| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2009;40:757.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From Movement Science Group (C.W.), Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK; Primary Care and General Practice (C.S.), University of Birmingham, UK; Department of Clinical Neurology (Z.M., P.M.R.), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Correspondence to Peter M. Rothwell, MD, PhD, FRCP, FMedSci, University Department of Clinical Neurology, Level 6, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU. E-mail peter.rothwell{at}clneuro.ox.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods— The prevalence of fatigue 6 months after TIA or minor stroke was assessed in consecutive patients using the Chalder fatigue scale in a population-based incidence study (Oxford Vascular Study). Patients were included if they were independent in self-care Barthel Index (
18/20) and without major cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination
24/30). Stroke severity at baseline was assessed with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Other potential causes of fatigue were assessed including anxiety, depression, recent life events, medication, and abnormalities in biochemistry or hematologic tests.
Results— Seventy-six participants had minor stroke (mean age, 74.1 years; 42 men) and 73 had TIA (mean age, 72.5 years; 40 men). At 6-month follow-up, median Barthel Index score was 20 (interquartile range, 20–20) in both groups. However, fatigue was more common after stroke than TIA (56% vs 29%; OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.51–6.57; P=0.0008). This difference was present both in patients with modified Rankin score of 0 at 6 months (23.8% vs 10.3%) and patients with modified Rankin score
1 (69.2% vs 48.6%), and remained more frequent in stroke patients after adjustment for potential confounders. Within the group of patients with stroke, the prevalence of fatigue increased with initial stroke severity (87% NIHSS
4 vs 48% NIHSS
3; P=0.0087); however, stroke patients with initial NIHSS of 0 were still more fatigued than patients with TIA (57% vs 29%; P=0.015).
Conclusions— The prevalence of fatigue after minor stroke is higher than after TIA, suggesting that it is not simply a consequence of the stress of a recent acute cerebral event, comorbidity, medication, or other potential confounders. The high levels of fatigue in stroke patients without neurological impairment suggest it has a central origin rather than being the result of increased physical effort required after stroke.
Key Words: fatigue stroke transient ischemic attack
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Both physical and mental factors contribute to fatigue. Poststroke fatigue is associated with depression,2,6,12 motor impairment,2,15 physical deconditioning,8,16 reduced health-related quality of life,2,6 and increased mortality.4 However, fatigue has also been reported in patients who are not depressed and have little motor impairment,4,5 and it is uncertain whether other factors, such as the stress of a cerebral event, comorbidity, and medication, may also contribute. To control for such factors, and to determine the extent of stroke-specific fatigue, we compared patients with recent minor stroke vs patients with a recent TIA and no neurological deficit; both groups had undergone similar investigations and treatment. To our knowledge there are no previously published data on the prevalence of fatigue in unselected patients with TIA and no population-based studies.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients were followed-up at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after the TIA or minor stroke. At the 6-month follow-up visit, a researcher assessed fatigue in all patients who fulfilled the following eligibility criteria: (1) TIA or stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) at baseline; (2) no recurrent stroke during first 6 months of follow-up; (3) no major nonstroke disorder (eg, cancer or acute coronary syndrome) during first 6 months of follow-up; and (4) functionally independent at 6-month follow-up: Barthel Index score
18/20 and Mini-Mental State Examination
24/30.
The following potential causes of fatigue were assessed: anxiety and depression,21 recent life events, obesity (body mass index), thyroid function, urea and electrolytes, hemoglobin, and medication. Other potential confounders were assessed, including social circumstances, educational attainment, employment status, and ethnic origin. We also measured the modified Rankin score at 6-month follow-up.22
To determine whether the presence of fatigue was associated with the patients subjective impressions of their recovery from the stroke or TIA, we also administered the Simple Questions scale for recovery from stroke at the 6-month follow-up.23
Fatigue was measured with the Chalder24 fatigue scale, which has been used widely in chronic fatigue,25 multiple sclerosis,26 Gulf War syndrome,27 migraine,28 HIV,29 and in healthy populations.30 The score consists of 11 short questions on tiredness, energy, and the need to rest, and it does not specifically ask about "fatigue." As generally recommended, a score >3 out of 11 indicates significant fatigue.24 Several studies have shown the score to be valid and reliable in measuring chronic fatigue.24,31,34 Data were analyzed with the SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
There were no differences at the 6-month assessment between TIA and stroke patients in medications (Table 3), Barthel Index, Mini-Mental State Examination, or anxiety and depression (Table 4). However, Chalder fatigue scores at the 6-month follow-up were significantly higher in patients with stroke than in those with TIA (P=0.0013; Figure). Significant fatigue (>3 on the Chalder fatigue scale) was more common after stroke than after TIA (56% vs 29% respectively; OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.51–6.57; P=0.0008; Table 4). This difference was still present after adjusting for previous stroke, living alone, and systolic blood pressure (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.36–5.96; P=0.005), and when patients with previous stroke were excluded from the analysis (53% vs 30%; OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.21–5.70; P=0.008).
|
|
|
Median modified Rankin score at 6 months was 1 (interquartile range, 0,2) in stroke cases and 0 (interquartile range, 0,1) in TIA (P=0.0002). However, when the analysis of fatigue was stratified by modified Rankin score at 6 months (Table 4), the excess of fatigue among patients with stroke (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.51–6.57; P=0.0008) was present in patients with modified Rankin score of 0 (23.8% vs 10.3%; OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 0.54–14.4) and patients with modified Rankin score
1 (69.2% vs 48.6%; OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 0.91–6.26).
Prevalence of fatigue increased with severity of the initial stroke (87% at NIHSS >3 vs 48% at
3; OR, 6.96; 95% CI, 1.30–49.25; P=0.0087). However, patients with stroke who had an NIHSS score of 0 in the acute phase were still more fatigued at 6-month follow-up than those with TIA (57% vs 29%, respectively; OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.10–9.34; P=0.015).
To determine whether the presence of fatigue was associated with the patients subjective impressions of their recovery from the stroke or TIA, we asked the "Simple Questions."23
Patients who felt that they had not made a full recovery were significantly more likely to be fatigued than those who had made a full recovery (37/51 vs 30/103; P<0.0001), and although patients with stroke were more likely than those with TIA to state that they had not fully recovered (Table 4), the association between lack of subjective recovery and fatigue was still present when the analysis was confined to those with stroke only (33/44 vs 10/32; P<0.0001).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Other studies have also reported high rates of fatigue during follow-up after stroke. In a Swedish study of all community and hospital first-ever strokes, Appelros et al33 found that 53% reported fatigue at 1 year after stroke, which is consistent with our rate of 56% at 6 months. Also consistent with our findings, they also found that rates of fatigue were positively correlated with the NIHSS score (P=0.004).33
Previous studies have also demonstrated a positive relationship between fatigue and increased modified Rankin score at the time of assessment.3,32,33 However, in our study even stroke patients with a modified Rankin score of 0 were more fatigued than patients with TIA. Furthermore, even stroke patients with initial NIHSS score of 0 (ie, very minor strokes at onset) still reported more fatigue than TIA patients. Similarly, fatigue is often considered to be a symptom of depression, although previous studies are conflicting.11,14,16,32,33 However, the majority of patients in our study felt fatigued without depression. It is therefore likely that fatigue and depression are separate, albeit overlapping, constructs.
Our study does have some limitations. First, there is no gold standard for the measurement of fatigue.32,34,35 However, the Chalder fatigue scale has been used previously in studies of patients with neurological conditions36 and has been shown to be valid and reliable in multiple different disease states25–29 and in the general population.30,37 Rates of fatigue, defined as a Chalder score >3, of 10% to 18% have been reported in healthy younger populations, increasing to 22% in the general population older than 6038,39 Thus, our stroke patients were more fatigued than would be expected in the general population of a similar age, whereas the TIA patients were probably not. Second, we only assessed some of the potentially confounding factors at baseline, such as blood tests, soon after the TIA or stroke, whereas we measured fatigue at 6-month follow-up. However, several other potential confounders, such as medication, anxiety, depression, and physical functioning, were measured at the 6-month follow-up. Third, anxiety and depression were not measured in any great detail; therefore, future studies using more sensitive measures would be appropriate. Fourth, our stroke patients were more likely to have had a previous stroke than the TIA patients. However, the excess of fatigue was still seen in incident strokes and all stroke patients were independent in self-care, even though they had experienced a previous event. Finally, we tried to use TIA patients as nonstroke controls to determine whether there might be central mechanisms consequent on having a stroke underlying fatigue and to minimize the various sources of confounding discussed, but we did not have MR brain imaging in all cases. Therefore, we cannot separate those TIA cases with and without a clinically appropriate cerebral infarct, or those with asymptomatic previous infarction. However, we found significant differences between minor strokes and TIA despite this limitation. It is possible that rates of fatigue would have been even lower in TIA patients with no infarction.
In conclusion, the prevalence of fatigue after minor stroke is higher than after TIA, suggesting that it is not simply a consequence of the stress of a recent acute cerebral event, comorbidity, medication, or other potential confounders. The high levels of fatigue in stroke patients without neurological impairment suggest it has a central origin rather than being the result of increased physical effort required after stroke. Monitoring fatigue and identifying interventions such as centrally acting pharmacological interventions may be an appropriate avenue for future study and may improve outcomes.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
Oxford Vascular Study is funded by the UK Medical Research Council, the Stroke Association, the Dunhill Medical Trust, the National Institute of Health Research, and the Oxford Partnership Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre. C.W. and C.S. were funded by Physiotherapy Research Foundation, the Elizabeth Casson Trust, and the Research Capacity Development Program.
Disclosures
None.
Received June 3, 2008; revision received July 16, 2008; accepted July 29, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. van de Port IG, Kwakkel G, Schepers VP, Heinemans CT, Lindeman E. Is fatigue an independent factor associated with activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living and health related quality of life in chronic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007; 23: 40–45.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Choi-Kwon S, Han SW, Kwon SU, Kim JS. Poststroke fatigue: Characteristics and related factors. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005; 19: 84–90.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Glader EL, Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Poststroke fatigue: A 2-year follow-up study of stroke patients in sweden. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1327–1333.
5. Ingles JL, Eskes GA, Phillips SJ. Fatigue after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 173–178.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. van der Werf SP, van den Broek HL, Anten HW, Bleijenberg G. Experience of severe fatigue long after stroke and its relation to depressive symptoms and disease characteristics. See comment. Eur Neurol. 2001; 45: 28–33.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Van Zandvoort MJ, Kappelle LJ, Algra A, De Haan EH. Decreased capacity for mental effort after single supratentorial lacunar infarct may affect performance in everyday life. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych. 1998; 65: 697–702.
8. Morley W, Jackson K. Mead GE Post-stroke fatigue: An important yet neglected symptom. Age Ageing. 2005; 34.
9. Carlsson GE, Moller A, Blomstrand C. A qualitative study of the consequences of hidden dysfunctions one year after a mild stroke in persons <75 years. Disabil Rehabil. 2004; 26: 1373–1380.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Roding J, Lindstrom B, Malm J, Ohman A. Frustrated and invisible—younger stroke patients experiences of the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25: 867–874.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Bogousslavsky J. William Feinberg lecture 2002: Emotions, mood, and behavior after stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1046–1050.
12. Schepers VP, Visser-Meily AM, Ketelaar M, Lindeman E. Poststroke fatigue: Course and its relation to personal and stroke-related factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 184–188.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Tyrrell PJ, Smithard DG. Fatigue after stroke. Therapy. 2005; 2: 865–869.[CrossRef]
14. Staub F, Bogousslavsky J. Fatigue after stroke: A major but neglected issue. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001; 12: 75–81.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Colle F, Bonan I, Gellez Leman MC, Bradai N, Yelnik A. Fatigue after stroke. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2006; 49: 361–364.
16. Staub F, Bogousslavsky J. Post-stroke depression or fatigue? Eur Neurol. 2001; 45: 3–5.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Rothwell PM. Incidence, risk factors and prognosis of stroke and tia: The need for high-quality, large-scale epidemiological studies and meta-analyses. Cerebrovas Dis. 2003; 3: 2–10.[CrossRef]
18. Coull AJ, Silver LE, Bull LM, Giles MF, Rothwell PM, Oxford Vascular S. Direct assessment of completeness of ascertainment in a stroke incidence study. See comment. Stroke. 2004; 35: 2041–2045.
19. Hatano S. Experience from a multicentre stroke register: A preliminary report. Bull WHO. 1976; 54: 541–553.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989; 20: 864–870.
21. Brooks R. Euroqol: The current state of play. Health Policy. 1996; 37: 53–72.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988; 19: 604–607.
23. McKevitt C, Dundas R, Wolfe C. Two simple questions to assess outcome after stroke: A European study. Stroke. 2001; 32: 681–686.
24. Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, Wallace EP. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psych Res. 1993; 37: 147–153.[CrossRef]
25. O'Dowd H, Gladwell P, Rogers CA, Hollinghurst S, Gregory A. Cognitive behavioural therapy in chronic fatigue syndrome: A randomised controlled trial of an outpatient group programme. Health Technol Assess. 2006; 10: 1–140.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Wade DT, Young CA, Chaudhuri KR, Davidson DL. A randomised placebo controlled exploratory study of vitamin b-12, lofepramine, and l-phenylalanine (the "Cari loder regime") in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych. 2002; 73: 246–249.
27. Hotopf M, David AS, Hull L, Nikalaou V, Unwin C, Wessely S. Gulf war illness–better, worse, or just the same? A cohort study.[see comment]. BMJ. 2003; 327: 13.
28. Peres MF, Zukerman E, Young WB, Silberstein SD. Fatigue in chronic migraine patients. Cephalalgia. 2002; 22: 720–724.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Henderson M, Safa F, Easterbrook P, Hotopf M. Fatigue among hiv-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. HIV Med. 2005; 6: 347–352.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. de Fatima Marinho de Souza M, Messing K, Menezes PR, Cho HJ. Chronic fatigue among bank workers in brazil. Occupat Med. 2002; 52: 187–194.[CrossRef]
31. Ridsdale L, Evans A, Jerrett W, Mandalia S, Osler K, Vora H. Patients with fatigue in general practice: A prospective study. BMJ. 1993; 307: 103–106.
32. Naess H, Nyland HI, Thomassen L, Aarseth J, Myhr KM. Fatigue at long-term follow-up in young adults with cerebral infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005; 20: 245–250.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Appelros P. Prevalence and predictors of pain and fatigue after stroke: A population-based study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2006; 29: 329–333.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Mead G, Lynch J, Greig C, Young A, Lewis S, Sharpe M. Evaluation of fatigue scales in stroke patients. Stroke. 2007; 38: 2090–2095.
35. Dittner AJ, Wessely SC, Brown RG. The assessment of fatigue: A practical guide for clinicians and researchers. J Psychosom Res. 2004; 56: 157–170.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Hjollund NH, Andersen JH, Bech P. Assessment of fatigue in chronic disease: A bibliographic study of fatigue measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007; 5: 12.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. De Vries J, Michielsen HJ, Van Heck GL Assessment of fatigue among working people: A comparison of six questionnaires. Occup Environ Med. 2003; 60 (Suppl 1): i10–i15.
38. David A, Pelosi A, McDonald E, Stephens D, Ledger D, Rathbone R, Mann A. Tired, weak, or in need of rest: Fatigue among general practice attenders. BMJ. 1990; 301: 1199–1202.
39. Loge JH, Ekeberg O, Kaasa S. Fatigue in the general Norwegian population: Normative data and associations. J Psychosom Res. 1998; 45: 53–65.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Bray and C. Bladin Success With Paramedic Diagnosis of Stroke Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e398 - e398. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |