Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on October 31, 2002

Stroke. 2002
Published online before print October 31, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000035734.61539.F6
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/12/2895    most recent
01.STR.0000035734.61539.F6v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Werner, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hesse, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Werner, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hesse, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Stroke Syndromes
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

Submitted on June 5, 2002
Accepted on June 25, 2002

Treadmill Training With Partial Body Weight Support and an Electromechanical Gait Trainer for Restoration of Gait in Subacute Stroke Patients. A Randomized Crossover Study

C. Werner MA; S. von Frankenberg PT; T. Treig MD; M. Konrad MD; and S. Hesse MD*

From Klinik Berlin (C.W., S.v.F., M.K., S.H.), Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, Free University Berlin, and Neurological Rehabilitation Centre (T.T.), Greifswald, Germany.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bhesse{at}zedat.fu-berlin.de.

Background and Purpose—The purpose of this study was to compare treadmill and electromechanical gait trainer therapy in subacute, nonambulatory stroke survivors. The gait trainer was designed to provide nonambulatory subjects the repetitive practice of a gait-like movement without overexerting therapists.

Methods—This was a randomized, controlled study with a crossover design following an A-B-A versus a B-A-B pattern. A consisted of 2 weeks of gait trainer therapy, and B consisted of 2 weeks of treadmill therapy. Thirty nonambulatory hemiparetic patients, 4 to 12 weeks after stroke, were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 groups receiving locomotor therapy every workday for 15 to 20 minutes for 6 weeks. Weekly gait ability (functional ambulation category [FAC]), gait velocity, and the required physical assistance during both kinds of locomotor therapy were the primary outcome measures, and other motor functions (Rivermead motor assessment score) and ankle spasticity (modified Ashworth score) were the secondary outcome measures. Follow-up occurred 6 months later.

Results—The groups did not differ at study onset with respect to the clinical characteristics and effector variables. During treatment, the FAC, gait velocity, and Rivermead scores improved in both groups, and ankle spasticity did not change. Median FAC level was 4 (3 to 4) in group A compared with 3 (2 to 3) in group B at the end of treatment (P=0.018), but the difference at 6-month follow up was not significant. The therapeutic effort was less on the gait trainer, with 1 instead of 2 therapists assisting the patient at study onset. All but seven patients preferred the gait trainer.

Conclusions—The newly developed gait trainer was at least as effective as treadmill therapy with partial body weight support while requiring less input from the therapist. Further studies are warranted.


Key words: exercise therapy • gait • paresis • rehabilitation • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
R. Dickstein
Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 649 - 660.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
J.-P. Regnaux, K. Saremi, J. Marehbian, B. Bussel, and B. H. Dobkin
An Accelerometry-Based Comparison of 2 Robotic Assistive Devices for Treadmill Training of Gait
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2008; 22(4): 348 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. G. Hornby, D. D. Campbell, J. H. Kahn, T. Demott, J. L. Moore, and H. R. Roth
Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study
Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1786 - 1792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
A. L Behrman and P. Plummer-D'Amato
"What's in a Name?" Revisited
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 6 - 9.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. F.W. Ng, R. K.Y. Tong, and L. S.W. Li
A Pilot Study of Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial of Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients With Partial Body-Weight Support Electromechanical Gait Trainer and Functional Electrical Stimulation: Six-Month Follow-Up
Stroke, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 154 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
K. J Sullivan, D. A Brown, T. Klassen, S. Mulroy, T. Ge, S. P Azen, C. J Winstein, and for the Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network
Effects of Task-Specific Locomotor and Strength Training in Adults Who Were Ambulatory After Stroke: Results of the STEPS Randomized Clinical Trial
Physical Therapy, December 1, 2007; 87(12): 1580 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
A. Mayr, M. Kofler, E. Quirbach, H. Matzak, K. Frohlich, and L. Saltuari
Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2007; 21(4): 307 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. Husemann, F. Muller, C. Krewer, S. Heller, and E. Koenig
Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 349 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. F Israel, D. D Campbell, J. H Kahn, and T G. Hornby
Metabolic Costs and Muscle Activity Patterns During Robotic- and Therapist-Assisted Treadmill Walking in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Physical Therapy, November 1, 2006; 86(11): 1466 - 1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. K. Tong, M. F. Ng, L. S. Li, and E. F. So
Gait Training of Patients After Stroke Using an Electromechanical Gait Trainer Combined With Simultaneous Functional Electrical Stimulation
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2006; 86(9): 1282 - 1294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. Y. Pang, J. J Eng, A. S Dawson, and S. Gylfadottir
The use of aerobic exercise training in improving aerobic capacity in individuals with stroke: a meta-analysis
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2006; 20(2): 97 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. J Page and C. Garner
Psychometric evaluation of the Motor Readiness Questionnaire for Stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2005; 19(5): 531 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
H. J. Huang and D. P. Ferris
Neural coupling between upper and lower limbs during recumbent stepping
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2004; 97(4): 1299 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
N M Salbach, N E Mayo, S Wood-Dauphinee, J A Hanley, C L Richards, and R Cote
A task-orientated intervention enhances walking distance and speed in the first year post stroke: a randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2004; 18(5): 509 - 519.
[Abstract] [PDF]