Published online before print March 13, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505602
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2008;39:1401.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorials |
Leukoaraiosis: From an Ancient Term to an Actual Marker of Poor Prognosis
From the Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Florence, Italy.
Correspondence to Leonardo Pantoni, MD, PhD, Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134 Florence, Italy. E-mail pantoni{at}neuro.unifi.it
Key Words: leukoaraiosis • white matter changes • disability • MRI • prognosis • stroke
See related article, pages 1409–1413.
The term leukoaraiosis (from the Greek leuko, white, and araiosis, rarefaction) was introduced in 1986 by Hachinski, Potter and Merskey to designate bilateral and symmetrical areas in the periventricular and centrum semiovale white matter that appeared hypodense on CT scans and hyperintense on T2-weighted MRI.1,2 Leukoaraiosis was supposed to be "a neutral term, exact enough to define white-matter changes, sufficient as a description or label, and demanding enough to require precise clinical and imaging descriptions."1,2 It was clear in Hachinski and coworkers’ proposal the aim of contrasting the tendency to immediately identify a radiological aspect with a clinical picture. At that time, changes or lesions of the white matter were recognized with increasing frequency on the brain CT scans of elderly patients,3 and some authors had begun to attribute a clinical significance to these radiological findings, particularly interpreting them as a correlate of cognitive decline. According to some, the introduction of CT had made possible the identification in vivo of subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy (or Binswanger disease), a form of vascular dementia with only few cases reported on pathological grounds until the eighties.4,5 The issue became even more complex after the introduction of MRI in neurological clinical practice because it was soon apparent that this neuroimaging technique was able to detect cerebral white matter changes with much higher frequency than CT.6,7 On MRI, changes of the white matter can be detected even when they are of very small ("puntiform") size.8 A review of the topic published in 1995 concluded that the clinical significance of leukoaraiosis remained incompletely defined, but it also suggested that the presence of the most severe degrees of these changes had an effect on cognitive functions in subjects without or with only minor cognitive impairment.9 The number of studies from which these conclusions were drawn at that time was much smaller than that available today.9
Over the last 10 years, evidence has been mounting on the prevalence, clinical significance, and prognostic value of white matter changes (Table). Nowadays, we know that minimal changes are almost invariably found in the general population.10,11 Data are sufficient to sustain that the mildest degree of leukoaraiosis is to be considered as an almost normal finding in the brain of elderly patients. However, evidence has also accumulated showing that moderate-to-severe white matter changes are not so benign. They are in fact correlated with motor and gait disturbances,12 depressive symptoms,13 urinary disturbances,14 and some cognitive deficits15; the extent of these latter, however, is likely also influenced by possibly associated lesions such as lacunar infarcts and coexisting degenerative diseases.16–19 Longitudinal studies have outlined also a predictive role of leukoaraiosis in terms of less favorable prognosis in the general population and in a number of clinical conditions (Table). It is therefore essential in studies on white matter changes to abandon the mere assessment of their presence, and it is crucial to recognize their most severe degrees because these are likely the ones bearing clinical consequences. Further studies are needed to determine whether mild-to-moderate changes progress over time to become severe. Most of the studies with a longitudinal assessment of leukoaraiosis, however, have found that the most powerful predictor of progression is indeed baseline leukoaraiosis severity.20,21 Should this be definitely confirmed in the future, it will strongly support the hypothesis that at least 2 different pathological age-related processes of the white matter exist: a first one, more benign and attributable to a quasi-physiological aging process of the brain; and a second one, clearly pathological and associated with clinical disturbances and disease status. This will eventually demonstrate Hachinski and coworkers’ original hypothesis on the heterogeneity of leukoaraiosis.2 Preventive and therapeutic measures will obviously have to focus on the second type of leukoaraiosis.
|
Perhaps, the most important result in recent years has been the demonstration that leukoaraiosis represents a marker of poor prognosis, particularly in terms of increased mortality and risk of dementia.22–24 In a multicenter study, the severity of white matter changes at baseline was an independent predictor of the transition from a normal functional status to disability already after 1 year.25 The same study showed that this transition was mainly explained by cognitive and motor performances decline. This is of relevance because it suggests that the clinical effect of white matter changes is likely a composite one where different clinical correlates interact to cause loss of independence.
The presence of leukoaraiosis has been identified as a marker of less favorable prognosis also in the acute stroke settings. In particular, white matter changes have been associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic transformation of the brain infarct in patients subjected to thrombolysis26; this increased risk is probably partially influenced by the copresence of lacunar infarcts.27 In this issue of Stroke, the article by Ay and colleagues28 adds further evidence about the prognostic significance of leukoaraiosis in this setting. These authors have shown that leukoaraiosis volume at the time of acute ischemic stroke is a predictor of infarct size growth. In this study, leukoaraiosis severity was volumetrically assessed whereas ischemic lesions on admission and follow-up were identified with diffusion and perfusion images. Clearly, this protocol is applicable only in centers with high expertise in neuroimaging techniques and not on a routine basis. But the relevance of the study is to have shown that a neuroimaging correlate of an underlying parenchyma and vessel disease is able to predict outcome in terms of infarct extension. When implemented in clinical practice, these data could provide a basis for a better selection of patients undergoing interventions in the acute phase of stroke.
Taken together, these recently acquired data indicate that the view that white matter changes are an innocuous and incidental finding or a topic to be left to the discussion of a small group of researchers should be now disregarded. Like other biological markers of an underlying disease, leukoaraiosis needs to be carefully looked at, assessed, and quantified29; further studies will tell us whether this can be done by using simple visual rating scales or if it requires volume assessment and more sophisticated MRI techniques.
 |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Disclosures
None.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
The opinions in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.
|
References |
|---|
 Top References |
|---|
1. Hachinski VC, Potter P, Merskey H. Leuko-araiosis: an ancient term for a new problem. Can J Neurol Sci. 1986; 13 (4 Suppl): 533–534.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Hachinski VC, Potter P, Merskey H. Leuko-araiosis. Arch Neurol. 1987; 44: 21–23.
3. George AE, de Leon MJ, Gentes CI, Miller J, London E, Budzilovich GN, Ferris S, Chase N. Leukoencephalopathy in normal and pathologic aging: 1. CT of brain lucencies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1986; 7: 561–566.[Abstract]
4. Pullicino P, Eskin T, Ketonen L. Prevalence of Binswanger’s disease. Lancet. 1983; 1: 939.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Roman GC. Why not Binswanger’s disease? Arch Neurol. 1988; 45: 141–143.
6. Johnson KA, Davis KR, Buonanno FS, Brady TJ, Rosen TJ, Growdon JH. Comparison of magnetic resonance and roentgen ray computed tomography in dementia. Arch Neurol. 1987; 44: 1075–1080.
7. George AE, de Leon MJ, Kalnin A, Rosner L, Goodgold A, Chase N. Leukoencephalopathy in normal and pathologic aging: 2. MRI of brain lucencies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1986; 7: 567–570.[Abstract]
8. Fazekas F. Magnetic resonance signal abnormalities in asymptomatic individuals: their incidence and functional correlates. Eur Neurol. 1989; 29: 164–168.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Pantoni L, Garcia JH. The significance of cerebral white matter abnormalities 100 years after Binswanger’s report. A review. Stroke. 1995; 26: 1293–1301.
10. Longstreth WT Jr, Manolio TA, Arnold A, Burke GL, Bryan N, Jungreis CA, Enright PL, O’Leary D, Fried L. Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3301 elderly people: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1274–1282.
11. de Leeuw FE, de Groot JC, Achten E, Oudkerk M, Ramos LM, Heijboer R, Hofman A, Jolles J, van Gijn J, Breteler MM. Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001; 70: 9–14.
12. Guttmann CR, Benson R, Warfield SK, Wei X, Anderson MC, Hall CB, Abu-Hasaballah K, Mugler JP III, Wolfson L. White matter abnormalities in mobility-impaired older persons. Neurology. 2000; 54: 1277–1283.
13. Teodorczuk A, O’Brien JT, Firbank MJ, Pantoni L, Poggesi A, Erkinjuntti T, Wallin A, Wahlund LO, Gouw A, Waldemar G, Schmidt R, Ferro JM, Chabriat H, Bazner H, Inzitari D; on behalf of the LADIS Group. White matter changes and late-life depressive symptoms: longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry. 2007; 191: 212–217.
14. Hirono N, Kitagaki H, Kazui H, Hashimoto M, Mori E. Impact of white matter changes on clinical manifestation of Alzheimer’s disease: a quantitative study. Stroke. 2000; 31: 2182–2188.
15. Pantoni L, Poggesi A, Inzitari D. The relation between white-matter lesions and cognition. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007; 20: 390–397.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Wen HM, Mok VC, Fan YH, Lam WW, Tang WK, Wong A, Huang RX, Wong KS. Effect of white matter changes on cognitive impairment in patients with lacunar infarcts. Stroke. 2004; 35: 1826–1830.
17. van der Flier WM, van Straaten EC, Barkhof F, Verdelho A, Madureira S, Pantoni L, Inzitari D, Erkinjuntti T, Crisby M, Waldemar G, Schmidt R, Fazekas F, Scheltens P. Small vessel disease and general cognitive function in nondisabled elderly: the LADIS study. Stroke. 2005; 36: 2116–2120.
18. van der Flier WM, van Straaten EC, Barkhof F, Ferro JM, Pantoni L, Basile AM, Inzitari D, Erkinjuntti T, Wahlund LO, Rostrup E, Schmidt R, Fazekas F, Scheltens P, for the LADIS study group. Medial temporal lobe atrophy and white matter hyperintensities are associated with mild cognitive deficits in non-disabled elderly people: the LADIS study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005; 76: 1497–1500.
19. Schmidt R, Petrovic K, Ropele S, Enzinger C, Fazekas F. Progression of leukoaraiosis and cognition. Stroke. 2007; 38: 2619–2625.
20. Schmidt R, Enzinger C, Ropele S, Schmidt H, Fazekas F, for the Austrian Stroke Prevention Study. Progression of cerebral white matter lesions: 6-year results of the Austrian Stroke Prevention Study. Lancet. 2003; 361: 2046–2048.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Sachdev P, Wen W, Chen X, Brodaty H. Progression of white matter hyperintensities in elderly individuals over 3 years. Neurology. 2007; 68: 214–222.
22. Inzitari D, Cadelo M, Marranci ML, Pracucci G, Pantoni L. Vascular deaths in elderly neurological patients with leukoaraiosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997; 62: 177–181.
23. Briley DP, Haroon S, Sergent SM, Thomas S. Does leukoaraiosis predict morbidity and mortality? Neurology. 2000; 54: 90–94.
24. Prins ND, van Dijk EJ, den Heijer T, Vermeer SE, Koudstaal PJ, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Breteler MM. Cerebral white matter lesions and the risk of dementia. Arch Neurol. 2004; 61: 1531–1534.
25. Inzitari D, Simoni M, Pracucci G, Poggesi A, Basile AM, Chabriat H, Erkinjuntti T, Fazekas F, Ferro JM, Hennerici M, Langhorne P, O’Brien J, Barkhof F, Visser MC, Wahlund LO, Waldemar G, Wallin A, Pantoni L, for the LADIS Study Group. Risk of rapid global functional decline in elderly patients with severe cerebral age-related white matter changes: the LADIS study. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 81–88.
26. Neumann-Haefelin T, Hoelig S, Berkefeld J, Fiehler J, Gass A, Humpich M, Kastrup A, Kucinski T, Lecei O, Liebeskind DS, Rother J, Rosso C, Samson Y, Saver JL, Yan B, for the MR Stroke Group. Leukoaraiosis is a risk factor for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after thrombolysis for acute stroke. Stroke. 2006; 37: 2463–2466.
27. Palumbo V, Boulanger JM, Hill MD, Inzitari D, Buchan AM, for the CASES Investigators. Leukoaraiosis and intracerebral hemorrhage after thrombolysis in acute stroke. Neurology. 2007; 68: 1020–1024.
28. Ay H, Arsava EM, Rosand J, Furie KL, Singhal AB, Schaefer PW, Wu O, Gonzalez RG, Koroshetz WJ, Sorensen AG. Severity of leukoaraiosis and susceptibility to infarct growth in acute stroke. Stroke. 2008; 39: 1409–1413.
29. Schmidt R, Scheltens P, Erkinjuntti T, Pantoni L, Markus HS, Wallin A, Barkhof F, Fazekas F, for the European Task Force on Age-Related White Matter Changes. White matter lesion progression. A surrogate endpoint for trials in cerebral small vessel disease. Neurology. 2004; 63: 139–144.
Related Article:
Stroke 2008 39: 1409-1413.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. A. Kuchel, N. Moscufo, C. R. Guttmann, N. Zeevi, D. Wakefield, J. Schmidt, C. E. DuBeau, and L. Wolfson Localization of Brain White Matter Hyperintensities and Urinary Incontinence in Community-Dwelling Older Adults J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, August 1, 2009; 64A(8): 902 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Hachinski World Stroke Day 2008: "Little Strokes, Big Trouble" Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2407 - 2408. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||