on July 3, 2003
Stroke. 2003
Published online before print July 3, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000081000.23561.61
Published online before print July 3, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000081000.23561.61
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on March 25, 2003
From the Interventional Cardio-Angiology Unit, Villa Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (A.C., R.M., F.C.), and Department of General and Vascular Surgery, University of Siena, Siena (F.S., C.S.), Italy.
Background and Purpose--Periprocedural embolization of debris during carotid stenting interventions may result in neurological deficit. This study was designed to evaluate in-hospital and 30-day adverse events in patients percutaneously treated for carotid artery disease with embolic protection devices. Methods--From 1999 to June 2002, a total of 442 consecutive patients underwent percutaneous angioplasty and/or stenting of the extracranial carotid artery. The endovascular procedure was conducted under embolic protection devices. Results--The percutaneous procedure was successful in 440 of 442 patients (99.5%). No periprocedural death occurred with any embolic protection device. All in-hospital stroke/death and 30-day ipsilateral stroke/death rate was 1.1%. The overall complication rate was 3.4%. Major adverse events included 1 major stroke (0.2%), 4 intracranial hemorrhages (0.9%), 1 carotid artery wall fissuration (0.2%), and 1 diffuse cardioembolism (0.2%). Minor adverse events included 4 minor strokes (0.9%) and 4 transient ischemic attacks (0.9%). The cerebral protection device-related complications were 4 (0.9%): 1 case of abrupt closure of the internal carotid artery because of spiral dissection (0.2%), 1 case of trapped guide wire (0.2%), and 2 cases of intimal dissection (0.5%). Transient loss of consciousness, tremors, and fasciculations were present in 6 of 40 patients (15%) in whom occlusive protection devices were used. Conclusions--Our data suggest that percutaneous stenting of the carotid artery when a cerebral protection device is used is feasible and effective but not without potential complications. However, a long learning curve may exist for the proper use of some embolic protection devices.
Accepted on April 4, 2003
Protected Carotid Stenting. Clinical Advantages and Complications of Embolic Protection Devices in 442 Consecutive Patients
Alberto Cremonesi MD*;
Key words: carotid arteries • protective devices • stents
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. Roffi, D. Mukherjee, and D. G. Clair Carotid artery stenting vs. endarterectomy Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2009; 30(22): 2693 - 2704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Jansen, J. Fiehler, M. Hartmann, and H. Bruckmann Protection or Nonprotection in Carotid Stent Angioplasty: The Influence of Interventional Techniques on Outcome Data From the SPACE Trial Stroke, March 1, 2009; 40(3): 841 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Perona, G. Castellazzi, L. Valvassori, E. Boccardi, L. de Girolamo, G. P. Cornalba, and K. Kandarpa Safety of Unprotected Carotid Artery Stent Placement in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of 30-day Combined Adverse Outcomes Radiology, January 1, 2009; 250(1): 178 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Verzini, P. De Rango, G. Parlani, G. Panuccio, and P. Cao Carotid Artery Stenting: Technical Issues and Role of Operators' Experience Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, September 1, 2008; 20(3): 247 - 257. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bosiers, K. Deloose, J. Verbist, and P. Peeters The Impact of Embolic Protection Device and Stent Design on the Outcome of CAS Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, September 1, 2008; 20(3): 272 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Eskandari Preventable Complications of Carotid Stenting Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 17 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Schillinger, M. Gschwendtner, B. Reimers, J. Trenkler, L. Stockx, J. Mair, S. Macdonald, F. Karnel, K. Huber, and E. Minar Does Carotid Stent Cell Design Matter? Stroke, March 1, 2008; 39(3): 905 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Maynar, S. Baldi, R. Rostagno, T. Zander, M. Rabellino, R. Llorens, J. Alvarez, and F. Barajas Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2007; 28(7): 1378 - 1383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Zahn, T. Ischinger, M. Hochadel, U. Zeymer, W. Schmalz, N. Treese, K. E. Hauptmann, H. Seggewiss, I. Janicke, H. Haase, et al. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: results from the ALKK Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) Registry Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2007; 28(3): 370 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. F. Bonvini, M. Righini, M. Hamon, J. W. Riddell, A. O. Maree, K. A. Rosenfield, J.-L. Mas, G. Chatellier, and the EVA-3S Investigators Endarterectomy versus Stenting for Carotid Stenosis N. Engl. J. Med., January 18, 2007; 356(3): 305 - 307. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Maleux, P. Demaerel, E. Verbeken, K. Daenens, S. Heye, F. Van Sonhoven, A. Nevelsteen, and G. Wilms Cerebral ischemia after filter-protected carotid artery stenting is common and cannot be predicted by the presence of substantial amount of debris captured by the filter device. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2006; 27(9): 1830 - 1833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Hofmann, A. Niessner, A. Kypta, C. Steinwender, J. Kammler, K. Kerschner, M. Grund, F. Leisch, and K. Huber Risk Score for Peri-Interventional Complications of Carotid Artery Stenting Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2557 - 2561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Cremonesi, C. Setacci, A. Bignamini, L. Bolognese, F. Briganti, G. Di Sciascio, D. Inzitari, G. Lanza, L. Lupattelli, S. Mangiafico, et al. Carotid Artery Stenting: First Consensus Document of the ICCS-SPREAD Joint Committee Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2400 - 2409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. du Mesnil de Rochemont, S. Schneider, B. Yan, A. Lehr, M. Sitzer, and J. Berkefeld Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Lesions after Filter-Protected Stenting of High-Grade Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenoses AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1321 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Shilling, B. F. Uretsky, and G. C. Hunter Entrapment of a Cerebral Embolic Protection Device: A Case Report Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, May 1, 2006; 40(3): 229 - 233. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. S. Roubin, S. Iyer, A. Halkin, J. Vitek, and C. Brennan Realizing the Potential of Carotid Artery Stenting: Proposed Paradigms for Patient Selection and Procedural Technique Circulation, April 25, 2006; 113(16): 2021 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.D. Hill, W. Morrish, G. Soulez, A. Nevelsteen, G. Maleux, C. Rogers, K.E. Hauptmann, A. Bonafe, R. Beyar, L. Gruberg, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a self-expanding carotid stent system with distal protection in the treatment of carotid stenosis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 759 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Lin, R. R. Kolvenbach, and L. Pinter Protected Carotid Artery Stenting and Angioplasty via Transfemoral versus Transcervical Approaches Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, November 1, 2005; 39(6): 499 - 503. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. P. Liew and J. R Bartholomew Atheromatous embolization Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2005; 10(4): 309 - 326. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. I. Bluth, J. A. Vos, and R. G. A. Ackerstaff Value of US in Selecting Patients for Carotid Angioplasty and Stent Placement * Drs Vos and Ackerstaff respond: Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 374 - 375. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. I. Paraskevas, S. S. Daskalopoulou, M. E. Daskalopoulos, and C. D. Liapis Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease. What Is the Evidence? Angiology, September 1, 2005; 56(5): 539 - 552. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Orlandi, S. Fanucchi, S. Gallerini, C. Sonnoli, M. Cosottini, M. Puglioli, F. Sartucci, and L. Murri Impaired Clearance of Microemboli and Cerebrovascular Symptoms During Carotid Stenting Procedures Arch Neurol, August 1, 2005; 62(8): 1208 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Zahn, T. Ischinger, B. Mark, S. Gass, U. Zeymer, W. Schmalz, K. Haerten, K. E. Hauptmann, E.-R. von Leitner, W. Kasper, et al. Embolic Protection Devices for Carotid Artery Stenting: Is There a Difference Between Filter and Distal Occlusive Devices? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1769 - 1774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Lownie, D. M. Pelz, D. H. Lee, S. Men, I. Gulka, and P. Kalapos Efficacy of Treatment of Severe Carotid Bifurcation Stenosis By Using Self-Expanding Stents without Deliberate Use of Angioplasty Balloons AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1241 - 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. J. Coward, R. L. Featherstone, and M. M. Brown Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis Compared With Carotid Endarterectomy: A Cochrane Systematic Review of the Randomized Evidence Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 905 - 911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Vos, J. C. van den Berg, S. M. P. G. Ernst, M. J. Suttorp, T. T. C. Overtoom, H. W. Mauser, O. J. M. Vogels, H. P. M. van Heesewijk, F. L. Moll, Y. van der Graaf, et al. Carotid Angioplasty and Stent Placement: Comparison of Transcranial Doppler US Data and Clinical Outcome with and without Filtering Cerebral Protection Devices in 509 Patients Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 493 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. K. Sztriha, E. Voros, K. Sas, R. Szentgyorgyi, A. Pocsik, P. Barzo, P. Szikra, A. Makai, A. Szolics, P. Elek, et al. Favorable Early Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Without Protection Devices Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2862 - 2866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Schmidt, K.-W. Diederich, S. Scheinert, S. Braunlich, T. Olenburger, G. Biamino, G. Schuler, and D. Scheinert Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolization during carotid artery stenting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 16, 2004; 44(10): 1966 - 1969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Zahn, B. Mark, N. Niedermaier, U. Zeymer, P. Limbourg, T. Ischinger, K. Haerten, K. E. Hauptmann, E.-R. v. Leitner, W. Kasper, et al. Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: better results than stenting without protection? Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2004; 25(17): 1550 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Bettmann, M. D. Dake, L. N. Hopkins, B. T. Katzen, C. J. White, A. C. Eisenhauer, W. H. Pearce, K. A. Rosenfield, R. W. Smalling, T. A. Sos, et al. Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group VI: Revascularization Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2643 - 2650. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Pelz, P. Lylyk, and M. Negoro Interventional Neuroradiology Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 381 - 382. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Forsting Editorial Comment--With or Without Protection? The Second Important Question in Carotid Artery Stenting Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35 (1): e20 - e21. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Barr, J. J. Connors III, D. Sacks, J. C. Wojak, G. J. Becker, J. F. Cardella, B. Chopko, J. E. Dion, A. J. Fox, R. T. Higashida, et al. Quality Improvement Guidelines for the Performance of Cervical Carotid Angioplasty and Stent Placement: Developed by a Collaborative Panel of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, and the Society of Interventional Radiology AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2003; 24(10): 2020 - 2034. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Eckert and H. Zeumer Editorial Comment--Carotid Artery Stenting With or Without Protection Devices? Strong Opinions, Poor Evidence! Stroke, August 1, 2003; 34(8): 1941 - 1943. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|