Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:1296-1303
Published online before print January 29, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.520882
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/4/1296    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.520882v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yahalom, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tanne, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yahalom, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tanne, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction

(Stroke. 2009;40:1296.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Chronic Kidney Disease and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Acute Stroke

Gilad Yahalom, MD; Roseline Schwartz, MSc; Yvonne Schwammenthal, MD; Oleg Merzeliak, MD; Maya Toashi, BSc; David Orion, MD; Ben-Ami Sela, PhD David Tanne, MD

From the Stroke Center, Department of Neurology (G.Y., R.S., Y.S., O.M., M.T., D.O., D.T.) and the Institute of Chemical Pathology (B.-A.S.), the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel- Hashomer, Israel; and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University (B.-A.S., D.T.), Tel Aviv, Israel.

Correspondence to David Tanne, MD, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel. E-mail tanne{at}post.tau.ac.il


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke. Our aim was to examine the association between estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and stroke outcome and to assess whether CKD and its severity affect stroke outcome in a large cohort of unselected patients with acute stroke.

Methods— We examined the association between baseline estimated GFR and CKD and 1-year outcomes in 821 consecutive patients with acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic). GFR was estimated by 2 methods: the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and the Mayo Clinic quadratic equation. An estimated GFR rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2 defined CKD.

Results— Odds ratios (95% CI) for death across levels of estimated GFR based on both equations were estimated. CKD was present in 36% (n=291) of patients based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation and 18% (n=147) based on the Mayo Clinic equation. The adjusted ORs for mortality after 1-year based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation were 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4 to 1.2) associated with GFR 45 to 60 and 3.2 (1.7 to 6.4) associated with GFR 15 to 44 as compared with GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2, whereas those based on the Mayo Clinic equation were 2.3 (1.1 to 4.7) and 3.3 (1.6 to 7.1), respectively. The adjusted ORs for Barthel Index ≤75 or death after 1 year were 0.8 (0.5 to 1.5) and 2.1 (0.9 to 4.8) by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation and 1.9 (0.8 to 4.4) and 3.9 (1.5 to 11.0) by the Mayo Clinic equation, respectively.

Conclusions— CKD is a strong independent predictor of mortality and poor outcome in patients with acute stroke. The estimation of the prevalence of CKD and of the GFR cutoffs associated with poor outcome depend on the equation used to estimate GFR.


Key Words: acute stroke • chronic kidney disease • prognosis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide public health problem with an estimated prevalence of 11% of adults in the United States and higher prevalence among patients with cardiovascular disease.1–4 There is growing evidence for an association between CKD and adverse cardiovascular events.2–5 The relationship between renal dysfunction and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality extends across the spectrum of renal dysfunction to encompass mild degrees of renal impairment. We have previously shown that CKD is associated with increased risk of incident ischemic stroke among patients with pre-existing atherothrombotic disease.6

In the context of an acute coronary syndrome, CKD has been shown to be a marker of adverse clinical characteristics and was independently associated with adverse outcomes.4,5,7 Data on the association between renal dysfunction and outcome after acute stroke are scarce, and what is known relates to serum creatinine level or other less sensitive indicators of renal function with outcome data limited to survival.8,9 We therefore evaluated the prevalence of CKD using glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by 2 equations in an unselected large cohort of patients with an acute stroke to examine the association between GFR and stroke outcome and to assess whether CKD and its severity affect mortality and functional outcome.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Design
A prospective longitudinal cohort study included 821 consecutive patients hospitalized due to acute stroke throughout a large medical center with a catchment area of approximately 500 000 people. Data were collected on all patients admitted from March 2001 to June 2002 with a diagnosis of acute stroke according to World Health Organization criteria.

Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate and Determination of Chronic Kidney Disease
GFR was estimated using 2 equations: (1) the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula7: GFR=186x(Scr)–1.154x (age)–0.203x0.742 (if the subject is female); and (2) the Mayo Clinic quadratic equation10: GFR=expx(1.911+[5.249/Scr]–[2.114/Scr2]–0.00686xage–0.205 [if female]; if Scr <0.8 mg/dL, use 0.8 for Scr). Baseline serum creatinine measurements were performed at a central laboratory using the Jaffe assay. CKD was defined following the National Kidney Foundation definition as kidney damage reflected by an estimated GFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area. We have further categorized CKD into moderate reduction of GFR of 45 to 60 and moderate–severe reduction of 15 to 44 mL/min/1.73 m2. This further categorization is a modification of the National Kidney Foundation classification scheme chosen based on prior studies in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Data Collection
Patients were evaluated systematically for risk factors, stroke severity, type, and subtype. Severity of stroke was assessed using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale.11 Intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke were differentiated by the results of the baseline head CT scan. Ischemic stroke etiology was determined by the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification.12 Throughout hospitalization and at 1-month follow-up, data were collected by clinical evaluations and personal interviews with patients and/or proxies. One year after the stroke, phone follow-up interviews were conducted by professional interviewers from the Israel Center for Disease Control. Functional outcome were assessed using the Barthel Index.13 Mortality data were collected from the Israeli Population Registry.

Statistical Analysis
GFR at baseline was estimated with the use of the 4-component MDRD and the Mayo Clinic quadratic equations. Estimated GFR (eGFR) derived from each equation was categorized in an exploratory manner with respect to the outcome into distribution derived quintiles and into clinically relevant groups (<20, 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, 80 to 89, ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2) with ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2 serving as the reference group. Higher values in the normal range were not further categorized because the MDRD equation is well known to have substantial errors for GFR estimates in the normal–high range7,10,14 The distribution of the GFR was further divided into 3 groups, based on CKD and its severity (15 to 44, 45 to 60, and >60 mL/min/1.73 m2), after excluding patients with <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 to focus on mild and moderate CKD rather than kidney failure. Univariate associations between GFR categories and other baseline demographic and clinical variables were evaluated with analysis of variance and {chi}2 tests. Unadjusted event rates for the stroke outcome end points were compared across GFR categories with the {chi}2 test. Event-free survival rates after a 1-year follow-up of the 3 groups are presented as a Kaplan–Meier curve and compared by means of the log rank test. To examine the relationship between CKD and its severity and outcome, multivariable analyses were conducted. GFR category was entered as 2 dummy variables with GFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 as the reference group. In the multivariable models, we adjusted for age, gender, stroke type (ischemic or intracerebral hemorrhage), stroke severity, anemia, hypertension, prior disability, diabetes, angina pectoris or past myocardial infarction, other cardiac disease (atrial fibrillation or chronic heart failure or vascular heart disease), past stroke, and malignancy. For the Mayo Clinic equation, the previously mentioned analyses were repeated by including eGFR as a continuous variable, and ORs were computed for a decrease of 1 SD of eGFR. Analyses were performed with SAS statistical software version 8.2 (SAS, Inc, Cary, NC).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The study cohort included 821 patients. The distributions of GFR among the study cohort estimated by the 2 equations and a scatterplot of eGFR by both estimations are presented in Figure 1Down. The mean±SD eGFR was 64.2±20.0 (range, 5.3 to 140.0) mL/min/1.73 m2 by the MDRD equation and 76.8±24.8 (range, 5.7 to 127.4) mL/min/1.73 m2 by the Mayo Clinic equation. Overall, the proportion of patients having CKD was 36% (n=291) based on the MDRD equation and 18% (n=147) based on the Mayo Clinic equation.


Figure 1520882
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Distribution of estimated GFR among the study cohort: (A) using the MDRD equation; (B) using the Mayo Clinic quadratic equation; and (C) scatterplot of the Mayo Clinic versus the MDRD-estimated GFR.


Figure 520882
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. (Continued).

OR (95% CIs) for death at 1 year across the levels of eGFR, categorized into distribution-derived quintiles for each equation, as well as into clinically relevant groups of 10-mL/min/1.73 m2 differences, are shown in Figure 2. Regarding the MDRD equation, one may note that for eGFR ranging from 20 to 50 mL/min/1.73 m2, there is a linear decrease of approximately 1 U in the OR for mortality after 1 year for each 10-mL/min/1.73 m2 increment in the eGFR, whereas from 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 and above, the estimated coefficients are comparable in magnitude with wide overlapping CIs. The corresponding ORs by the Mayo Clinic quadratic equation reveal a decrease across eGFR levels. The unadjusted ORs for 1-year mortality based on a 1-SD (24.8 mL/min/1.73 m2) decrease in the Mayo Clinic eGFR is 2.0 (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.4) and the adjusted OR is 1.6 (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.1).


Figure 2520882
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. ORs (95% CIs) for death at 1 year according to the level of eGFR: (A) using the MDRD equation; and (B) using the Mayo Clinic quadratic equation. 1, According to quintiles with the highest quintile serving as the reference group; (2) categorization by 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 differences in eGFR with ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2 serving as the reference group.

We have further categorized eGFR into 3 categories based on CKD and its severity after excluding patients with kidney failure. Baseline characteristics of the study cohort across the 3 GFR groups estimated by the MDRD equation are shown in Table 1. Patients with lower GFR were older, were more likely to be women, had more comorbidity, and were less often cigarette smokers. Thus, patients in the lowest category of the GFR had the highest rates of hypertension, prior stroke, prior myocardial infarction or angina, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and anemia; had more frequently intracerebral hemorrhage; and less frequently mild stroke severity as compared with those without CKD.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics by eGFR*

At 1 month after the event, 695 patients (87%) were alive, and 561 (81%) of them had a follow-up evaluation. At 1 year, 642 patients (80%) were alive, and 481 (75%) of them had a phone follow-up interview. Mortality data derived from the Israeli Population Registry were available for all patients. Age of patients assessed after 1 month was 69±13 years and after 1 year 67±12 years. Patients lost to follow-up for the 1-year questionnaire had more often low GFR, more severe strokes, and were more often discharged to a nursing facility.

Decreasing categories of GFR estimated by both equations were associated with increasing rates of poor outcome at both 1 month and 1 year after the index stroke (Table 2). Using the MDRD equation, particularly high mortality and rates of poor functional outcome were observed restricted to those with markedly low GFR of 15 to 44 mL/min/1.73 m2. Using the Mayo Clinic equation, there was a more gradual increase in the rates of poor outcome across the 3 categories of GFR. Thus, mortality rates after 1 year increased from 14.8% for patients with no CKD to 35.9% and 47.8% among those with GFR of 45 to 60 and 15 to 44 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses by categories of GFR, estimated by both equations, are depicted in Figure 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Clinical Outcomes by GFR Estimated by the MDRD and Mayo Clinic Equations


Figure 3520882
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier estimates for cumulative 1-year survival function for all-cause mortality according to categories for GFR: (A) estimated using the MDRD equation; and (B) estimated using the Mayo Clinic quadratic equation. Log rank test, probability value <0.001 for both models.

The adjusted ORs for poor outcomes by categories of GFR are shown in Table 3. Using the group with GFR of at least 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 as the reference group yielded adjusted OR for death, institution in a long-term nursing facility, and disability that increased as the degree of renal function deteriorated at both 1 month and 1 year after the stroke. The intermediate category of 45 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 exhibited increased adjusted OR when estimated by the Mayo Clinic equation, but not by the MDRD equation. The category with the lowest GFR exhibited approximately 3- to 5-fold increased relative odds for mortality using both the MDRD and the Mayo Clinic equations (adjusted OR at 1 month, 3.7 and 4.5 and at 1 year of 3.2 and 3.3, respectively; P<0.0001 for all). Further adjustment to baseline serum albumin only mildly attenuated these associations with adjusted OR using the MDRD equation for 1-month mortality of 2.7 (95% CI, 1.2 to 5.9) and 1-year mortality of 2.8 (95% CI, 1.3 to 6.0) for the category with GFR of 15 to 44 mL/min/1.73 m2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Logistic Regression Models for Prediction of Outcomes by GFR Estimated by the MDRD and Mayo Clinic Equations

Similar dose–response associations between GFR and 1-year mortality were observed in women and men, in patients younger or older than 70 years, in patients with or without diabetes, and in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage as well as ischemic stroke with no evidence of interaction. Rates of 1-year mortality among patients with an ischemic stroke by MDRD-derived eGFR categories of >60, 45 to 60, and 15 to 44 mL/min/1.73 m2 were 11%, 15%, and 37%, respectively, among patients with ischemic stroke versus 46%, 36%, and 86% among those with intracerebral hemorrhage (P for interaction=0.21).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our main finding is that low eGFR and the presence of CKD constitute strong independent predictors of mortality and poor outcome in patients with acute stroke. The estimation of the prevalence of CKD and of the GFR cutoffs associated with poor outcome depend, however, on the equation used to estimate GFR.

Data on the association between renal dysfunction and outcome after acute stroke are scarce.8,9 Friedman et al have found an association between serum creatinine levels and mortality in a group of patients with stroke.8 MacWalter et al have found that higher serum creatinine and reduced admission calculated creatinine estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula is associated with higher mortality rates.9 Inference of renal dysfunction from the serum creatinine level alone is complicated by the differing rates of creatinine production among persons, mainly because of variations in muscle mass. Women and the elderly often have deceptively low serum creatinine levels despite substantial reductions in GFR. Estimation of the GFR by the MDRD and the Mayo Clinic equations were found to be more accurate than the Cockcroft-Gault formula.15,16

The MDRD equation, used in the current study, has now been validated extensively in multiple samples with and without CKD and is recommended for estimation of GFR by authoritative guidelines.7,17 There are, however, substantial errors for GFR estimates in the normal–high range,14 and creatinine-based estimations are not reliable in those with particularly low creatinine generation. We have estimated the GFR using also the more recently developed Mayo Clinic equation, which was previously suggested to be more accurate than the MDRD.10 The population studied for developing this equation had a younger mean age, but this equation was found to best identify subjects at increased risk for mortality among community-dwelling elderly subjects.15 Although both equations consistently show the poor outcome associated with renal dysfunction, the GFR values and the cutoffs associated with poor outcome in our study cohort depend on the equation used with overall higher OR estimates obtained using the Mayo Clinic equation.

Patients with end-stage renal disease experience markedly advanced atherosclerotic disease of the cerebral vasculature and an extraordinary high risk of stroke as patients compared with individuals without end-stage-renal disease.18 Furthermore, hemodialysis treatment is an independent indicator for poor functional outcome and mortality after stroke.18,19 In our cohort, eGFR <20 mL/min/1.73 m2 was associated with an approximately 7-fold increased odds for mortality after 1 year by the MDRD equation and approximately 13-fold by the Mayo Clinic equation.

There is a growing body of evidence regarding the relationship between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.2–5 CKD is also associated with increased risk of incident ischemic stroke.6 Recently, Khatri et al found that CKD was associated with a greater burden of white matter hyperintensities as seen in brain MRI,20 and Ikram et al showed that persons with lower GFR had less deep white matter volume and more white matter lesions,21 adding to a growing body of evidence that kidney disease is an important, independent risk factor for cerebrovascular diseases.

Mechanisms by which renal dysfunction increases cardiovascular risk are under investigation. The progressive increase in cardiovascular risk with worsening GFR is partly explained by factors associated with renal decline, including anemia, oxidative stress, increase in plasma asymmetrical dimethylarginine, a powerful inhibitor of nitric oxide synthesis, inflammation, and conditions promoting coagulation,22–25 all of which are associated with accelerated atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction. Other markers that progressively increase with renal decline include albuminuria, proteinuria, fibrinogen, homocystinemia, and elevated uric acid levels.26–30

Strength and Limitations
Data are based on a large cohort of consecutive unselected patients presenting with acute stroke. GFR was not directly measured in the current study and creatinine measurements, although performed at a central laboratory, were not calibrated to creatinine reference standards. Direct measurement is, however, cumbersome and expensive and is not performed in routine clinical practice. The difference between the estimated and true GFR may have led to misclassification of some subjects, although misclassification would likely lead to underestimation of the strength of the associations. We have focused our analyses, however, on eGFR in the borderline or kidney disease range for which the estimation equations are more accurate. We may have not adjusted for all potential sources of confounding, although we adjusted for multiple variables, including anemia that was independently shown to be associated with cardiovascular disease.22 It is therefore unlikely that residual confounding could explain the increases in relative odds that were observed in the present study. Finally, no data on microalbuminuria or other renal-specific factors such as cystatin C31 is available in the current cohort.

In conclusion, we present data on the association between eGFR and outcome after stroke and have found that CKD is prevalent among patients with acute stroke and is a strong independent predictor of mortality and poor outcome after acute stroke. The estimation of the prevalence of CKD and the GFR cutoffs associated with poor outcome depend on the equation used to estimate GFR. These findings underscore the importance of estimating GFR in routine clinical practice among patients with acute stroke.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

None.

Received March 20, 2008; revision received April 15, 2008; accepted May 27, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Coresh J, Astor BC, Greene T, Eknoyan G, Levey AS. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003; 41: 1–12.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Sadeghi HM, Stone GW, Grines CL, Mehran R, Dixon SR, Lansky AJ, Fahy M, Cox DA, Garcia E, Tcheng JE, Griffin JJ, Stuckey TD, Turco M, Carroll JD. Impact of renal insufficiency in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2769–2775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Al Suwaidi J, Reddan DN, Williams K, Pieper KS, Harrington RA, Califf RM, Granger CB, Ohman EM, Holmes DR Jr. Prognostic implications of abnormalities in renal function in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2002; 106: 974–980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Anavekar NS, McMurray JJV, Velazquez EJ, Solomon SD, Kober L, Rouleau J-L, White HD, Nordlander R, Maggioni A, Dickstein K, Zelenkofske S, Leimberger JD, Califf RM, Pfeffer MA. Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1285–1295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. McCullough PA, Soman SS, Shah SS, Smith ST, Marks KR, Yee J, Borzak S. Risks associated with renal dysfunction in patients in the coronary care unit. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 679–684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Koren-Morag N, Goldbourt U, Tanne D. Renal dysfunction and risk of ischemic stroke or TIA in patients with cardiovascular disease. Neurology. 2006; 67: 224–228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Brosius FC III, Hostetter TH, Kelepouris E, Mitsnefes MM, Moe SM, Moore MA, Pennathur S, Smith GL, Wilson PW. Detection of chronic kidney disease in patients with or at increased risk of cardiovascular disease: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Kidney and Cardiovascular Disease Council; the Councils on High Blood Pressure Research, Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and Epidemiology and Prevention; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: developed in collaboration with the National Kidney Foundation. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1083–1087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Friedman PJ. Serum creatinine: an independent predictor of survival after stroke. J Intern Med. 1991; 229: 175–179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. MacWalter RS, Wong SYS, Wong KYK, Stewart G, Fraser CG, Fraser HW, Ersoy Y, Ogston SA, Chen R. Does renal dysfunction predict mortality after acute stroke? A 7-year follow-up study. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1630–1635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Rule AD, Larson TS, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Jacobsen SJ, Cosio FG. Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 929–937.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Brott T, Adams HPJ, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989; 20: 864–870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Adams HPJ, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993; 24: 35–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Herndon R. Handbook of Neurologic Rating Scales. New York: Demos Vermande; 1997.

14. Stevens LA, Manzi J, Levey AS, Chen J, Deysher AE, Greene T, Poggio ED, Schmid CH, Steffes MW, Zhang YL, Van Lente F, Coresh J. Impact of creatinine calibration on performance of GFR estimating equations in a pooled individual patient database. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007; 50: 21–35.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Maaravi Y, Bursztyn M, Hammerman-Rozenberg R, Stessman J. Glomerular filtration rate estimation and mortality in an elderly population. QJM. 2007; 100: 441–449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Froissart M, Rossert J, Jacquot C, Paillard M, Houillier P. Predictive performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations for estimating renal function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16: 763–773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, Levin A, Coresh J, Rossert J, De Zeeuw D, Hostetter TH, Lameire N, Eknoyan G. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2005; 67: 2089–2100.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Seliger SL, Gillen DL, Longstreth WT Jr, Kestenbaum B, Stehman-Breen CO. Elevated risk of stroke among patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2003; 64: 603–609.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Toyoda K, Fujii K, Fujimi S, Kumai Y, Tsuchimochi H, Ibayashi S, Iida M. Stroke in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: a 22-year single-center study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005; 45: 1058–1066.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Khatri M, Wright CB, Nickolas TL, Yoshita M, Paik MC, Kranwinkel G, Sacco RL, DeCarli C. Chronic kidney disease is associated with white matter hyperintensity volume: the Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS). Stroke. 2007; 38: 3121–3126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Ikram MA, Vernooij MW, Hofman A, Niessen WJ, van der Lugt A, Breteler MM. Kidney function is related to cerebral small vessel disease. Stroke. 2008; 39: 55–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. McCullough PA, Jurkovitz CT, Pergola PE, McGill JB, Brown WW, Collins AJ, Chen SC, Li S, Singh A, Norris KC, Klag MJ, Bakris GL. Independent components of chronic kidney disease as a cardiovascular risk state: results from the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP). Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 1122–1129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Johnson DW, Armstrong K, Campbell SB, Mudge DW, Hawley CM, Coombes JS, Prins JB, Isbel NM. Metabolic syndrome in severe chronic kidney disease: prevalence, predictors, prognostic significance and effects of risk factor modification. Nephrology (Carlton). 2007; 12: 391–398.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Valkonen VP, Paiva H, Salonen JT, Lakka TA, Lehtimaki T, Laakso J, Laaksonen R. Risk of acute coronary events and serum concentration of asymmetrical dimethylarginine. Lancet. 2001; 358: 2127–2128.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Soriano S, Gonzalez L, Martin-Malo A, Rodriguez M, Aljama P. C-reactive protein and low albumin are predictors of morbidity and cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease (CKD) 3–5 patients. Clin Nephrol. 2007; 67: 352–357.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Gerstein HC, Mann JF, Yi Q, Zinman B, Dinneen SF, Hoogwerf B, Halle JP, Young J, Rashkow A, Joyce C, Nawaz S, Yusuf S. Albuminuria and risk of cardiovascular events, death, and heart failure in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. JAMA. 2001; 286: 421–426.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Madison JR, Spies C, Schatz IJ, Masaki K, Chen R, Yano K, Curb JD. Proteinuria and risk for stroke and coronary heart disease during 27 years of follow-up: the Honolulu Heart Program. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166: 884–889.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Ohira T, Shahar E, Chambless LE, Rosamond WD, Mosley TH Jr, Folsom AR. Risk factors for ischemic stroke subtypes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Stroke. 2006; 37: 2493–2498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Sacco RL, Anand K, Lee HS, Boden-Albala B, Stabler S, Allen R, Paik MC. Homocysteine and the risk of ischemic stroke in a triethnic cohort: the Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke. 2004; 35: 2263–2269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis DP, Tziomalos K, Sileli M, Savvatianos S, Kakafika A, Gossios T, Krikis N, Moschou I, Xochellis M, Athyros VG. Serum uric acid as an independent predictor of early death after acute stroke. Circ J. 2007; 71: 1120–1127.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Menon V, Shlipak MG, Wang X, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens L, Kusek JW, Beck GJ, Collins AJ, Levey AS, Sarnak MJ. Cystatin C as a risk factor for outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 147: 19–27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Agrawal, B. Rai, J. Fellows, and P. A. McCullough
In-hospital outcomes with thrombolytic therapy in patients with renal dysfunction presenting with acute ischaemic stroke
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 27, 2009; (2009) gfp619v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/4/1296    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.520882v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yahalom, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tanne, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yahalom, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tanne, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction