Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on November 14, 2002

Stroke. 2002
Published online before print November 14, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000043820.72323.23
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/12/2877    most recent
01.STR.0000043820.72323.23v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Derdeyn, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fox, D. J., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Derdeyn, C. P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
Related Collections
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention
Right arrow Angioplasty and Stenting

Submitted on June 27, 2002
Accepted on July 26, 2002

Long-Term Outcome After Angioplasty for Symptomatic Extracranial Carotid Stenosis in Poor Surgical Candidates

Douglas J. Fox Jr MD; Christopher J. Moran MD; DeWitte T. Cross III MD; Robert L. Grubb Jr MD; Keith M. Rich MD; Michael R. Chicoine MD; Ralph G. Dacey Jr MD; and Colin P. Derdeyn MD*

From the Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery (Neurological Surgery)(D.J.F., R.L.G., K.M.R., M.R.C., R.G.D.), Interventional Neuroradiology Service (C.J.M., D.T.C., C.P.D.), and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (C.J.M., D.T.C., R.L.G., K.M.R., R.G.D., C.P.D.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: derdeync{at}mir.wustl.edu.

Background and Purpose—The optimal treatment of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis who are poor surgical candidates is uncertain. The purposes of this study were to report the long-term outcome after angioplasty in a series of these patients and to compare these data with historical control data from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET).

Methods—We identified 42 consecutive patients with >70% carotid stenosis and ipsilateral ischemic symptoms within 120 days of treatment with angioplasty. All were considered poor surgical candidates by experienced surgeons. Baseline epidemiological stroke risk factors were obtained from review of medical records. Follow-up was from clinic records and by telephone.

Results—Baseline epidemiological stroke risk factors were similar to those of medically treated NASCET patients. Angioplasty patients tended to have higher degrees of stenosis (45% with >90% stenosis versus 24% in NASCET) and more frequent contralateral stenosis or occlusion (30% versus 9%) than NASCET patients. Three patients suffered procedural strokes; 2 of the 3 made nearly complete recoveries. One additional patient suffered a central retinal occlusion 48 hours after angioplasty. No ipsilateral strokes occurred during the mean follow-up period of 1.7 years. Three patients were lost to follow-up. The cumulative risk of stroke was 9.5% (4 of 42) compared with 26% at 2 years for medically treated patients in NASCET.

Conclusions—These pilot data suggest a beneficial effect of angioplasty for patients with high-grade symptomatic carotid stenosis who are not good surgical candidates.


Key words: angioplasty • carotid endarterectomy • carotid stenosis • stents




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Onizuka, K. Kazekawa, S. Nagata, M. Tsutsumi, H. Aikawa, M. Tomokiyo, M. Iko, T. Kodama, K. Nii, S. Matsubara, et al.
The Significance of Incomplete Stent Apposition in Patients Undergoing Stenting of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2006; 27(7): 1505 - 1507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Kohyama, K. Kazekawa, M. Iko, H. Aikawa, M. Tsutsumi, Y. Go, S. Nagata, T. Kodama, K. Nii, S. Matsubara, et al.
Spontaneous Improvement of Peristent Ulceration after Carotid Artery Stenting
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 151 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
I. Linfante, J. A. Hirsch, M. Selim, G. Schlaug, L. R. Caplan, and A. S. Reddy
Safety of Latest-Generation Self-expanding Stents in Patients With NASCET-Ineligible Severe Symptomatic Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
Arch Neurol, January 1, 2004; 61(1): 39 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Lucertini, D.L. Fox, C.P. Derdeyn, C.J. Moran, D.T. Cross III, R.L. Grubb Jr, and R.G. Dacey Jr
Carotid Angioplasty With Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy for High-Risk Patients * Response
Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34 (6): e42 - e43.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Ballotta, G. D. Giau, C. Baracchini, C. P. Derdeyn, D. Fox, C. J. Moran, D. T. Cross III, and R. G. Dacey Jr
Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting in High-Risk Patients With Severe Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, April 1, 2003; 34(4): 834 - 835.
[Full Text] [PDF]