Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on October 16, 2003

Stroke. 2003
Published online before print October 16, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000094423.34841.BB
A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/11/2599    most recent
01.STR.0000094423.34841.BBv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cavallini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Quaglini, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cavallini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Quaglini, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical

Submitted on July 2, 2003
Accepted on July 8, 2003

Role of Monitoring in Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Anna Cavallini MD*; Giuseppe Micieli MD; Simona Marcheselli MD; and Silvana Quaglini PhD

From the Cerebrovascular Department/Stroke Unit, C. Mondino Foundation (A.C, G.M., S.M.), and Department of Computer Science and Systems, University of Pavia (S.Q.), Pavia, Italy.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: anna.cavallini{at}mondino.it.

Background and Purpose--Although several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of specialist Stroke Unit (SU) care of stroke patients, there is still disagreement over how these units are best organized. We sought to clarify the role of continuous monitoring of physiological parameters in acute ischemic stroke.

Methods--We conducted a prospective study of 268 first-ever ischemic stroke patients admitted to our Cerebrovascular Department and allocated, according to the availability of beds, to the SU or Cerebrovascular Unit (CU). Statistical analysis compared mortality and outcome at discharge, medical and neurological complications, and length of hospitalization in the 2 care settings.

Results--Two hundred sixty-eight patients were enrolled. A good outcome at discharge, observed in 114 SU patients (85%) and 78 CU patients (58%) (odds ratio, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.8; P<0.02), was found, on multivariate analysis, to be significantly related to type of care (SU versus CU). A significantly greater proportion of SU patients showed adverse changes in monitored parameters, which required acute medical treatment (SU: 64%; CU: 19%; P<0.0001). The mean duration of these complications was significantly shorter in the SU patients (SU: 1.0 day; CU: 2.4 days; P<0.02), and the outcome in patients experiencing complications covered by the monitoring protocol was significantly better in the SU (66%) than in the CU (35%) group (P<0.0001).

Conclusions--Admission of acute stroke patients to a monitoring SU may positively influence their outcome at discharge. Confirmation of our findings in larger trials will indicate the need for a revision of the minimum requirements of SUs, with the addition of monitoring as a new requirement.


Key words: monitoring • stroke, ischemic • stroke management • stroke units




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. Indredavik, G. Rohweder, E. Naalsund, and S. Lydersen
Medical Complications in a Comprehensive Stroke Unit and an Early Supported Discharge Service
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 414 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. Govan, P. Langhorne, C. J. Weir, and for the Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration
Does the Prevention of Complications Explain the Survival Benefit of Organized Inpatient (Stroke Unit) Care?: Further Analysis of a Systematic Review
Stroke, September 1, 2007; 38(9): 2536 - 2540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Rocco, M. Pasquini, E. Cecconi, G. Sirimarco, M. C. Ricciardi, E. Vicenzini, M. Altieri, V. Di Piero, and G. L. Lenzi
Monitoring After the Acute Stage of Stroke: A Prospective Study
Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1225 - 1228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. Hanley and W. Hacke
Critical Care and Emergency Medicine Neurology in Stroke
Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 205 - 207.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. J.A.M. van Putten and D. L.J. Tavy
Continuous Quantitative EEG Monitoring in Hemispheric Stroke Patients Using the Brain Symmetry Index
Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2489 - 2492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
V. Aiyagari, A. Gujjar, A. R. Zazulia, and M. N. Diringer
Hourly Blood Pressure Monitoring After Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Ischemic Stroke: Does Everyone Need It?
Stroke, October 1, 2004; 35(10): 2326 - 2330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. Indredavik
Intensive Monitoring Should Not Be the Routine
Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 1019 - 1020.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. M. Davis and G. A. Donnan
Stroke Unit Design: High Tech Versus Low Tech
Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 1021 - 1021.
[Full Text] [PDF]