Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on February 13, 2003

Stroke. 2003
Published online before print February 13, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000057978.15397.6F
A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/3/801    most recent
01.STR.0000057978.15397.6Fv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopman, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Verner, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hopman, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Verner, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke
Right arrow Other Stroke

Submitted on September 11, 2002
Accepted on October 1, 2002

Quality of Life During and After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation

Wilma M. Hopman MA* and Jane Verner MEd

From the Clinical Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, and the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University (W.M.H.), and the Social Services Department, St Mary's of the Lake Hospital Site, Providence Continuing Care Centre (J.V.), Kingston, Ontario.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hopmanw{at}kgh.kari.net.

Background and Purpose--Very limited longitudinal data are available that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of stroke survivors after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. The purpose of this research was to assess changes in HRQOL during inpatient rehabilitation and again 6 months after discharge.

Methods--This was a prospective study of all eligible patients admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation hospital over a 3-year period. HRQOL was assessed by means of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36). Dependent t tests were used to compare the scores at admission and discharge and at discharge and 6 months. Changes in HRQOL were calculated for the period of admission to discharge and of discharge to the 6-month follow-up.

Results--Complete data were available for 85 patients. During rehabilitation, there were improvements in all 8 domains of the SF-36, with 5 attaining statistical significance. After discharge, 3 domains continued to improve, with 1 attaining statistical significance. However, there were marked and statistically significant declines in the other 5 domains of the SF-36. Feedback was obtained from a subset of the patients as to the reasons for these declines.

Conclusions--Substantial gains in HRQOL during inpatient stroke rehabilitation may be followed by equally substantial declines in the 6 months after discharge. There is a need for longitudinal research into the HRQOL of stroke survivors and their families, as well as a need to ensure that adequate community services and support are available.


Key words: outcome • quality of life • rehabilitation • stroke • stroke assessment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. J. Gray, N. Sprigg, P. M.W. Bath, G. Boysen, P. P. De Deyn, D. Leys, D. O'Neill, E. B. Ringelstein, and for the TAIST Investigators
Sex Differences in Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors: Data From the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Trial (TAIST)
Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 2960 - 2964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
T. Ewert and G. Stucki
Validity of the SS-QOL in Germany and in Survivors of Hemorrhagic or Ischemic Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2007; 21(2): 161 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Xie, E. Q. Wu, Z.-J. Zheng, J. B. Croft, K. J. Greenlund, G. A. Mensah, and D. R. Labarthe
Impact of Stroke on Health-Related Quality of Life in the Noninstitutionalized Population in the United States
Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2567 - 2572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. R. Torp, S. Vinkler, K. D. Pedersen, F. R. Hansen, T. Jorgensen, and J. Olsen
Model of Hospital-Supported Discharge After Stroke
Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1514 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. S. Nichols-Larsen, P.C. Clark, A. Zeringue, A. Greenspan, and S. Blanton
Factors Influencing Stroke Survivors' Quality of Life During Subacute Recovery
Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1480 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A.-C. Jonsson, I. Lindgren, B. Hallstrom, B. Norrving, and A. Lindgren
Determinants of Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers
Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 803 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, October 6, 2003; 327(7418): E225 - 225.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. Padua, P. Caliandro, P. Tonali, I. Caruso, I. Aprile, and W. Hopman
Quality of Life During and After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation * Response
Stroke, October 1, 2003; 34 (10): e180 - e181.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, March 22, 2003; 326(7390): 668 - 668.
[Full Text] [PDF]