on December 12, 2002
Published online before print December 12, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000047850.33686.32
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on July 26, 2002
From the School of Psychology, University of Nottingham (N.B.L.); Central Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust (V.M.F., S.A.L.); and Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Trust (J.C.S., M.S.), Mansfield, UK. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nbl{at}psychology.nottingham.ac.uk..
Background and Purpose—There is inconclusive evidence of the effectiveness of the Stroke Family Support Organiser (FSO) service. We report the results from a randomized controlled trial of the service. Methods—Stroke patients admitted to hospital and their informal caregivers were randomly allocated to receive the FSO service (n=126) or standard care (n=124). Outcome assessments were undertaken 4 and 9 months after recruitment with the General Health Questionnaire 12, Carer Strain Index, Barthel Index, Extended Activities of Daily Living scale, and a specially designed questionnaire to determine knowledge of stroke and satisfaction with services. Results—There were no significant differences between groups in patients' mood and independence in personal or instrumental activities of daily living or caregivers' mood, strain, or independence. Patients in the intervention group were significantly more knowledgeable about whom to contact for stroke information, reducing the risk of stroke, practical help, community services, and emotional support. Patients in the intervention group were also significantly more satisfied with the stroke information received. Caregivers in the intervention group were significantly more knowledgeable about whom to contact for information on stroke, reducing the risk of stroke, community services, and emotional support. Caregivers in the intervention group were also significantly more satisfied with stroke information. Conclusions—The FSO service had no significant effect on mood, independence in activities of daily living, or reduction in caregiver strain, but it did increase knowledge of stroke and satisfaction with that knowledge. The results may not be representative of all FSO services, and the sample was small relative to the heterogeneity of the participants. However, results suggest that the policies and training procedures of FSOs need to be evaluated to ensure that a cost-effective service is being provided to stroke patients and their caregivers.
Accepted on August 14, 2002
Evaluation of a Stroke Family Support Organiser. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Nadina B. Lincoln PhD*;
Key words: affect • caregivers • randomized controlled trial • rehabilitation • stroke management
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. Franzen-Dahlin, J. Larson, V. Murray, R. Wredling, and E. Billing A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of a support and education programme for spouses of people affected by stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 722 - 730. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Brereton, C. Carroll, and S. Barnston Interventions for adult family carers of people who have had a stroke: a systematic review Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2007; 21(10): 867 - 884. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Lee, K. Soeken, and S. J. Picot A Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Informal Stroke Caregivers West J Nurs Res, April 1, 2007; 29(3): 344 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Redfern, C. McKevitt, and C. D.A. Wolfe Development of Complex Interventions in Stroke Care: A Systematic Review Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2410 - 2419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J Mant, S Winner, J Roche, and D T Wade Family support for stroke: one year follow up of a randomised controlled trial J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2005; 76(7): 1006 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Robinson, J. Francis, P. James, N. Tindle, K. Greenwell, and H. Rodgers Caring for carers of people with stroke: developing a complex intervention following the Medical Research Council framework Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2005; 19(5): 560 - 571. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Boter and for the HESTIA Study Group Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of an Outreach Nursing Support Program for Recently Discharged Stroke Patients Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2867 - 2872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J M A. Visser-Meily, M. W M Post, I. I Riphagen, and E. Lindeman Measures used to assess burden among caregivers of stroke patients: a review Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 601 - 623. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Boter, G. J. Rinkel, and R. J de Haan Outreach nurse support after stroke: a descriptive study on patients' and carers' needs, and applied nursing interventions Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2004; 18(2): 156 - 163. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N B Lincoln, M F Walker, A Dixon, and P Knights Evaluation of a multiprofessional community stroke team: a randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2004; 18(1): 40 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S Clark, S. Rubenach, and A. Winsor A randomized controlled trial of an education and counselling intervention for families after stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2003; 17(7): 703 - 712. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A Lilley, N. B Lincoln, and V. M Francis A qualitative study of stroke patients' and carers' perceptions of the stroke family support organizer service Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2003; 17(5): 540 - 547. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|