Published Online
on February 6, 2003

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2003

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 34/3/713    most recent 01.STR.0000057580.23952.0Dv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McNaughton, H. Articles by Weatherall, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McNaughton, H. Articles by Weatherall, M. Related Collections Resource utilization Acute Stroke Syndromes Rehabilitation, Stroke

Submitted on September 12, 2002
Accepted on September 25, 2002

Relationship Between Process and Outcome in Stroke Care

Harry McNaughton PhD^*; Kathryn McPherson PhD; William Taylor FRACP; and Mark Weatherall FRACP

From the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington (H.M.); Health and Rehabilitation Research Unit, School of Health Professions, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK (K.M.); and Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Otago, New Zealand (W.T., M.W.).

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hkmcn{at}paradise.net.nz.

Background and Purpose--Better processes in stroke care are assumed to lead to better stroke outcomes. We sought to test whether current measures of stroke process are related to measures of stroke outcome.

Methods--This was a prospective study of consecutive patients with acute stroke admitted to each of the 3 general hospitals in 1 region who were followed up for 12 months after hospital discharge. Process was measured by use of the Royal College of Physicians Stroke Audit Package, and outcomes were measured with a range of disability, health status, handicap, and independence measures, as well as mortality.

Results--One hundred eighty-one patients were recruited. There was evidence for a relationship between some process variables and outcomes at hospital discharge, but the relationships were generally weak. None of the process variables remained in regression models of functional outcomes at 12 months. The hospital with the best process scores had the worst case mix-adjusted outcomes.

Conclusions--The link between stroke process and outcome, through the use of currently available measures of process such as the Royal College of Physicians Stroke Audit Package, is not straightforward. Ongoing work may clarify some of these issues and provide guidance to stroke clinicians on how best to improve existing services.

Key words: outcome • process assessment (health care) • stroke

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P L Kavanagh, W G Adams, and C J Wang Quality indicators and quality assessment in child health Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 458 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Abilleira, M. Gallofre, A. Ribera, E. Sanchez, and R. Tresserras Quality of In-Hospital Stroke Care According to Evidence-Based Performance Measures: Results From the First Audit of Stroke, Catalonia (Spain) 2005/2006 Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1433 - 1438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H F Lingsma, D W J Dippel, S E Hoeks, E W Steyerberg, C L Franke, R J van Oostenbrugge, G de Jong, M L Simoons, W J M Scholte op Reimer, and The Netherlands Stroke Survey investigators Variation between hospitals in patient outcome after stroke is only partly explained by differences in quality of care: results from the Netherlands Stroke Survey J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2008; 79(8): 888 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Mohammed, J. Mant, L. Bentham, A. Stevens, and S. Hussain Process of care and mortality of stroke patients with and without a do not resuscitate order in the West Midlands, UK Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 18(2): 102 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Kapral, A. Laupacis, S. J. Phillips, F. L. Silver, M. D. Hill, J. Fang, J. Richards, J. V. Tu, and for the Investigators of the Registry of the Canad Stroke Care Delivery in Institutions Participating in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network Stroke, July 1, 2004; 35(7): 1756 - 1762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Rudd and D. B. Matchar Health Policy and Outcome Research in Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 397 - 400. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Likosky, W. H. Likosky, and T. L. Cress Re: Relationship Between Process and Outcome in Stroke Care Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34 (9): e158 - e158. [Full Text] [PDF]