| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on November 18, 2002
From the University of Pittsburgh (L.R.W.), Pittsburgh, Pa; McMaster University (R.R.), Hamilton, Canada; the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (A.J.F.), Cleveland, Ohio; the University of California (R.T.H., W.D., W.S.S.), San Francisco; the University of Toronto (H. Roberts), Toronto, Canada; the University of Wisconsin (H.A. Rowley), Madison; the University of Kentucky (L.C.P.), Lexington; the Centennial Medical Center (A.S.C. III), Nashville, Tenn; Indiana University (A.B.), Indianapolis, Ind; the University of Nebraska Medical Center (P.F.), Omaha; and Abbott Laboratories (C.M.F., G.A.S.), Abbott Park, Ill. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lwechsler{at}stroke.upmc.edu.
Background and Purpose--The PROACT II study demonstrated a significant benefit from treatment with intra-arterial pro-urokinase (r-proUK) in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion treated within 6 hours of stroke onset. The purpose of the current study was to examine baseline factors to determine predictors of good outcome and response to treatment. Methods--We selected from the baseline clinical, radiologic, and angiographic data variables that considered possibly related to outcome. A univariate analysis was performed to examine the association between these baseline factors and good outcome, defined as a modified Rankin scale score Results--In the univariate analysis, screening National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score and age were strongly associated with good outcome. The multivariate model selected age, NIHSS score, and CT hypodensity as the most important prognostic variables. Dividing patients into quartiles based on risk scores achieved a uniform gradient of probability of good outcomes. A trend toward benefit of r-proUK treatment was seen in all risk quartiles, and no differential treatment effect was observed across risk groups. Conclusions--There was no evidence of differential effect of r-proUK across subgroups of patients stratified by risk.
Accepted on December 10, 2002
Factors Influencing Outcome and Treatment Effect in PROACT II
Lawrence R. Wechsler MD*;
2. A multivariate model then selected the most important variables independently influencing prognosis. A risk score for each patient was constructed on the basis of the patient's individual values for each independent variable. Patients were stratified into risk quartiles based on their risk scores, and an odds ratio for each risk quartile was calculated. The treatment effects of each quartile were compared.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. G. Nogueira, D. S. Liebeskind, G. Sung, G. Duckwiler, W. S. Smith, and on Behalf of the MERCI; and Multi MERCI Writing Co Predictors of Good Clinical Outcomes, Mortality, and Successful Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Thrombectomy: Pooled Analysis of the Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) and Multi MERCI Trials Stroke, December 1, 2009; 40(12): 3777 - 3783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Khatri, T. Abruzzo, S. D. Yeatts, C. Nichols, J. P. Broderick, T. A. Tomsick, and For the IMS I and II Investigators Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent Neurology, September 29, 2009; 73(13): 1066 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.G. Nogueira, A.J. Yoo, F.S. Buonanno, and J.A. Hirsch Endovascular Approaches to Acute Stroke, Part 2: A Comprehensive Review of Studies and Trials AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2009; 30(5): 859 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hallevi, A. D. Barreto, D. S. Liebeskind, M. M. Morales, S. B. Martin-Schild, A. T. Abraham, J. Gadia, J. L. Saver, the UCLA Intra-Arterial Therapy Investigators, J. C. Grotta, et al. Identifying Patients at High Risk for Poor Outcome After Intra-Arterial Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1780 - 1785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Barreto, K. C. Albright, H. Hallevi, J. C. Grotta, E. A. Noser, A. M. Khaja, H. M. Shaltoni, N. R. Gonzales, K. Illoh, S. Martin-Schild, et al. Thrombus Burden Is Associated With Clinical Outcome After Intra-Arterial Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, December 1, 2008; 39(12): 3231 - 3235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.S. Rosenthal, L.H. Schwamm, L. Roccatagliata, S.B. Coutts, A.M. Demchuk, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. Gonzalez, M.D. Hill, E.F. Halpern, and M.H. Lev Role of Recanalization in Acute Stroke Outcome: Rationale for a CT Angiogram-Based "Benefit of Recanalization" Model AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1471 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Mattle, M. Arnold, D. Georgiadis, C. Baumann, K. Nedeltchev, D. Benninger, L. Remonda, C. von Budingen, A. Diana, A. Pangalu, et al. Comparison of Intraarterial and Intravenous Thrombolysis for Ischemic Stroke With Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 379 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Shah, D. S. Liebeskind, J. L. Saver, S. Starkman, F. Vinuela, G. Duckwiler, R. Jahan, D. Kim, N. Sanossian, P. Vespa, et al. Influence of gender on outcomes after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke Neurology, June 13, 2006; 66(11): 1745 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The IMS Study Investigators Hemorrhage in the Interventional Management of Stroke Study Stroke, March 1, 2006; 37(3): 847 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Schwamm, E. S. Rosenthal, C. J. Swap, J. Rosand, G. Rordorf, F. S. Buonanno, M. G. Vangel, W. J. Koroshetz, and M. H. Lev Hypoattenuation on CT Angiographic Source Images Predicts Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Outcome after Intra-Arterial Reperfusion Therapy AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2005; 26(7): 1798 - 1803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |