| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2009;40:2680.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Medicine (X.Z., X.-O.S., G.Y., W.Z.), Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn; and the Department of Epidemiology (Y.-T.G., H.L.), Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Correspondence to Xianglan Zhang, MD, MPH, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Institute for Medicine & Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Sixth Floor, Suite 600, 2525 West End Avenue, Nashville, TN 37203-1738. E-mail xianglan.zhang{at}vanderbilt.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods— We evaluated associations of gravidity and parity with incidence of stroke in the Shanghai Womens Health Study (SWHS), a population-based cohort study of 74 942 Chinese women aged 40 to 70 years at enrollment (1996 to 2000). We also examined the association between number of children and stroke prevalence in both SWHS participants and their husbands. Stroke cases were ascertained through in-person interviews and linkage with vital statistics registries.
Results— During a mean follow-up of 7.3 years, 2343 incident cases of stroke were identified. Women with more pregnancies or live births had a significantly increased risk for incident stroke. After adjustment for socioeconomic status and other potential confounders, women with
5 pregnancies had a hazard ratio for incident stroke of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.18 to 1.77) compared with those with only one pregnancy. At baseline recruitment, 859 and 1274 prevalent cases of stroke were reported among SWHS participants and their husbands, respectively. Stroke prevalence increased with increasing number of children in both women and men. Adjusted ORs of prevalent stroke for having
5 children versus having one child were 1.61 (95% CI, 1.16 to 2.23) in women and 1.45 (1.11 to 1.89) in men.
Conclusions— High gravidity or parity may be related to increased risk of stroke in women. Chronic stress and adverse lifestyle factors related to childrearing may contribute importantly to the increased risk.
Key Words: pregnancy stroke women
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Childrearing is known to be associated with elevated levels of stress and anxiety and unfavorable changes in lifestyles, which may increase the risk for cardiovascular disease.1,2,6 This raises the question of whether factors related to childrearing, rather than pregnancy per se, may underlie the association between gravidity or parity and cardiovascular disease in women. Few studies have addressed this important issue.
We examined numbers of pregnancies and live births in relation to incidence of stroke in a large cohort of Chinese women enrolled in the Shanghai Womens Health Study (SWHS). We also evaluated the association between number of children and stroke prevalence in both SWHS participants and their husbands to address the issue of childrearing as a potential mediator of the gravidity/parity and stroke association in women.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Over 99% of SWHS participants were married. As part of the baseline survey, all married women were also asked to provide information on their husbands demographic background, lifestyle, and medical history. Husbands were invited to participate in the interviews whenever possible. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of all institutes involved, and written, informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Assessment of Reproductive History
During the baseline in-person interviews, each participant was asked whether she had ever been pregnant and, if so, how many times followed by questions on specific details of each pregnancy, including the date the pregnancy ended, the length of the pregnancy, and the pregnancys outcome (eg, live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage, or induced abortion).
Outcome Ascertainment
Participants were followed every 2 years through home visits and record linkage to the Shanghai Cancer Registry and the Shanghai Vital Statistics Registry. During the biennial home visits, trained study interviewers conducted in-person interviews using a structured questionnaire that captured information on newly diagnosed major chronic diseases. For subjects who had died, an adult family member (next of kin) was interviewed to complete the disease outcome survey. The primary outcome for the present analysis was incident stroke, defined as the first nonfatal stroke or stroke death that occurred after the baseline survey. The occurrence of stroke was ascertained by asking the following question: "Since our last visit, have you suffered a stroke that was confirmed by a doctor?" For each positive response, information on the date and hospital of the first diagnosis was obtained. Information on major stroke subtypes, including ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage, was also collected through in-person interviews starting with the second follow-up. In addition to the biennial home visits, disease outcomes and deaths were also ascertained through record linkages. The underlying cause of death was determined on the basis of death certificates and information gathered from next of kin.
To evaluate the validity of stroke ascertained through interviews, medical records were obtained and reviewed by independent physicians for 225 participants who reported a first-ever stroke during follow-up interviews. Brain imaging, including CT or MRI, was available for 95% of these reported stroke cases. The diagnosis of stroke was confirmed according to the criteria of the US National Survey of Stroke, which requires evidence of sudden or rapid onset of neurological deficits that persist for >24 hours or until death and have no apparent nonvascular causes such as trauma, tumor, or infection.11 Based on review of clinical information and imaging data, 203 (90.2%) stroke cases were confirmed, including 177 cases of ischemic stroke, 22 intracerebral hemorrhage, and 4 subarachnoid hemorrhage. Nine (4.0%) reported stroke cases did not meet the defined criteria for confirmation. Medical documentation was lacking or insufficient to confirm the diagnosis for the remaining 13 (5.8%) cases.
Statistical Analysis
Of the 74 942 SWHS participants, only 2507 (3.4%) had never had a live birth, and they were excluded from the present study to avoid potential bias from health-related factors that might have led to childlessness. To examine the association between reproductive history and incidence of stroke, we further excluded women who reported a history of stroke, coronary heart disease, rheumatic heart disease, cardiac surgery, or cancer at baseline (n=7548). We also excluded those who were lost to follow-up shortly after enrollment (n=7). After these exclusions, 64 880 women remained for the analysis. Women were categorized into 5 groups according to the total number of pregnancies/live births (1, 2, 3, 4, and
5 pregnancies/live births) they reported, with those having one pregnancy/live birth serving as the reference group. Cox proportional hazards models were used, with age as the time scale, to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of incident stroke associated with the number of pregnancies/live births and their 95% CIs and to adjust for potential confounders.12 Entry time was defined as the age at enrollment, and exit time was defined as the age at stroke diagnosis, death, or censoring. Covariates included age (continuous), birth calendar year (7 categories), education level (4 categories), occupation (3 categories), annual family income (4 categories), menopausal status (pre- or postmenopausal), use of oral contraceptives and hormone therapy (yes or no), cigarette smoking (yes or no), and alcohol consumption (yes or no). Considering that obesity, hypertension, and diabetes may play a role in the causal pathway between pregnancy and stroke, these factors were not adjusted for in the primary analyses. Using baseline survey data, we also examined stroke prevalence in relation to the number of children in both the SWHS participants and their husbands (for whom incident stroke was not ascertained) to evaluate the potential contribution of childrearing-related factors to the association between reproductive history and stroke risk in women. Logistic regression models were used to calculate ORs and 95% CIs for the associations. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (Version 9.1; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). All statistical tests were based on 2-sided probability.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
During a mean follow-up of 7.3 years, we identified 2343 incident cases of stroke, including 2206 nonfatal strokes and 137 deaths from stroke. These cases were further classified as ischemic stroke (n=1698), intracerebral hemorrhage (n=200), and undefined stroke (n=445). Table 2 summarizes the HRs and 95% CIs of incident stroke according to the numbers of pregnancies and live births. In both age- and multivariable-adjusted analyses, greater numbers of pregnancies or live births were associated with significantly increased risk of incident stroke in a dose-response fashion. Women with
5 pregnancies had a multivariable-adjusted HR for incident stroke of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.18 to 1.77) compared with those with only one pregnancy. The multivariable-adjusted HR was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.69) for women who had
5 live births compared with those having one live birth. These risk estimates were attenuated but remained statistically significant after additional adjustment for potential mediators, including body mass index and history of hypertension and diabetes. Additional adjustment for dyslipidemia did not appreciably alter the results. Further stratified analyses revealed that the association between number of pregnancies and stroke risk did not vary materially by age, birth calendar year, level of education, or family income (data not shown). In addition, analyses of major stroke subtypes found positive associations similar to total stroke with multivariable-adjusted HRs comparing 5 pregnancies versus one pregnancy of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.80), 1.27 (0.67 to 2.43), and 1.68 (1.03 to 2.74) for ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and undefined stroke, respectively. We also examined age at first pregnancy in relation to stroke risk and found no association after accounting for number of pregnancies.
|
There were 859 and 1274 prevalent cases of stroke reported at baseline among SWHS participants and their husbands, respectively. Table 3 presents the ORs of prevalent stroke associated with the number of children in women and their husbands. Similar to the findings on incident stroke in women, the ORs for prevalent stroke also increased with increasing number of children in both women and husbands. After adjusting for socioeconomic status and other potential confounders, the ORs of prevalent stroke for having
5 children versus having one child were 1.61 (95% CI, 1.16 to 2.23) in women and 1.45 (1.11 to 1.89) in husbands. Additional control for body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes, again, weakened the positive association for women but not for husbands.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The findings of our study are consistent with those of previous studies linking greater number of pregnancies with greater risk of stroke in women beyond typical childbearing age.9 For example, an analysis of women 45 to 74 years of age in the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiological Follow-up Study showed that women with
6 pregnancies had a 70% increased risk of stroke compared with those who had never been pregnant.9 As seen in our study, adjustment for stroke risk factors reduced, but did not eliminate, the positive association between gravidity and stroke. An earlier British study of middle-aged and elderly women also found a higher mortality rate from cerebrovascular disease in parous women than in nulliparous women.13 In addition, there are also reports of positive associations of parity with both carotid atherosclerosis and carotid intima media thickness, which are strong predictors of stroke.14,15 In contrast to these findings, a few case-control studies of subarachnoid hemorrhage in relatively younger women suggested a potentially protective effect for parity.16 We have no specific information on subarachnoid hemorrhage. In stratified analyses, we found no modifying effect of age on the association between parity and total stroke.
Although the adverse metabolic changes induced by repeated pregnancies provide biological plausibility for the increased risk of stroke associated with increasing gravidity or parity in women, our observation of a positive association between number of children and stroke prevalence in both women and their husbands suggests that explanations other than the biological consequences of pregnancy may also need to be considered when interpreting study results on childbearing history and stroke risk. Childrearing may increase anxiety levels because of increased responsibilities, sleep deprivation, and financial and occupational stress. Childrearing has also been associated with adverse changes in lifestyle such as unhealthy dietary habits and physical inactivity.1,2,6 These childrearing-related anxiety, stress, and adverse lifestyle factors may contribute importantly to the elevated risk of stroke associated with high gravidity or parity. However, these factors are difficult to measure or properly address in studies involving women only. Incorporating data on men, particularly spouses, offers a useful approach to the evaluation of such alternative explanations.
Socioeconomic status is known to be related to both number of children and stroke risk, and its confounding effect is a major concern in evaluating the association between parity and stroke. Although we cannot rule out the possibility of residual confounding by socioeconomic status, we adjusted for education, income, and occupation and found that such adjustments attenuated, but did not eliminate, the significant associations. We did not collect information on pregnancy complications and thus were unable to account for their potential effects on the results. Pregnancy complications such as gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia have been associated with an elevated risk of stroke in later life.17,18 These complications are likely to have reduced the number of subsequent pregnancies. Thus, the association between number of pregnancies or live births and stroke observed in our study may have been underestimated. Another concern is possible misclassification of stroke, because stroke outcome in our study was assessed through in-person interviews without further verification by review of medical records. However, our validation study indicated that stroke assessment through in-person interviews in our cohort was accurate. Previous studies have also shown that even with a self-administered questionnaire, stroke, a life-threatening medical emergency, can be assessed reasonably well.19 Nevertheless, certain self-reported stroke cases could be false-positives, and such random misclassification of outcome might have attenuated the associations. Another limitation of the study is that because of differences in sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, the findings of our study conducted in urban Shanghai may not be generalizable to other populations. Finally, to further address the potential contribution of lifestyle risk factors associated with childrearing to stroke risk, it would be interesting to evaluate the association between number of adopted children and stroke risk in future studies.
In summary, our study indicates that high gravidity and high parity were associated with increased risk of stroke in women. Although the biological effects of pregnancy may account for this positive association, chronic stress and lifestyle risk factors related to childrearing may also be important contributing factors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by research grants R01CA70867 and R01HL079123 from the National Institutes of Health. X.Z. was supported by a National Institutes of Health-sponsored Bldg Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Womens Health (BIRCWH) Program at Vanderbilt University (2K12HD043483-06). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Disclosures
None.
Received January 14, 2009; revision received April 9, 2009; accepted April 15, 2009.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Lawlor DA, Emberson JR, Ebrahim S, Whincup PH, Wannamethee SG, Walker M, Smith GD. Is the association between parity and coronary heart disease due to biological effects of pregnancy or adverse lifestyle risk factors associated with child-rearing? Findings from the British Womens Heart and Health Study and the British Regional Heart Study. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1260–1264.
3. McDonald SD, Yusuf S, Sheridan P, Anand SS, Gerstein HC; for the DREAM Trial Investigators. Dysglycemia and a history of reproductive risk factors. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31: 1635–1638.
4. Cohen A, Pieper CF, Brown AJ, Bastian LA. Number of children and risk of metabolic syndrome in women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006; 15: 763–773.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Ness RB, Harris T, Cobb J, Flegal KM, Kelsey JL, Balanger A, Stunkard AJ, D'Agostino RB. Number of pregnancies and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 1528–1533.
6. Dekker JM, Schouten EG. Number of pregnancies and risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 1893–1894.
7. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. A prospective study of age at menarche, parity, age at first birth, and coronary heart disease in women. Am J Epidemiol. 1987; 126: 861–870.
8. Steenland K, Lally C, Thun M. Parity and coronary heart disease among women in the American Cancer Society CPS II population. Epidemiology. 1996; 7: 641–643.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Qureshi AI, Giles WH, Croft JB, Stern BJ. Number of pregnancies and risk for stroke and stroke subtypes. Arch Neurol. 1997; 54: 203–206.
10. Zheng W, Chow WH, Yang G, Jin F, Rothman N, Blair A, Li HL, Wen W, Ji BT, Li Q, Shu XO, Gao YT. The Shanghai Womens Health Study: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 162: 1123–1131.
11. Walker AE, Robins M, Weinfeld FD. The National Survey of Stroke. Clinical findings. Stroke. 1981; 12 (suppl 1): I13–I44.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Korn EL, Graubard BI, Midthune D. Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice of the time-scale. Am J Epidemiol. 1997; 145: 72–80.
13. Beral V. Long term effects of childbearing on health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1985; 39: 343–346.
14. Humphries KH, Westendorp ICD, Bots ML, Spinelli JJ, Carere RG, Hofman A, Witteman JCM. Parity and carotid artery atherosclerosis in elderly women: the Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 2001; 32: 2259–2264.
15. Wolff B, Volzke H, Robinson D, Schwahn C, Ludemann J, Kessler C, John U, Felix SB. Relation of parity with common carotid intima-media thickness among women of the study of health in Pomerania. Stroke. 2005; 36: 938–943.
16. Gaist D, Pedersen L, Cnattingius S, Sorensen HT. Parity and risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage in women: a nested case-control study based on national Swedish registries. Stroke. 2004; 35: 28–32.
17. Carpenter MW. Gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, and late vascular disease. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30 (suppl 2): S246–S250.
18. Wilson BJ, Watson MS, Prescott GJ, Sunderland S, Campbell DM, Hannaford P, Smith WC. Hypertensive diseases of pregnancy and risk of hypertension and stroke in later life: results from cohort study. BMJ. 2003; 326: 845.
19. Engstad T, Bonaa KH, Viitanen M. Validity of self-reported stroke: the Tromso Study. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1602–1607.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |