| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:423.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Progress Reviews |
From the Stroke Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Correspondence to Maurizio Paciaroni, MD, Stroke Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Perugia, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, SantAndrea delle Fratte, Perugia, Italy. E-mail: mpaciaroni{at}libero.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Using electronic and manual searches of the literature, we identified randomized trials comparing anticoagulants (unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin or heparinoids), started within 48 hours, with other treatments (aspirin or placebo) in patients with acute ischemic cardioembolic stroke. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on study design, quality, and clinical outcomes, including death or disability, all strokes, recurrent ischemic stroke, and cerebral symptomatic bleeding. Odds ratios for individual outcomes were calculated for each trial and data from all the trials were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method.
Results Seven trials, involving 4624 patients with acute cardioembolic stroke, met the criteria for inclusion. Compared with other treatments, anticoagulants were associated with a nonsignificant reduction in recurrent ischemic stroke within 7 to 14 days (3.0% versus 4.9%, odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.06, P=0.09, number needed to treat=53), a significant increase in symptomatic intracranial bleeding (2.5% versus 0.7%, odds ratio 2.89; 95% CI: 1.19 to 7.01, P=0.02, number needed to harm=55), and a similar rate of death or disability at final follow up (73.5% versus 73.8%, odds ratio 1.01; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.24, P=0.9).
Conclusions Our findings indicate that in patients with acute cardioembolic stroke, early anticoagulation is associated with a nonsignificant reduction in recurrence of ischemic stroke, no substantial reduction in death and disability, and an increased intracranial bleeding.
Key Words: anticoagulants cardioembolism cerebral bleeding stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The risk of early recurrent ischemic stroke, defined as a new stroke of presumed embolic origin occurring within the first 2 weeks, is higher in patients with NVAF than in patients with stroke resulting from other causes, and the rate varies between 0.1% and 1.3% per day.3,4 The role of immediate anticoagulation to reduce early recurrence and improve functional outcome in acute cardioembolic ischemic stroke is controversial. However, unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), or heparinoids are commonly used in routine clinical practice outside clinical trials.
To further clarify the role of anticoagulants (UFH, LMWH, heparinoid) for the treatment of acute cardioembolic stroke, we performed an updated meta-analysis of all randomized trials comparing anticoagulants, started within 48 hours, with other treatments (placebo or aspirin) for the initial treatment of acute cardioembolic stroke. Our outcomes were death or disability, all strokes, recurrent ischemic stroke, and cerebral symptomatic bleeding.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Identification
We aimed to identify all relevant published and unpublished randomized trials comparing anticoagulants (UFH, LMWH, heparinoids) with other treatments (placebo or aspirin) for the initial treatment (within 48 hours) of acute cardioembolic ischemic stroke. The following anticoagulant regimens were to be included: subcutaneous and intravenous UFH, subcutaneous LMWHs, and subcutaneous and intravenous heparinoids. We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) from January 1980 to February 2006 and the Cochrane Library (2006, Issue 1) using the terms stroke, cardioembolism, heparin, heparinoids, low-molecular-weight heparin, anticoagulants, randomized controlled trial, and controlled clinical trial. Bibliographies of journal articles were manually searched to locate additional studies and abstracts from major international meetings were reviewed to locate any unpublished studies. Relevance of studies was assessed using a hierarchical approach based on title, abstract, and the full manuscript. We included in this review randomized controlled trials that compared anticoagulants with other treatments or placebo in patients with acute stroke resulting from etiologies other than cardioembolism but only when it was possible to extrapolate data regarding patients with cardioembolism. If any of these data were not available in the publications, further information was sought by correspondence with the authors.
Study Selection
Criteria for inclusion were: (1) randomization within 48 hours from stroke onset; (2) inclusion of patients with objectively diagnosed stroke of presumed cardioembolic origin; (3) comparison of anticoagulants (UFH, LMWH, heparinoid) with other treatments (placebo or aspirin) for the initial therapy of cardioembolic ischemic stroke; and (4) use of objective methods to assess one or more of the study outcomes.
Assessment of Study Quality
We adopted the criteria for study quality outlined by Schultz and colleagues5 in the evaluation of studies included in our meta-analysis. These criteria include: (1) proper generation of the treatment allocation sequence; (2) proper concealment of the allocation sequence; (3) blinding of the patient and the investigator assessing clinical outcomes to treatment allocation; and (4) completeness of follow up.
Data Extraction
Two investigators (M.P., S.M.) independently extracted data on study design, study quality, and the following efficacy and safety outcomes at 14 days: (1) all strokes (ischemic or hemorrhagic); (2) recurrent ischemic stroke; (3) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; (4) pulmonary embolism and, at final follow up, (5) death or disability. The data abstracted for each trial were confirmed by a third investigator (V.C.) and any disagreements resolved by consensus.
Outcomes
The efficacy outcomes were the composite of death or disability at final follow up (at least 3 months), all strokes (ischemic and hemorrhagic) within 14 days, early recurrent stroke (within 14 days), and pulmonary embolism; the safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial bleeding.
Study outcomes were analyzed comparing the results from trials with anticoagulants versus aspirin or the results from trials with anticoagulants versus placebo.
Statistical Analysis
Given the presence of possible statistical heterogeneity resulting from clinical diversity of the selected studies, we used a random-effects model based on the Mantel-Haenszel method6 for combining results from the individual trials. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs. Tests of heterogeneity were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant except for heterogeneity testing, in which statistical significance was accepted at a P value of 0.10. All statistical calculations were performed using Review Manager.7
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Study Design
The design of 7 studies included14,16,2630 in this meta-analysis are summarized in Table 1. All studies included patients with cardioembolic ischemic stroke (n=4624) randomized within 48 hours from stroke onset. Atrial fibrillation was present in 3797 patients and other mixed cardioembolic sources in 827. Three trials used UFH,16,26,30 3 trials LMWH (TAIST tinzaparin, HAEST dalteparin, and FISS-bis nadroparin),14,28,29 and one trial (TOAST) heparinoid (danaparoid).27 In the CESG trial, the follow up was reported only at 14 days.30
|
Study Quality
Reporting of study quality data was incomplete. Randomized treatment allocation sequences were block-randomized by assignment to sequential numbered packages containing either active drug and corresponding placebo (double-dummy masking) in the HAEST trial28 and in the TAIST trial14; sequentially numbered boxes blinded to doctor, patient, and assessor in the FISS-bis trial29; permuted blocks with randomly ordered sizes of 6, 6, and 4 (randomization lists pharmacy controlled) blinded to doctor, patient, and assessor in TOAST27; telephone randomization in IST26, using a computer program from Camerlingo16 and with sealed envelopes (opaque and sequentially) in CESG.30 Both patients and investigators were blind to treatment allocation in 5 of the 7 trials. The number of patients lost to follow up was reported in 6 trials included in our meta-analysis (none in CESG, HAEST, and Camerlingo; 11 in TAIST; 25 patients overall in TOAST without specific information about the number of patients with cardioembolic stroke; 99.99% completed for 14 days outcome and 99.2% completed 6-month outcome in IST).
Outcomes
Data on the outcomes are presented in Table 2 and Figures 2 and 3
A through C and summary data for individual components of these outcomes are presented in Table 3. Compared with other treatments, anticoagulants were associated with a nonsignificant difference in death or disability at final follow up (73.5% versus 73.8%, OR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.24, P=0.9, P for heterogeneity=0.21). The difference in death or disability was statistically significant in only one trial16 (58.5% versus 74.1%, OR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.93). The difference in all strokes (ischemic and hemorrhagic) was not significant (OR 1.18; 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.88, P=0.49, P for heterogeneity=0.25). Anticoagulants were associated with a nonsignificant reduction in recurrent stroke within 7 to 14 days (3.0% versus 4.9%, OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.06, P=0.09, number needed to treat=53) but were associated with a significant increase in symptomatic intracranial bleeding (2.5% versus 0.7%, OR 2.89; 95% CI: 1.19 to 7.01, P=0.02, number needed to harm=55).
|
|
|
|
Subgroup Analyses
Compared with placebo, anticoagulants were associated with a nonsignificant difference in death or disability at final follow up (OR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.22). Compared with aspirin, anticoagulants were associated with a nonsignificant trend in favor of aspirin in death or disability at final follow up (OR 1.14; 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.38).
Compared with aspirin, anticoagulants were not associated with a reduction in pulmonary embolism (OR 0.94; 95% CI: 0.44 to 2.00; P=0.87, P for heterogeneity=0.94).
Sensitivity Analyses
Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the robustness of our results. To identify any study that may have exerted a disproportionate influence on the summary treatment effect, we deleted studies one at a time. Deleting individual studies did not significantly alter the outcomes. The lack of positive trials with a large number of patients (only one small study showed a reduction in death or disability after the scheduled follow-up) and the fact that all the trials demonstrated similar no significant results argue against possible publication bias.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The use of early anticoagulation in ischemic stroke has been a matter of debate for a long time. In the most recent of these debates, Caplan supported the use of UFH in selected patients as those with cardioembolic stroke with a high risk of early recurrence. Sandercock, on the other hand, took the stand that current data from randomized trials are not sufficient to support the use of UFH in acute ischemic stroke.34,35
In the IST and CAST studies, patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to aspirin versus control and treated a mean of 20 hours after stroke onset showed trends toward a reduction in early recurrent stroke and an improvement of 6-month functional outcome.36,37 In our analysis, mortality and disability in patients with cardioembolic stroke treated with aspirin were certainly not worse than in patients treated with anticoagulants. These data combined with the safety and ease of aspirin make early aspirin therapy reasonable for patients with acute stroke and atrial fibrillation.38
In the single study in which anticoagulation was started within 3 hours from stroke onset, death or disability was reduced by anticoagulant treatment. These results should be interpreted with caution because other trials did subgroup analyses in hyperacute patients and showed neutral results. Several studies have suggested that besides its antithrombotic effects, UFH also modulates inflammation.3943 Thus, the positive effect of early heparin could be the result of either its antithrombotic effects and/or its modulation on the antiinflammatory pathway that appears relevant in the first hours. Whatever the mechanism for improvement, the benefit observed in patients treated within 3 hours suggests the need for further trials on the efficacy of very early administration of anticoagulants in acute cardioembolic stroke. In selecting the study population for these trials, size of ischemia, age, and blood pressure in the acute phase, all known as risk factors for hemorrhagic complications, should be considered.
In clinical trials on thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke, approximately 20% to 30% of patients had NVAF and thus, a stroke of presumed cardioembolic origin.38,4446 The option of treating with thrombolysis patients with acute ischemic stroke and NVAF is limited by the large volume of their brain infarcts, their old age, and the likelihood of symptomatic brain hemorrhage. However, some studies, after adjustment for extent and severity of ischemia, have demonstrated that NVAF is not associated with secondary hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis.47 Furthermore, thrombolysis given within 3 hours of stroke onset appears to offer a benefit for patients with NVAF with acute ischemic stroke. Therefore, further clinical trials in the 3-hour time window need to compare anticoagulant treatment with thrombolysis or to consider anticoagulants for patients in whom thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated.
Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are major causes of morbidity and mortality after ischemic stroke.48,49 Heparin has a role in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.50 In the IST, UHF-allocated patients had fewer pulmonary emboli recorded within 14 days (0.5% versus 0.8%; P=0.02), but, at 6 months, the rate of deaths or dependent patients was identical. In this analysis, the rates of pulmonary embolism were similar in patients treated with anticoagulants and in patients treated with aspirin.
The optimal timing to initiate oral anticoagulant therapy for secondary prevention was not addressed in this review. It seems reasonable to begin it as soon as the patient is medically and neurologically stable after repeating a computed tomography scan to exclude a hemorrhagic transformation or a large infarct. Empirically if the infarct is large or a hemorrhagic transformation is present, initiation of warfarin should be delayed for 2 to 3 weeks.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Disclosures
Giancarlo Agnelli received honoraria as a member of the speaker bureau of Astra Zeneca and Bayer.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 24, 2006; revision received August 28, 2006; accepted September 25, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Hallevi, K. C. Albright, S. Martin-Schild, A. D. Barreto, S. I. Savitz, M. A. Escobar, N. R. Gonzales, E. A. Noser, K. Illoh, and J. C. Grotta Anticoagulation After Cardioembolic Stroke: To Bridge or Not to Bridge? Arch Neurol, July 14, 2008; (2008) 65.9.noc70105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Streifler Early Stroke Risk After a Transient Ischemic Attack: Can It Be Minimized? Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1655 - 1656. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Guedes and J. M. Ferro A Systematic Review of Immediate Anticoagulation for Ischemic Stroke of Presumed Cardioembolic Origin Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): e81 - e82. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Paciaroni, G. Agnelli, S. Micheli, and V. Caso Response to Letter by Guedes and Ferro Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): e83 - e83. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G J Hankey When the patient fails to respond to treatment: TIAs that go on, and on Practical Neurology, April 1, 2008; 8(2): 103 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Doufekias, A. Z. Segal, and J. R. Kizer Cardiogenic and aortogenic brain embolism. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1049 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Engelter, T. Brandt, S. Debette, V. Caso, C. Lichy, A. Pezzini, S. Abboud, A. Bersano, R. Dittrich, C. Grond-Ginsbach, et al. Antiplatelets Versus Anticoagulation in Cervical Artery Dissection Stroke, September 1, 2007; 38(9): 2605 - 2611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. B. van der Worp and J. van Gijn Acute Ischemic Stroke N. Engl. J. Med., August 9, 2007; 357(6): 572 - 579. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Additional articles abstracted in ACP Journal Club Evid. Based Med., August 1, 2007; 12(4): 126 - 126. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |