation
The presence of synthesizing enzymes and receptors suggested that endogenous PGE2 likely played a role in modulating nitrergic neurovascular transmission. Effect of SC-19220 (a selective EP1 receptor antagonist) was examined after inhibiting endogenous PGE2 synthesis by COX inhibitors. Salicylic acid (300 µmol/L, n=13) and naproxen (300 µmol/L, n=6) completely prevented the SC-19220 inhibition of TNS-induced relaxation in endothelium-denuded porcine basilar arteries. In each of these preparations, SC-19220 at the same concentration (30 µmol/L) when given alone in the absence of COX inhibitors inhibited the TNS-elicited relaxation (Figure 4A–C).
|
Sodium Nitroprusside-Induced Relaxation Is Not Affected by SC-19220
Sodium nitroprusside (0.001 µmol/L to 3 mmol/L), an NO donor known to exert its action on the postsynaptic smooth muscle cells to induce cGMP synthesis,34 caused a concentration-dependent relaxation of endothelium-denuded porcine basilar arteries. The relaxation was not significantly affected in the presence of SC-19220 (30 µmol/L; n=6, data not shown).
PGE2-Induced Calcium Influx in Cultured Porcine Sphenopalatine Ganglion Cells
PGE2 (5 µmol/L) induced a significant increase in calcium influx in the porcine SPG cells (n=15 random cells pooled from 6 different animals from 4 separate experiments; Figure 5A–B). The increase was attenuated by SC-19220 (30 µmol/L, n=20 random cells pooled from 6 different animals from 4 separate experiments), which alone did not affect calcium influx. In the presence of SC-19220, KCl (50 mmol/L) still induced significant calcium influx; Figure 5A–C), which was comparable to that obtained in the absence of antagonist, suggesting the specificity of blockade by SC-19220.
|
Effect of N-Type Ca++ Channel Blocker on EP1-Receptor-Mediated Inhibition of Transmural Nerve Stimulation-Induced Neurogenic Vasodilation
-conotoxin GVIA (CTX, 0.1 µmol/L), a selective N-type Ca++ channel blocker, which did not affect U-46619-induced active muscle tone of endothelium-denuded basilar arteries, significantly inhibited the relaxation elicited by TNS, a result similar to our earlier findings.11 In the presence of CTX (0.1 µmol/L), the residual relaxation induced by TNS was further decreased significantly by SC-19220 (30 µmol/L, n=7; Figure 5D–E).
Prostaglandin E2-Induced Nitric Oxide Release in Cultured Porcine Sphenopalatine Ganglion Cells
PGE2 (5 µmol/L) induced a significant increase in fluorescence signal indicative of NO release in the porcine SPG cells (n=45 random cells pooled from 6 different animals from 4 separate experiments; Figure 6A–C). The PGE2-induced increase in 4,5-diaminofluorescein diacetate fluorescence was attenuated in cells pretreated with SC-19220 (30 µmol/L), which alone did not have any effect (n=38 random cells pooled from 6 different animals from 4 separate experiments; Figure 6C).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, the presence of COX-1 and COX-2 immunoreactivities on the perivascular nerves in the porcine basilar arteries suggested the synthesis of prostanoids in perivascular neurons. The predominant nerve bundles with fewer fine fibers represented by both COX immunoreactivities implied that these nerve fibers were most likely nonsympathetic or nitrergic.6 Furthermore, the immunoreactivities of PGE synthase, the PGE2-specific synthesizing enzyme35 and the EP1 receptor immunoreactivities were coincident with nNOS immunoreactivities in the perivascular nerves and neuronal cells of the porcine SPG. The SPG is one of the origins of nitrergic parasympathetic perivascular nerves to the brain in many species, including pigs.5,12 This immunohistochemical data suggested the presence of machinery for synthesizing PGE2 in cerebral perivascular nitrergic nerves and the receptors for its role in modulating nitrergic neurotransmission. In the course of this study, immunoreactivities of COX-1 but not COX-2 were found in medial smooth muscle layers. The functional consequence of this striking difference is interesting and remains to be determined.
The functional role of endogenous PGE2 in regulating cerebral nitrergic vasodilation was elaborated using TNS and nicotine.6,10 Direct depolarization by TNS releases NO from the nitrergic nerve terminals, whereas nicotine and its agonists bind
7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on the adrenergic nerves causing release of norepinephrine. The released norepinephrine then diffuses to act on the β2-adrenergic receptor located on the neighboring nitrergic nerve to release NO and subsequently cause vasodilation (schematic in Figure 6D). Thus, nicotinic agonist-induced nitrergic vasodilation requires intact sympathetic and nitrergic innervations, whereas TNS-elicited relaxation is dependent solely on nitrergic nerves.12,13 Any possible norepinephrine modulation of nitrergic neurons after release of NO on TNS does not affect the magnitude of the relaxation. Both stimulating approaches allow to simultaneously study involvement of both nitrergic parasympathetic and/or sympathetic nerves in the endogenous PGE2 neuromodulatory effects.
The selective EP1 receptor antagonists (SC-19220 and SC-51322)17,30 significantly blocked the TNS-induced neurogenic nitrergic relaxation but did not affect that induced by nicotine in endothelium-denuded basilar arteries. This inhibition of TNS-induced relaxation by the EP1 receptor antagonist was completely prevented in the presence of COX inhibitors (salicylic acid and naproxen). These findings suggested that endogenous PGE2 facilitated the TNS-induced cerebral arterial dilation through release of NO by acting on presynaptic EP1 receptors located on the nitrergic nerves, a result that was consistent with immunohistochemical findings.
Previous reports showing ineffectiveness of COX inhibitors in inhibiting NO-mediated neurogenic relaxation in cerebral arteries had promoted the conclusion that prostanoids were not involved in cerebrovascular neurogenic transmission.3 In our study, there was no significant difference between the neurogenic relaxation in the presence and absence of salicylic acid; however, the relaxation was significantly greater in the presence of naproxen as compared with that in its absence. The exact reason for this observation is not known; however, it could be due to the lack of action of other COX metabolites with opposing actions. Thromboxane A2 and prostaglandin F2
act as vasoconstrictors and there are also vasodilators such as prostaglandin I2.36 PGE2 can actually have dual effects depending on predominance of the receptor subtype; direct stimulation of EP1 and EP3 receptors on the smooth muscle can cause vasoconstriction, whereas EP2 and EP4 receptor stimulation can lead to vasodilation.17,37,38 The cerebral vasculature, however, is subjected not only to the actions of COX metabolites, but also other arachidonic acid metabolites from the lipoxygenase and cytochrome P450 pathways.39–41 The present study, however, was focused on elucidating the role of PGE2 in cerebral nitrergic neurotransmission using 2 different selective pharmacological inhibitors of the EP1 receptor subtype, ie, downstream of COX. Moreover, EP1 receptors have been implicated in neurotransmitter release from postganglionic sympathetic neurons, sensory nerves, and the spinal cord.42–44
Lack of effects of EP1 receptor antagonists on nicotine-induced relaxation, on the other hand, suggested that endogenous PGE2 has an insignificant effect on the adrenergic transmission in the isolated cerebral arteries. This latter finding was further supported by the results that guanethidine, an adrenergic neuronal blocker,6 did not affect SC-19220 inhibition of TNS-induced relaxation. Guanethidine at similar concentration, however, blocked the relaxation induced by nicotine, similar to previous reports.6,10 These results further supported the hypothesis that endogenous PGE2 facilitates depolarization-induced NO release by directly acting on the EP1 receptors located on the nitrergic nerves.
Lack of any effect of SC-19220 (an EP1 receptor inhibitor) on relaxation of the basilar arteries induced by sodium nitroprusside (an NO donor that exerts its action by relaxing the postsynaptic smooth muscle cells)34 indicated that postsynaptic vascular smooth muscle EP1 receptor inhibition did not contribute to the presynaptic EP1 receptor-mediated effect on TNS-induced nitrergic neurogenic vasodilation. Moreover, our previous study has shown that EP1 and EP3 receptors on the postsynaptic smooth muscle cell mediate constriction of porcine basilar arteries.17 Any possible effect of EP1 receptor antagonist on the smooth muscle was expected to enhance but not diminish the relaxation. Furthermore, the role of endothelium, if any, in PGE2 facilitation of nitrergic transmission was excluded, because a similar effect of SC-19220 inhibition of TNS-induced relaxation was observed in endothelium-preserved porcine basilar arteries (data not shown).
Previous studies have shown that endogenous acetylcholine coreleased with NO from cholinergic-nitrergic (parasympathetic) nerves in cerebral arteries of several species, including the pig, inhibit NO release through negative coupling of presynaptic M2 receptors to N-type Ca++ channels.11,12 Atropine blocks this M2 muscarinic receptor-mediated negative coupling effect and enhances NO-induced vasodilation as shown in previous studies and our present findings (Figure 2A).11 PGE2 has been shown to inhibit acetylcholine release from cholinergic nerve terminals in peripheral organs such as the bronchi, trachea, and mesenteric arteries.27,45 This raised the possibility that PGE2 facilitated cerebral nitrergic neurogenic vasodilation through inhibition of acetylcholine release. However, this mechanism was ruled out because SC-19220 inhibited TNS-elicited neurogenic vasodilation even in the presence of atropine (Figure 2A).
PGE2 has been previously suggested to enhance hormone release from adrenal medullary cells and hypothalamus by facilitating Ca++ influx through EP1-like receptors.30,46 Release of neuronal NO evoked by electric stimulation is dependent on Ca++ influx mediated through voltage-sensitive N-type and non-N-type Ca++ channels and/or release of intracellular Ca++.47,48 EP1 receptor has been shown by others to increase Ca++ influx in nonneuronal cells such as chick hamster ovary cells and xenopus oocytes.49 Our study showed that PGE2 caused an increase in calcium influx and NO synthesis in the porcine SPG neuronal cells, which was specifically and almost completely attenuated by pretreatment with SC-19220, a selective EP1 receptor antagonist.
-conotoxin, an N-type calcium channel blocker, significantly decreased the TNS-induced neurogenic nitrergic relaxation as reported previously.11 However, in the presence of
-conotoxin, SC-19220 further reduced the TNS-induced relaxation. These data together with the immunohistochemical evidence suggested that the EP1 receptor is the predominant functional PGE2 receptor subtype on the cerebral perivascular nitrergic neurons and the intracellular increase of calcium for NO release was dependent on both N-type and non-N-type calcium channels. The exact mechanism remains to be determined.
Recent studies have shown that EP1 receptors are critical in the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemic and excitotoxic injury mediated by Ca++ dysfunction.21–25 Moreover, PGE2 levels are dramatically increased in prominent cerebrovascular disorders such as ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage,20 migraine,19 and septic shock18 and also in the primary manifestation of many pathologies, ie, fever. Thus, overstimulation of EP1 receptors and its downstream pathways may lead to deleterious pathological consequences. On the other hand, the cerebrovascular physiological role of EP1 receptors has never been elaborated. The present trend in cerebrovascular translational research elucidating the neuroprotective effects of COX-2 inhibition in stroke is to use selective modulators of PGE2 receptor subtypes, ie, downstream of COX-2 to "ameliorate the COX-2 side-effects without compromising the beneficial effects."22 Thus, the importance of understanding their function in cerebrovascular physiology cannot be overstated.
The present study shows for the first time that presynaptic EP1 receptors mediate the neuromodulatory effects of PGE2 in neuronal NO release from cerebral nitrergic nerves. This conclusion is strongly supported by studies showing that PGE2-dependent neuronal NOS activity is physiologically required for cerebral blood flow autoregulation as well as normal brain development.14–16 Others too have recently suggested a modulatory role for COX-2 and nNOS in cerebrovascular coupling.50,51
In summary, the present study using multifaceted approaches demonstrated that endogenous PGE2 positively modulated NO release in porcine cerebral perivascular parasympathetic nitrergic nerves. This action of PGE2 was mediated by increasing intracellular Ca++ through activation of presynaptic EP1 receptors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL-27763 and HL-47574), Tzu Chi Foundation, Taiwan National Science Council (93-2745-B-320-004-URD, NSC-95-2320-B-320-013-MY2, and NSC-96-2320-B-320-005-MY3), and the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Disclosures
None.
Received February 6, 2008; revision received May 12, 2008; accepted May 27, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Faraci FM, Heistad DD. Regulation of large cerebral arteries and cerebral microvascular pressure. Circ Res. 1990; 66: 8–17.
3. Ayajiki K, Okamura T, Toda N. Neurogenic relaxations caused by nicotine in isolated cat middle cerebral arteries. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994; 270: 795–801.
4. Lee TJF. Putative transmitters in cerebral neurogenic vasodilation. In: Bevan RD, Bevan JA, Walters CL, eds. The Human Brain Circulation: Functional Changes in Disease. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1994: 73–91.
5. Kimura T, Yu JG, Edvinsson L, Lee TJF. Cholinergic, nitric oxidergic innervation in cerebral arteries of the cat. Brain Res. 1997; 773: 117–124.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Zhang W, Edvinsson L, Lee TJF. Mechanism of nicotine-induced neurogenic vasodilation in the porcine basilar artery. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998; 284: 790–797.[Abstract]
7. Toda N. Relaxant responses to transmural stimulation and nicotine of dog and monkey cerebral arteries. Am J Physiol. 1982; 243: H145–H153.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Okamura T, Ayajiki K, Fujioka H, Shinozaki K, Toda N. Neurogenic cerebral vasodilation mediated by nitric oxide. Jpn J Pharmacol. 2002; 88: 32–38.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Gonzalez C, Barroso C, Martin C, Gulbenkian S, Estrada C. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase activation by vasoactive intestinal peptide in bovine cerebral arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1997; 17: 977–984.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Si ML, Lee TJ. Alpha7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on cerebral perivascular sympathetic nerves mediate choline-induced nitrergic neurogenic vasodilation. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 62–69.
11. Liu J, Lee TJ. Mechanism of prejunctional muscarinic receptor-mediated inhibition of neurogenic vasodilation in cerebral arteries. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: H194–H204.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Lee TJ, Liu J, Evans MS. Cholinergic–nitrergic transmitter mechanisms in the cerebral circulation. Microsc Res Tech. 2001; 53: 119–128.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Lee TJ. Sympathetic modulation of nitrergic neurogenic vasodilation in cerebral arteries. Jpn J Pharmacol. 2002; 88: 26–31.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Davidge ST. Prostaglandin H synthase and vascular function. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 650–660.
15. Dumont I, Hou X, Hardy P, Peri KG, Beauchamp M, Najarian T, Molotchnikoff S, Varma DR, Chemtob S. Developmental regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in cerebral vessels of newborn pig by prostaglandin E(2). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999; 291: 627–633.
16. Li DY, Hardy P, Abran D, Martinez-Bermudez AK, Guerguerian AM, Bhattacharya M, Almazan G, Menezes R, Peri KG, Varma DR, Chemtob S. Key role for cyclooxygenase-2 in PGE2 and PGF2alpha receptor regulation and cerebral blood flow of the newborn. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273: R1283–R1290.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Jadhav V, Jabre A, Lin SZ, Lee TJ. EP1- and EP3-receptors mediate prostaglandin E2-induced constriction of porcine large cerebral arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004; 24: 1305–1316.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Hahn EL, Clancy KD, Tai HH, Ricken JD, He LK, Gamelli RL. Prostaglandin E2 alterations during sepsis are partially mediated by endotoxin-induced inhibition of prostaglandin 15-hydroxydehydrogenase. J Trauma. 1998; 44: 777–782.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Sarchielli P, Alberti A, Codini M, Floridi A, Gallai V. Nitric oxide metabolites, prostaglandins and trigeminal vasoactive peptides in internal jugular vein blood during spontaneous migraine attacks. Cephalalgia. 2000; 20: 907–918.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Macdonald RL, Weir BK. A review of hemoglobin and the pathogenesis of cerebral vasospasm. Stroke. 1991; 22: 971–982.
21. Iadecola C, Niwa K, Nogawa S, Zhao X, Nagayama M, Araki E, Morham S, Ross ME. Reduced susceptibility to ischemic brain injury and N-methyl-D-aspartate-mediated neurotoxicity in cyclooxygenase-2-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 30: 98:1294–1299.
22. Kawano T, Anrather J, Zhou P, Park L, Wang G, Frys KA, Kunz A, Cho S, Orio M, Iadecola C. Prostaglandin E2 EP1 receptors: downstream effectors of COX-2 neurotoxicity. Nat Med. 2006; 12: 225–229.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Saleem S, Li RC, Wei G, Dore S. Effects of EP1 receptor on cerebral blood flow in the middle cerebral artery occlusion model of stroke in mice. J Neurosci Res. 2007; 85: 2433–2440.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Ahmad AS, Saleem S, Ahmad M, Dore S. Prostaglandin EP1 receptor contributes to excitotoxicity and focal ischemic brain damage. Toxicol Sci. 2006; 89: 265–270.
25. Liu D, Wu L, Breyer R, Mattson MP, Andreasson K. Neuroprotection by the PGE2 EP2 receptor in permanent focal cerebral ischemia. Ann Neurol. 2005; 57: 758–761.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Malik KU, Sehic E. Prostaglandins and the release of the adrenergic transmitter. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990; 604: 222–236.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Serio R, Daniel EE. Eicosanoids and peripheral neurotransmission. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1989; 38: 237–246.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Gullner HG. The interactions of prostaglandins with the sympathetic nervous system—a review. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1983; 8: 1–12.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Lee TJ. Cholinergic mechanism in the large cat cerebral artery. Circ Res. 1982; 50: 870–879.
30. Shibuya I, Tanaka K, Uezono Y, Ueta Y, Toyohira Y, Yanagihara N, Izumi F, Yamashita H. Prostaglandin E2 induces Ca2+ release from ryanodine/caffeine-sensitive stores in bovine adrenal medullary cells via EP1-like receptors. J Neurochem. 1999; 73: 2167–2174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Kojima H, Nakatsubo N, Kikuchi K, Urano Y, Higuchi T, Tanaka J, Kudo Y, Nagano T. Direct evidence of NO production in rat hippocampus and cortex using a new fluorescent indicator: DAF-2 DA. Neuroreport. 1998; 26: 3345–3348.
32. Ishine T, Yu JG, Asada Y, Lee TJ. Nitric oxide is the predominant mediator for neurogenic vasodilation in porcine pial veins. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999; 289: 398–404.
33. Tran Dinh YR, Jomaa A, Callebert J, Reynier-Rebuffel AM, Tedgui A, Savarit A, Sercombe R. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 in rabbit basilar artery endothelial cells after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2001; 48: 626–633.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Yamamoto R, Wada A, Asada Y, Yanagita T, Yuhi T, Niina H, Sumiyoshi A, Kobayashi H, Lee TJ. Nitric oxide-dependent and -independent norepinephrine release in rat mesenteric arteries. Am J Physiol. 1997; 272: H207–H210.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Tanioka T, Nakatani Y, Semmyo N, Murakami M, Kudo I. Molecular identification of cytosolic prostaglandin E2 synthase that is functionally coupled with cyclooxygenase-1 in immediate prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 32775–32782.
36. Wendling WW, Harakal C. Effects of prostaglandin F2 alpha and thromboxane A2 analogue on bovine cerebral arterial tone and calcium fluxes. Stroke. 1991; 22: 66–72.
37. Davis RJ, Murdoch CE, Ali M, Purbrick S, Ravid R, Baxter GS, Tilford N, Sheldrick RL, Clark KL, Coleman RA. EP4 prostanoid receptor-mediated vasodilatation of human middle cerebral arteries. Br J Pharmacol. 2004; 141: 580–585.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Abran D, Dumont I, Hardy P, Peri K, Li DY, Molotchnikoff S, Varma DR, Chemtob S. Characterization and regulation of prostaglandin E2 receptor and receptor-coupled functions in the choroidal vasculature of the pig during development. Circ Res. 1997; 80: 463–472.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Harder DR, Roman RJ, Gebremedhin D. Molecular mechanisms controlling nutritive blood flow: role of cytochrome P450 enzymes. Acta Physiol Scand. 2000; 168: 543–549.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Phillis JW, Horrocks LA, Farooqui AA. Cyclooxygenases, lipoxygenases, and epoxygenases in CNS: their role and involvement in neurological disorders. Brain Res Rev. 2006; 52: 201–243.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Faraci FM, Sobey CG, Chrissobolis S, Lund DD, Heistad DD, Weintraub NL. Arachidonate dilates basilar artery by lipoxygenase-dependent mechanism and activation of K(+) channels. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001; 281: R246–R253.
42. Boehm S, Huck S. Receptors controlling transmitter release from sympathetic neurons in vitro. Prog Neurobiol. 1997; 51: 225–242.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Sakai M, Minami T, Hara N, Nishihara I, Kitade H, Kamiyama Y, Okuda K, Takahashi H, Mori H, Ito S. Stimulation of nitric oxide release from rat spinal cord by prostaglandin E2. Br J Pharmacol. 1998; 123: 890–894.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Kopp UC, Cicha MZ. PGE2 increases substance P release from renal pelvic sensory nerves via activation of N-type calcium channels. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: R1241–R1248.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Deckers IA, Rampart M, Bult H, Herman AG. Evidence for the involvement of prostaglandins in modulation of acetylcholine release from canine bronchial tissue. Eur J Pharmacol. 1989; 167: 415–418.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Ojeda SR, Urbanski HF, Katz KH, Costa ME. Prostaglandin E2 releases luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone from the female juvenile hypothalamus through a Ca+2-dependent, calmodulin-independent mechanism. Brain Res. 1988; 441: 339–351.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Liu J, Evans MS, Lee TJ. Presynaptic muscarinic M(2)-receptor-mediated inhibition of N-type Ca(2+) channels in cultured sphenopalatine ganglion: direct evidence for acetylcholine inhibition of cerebral nitrergic neurogenic vasodilation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002; 302: 397–405.
48. Smith AB, Cunnane TC. Omega-conotoxin GVIA-resistant neurotransmitter release from postganglionic sympathetic nerves in the guinea-pig vas deferens and its modulation by presynaptic receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1998; 123: 167–172.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Tabata H, Tanaka S, Sugimoto Y, Kanki H, Kaneko S, Ichikawa A. Possible coupling of prostaglandin E receptor EP(1) to TRP5 expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002; 298: 398–402.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Stefanovic B, Bosetti F, Silva AC. Modulatory role of cyclooxygenase-2 in cerebrovascular coupling. Neuroimage. 2006; 32: 23–32.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Wang H, Hitron IM, Iadecola C, Pickel VM. Synaptic and vascular associations of neurons containing cyclooxygenase-2 and nitric oxide synthase in rat somatosensory cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2005; 15: 1250–1260.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. Iliff, R. Wang, D. C. Zeldin, and N. J. Alkayed Epoxyeicosanoids as mediators of neurogenic vasodilation in cerebral vessels Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): H1352 - H1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |