Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on February 6, 2003

Stroke. 2003
Published online before print February 6, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000057580.23952.0D
A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/3/713    most recent
01.STR.0000057580.23952.0Dv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNaughton, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weatherall, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNaughton, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weatherall, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Resource utilization
Right arrow Acute Stroke Syndromes
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

Submitted on September 12, 2002
Accepted on September 25, 2002

Relationship Between Process and Outcome in Stroke Care

Harry McNaughton PhD*; Kathryn McPherson PhD; William Taylor FRACP; and Mark Weatherall FRACP

From the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington (H.M.); Health and Rehabilitation Research Unit, School of Health Professions, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK (K.M.); and Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Otago, New Zealand (W.T., M.W.).

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hkmcn{at}paradise.net.nz.

Background and Purpose--Better processes in stroke care are assumed to lead to better stroke outcomes. We sought to test whether current measures of stroke process are related to measures of stroke outcome.

Methods--This was a prospective study of consecutive patients with acute stroke admitted to each of the 3 general hospitals in 1 region who were followed up for 12 months after hospital discharge. Process was measured by use of the Royal College of Physicians Stroke Audit Package, and outcomes were measured with a range of disability, health status, handicap, and independence measures, as well as mortality.

Results--One hundred eighty-one patients were recruited. There was evidence for a relationship between some process variables and outcomes at hospital discharge, but the relationships were generally weak. None of the process variables remained in regression models of functional outcomes at 12 months. The hospital with the best process scores had the worst case mix-adjusted outcomes.

Conclusions--The link between stroke process and outcome, through the use of currently available measures of process such as the Royal College of Physicians Stroke Audit Package, is not straightforward. Ongoing work may clarify some of these issues and provide guidance to stroke clinicians on how best to improve existing services.


Key words: outcome • process assessment (health care) • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
H F Lingsma, D W J Dippel, S E Hoeks, E W Steyerberg, C L Franke, R J van Oostenbrugge, G de Jong, M L Simoons, W J M Scholte op Reimer, and The Netherlands Stroke Survey investigators
Variation between hospitals in patient outcome after stroke is only partly explained by differences in quality of care: results from the Netherlands Stroke Survey
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2008; 79(8): 888 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
M. A. Mohammed, J. Mant, L. Bentham, A. Stevens, and S. Hussain
Process of care and mortality of stroke patients with and without a do not resuscitate order in the West Midlands, UK
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 18(2): 102 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. K. Kapral, A. Laupacis, S. J. Phillips, F. L. Silver, M. D. Hill, J. Fang, J. Richards, J. V. Tu, and for the Investigators of the Registry of the Canad
Stroke Care Delivery in Institutions Participating in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network
Stroke, July 1, 2004; 35(7): 1756 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. G. Rudd and D. B. Matchar
Health Policy and Outcome Research in Stroke
Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 397 - 400.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. S. Likosky, W. H. Likosky, and T. L. Cress
Re: Relationship Between Process and Outcome in Stroke Care
Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34 (9): e158 - e158.
[Full Text] [PDF]